Innovative pathways allow safe discharge of mild acute pancreatitis from the emergency room.

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a leading cause of gastrointestinal-related hospitalizations in the United States, resulting in 300000 admissions per year with an estimated cost of over $2.6 billion annually. The severity of AP is determined by the presence of pancreatic complications and end-organ damage. While moderate/severe pancreatitis can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality, the majority of patients have a mild presentation with an uncomplicated course and mortality rate of less than 2%. Despite favorable outcomes, the majority of mild AP patients are admitted, contributing to healthcare cost and burden. In this Editorial we review the performance of an emergency department (ED) pathway for patients with mild AP at a tertiary care center with the goal of reducing hospitalizations, resource utilization, and costs after several years of implementation of the pathway. We discuss the clinical course and outcomes of mild AP patients enrolled in the pathway who were successfully discharged from the ED compared to those who were admitted to the hospital, and identify predictors of successful ED discharge to select patients who can potentially be triaged to the pathway. We conclude that by implementing innovative clinical pathways which are established and reproducible, selected AP patients can be safely discharged from the ED, reducing hospitalizations and healthcare costs, without compromising clinical outcomes. We also identify a subset of patients most likely to succeed in this pathway.

Long-Term Follow-up of Disabled Patients With Chronic Pancreatitis: Evaluation of Clinical Characteristics, Outcomes, and Predictors.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP) often report a poor quality of life and may be disabled. Our study identifies clinical characteristics, predictors and outcomes in CP patients with disability. METHODS: A review of established CP patients followed in our Pancreas Center between January 1, 2016 and April 30, 2021. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on disability. Univariate analysis was performed to identify differences in demographics, risk factors, comorbidities, complications, controlled medications, and resource utilization. Multivariate analysis was conducted to identify predictors for disability. RESULTS: Out of 404 CP patients, 18% were disabled. These patients were younger (53.8 vs. 58.8, P =0.001), had alcoholic CP (54.1% vs. 30%; P <0.001), more recurrent pancreatitis (83.6% vs. 61.1%; P =0.001), chronic abdominal pain (96.7% vs. 78.2%; P =0.001), exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (83.6% vs. 55.5%; P <0.001), concurrent alcohol (39.3% vs. 23.3%; P =0.001) and tobacco abuse (42.6% vs. 26%; P =0.02), anxiety (23% vs. 18.2%; P <0.001), and depression (57.5% vs. 28.5%; P <0.001). A higher proportion was on opiates (68.9% vs. 43.6%; P <0.001), nonopiate controlled medications (47.5% vs. 23.9%; P <0.001), neuromodulators (73.3% vs. 44%; P <0.001), and recreational drugs (27.9% vs. 15.8%; P =0.036). Predictors of disability were chronic pain (OR 8.71, CI 2.61 to 12.9, P < 0.001), celiac block (OR 4.66, 2.49 to 8.41; P <0.001), neuromodulator use (OR 3.78, CI 2.09 to 6.66; P <0.001), opioid use (OR3.57, CI 2.06 to 6.31; P < 0.001), exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (OR3.56, CI 1.89 to 6.82; P <0.001), non-opioid controlled medications (OR 3.45, CI 2.01 to 5.99; P <0.001), history of recurrent acute pancreatitis (OR 2.49, CI 1.25 to 4.77; P <0.001), depression (OR 2.26, CI 1.79 to 3.01; P <0.001), and active smoking (OR1.8, CI 1.25 to 2.29; P <0.001). CONCLUSION: CP patients with disability have unique characteristics and predictors, which can be targeted to reduce disease burden and health care expenditure in this population.

Natural history, clinical characteristics, outcomes, and long-term follow-up of pain-free chronic pancreatitis.

