Enteric plexus neuropathy associated with PD-L1 blockade in a patient with small-cell lung cancer.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized the management of patients with cancer. The increasing use of these agents has brought up a new set of adverse events which are widely heterogenous and potentially life-threatening. Rare immune-related adverse events associated with nervous system have not been described thoroughly, but their early recognition and management may be crucial. Immune-related autonomic neuropathy may be presented with a constellation of symptoms ranging from gastrointestinal and urinary complaints, to sweating and hypotension. Intestinal pseudo-obstruction as consequence of immune-related myenteric autonomic neuropathy is an under-recognized, not-well described and potentially fatal adverse event. We herein, present a unique case of enteric plexus neuropathy induced by PD-L1 blockade in a patient with small-cell lung cancer.

Lay abstract Immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors has improved the life expectancy in many cancer patients. However, the stimulation of immune system to fight cancer may also affect healthy tissues, bringing about the risk of adverse events. These adverse events may affect almost every organ system of the body and may vary from mild to life-threatening. Immunotherapy-related damage to nervous plexuses, which supply the guts with nerves, has been reported only in a small number of cases. The symptoms usually mimic those of gut inflammation, including diarrhea, constipation, abdominal distension, and vomiting. Upon these symptoms, enteric nervous system toxicity should be considered. Early recognition and management are crucial to stop further neurological damage. We present a rare case of enteric nerve damage in a patient with small-cell lung cancer treated with immunotherapy.

Moderate Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: The Triumph of Radiobiology.

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy represents one of the main therapeutic modalities for localized prostate cancer. In the last two decades, emerging data regarding the radiobiology of prostate cancer suggests a very low α/ß value, which has led the scientific community to evaluate the potential advantage of hypofractionation. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this manuscript is to present the rationale of prostate radiobiology and the medical evidence of moderate hypofractionation for prostate cancer. METHODS: Existing literature was reviewed, including data from prospective clinical trials dealing with the efficacy and toxicity of hypofractionated radiotherapy. Fifteen prospective phase II studies, nine randomized phase III studies and ten meta-analyses were selected. For every study included, the equivalent dose was calculated for both biochemical control and late toxicity. RESULTS: The efficacy of hypofractionated radiotherapy, compared to conventional radiotherapy, regarding biochemical control, was evaluated in five superiority and four non-inferiority randomized phase III studies. The majority of participants in these studies were patients with low- and intermediate- risk prostate cancer. Even though the superiority criterion of the hypofractionation was not met in all studies, the noninferiority criterion was met. Prospective phase II studies of hypofractionation reported a low rate of acute and late toxicity. In randomized phase III studies, acute and late toxicity grade 3 and higher for the bowel and bladder was comparable between hypofractionated and conventional radiotherapy. The included meta-analyses showed no difference in efficacy and toxicity. CONCLUSION: Moderate hypofractionation is feasible and safe, and may be considered as an alternative option in low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients.