Survey of genetic screening for oocyte donors.

OBJECTIVE: To describe current screening practices of oocyte donation programs in the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technologies (SART). DESIGN: Descriptive data from a mailed questionnaire. SETTING: Academic medical center. PARTICIPANT(S): In vitro fertilization programs in SART. INTERVENTION(S): Survey mailed to IVF programs in the SART registry. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Current practices, opinions, and genetic criteria for oocyte donor selection. RESULT(S): Results from 159 of 229 (69%) eligible oocyte donation programs are described. Most centers (70%) completed fewer than 25 cycles and used both anonymous and directed donors. There was considerable variability in limits on numbers of cycles or births allowed per donor, with many centers having no limits. As well, the use of well-established screening tests for genetic disorders, such as sickle cell anemia and cystic fibrosis, varied considerably. Consultation with a geneticist was possible at most (89%) centers and specifically mentioned by some centers as a means to help make decisions. CONCLUSION(S): Most programs follow recommendations made by the American Society of Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) for screening of gamete donors, but a significant percentage does not use well-established testing. The widespread availability of genetic consultation should promote responsible screening practices.

Abstract presentations: what do SGIM presenters prefer? Society of General Internal Medicine.

We surveyed physicians presenting abstracts at the 1995 Society of General Internal Medicine annual meeting to determine whether the oral or poster format better achieved their presentation goals. Poster presentations better met respondents' objectives for feedback and criticism and for networking and developing collaborative projects, while oral presentations better met their objectives for national visibility and sharing knowledge within one's field. Sixty-nine percent of respondents preferred to present oral abstracts. The majority of these presenters preferred to present their research in an oral format although poster presentations still played an important role for them, particularly as a venue for feedback on their work. As meeting size increases, different presentation formats should be explored that best meet the needs of the academic community.

Performance-based physician reimbursement and influenza immunization rates in the elderly. The Primary-Care Physicians of Monroe County.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of performance-based financial incentives on the influenza immunization rate in primary care physicians' offices. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial during the 1991 influenza immunization season. SETTING: Rochester, New York, and surrounding Monroe County during the Medicare Influenza Vaccine Demonstration Project. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 54 solo or group practices that had participated in the 1990 Medicare Demonstration Project. INTERVENTIONS: All physicians in participating practices agreed to enumerate their ambulatory patients aged 65 or older who had been seen during the 1990 or 1991 calendar years, and to track the immunization rate on a weekly basis using a specially designed poster from September 1991 to January 1, 1992. Additionally, physicians agreed to be randomized, by practice group, to the control group or to the incentive group, which could receive an additional $.80 per shot or $1.60 per shot if an immunization rate of 70% or 85%, respectively, was attained. MEASUREMENTS: The main outcome measures are the 1991 immunization rate and the improvement in immunization rate from the 1990 to 1991 influenza seasons for each group practice. RESULTS: For practices in the incentive group, the mean immunization rate was 68.6% (SD 16.6%) compared with 62.7% (SD 18.0%) in the control group practices (P = .22). The median practice-specific improvement in immunization rate was +10.3% in the incentive group compared with +3.5% in the control group (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Despite high background immunization rates, this modest financial incentive was responsible for approximately 7% increase in immunization rate among the ambulatory elderly.

Estimating the accuracy of screening mammography: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the accuracy of mammographic screening. DESIGN: A meta-analysis of published literature. DATA SOURCES: Published English-language randomized controlled trials, case-control studies, and demonstration projects involving screening mammography were identified using recent review articles. We found additional references using MEDLINE searches combining the MeSH terms "mammography," "screening," and/or study authors and locations. STUDY SELECTION: We included all studies that provided information to calculate the true-positive rate (TPR) and the false-positive rate (FPR) for breast cancer screening. DATA EXTRACTION: Reported data were reviewed independently by the authors; calculations were compared and discrepancies resolved. We calculated the sensitivity as the number of breast cancers detected during the first round of screening (true positives) divided by the sum of the true positives and the false negatives (defined as cancer discovered within 1 year of screening). False-positives were determined by biopsy. DATA SYNTHESIS: TPR and FPR values from each study were plotted in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) space. Tests of homogeneity were performed to assess the validity of using summary ROC curves or a single point to summarize the data. The reported TPR and FPR of mammography ranged from 83% to 95% and 0.9% to 6.5%, respectively. The sensitivity of mammography is higher in women over the age of 50 years. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of mammography should be recognized and included in discussions about policies for screening for breast cancer. This meta-analysis, by quantifying the expected TPR/FPR, should assist program planners, physicians, and women to understand better the cost and clinical implications of such screening programs.

Respiratory syncytial virus and influenza A infections in the hospitalized elderly.

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infections in the institutionalized elderly have been described; however, there is little information on the impact of RSV infection on community-dwelling elderly. The purpose of this study was to determine the relative numbers of hospitalizations associated with RSV infection and compare the clinical manifestations with influenza A infection. Between November and April during 1989-1992, persons > or = 65 years old hospitalized with acute cardiopulmonary conditions or influenza-like illnesses were evaluated. Evaluation included viral culture, RSV antigen detection, and serologic analysis; 159 (10%) of 1580 had RSV infection and 221 (11%) of 2091 had influenza A. RSV and influenza A cases occurred simultaneously throughout the 3 years. Clinical manifestations were similar; however, patients with RSV infection were more likely to receive therapy for bronchospasm. Death rates were 10% and 6% for RSV infection and influenza A, respectively. RSV infection is the cause of serious disease in community-dwelling older persons.

A performance-based incentive program for influenza immunization in the elderly.

Our objective was to implement and evaluate performance-based reimbursement for influenza immunization of the elderly in physician offices. We performed a community-based quasi-experiment with historic and concurrent comparisons, using primary care physician offices in Monroe County, New York. Participants in the intervention group included 53 primary care physicians admitting to one hospital, and the comparison group included 82 primary care physicians admitting to other hospitals. All physicians participated in a Medicare-sponsored demonstration to increase influenza immunization rates, and, during the 1990-1991 immunization season, used a target-based poster to track immunization rates. Physicians in the intervention group were enrolled in a performance-based financial incentive program that rewarded immunization rates above 70%. A survey concerning influenza immunization practices and opinions was sent to all physicians. The average physician-specific immunization rate in the incentive group was 73.1% versus 55.7% in the comparison practices (P < .001). Eligibility for incentives, practice size, sex of physician, medical specialty, reminder postcards, and practice populations including medically indigent patients were associated with immunization level. Controlling for the above variables, we completed a regression analysis showing that eligibility for the incentive was still significant (P = .003). The survey responses were not predictive of performance or significantly different between the two groups, except for the negative influence of sending postcards. This study in a community setting suggests that linking reimbursement to performance may be a successful strategy to increase influenza immunization levels for the elderly.