Background: Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is characterized by chronic abdominal pain and functional insufficiency. However, a small subset of patients with prior acute pancreatitis (AP) and/or underlying risk factors for developing CP may be pain-free at diagnosis and may have a different clinical course. We aimed to compare the clinical characteristics, outcomes, and healthcare utilization between CP patients with and without pain. Methods: Reviewed patients with established CP were followed in our Pancreas Center between January 2016 and April 2021. Patients without risk factors for developing CP and/or without AP prior to their diagnosis and only with incidental radiologic features of CP were excluded, so as to minimize confounding factors of pancreatopathy unrelated to CP. Patients were divided into painful and pain-free groups to analyze differences in demographics, outcomes, and healthcare utilization. Results: Of 368 CP patients, 49 (13.3%) were pain-free at diagnosis and had remained so for >9 years. There were no significant differences in body mass index, race, sex, or co-morbidities between the two groups. Pain-free patients were older at diagnosis (53.9 vs 45.7, P = 0.004) and had less recurrent AP (RAP) (43.8% vs 72.5%, P < 0.001) and less exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) (34.7% vs 65.7%, P < 0.001). Pain-free patients had less disability (2.2% vs 22.0%, P = 0.003), mental illness (20.4% vs 61.0%, P < 0.001), surgery (0.0% vs 15.0%, P = 0.059), and therapeutic interventions (0.0% vs 16.4%, P = 0.005) for pain. Conclusions: We described a unique subset of patients with underlying risk factors for CP and/or prior AP who were pain-free at diagnosis. They were older at diagnosis, had less EPI and RAP, and overall favorable outcomes with minimal resource utilization.

Prospective evaluation of an emergency department protocol to prevent hospitalization in mild acute pancreatitis: Outcomes and predictors of discharge.

BACKGROUND: While acute pancreatitis (AP) contributes significantly to hospitalizations and costs, most cases are mild with minimal complications. In 2016, we piloted an observation pathway in the emergency department (ED) for mild AP and showed reduced admissions and length of stay (LOS) without increased readmissions or mortality. After 5 years of implementation, we evaluated outcomes of the ED pathway and identified predictors of successful discharge. METHODS: We reviewed a prospectively enrolled cohort of patients with mild AP presenting to a tertiary care center ED between 10/2016 and 9/2021, evaluating LOS, charges, imaging, and 30-day readmission, and assessed predictors of successful ED discharge. Patients were divided into two main groups: successfully discharged via the ED pathway ("ED cohort") and admitted to the hospital ("admission cohort"), with subgroups to compare outcomes, and multivariate analysis to determine predictors of discharge. RESULTS: Of 619 AP patients, 419 had mild AP (109 ED cohort, 310 admission cohort). The ED cohort was younger (age 49.3 vs 56.3,p < 0.001), had lower Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (1.30 vs 2.43, p < 0.001), shorter LOS (12.3 h vs 116 h, p < 0.001), lower charges (mean $6768 vs $19886, p < 0.001) and less imaging, without differences in 30-day readmissions. Increasing age (OR: 0.97; p < 0.001), increasing CCI (OR: 0.75; p < 0.001) and biliary AP (OR: 0.10; p < 0.001) were associated with decreased ED discharge, while idiopathic AP had increased ED discharge (OR: 7.8; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: After appropriate triage, patients with mild AP (age <50, CCI <2, idiopathic AP) can safely discharge from the ED with improved outcomes and cost savings.

Smoking Is Associated with Worse Clinical Outcomes in Chronic Pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: Tobacco smoking is a known risk factor for progression of chronic pancreatitis (CP). AIM: We compare clinical outcomes of CP patients with current or former smoking with those who have never smoked. METHODS: We reviewed all patients with followed at our Pancreas Center from 2016 to 2021, comparing the demographics, clinical features, comorbidities, outcomes, and resource utilization between smokers and non-smokers. RESULTS: Of 439 CP patients, 283 were smokers (125 current, 158 former). Significantly more smokers were men (58.3% vs 40.4%), with alcoholic CP (45.5% vs 12.1%), chronic abdominal pain (77.7% vs 65.4%), anxiety and depression (22.6% vs 14.1% and 38.9% vs 23.1%), and with more local pancreatic complications [splanchnic vein thrombosis (15.7% vs 5.13%), pseudocyst (42.7% vs 23.7%), biliary obstruction (20.5% vs 5.88%)], exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (65.8% vs 46.2%), hospitalizations (2.59 vs 1.75 visits), and emergency department visits (8.96% vs 3.25%). Opioid and neuromodulator use were significantly higher (59.2% vs 30.3% and 58.4% vs 31.2%). Current smokers had worse outcomes than former smokers. Multivariate analysis controlling for multiple factors identified smoking as an independent predictor of chronic abdominal pain (OR 2.49, CI 1.23-5.04, p = 0.011), opioid (OR 2.36, CI 1.35-4.12, p = 0.002), neuromodulators (OR 2.55, CI 1.46-4.46, p = 0.001), and non-opioid-controlled medications (OR 2.28, CI 1.22-4.30, p = 0.01) use, as well as splanchnic vein thromboses (OR 2.65, CI 1.02-6.91, p = 0.045) and biliary obstruction (OR 4.12, CI 1.60-10.61, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: CP patients who smoke or formerly smoked have greater morbidity and worse outcomes than non-smokers.

