A Novel Method for Repositioning Suboptimally Preoperatively Placed Nephrostomy Tubes for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Without Renal Repuncture.

Objective: Nephrostomy tubes (NTs) inserted in emergency settings by interventional radiologists are frequently unsuitable for subsequent percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). We report a novel method of adjusting these NTs to be used as PCNL tracts and avoid renal repuncture. Patients and Methods: A retrospective search of 981 consecutive PCNLs performed in our institution between 2002 and 2017 identified all patients with preoperatively inserted NTs. The NTs unsuitable for PCNL were adjusted by a novel approach in which a 5-mm incision was made at the ideal puncture location (IPL) as indicated under fluoroscopic guidance. The preinserted NT was removed after passing a guidewire into the kidney. A dissector clamp was introduced through the entry wound of the removed NTs to bluntly dissect a retroperitoneal tunnel and pull out the distal tip of guidewire through the IPL, while its proximal segment was maintained in the kidney. The newly positioned guidewire was used for PCNL tract preparation without repuncturing the kidney. Results: The NTs were located in the mid calix, lower calix, and renal pelvis in 6 (26%), 13 (57%), and 4 (17%) cases, respectively. The NT was suitable for PCNL in 5 (22%) cases, a new renal access was performed in 3 (13%), and the novel adjustment approach was used in 15 (65%), all successfully. The place of entry was moved an average of 6 cm (range 47) and the angle between the tract axis and the calix axis was reduced by 65° in average. The procedure was done uneventfully in an average of 4 minutes. Conclusions: The novel method of adjusting preoperatively inserted NTs for PCNL by repositioning their original entry location to the IPL offers the possibility of avoiding kidney repuncture. It is feasible, safe, and easy to implement, and it spares potential morbidity related to additional puncturing of the kidney.

Toward Respiratory-Gated Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: A Prospective Controlled Randomized Study.

INTRODUCTION: We set out to investigate whether general anesthesia with low ventilation (LV, respiratory rate ≤8/minute and tidal volume <500 mL) could reduce renal mobility and thereby facilitate improved retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) compared with general anesthesia with standard ventilation (SV). MATERIALS AND METHODS: All 60 consecutive patients who presented for RIRS in our department from September 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017 were prospectively randomized 1:1 into one group that was selected to receive SV and another that received LV. Significant factors influencing the study endpoints considered fragmentation rate (FR), removal rate (RR), processing rate (PR), and operating rate (OR), were statistically analyzed for the whole group as well as for comparison by level of surgeon expertise. RESULTS: Univariate analysis revealed that LV was a significant factor in improving all endpoints. Some endpoints were also affected by the stone's volume, number, and density as well as the surgeon expertise. LV remained the single independent factor for FR, RR, and PR in the multivariate analysis. LV significantly improved all four of the fellows' endpoints (p < 0.05 for each) and positively influenced the expert's RR (p = 0.04), PR (p = 0.02) and OR (p = 0.04). The performance gap between the fellows and the experts narrowed under LV. The end-tidal CO2 was significantly higher in the LV group (50 vs 36 mm Hg; p < 0.0001), however, without any clinical significance. The overall stone-free rate (97%) and complication rate (5%) were not significantly different between the two groups. The patient's anesthesia-related safety was not affected by the mode of ventilation as evidenced by no need to convert from LV to SV during the procedures. CONCLUSIONS: LV during RIRS has a significant positive impact on the overall improvement of surgical performance and effectiveness. It does not negatively affect the patient's anesthesia-related safety and may contribute to considerably improving the performance of in-training endourologists.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy prior to Radical Prostatectomy for Patients with High-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.

High-risk prostate cancer represents a pretentious clinical problem since a significant number of its patients will relapse and progress after radical prostatectomy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be valuable since its efficacy in hormone-resistant prostate cancer has been established. In this paper, we report studies of neoadjuvant chemotherapies that have been used in high-risk patients prior to radical prostatectomy. Even though the results regarding the prognostic surrogates are not significant, the effects on clinical and pathological outcomes are promising, while toxicity in most of the studies is in the expected field.