Real-world data show high efficacy of IL23 inhibitors guselkumab and risankizumab in psoriatic arthritis and difficult-to-treat areas.

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis are chronic inflammatory skin and joint diseases requiring effective therapies. Although clinical studies have shown the efficacy of IL-23 inhibitors, real-world data are limited. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective Greek study enrolling patients with psoriatic arthritis and moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis being treated at our multidisciplinary psoriasis outpatient clinic. Our aim was to investigate the efficacy and safety of IL-23 inhibitors guselkumab and risankizumab. Additionally, we sought to determine the clinical characteristics affecting treatment response. Primary endpoints were the evaluation of absolute Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (aPASI) and Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) at week 24. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients (55.9% male, 69.5% early onset) with a mean age of 51.7 years were included. Twenty-four patients (40.7%) had a concomitant psoriatic arthritis. Obesity was the main comorbidity (49.2%) with a mean body mass index (BMI) of 31.3 kg/m2 . Additional comorbidities were hypertension (44.1%), dyslipidemia (32.2%), and diabetes (18.6%). Only eight patients (13.6%) were naïve to previous systemic treatments, whereas 40 patients (67.8%) were bio-experienced. A statistically significant improvement of aPASI and DAPSA was demonstrated after 4, 16, and 24 weeks of treatment (P < 0.05). IL23 blockers were also efficacious in difficult-to-treat areas. Clinical outcome was affected from previous treatment with biologics. Treatment response was the same between guselkumab and risankizumab (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: This real-world study confirms the efficacy and safety of guselkumab and risankizumab in psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis reported from clinical trials.

Chlormethine Gel is Efficient and Safe in Mycosis Fungoides Skin Lesions.

Chlormethine is a bifunctional cytotoxic alkylating agent that binds to DNA, resulting in cell death (apoptosis). Chlormethine (also known as mechlorethamine) gel (CL gel) was approved in the European Union in 2017 and was first used in 2019. The aim of the study is to examine evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of chlormethine gel in everyday clinical experience from a cutaneous lymphoma centre. Twenty-three patients with stage IA-IIB mycosis fungoides received chlormethine gel between September 2020 and May 2021. All patients started by applying the gel daily and were monitored every month. At 1, 3, 6 and 9 months, 0%, 43.47%, 56.52% and 65.22% of patients, respectively, achieved an overall response. Five out of 23 patients (21.73%) achieved near complete response at a mean time of 6 months. Chlormethine gel was given as monotherapy in 12 patients (52.17%), and in addition to systemic treatments (methotrexate and peginterferon alpha-2a) in 11 patients (47.82%). Adverse events (AE) were recorded in 43.47% of patients, but only 3 discontinued treatment, due to dermatitis. Scale down of the treatment to application 3-times per week led to better patient compliance. This study shows that chlormethine gel is effective and safe in patients with mycosis fungoides with different types of skin lesions.

Chlormethine Gel in Combination with Other Therapies in the Treatment of Patients with Mycosis Fungoides Cutaneous T Cell Lymphoma: Three Case Reports.

INTRODUCTION: Chlormethine gel is a skin-directed therapy recommended for patients with early-stage mycosis fungoides (MF) cutaneous T cell lymphoma. METHODS: Herein, we present three cases of patients with stage IB-IIB MF who were treated with chlormethine gel and concomitant therapies. RESULTS: All patients responded well to treatment with chlormethine gel; complete responses were observed with improvements in Modified Severity-Weighted Assessment Tool scores and severity of lesions; one patient reported an improvement in quality of life. While adverse events did occur after treatment initiation, they were skin related and could be effectively managed through reductions in treatment frequency and the addition of emollients and topical steroids. CONCLUSION: The cases presented here illustrate that chlormethine gel is an effective and safe treatment option for patients with MF who had received prior therapies that had proved ineffective. Chlormethine gel could be combined with other skin-directed or systemic therapies for optimal benefit. Incidences of dermatitis were seen to be successfully managed and quality of life benefits were also reported.