Comparison of Opioid-Based Patient-Controlled Analgesia with Physician-Directed Analgesia in Acute Pancreatitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) is commonly used for acute postoperative pain management. Clinicians may also use PCA in the management of acute pancreatitis (AP); however, there is limited data on its impact on patient outcomes. We aimed to characterize a cohort of patients receiving PCA therapy for pain management in AP compared to those patients receiving standard physician-directed delivery of analgesia. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients admitted with AP at a tertiary care center from 2008 to 2018. Exclusion criteria included patients with chronic opioid use, chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. Primary outcomes include length of stay (LOS) and time to enteral nutrition. Secondary outcomes include proportion of patients discharged with opioid and complications. Multivariate regression analysis and t-test were used for analysis. RESULTS: Among 656 AP patients who met the criteria, patients receiving PCA (n = 62) and standard delivery (n = 594) were similar in admission pain score, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and pancreatitis severity. There were significantly greater proportion of women, Caucasians and nonalcoholics who received PCA therapy (p < 0.01) than standard delivery. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that patients in the PCA group have a longer LOS (7.17 vs. 5.43 days, p < 0.007, OR 1.03; 95% CI 1.01-1.07), longer time to enteral nutrition (3.84 days vs. 2.56 days, p = 0.012, OR 1.11; 95% CI 1.02-1.20), and higher likelihood of being discharged with opioids (OR 1.94; 95% CI 1.07-3.63, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: The use of PCA in AP may be associated with poorer outcomes including longer LOS, time to enteral intake and a higher likelihood of being discharged with opioids.

Pre-existing, Concurrent/Early-Onset, and Late-Onset Diabetes in Chronic Pancreatitis: Do Outcomes Differ?

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Diabetes secondary to endocrine insufficiency in chronic pancreatitis (CP) may develop at any time during the disease course. We sought to evaluate the differences in clinical characteristics and outcomes in CP patients with pre-existing, early-onset, and late-onset diabetes. METHODS: We reviewed CP patients seen at our Pancreas Center during 2016-2021. We divided them into four groups: those without diabetes, with pre-existing diabetes, with early-onset diabetes, and with late-onset diabetes. We then compared clinical characteristics and outcomes. RESULTS: We identified 450 patients with CP: 271 without diabetes, 99 with pre-existing diabetes, 51 with early-onset diabetes, and 29 with late-onset diabetes. Early-onset diabetics were younger (54.1 vs 57.3 vs 62.5 vs 61.9 years), had more alcohol-related CP (45.1% vs 31.7% vs 32.3% vs 31%), had higher HbA1C levels (8.02% vs 5.11% vs 7.71% vs 7.66%), were more likely to be on insulin (78.4% vs 0% vs 48.4% vs 65.5%), and used more opioids (64.7% vs 43.9% vs 55.1% vs 44.8%) and gabapentinoids (66.7% vs 43.5% vs 48% vs 60.7%) compared to other groups (p < 0.05). Patients who developed diabetes after CP diagnosis had more exocrine insufficiency (72.4% vs 70.6% vs 65.7% vs 53.1%), anatomical complications, and interventions for pain control (p < 0.05). There was no difference in pancreatic cancer in the four groups. CONCLUSION: CP patients who are younger and use alcohol are at higher risk of having early-onset diabetes and have poorer glucose control compared other CP patients. Patients who develop diabetes after CP diagnosis have worse outcomes and use more resources.

Impact of recurrent acute pancreatitis on the natural history and progression to chronic pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: It is believed that acute pancreatitis (AP), recurrent AP (RAP) and chronic pancreatitis (CP) represent stages of the same disease spectrum. We aimed to identify risk factors, clinical presentation and outcomes in patients with prior RAP who develop CP. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with CP who were seen at our Pancreas Center during 2016-2021. We divided them into two groups: with and without RAP (≥2 episodes of AP). We compared demographics, clinical presentation and resource utilization between the two groups. RESULTS: We identified 440 patients with CP, of which 283 (64%) patients had preceding RAP. These patients were younger (55.6 vs 63.1 years), active smokers (36% vs 20%) and had alcohol-related CP (49% vs 25%) compared to those without RAP and CP (p < 0.05). More patients with RAP had chronic abdominal pain (89% vs 67.9%), nausea (43.3% vs 27.1%) and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (65.8% vs 46.5%) (p < 0.05). More patients with RAP used opioids (58.4% vs 32.3%) and gabapentinoids (56.6% vs 34.8%) (p < 0.05). They also had more ED visits resulting in an opioid prescription (9.68% vs 2%) and more CP flares requiring hospitalization (3.09 vs 0.87) (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Young age, smoking and alcohol use are seen in patients with RAP who progress to CP. These patients are highly symptomatic and use more healthcare resources, suggestive of an overall a more course compared to those patients who develop CP without preceding RAP. Early identification and counselling of these patients may slow down progression to CP.

Evaluating the accuracy of American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines in patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis with choledocholithiasis.

BACKGROUND: Acute gallstone pancreatitis (AGP) is the most common cause of acute pancreatitis (AP) in the United States. Patients with AGP may also present with choledocholithiasis. In 2010, the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) suggested a management algorithm based on probability for choledocholithiasis, recommending additional imaging for patients at intermediate risk and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for patients at high risk of choledocholithiasis. In 2019, the ASGE guidelines were updated using more specific criteria to categorize individuals at high risk for choledocholithiasis. Neither ASGE guideline has been studied in AGP to determine the probability of having choledocholithiasis. AIM: To determine compliance with ASGE guidelines, assess outcomes, and compare 2019 vs 2010 ASGE criteria for suspected choledocholithiasis in AGP. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 882 patients admitted with AP to a single tertiary care center from 2008-2018. AP was diagnosed using revised Atlanta criteria and AGP was defined as the presence of gallstones on imaging or with cholestatic pattern of liver injury in the absence of another cause. Patients with chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic malignancy were excluded as were those who went directly to cholecystectomy prior to assessment for choledocholithiasis. Patients were assigned low, intermediate or high risk based on ASGE guidelines. Our primary outcomes of interest were the proportion of patients in the intermediate risk group undergoing magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) first and the proportion of patients in the high risk group undergoing ERCP directly without preceding imaging. Secondary outcomes of interest included outcome differences based on if guidelines were not adhered to. We then evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of 2019 in comparison to the 2010 ASGE criteria for patients with suspected choledocholithiasis. We performed the t test or Wilcoxon rank sum test, as appropriate, to analyze if there were outcome differences based on if guidelines were not adhered to. Kappa coefficients were calculated to measure the degree of agreement between pairs of variables. RESULTS: In this cohort, we identified 235 patients with AGP of which 79 patients were excluded as they went directly to surgery for cholecystectomy without prior MRCP or ERCP. Of the remaining 156 patients, 79 patients were categorized as intermediate risk and 77 patients were high risk for choledocholithiasis according to the 2010 ASGE guidelines. Among 79 intermediate risk patients, 54 (68%) underwent MRCP first whereas 25 patients (32%) went directly to ERCP. For the 54 patients with intermediate risk who had MRCP first, 36 patients had no choledocholithiasis while 18 patients had evidence of choledocholithiasis prompting ERCP. Of these patients, ERCP confirmed stone disease in 11 patients. Of the 25 intermediate risk patients who directly underwent ERCP, 18 patients had stone disease. One patient with a normal ERCP developed post ERCP pancreatitis. Patients undergoing MRCP in this group had a significantly longer length of stay (5.0 vs 4.0 d, P = 0.02). In the high risk group, 64 patients (83%) had ERCP without preceding imaging, of which, 53 patients had findings consistent with choledocholithiasis, of which 13 patients (17%) underwent MRCP before ERCP, all of which showed evidence of stone disease. Furthermore, all of these patients ultimately had an ERCP, of which 8 patients had evidence of stones and 5 had normal examination.Our cohort also demonstrated that 58% of all 156 patients with AGP had confirmed choledocholithiasis (79% of the high risk group and 37% of the intermediate group when risk was assigned based on the 2010 ASGE guidelines). When the updated 2019 ASGE guidelines were applied instead of the original 2010 guidelines, there was moderate agreement between the 2010 and 2019 guidelines (kappa = 0.46, 95%CI: 0.34-0.58). Forty-two of 77 patients were still deemed to be high risk and 35 patients were downgraded to intermediate risk. Thirty-five patients who were originally assigned high risk were reclassified as intermediate risk. For these 35 patients, 26 patients had ERCP findings consistent with choledocholithiasis and 9 patients had a normal examination. Based on the 2019 criteria, 9/35 patients who were downgraded to intermediate risk had an unnecessary ERCP with normal findings (without a preceding MRCP). CONCLUSION: Two-thirds in intermediate risk and 83% in high risk group followed ASGE guidelines for choledocholithiasis. One intermediate-group patient with normal ERCP had post-ERCP AP, highlighting the risk of unnecessary procedures.

