VT ablation based on CT imaging substrate visualization: results from a large cohort of ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy patients.

INTRODUCTION: The eradication of ventricular tachycardia (VT) isthmus sites constitutes the minimal procedural endpoint for VT ablation procedures. Contemporary high-resolution computed tomography (CT) imaging, in combination with computer-assisted analysis and segmentation of CT data, facilitates targeted elimination of VT isthmi. In this context, inHEART offers digitally rendered three-dimensional (3D) cardiac models which allow preoperative planning for VT ablations in ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathies. To date, almost no data have been collected to compare the outcomes of VT ablations utilizing inHEART with those of traditional ablation approaches. METHODS: The presented data are derived from a retrospective analysis of n = 108 patients, with one cohort undergoing VT ablation aided by late-enhancement CT and subsequent analysis and segmentation by inHEART, while the other cohort received ablation through conventional methods like substrate mapping and activation mapping. The ablations were executed utilizing a 3D mapping system (Carto3), with the mapping generated via the CARTO® PENTARAY™ NAV catheter and subsequently merged with the inHEART model, if available. RESULTS: Results showed more successful outcome of ablations for the inHEART group with lower VT recurrence (27% vs. 42%, p < 0.06). Subsequent analyses revealed that patients with ischemic cardiomyopathies appeared to derive a significant benefit from inHEART-assisted VT ablation procedures, with a higher rate of successful ablation (p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that inHEART-guided ablation is associated with reduced VT recurrence compared to conventional procedures. This suggests that employing advanced imaging and computational modeling in VT ablation may be valuable for VT recurrences.

Temperature-controlled high-power short-duration ablation with 90 W for 4 s: outcome, safety, biophysical characteristics and cranial MRI findings in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation.

BACKGROUND: High-power short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is highly efficient and safe while reducing procedure and RF time in pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). The QDot™ catheter is a novel contact force ablation catheter that allows automated flow and power adjustments depending on the local tissue temperature to maintain a target temperature during 90 W/4 s lesions. We analysed intraprocedural data and periprocedural safety using the QDot-catheter in patients undergoing PVI for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). METHODS: We included n = 48 patients undergoing PVI with the QDot-catheter with a temperature-controlled HPSD ablation mode with 90 W/4 s (TC-HPSD). If focal reconnection occurred besides repeat ablation, the ablation mode was changed to 50 W/15 s (QMode). N = 23 patients underwent cerebral MRI to detect silent cerebral lesions. RESULTS: Mean RF time was 8.1 ± 2.8 min, and procedure duration was 84.5 ± 30 min. The overall maximal measured catheter tip temperature was 52.0 °C ± 4.6 °C, mean overall applied current was 871 mA ± 44 mA and overall applied energy was 316 J ± 47 J. The mean local impedance drop was 12.1 ± 2.4 Ohms. During adenosine challenge, n = 14 (29%) patients showed dormant conduction. A total of n = 24 steam pops were detected in n = 18 patients (39.1%), while no pericardial tamponade occurred. No periprocedural thromboembolic complications occurred, while n = 4 patients (17.4%) showed silent cerebral lesion. CONCLUSIONS: TC-HPSD ablation with 90 W/4 s using the QDot-catheter led to a reduction of procedure and RF time, while no major complications occurred. Despite optimized temperature control and power adjustment, steam pops occurred in a rather high number of patients, while none of them leads to tamponade or to clinical or neurological deficits.

Repeat ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation - Does adenosine play a role in predicting pulmonary vein reconnection patterns?

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein (PV) reconduction after PV isolation (PVI) unmasked by adenosine is associated with a higher risk for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) recurrence. It is unknown if the reconnected PVs after adenosine testing and immediate re-ablation can predict reconnection and reconnection patterns of PVs at repeat procedures. We assessed reconnection of PVs with and without dormant-conduction (DC) during the first and the repeat procedure. METHODS: We included 67 patients undergoing PVI for PAF and a second procedure for PAF recurrence. DC during adenosine administration at first procedure was seen in 31 patients (46%). 264 PVs were tested with adenosine; DC was found in 48 PVs (18%) and re-ablated during first procedure. During the second procedure, all PVs where checked for reconnection. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients (87%) showed PV reconnection during the second procedure. Reconnection was found in 152/264 PVs (58%). Of 216 PVs without reconnection during adenosine testing at the first ablation, 116 PVs (53.7%) showed reconnection at the repeat procedure. Overall, 14.9% of patients showed the same PV reconnection pattern in the first and second procedure, expected statistical probability of encountering the same reconnection pattern was only 6.6%(p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: In repeat procedures PVs showed significantly more often the same reconnection pattern as during first procedure than statistically expected. More than 50% of initial isolated PVs without reconnection during adenosine testing showed a reconnection during repeat ablation. Techniques to detect susceptibility for PV re-connection like prolonged waiting-period should be applied. Elimination of DC should be expanded from segmental to circumferential re-isolation or vaster RF application.

Catheter Ablation for "Lone" Atrial Fibrillation: Efficacy and Predictors of Recurrence.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation in otherwise healthy young patients has been termed "lone" atrial fibrillation (AF). The best treatment choice is still under discussion. The aim of this study was to report on efficacy and safety of catheter ablation. METHODS: Among 855 patients referred to our center between 2011 and 2013, 76 (9%) met the diagnostic criteria for lone AF (mean age 45 ± 8 years; mean LA diameter 37 ± 4 mm; paroxysmal AF 82%; persistent AF 18%). The primary endpoint was freedom from any atrial tachycardia after the first ablation; the secondary endpoint was freedom from any atrial tachycardia after the last ablation procedure without antiarrhythmic drugs. RESULTS: The primary endpoint occurred in 56 patients (74%) after a mean follow-up time of 444 ± 344 days. The secondary endpoint occurred in 73 patients (96%) after a mean of 1.3 ablations/patient during a follow-up time of 459 ± 366 days. The risk of AF recurrence was not influenced by AF duration or by the type of AF (paroxysmal versus persistent). In a multivariate regression analysis smoking (P = 0.001), first degree atrioventricular block (P = 0.001), and early (< 3 months) AF recurrence (P = 0.001) were independently associated with a higher risk of AF recurrence. Major peri-procedural adverse events did not occur. CONCLUSIONS: Catheter ablation in young healthy patients is highly effective and safe. The outcomes are maintained during long-term follow-up irrespective of preoperative AF duration. Patients with AF recurrence were more likely to smoke, have first degree AV block and early AF recurrence.