Extrapancreatic Complications in Hospitalized Patients With Mild Acute Pancreatitis Are Associated With Poorer Outcomes: Results From a Single-Center Study.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) are at risk for extrapancreatic complications (EPCs) when admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). We assessed the prevalence of EPCs in non-ICU AP patients and their outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively studied EPCs in non-ICU AP patients between 2008 and 2018. Outcomes such as length of stay (LOS), inpatient mortality, and 30-day readmission rates were compared between those with and without EPC. RESULTS: Of the 830 AP patients, 151 (18.1%) had at least 1 EPC. These included urinary tract infection (15.9%), Clostridium difficile infection (17.2%), pneumonia (7.3%), bacteremia (17.2%), acute kidney injury requiring dialysis (3.3%), gastrointestinal bleeding (12.5%), alcohol withdrawal (24.5%), delirium (14.5%), and falls (1.32%). Patients with EPC had increased mean LOS (6.98 vs 4.42 days; P < 0.001) and 30-day readmissions (32.5% vs 19%; P < 0.001). On multivariate regression, EPCs were independently associated with higher LOS (odds ratio, 1.45 [95% confidence interval, 1.36-1.56]; P < 0.001) and 30-day readmissions (odds ratio, 1.94 [95% confidence interval 1.28-2.95]; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The EPCs are common among noncritical AP patients and contribute to poor outcomes like increased LOS and 30-day readmissions.

Evaluating Outcomes and Misuse in Opioid-Dependent Chronic Pancreatitis Using a State-Mandated Monitoring System.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP) often require opioids for pain control. The goal of our study was to characterize opioid use in patients with CP in a real-life practice using a state-mandated online monitoring program and to assess outcomes compared to CP patients without opioid dependency. METHODS: CP patients seen in our Pancreas Center from 2016 to 2021 were divided into two groups-with and without chronic opioid use. Details of opioids and other controlled prescriptions were obtained by review of the Massachusetts Prescription Awareness Tool (MassPat). RESULTS: Of the 442 CP outpatients, 216 used chronic opioids. Patients with opioid use had significantly more recurrent acute pancreatitis (76.6% vs. 52.7%), concurrent alcohol use (11.2% vs. 5.8%), tobacco use (37.8% vs. 19.7%), anxiety (22.4% vs. 16.6%), depression (43.5% vs. 23.5%) and daily pain (59.8% vs. 24.8%) (p < 0.001). They also concurrently used more benzodiazepines (43.7% vs. 12.4%), gabapentinoids (66.4% vs. 31.1%) and medical marijuana (14.9% vs. 4.19%) (p < 0.001). They had more celiac plexus blocks (22.0% vs. 6.67%), surgery (18.3% vs. 8.89%) and more hospitalizations for CP flares (3.6 vs. 1.0 visits) (p < 0.001). Less than 13% patients received opioids by means of ED visits; 81.7% patients received their prescriptions from one facility and 75% received them at regular intervals. CONCLUSION: Opioid-dependent CP patients exhibit polypharmacy and have worse outcomes with higher resource utilization. The state-monitoring program ensures that the majority of patients receive opioids from a single facility, thereby minimizing misuse.

Inpatient Alcohol Cessation Counseling Is Associated With a Lower 30-Day Hospital Readmission in Acute Alcoholic Pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: Alcohol use is a common cause of recurrent acute pancreatitis. Thus, guidelines recommend providing alcohol prevention resources during hospitalization. There is limited data on the real-world implementation of this recommendation. We aimed to assess how often inpatients admitted with alcohol-induced acute pancreatitis (AAP) receive counseling and to determine the impact of counseling on readmissions for AAP. METHODS: We retrospectively studied patients admitted with AAP at a tertiary care center from 2008 to 2018. We compared demographics, clinical features, and outcomes in patients who did and did not receive counseling. Outcomes studied were the proportion of patients with AAP receiving counseling, and readmission rates for AAP at 30 days and 1 year. RESULTS: A total of 243 patients with AAP were identified, of which 115 had inpatient alcohol counseling (47%). Demographic data were comparable between the 2 groups. Fewer patients receiving alcohol counseling were readmitted at 30 days compared with patients not receiving counseling (19.3% vs. 31.2%, P =0.048). At 1 year, the 2 groups had similar readmission rates. On multivariate analysis, patients who received counseling were half as likely to be readmitted in 30 days compared with those who did not receive counseling [odds ratio=0.52 (0.27, 0.98), P =0.046]. CONCLUSIONS: We note that <50% of patients receive alcohol counseling. Patients receiving alcohol counseling were less likely to be readmitted at 30 days, inferring possible value in the intervention provided. Similar readmission rates at 1 year suggest that the single intervention may not have a durable effect on alcohol prevention.

Evaluating the Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Idiopathic Acute Pancreatitis: Comparison With Nonidiopathic Acute Pancreatitis Over a 10-Year Period.

OBJECTIVE: Up to 30% of acute pancreatitis (AP) cases do not have an established etiology (idiopathic AP [IAP]). We evaluated the characteristics and outcomes of hospitalized IAP patients compared with those with established AP cause (non-IAP). METHODS: A retrospective study of AP patients admitted to a single center from 2008 to 2018 was performed. Patients were divided into IAP and non-IAP groups. Outcomes included mortality, 30-day and 1-year readmission, length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit admissions, and complications. RESULTS: Of 878 AP patients, 338 had IAP and 540 non-IAP (234 gallstone, 178 alcohol). Groups had similar demographics, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and pancreatitis severity. The IAP patients had more 1-year readmissions (0.64 vs 0.55, P = 0.006) but similar 30-day readmissions and mortality. Patients with IAP had shorter LOS (4.98 vs 5.99 days, P = 0.01), and fewer intensive care unit admissions (3.25% vs 6.85%, P = 0.03) and extrapancreatic complications (15.4% vs 25.2%, P = 0.001). There was no difference in pain level between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The IAP patients tend to have more readmissions in 1 year, but less severe presentations, shorter LOS, and fewer complications. Readmission rates may be related to lack of defined etiology and treatment to prevent recurrence.

Racial Variations in Pain Management and Outcomes in Hospitalized Patients With Acute Pancreatitis.

OBJECTIVES: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common cause of hospitalization. Black AP patients have higher risk for alcoholic etiology and hospitalization than White patients. We evaluated outcomes and treatment disparities by race in hospitalized AP patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed Black and White AP patients admitted 2008-2018. Primary outcomes were length of stay, intensive care unit admission, 30-day readmissions, and mortality. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, opioid dosing, and complications. RESULTS: We identified 630 White and 186 Black AP patients. Alcoholic AP (P < 0.001), tobacco use (P = 0.013), and alcohol withdrawal (P < 0.001) were more common among Blacks. There were no differences in length of stay (P = 0.113), intensive care unit stay (P = 0.316), 30-day readmissions (P = 0.797), inpatient (P = 0.718) or 1-year (P = 0.071) mortality, complications (P = 0.080), or initial (P = 0.851) and discharge pain scores (P = 0.116). Discharge opioids were prescribed more frequently for Whites (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalized Black and White AP patients had similar treatment and outcomes. Standardized protocols used to manage care may eliminate racial biases. Disparities in discharge opioid prescriptions may be explained by higher alcohol and tobacco use by Black patients.

The Impact of an Inpatient Pancreatitis Service and Educational Intervention Program on the Outcome of Acute Pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: We introduced an inpatient pancreatitis consultative service aimed to 1) provide guideline-based recommendations to acute pancreatitis inpatients and 2) educate inpatient teams on best practices for acute pancreatitis management. We assessed the impact of pancreatitis service on acute pancreatitis outcomes. METHODS: Inpatients with acute pancreatitis (2008-2018) were included in this cohort study. Primary outcomes included length of stay and refeeding time. The educational intervention was a guideline-based decision support tool, reinforced at hospital-wide educational forums. In Part A (n = 965), we compared outcomes pre-service (2008-2010) to post-service (2012-2018), excluding 2011, when the pancreatitis service was introduced. In Part B (n = 720, 2012-2018), we divided patients into 2 groups based on if co-managed with the pancreatitis service, and compared outcomes, including subgroup analysis based on severity, focusing on mild acute pancreatitis. RESULTS: In Part A, for mild acute pancreatitis, length of stay (111 vs 88.4 h, P = .001), refeeding time (61.8 vs 47.4 h, P = .002), and infections (10.0% vs 1.87%, P < .001) were significantly improved after the pancreatitis service was introduced, with multivariable analysis showing reduced length of stay (odds ratio 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-0.84; P < .001) and refeeding time (odds ratio 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-0.77; P < .001). In Part B, for mild acute pancreatitis, refeeding time (44.2 vs 50.3 h, P = .123) and infections (5.58% vs 4.70%, P = .80) were similar in patients cared for without and with the service. Length of stay was higher in the pancreatitis service group (93.3 vs 81.2 h, P = .05), as they saw more gallstone acute pancreatitis patients who had greater length of stay and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. In the post-service period, a majority of patients with moderate/severe acute pancreatitis and nearly all intensive care unit admits received care from the pancreatitis service. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of an inpatient pancreatitis service was associated with improved outcomes in mild acute pancreatitis. Guideline-based educational interventions have a beneficial impact on management of mild acute pancreatitis by admitting teams even without pancreatitis consultation.

Pain management in chronic pancreatitis incorporating safe opioid practices: Challenge accepted.

Patients with chronic pancreatitis often experience severe, unrelenting abdominal pain, which can significantly impact their quality of life. Pain control, therefore, remains central to the overall management of chronic pancreatitis. Most of the strategies aimed at treating the pain of chronic pancreatitis are based on expert opinion and vary from one institution to another, as there are no uniform guidelines to direct a stepwise approach towards achieving this goal. In this editorial, we comment on best practice strategies targeted towards pain control in chronic pancreatitis, specifically highlighting the use of opioid medications in this patient population. We discuss various safe and efficacious prescription monitoring practices in this article.

Hyperlipasemia in absence of acute pancreatitis is associated with elevated D-dimer and adverse outcomes in COVID 19 disease.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 affects multiple organs. Studies have reported mild elevations of lipase levels of unclear significance. Our study aims to determine the outcomes in patients with COVID-19 and hyperlipasemia, and whether correlation with D-dimer levels explains the effect on outcomes. METHODS: Case-control study from two large tertiary care health systems, of patients with COVID-19 disease admitted between March 1 and May 1, 2020 who had lipase levels recorded. Data analyzed to study primary outcomes of mortality, length of stay (LOS) and intensive care utilization in hyperlipasemia patients, and correlation with D-dimer and outcomes. RESULTS: 992 out of 5597 COVID-19 patients had lipase levels, of which 429 (43%) had hyperlipasemia. 152 (15%) patients had a lipase > 3x ULN, with clinical pancreatitis in 2 patients. Hyperlipasemia had a higher mortality than normal lipase patients (32% vs. 23%, OR = 1.6,95%CI = 1.2-2.1, P = 0.002). In subgroup analysis, hyperlipasemia patients had significantly worse LOS (11vs.15 days, P = 0.01), ICU admission rates (44% vs. 66%,OR = 2.5,95%CI = 1.3-5.0,P = 0.008), ICU LOS (12vs.19 days,P = 0.01), mechanical ventilation rates (34% vs. 55%,OR = 2.4,95%CI = 1.3-4.8,P = 0.01), and durations of mechanical ventilation (14 vs. 21 days, P = 0.008). Hyperlipasemia patients were more likely to have a D-dimer value in the highest two quartiles, and had increased mortality (59% vs. 15%,OR = 7.2,95%CI = 4.5-11,P < 0.001) and LOS (10vs.7 days,P < 0.001) compared to those with normal lipase and lower D-dimer levels. CONCLUSION: There is high prevalence of hyperlipasemia without clinical pancreatitis in COVID-19 disease. Hyperlipasemia was associated with higher mortality and ICU utilization, possibly explained by elevated D-dimer.