Identification and characteristics of patients with potential difficult-to-treat Psoriatic Arthritis: exploratory analyses of the Greek PsA registry.

OBJECTIVE: To present the characteristics of patients with potential difficult-to-treat (D2T) psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: We used data from the Greek multicentre registry of PsA patients. D2T-PsA was defined as follows: patients with at least 6-months disease duration, who have failed to at least 1 csDMARD and at least 2 bDMARDs/tsDMARDs with a different mechanism of action and have either at least moderate disease activity (MODA) defined as DAPSA > 14, and/or are not at minimal disease activity (MDA). Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between D2T and non-D2T PsA patients. In two sensitivity analyses, patients classified as D2T solely according to the MODA or MDA criterion were examined separately. RESULTS: Among 467 patients included, 77 (16.5%) were considered D2T and 390 non-D2T PsA. Compared with non-D2T, patients with D2T PsA presented more commonly with extensive psoriasis (p< 0.0001) and were more likely to have higher BMI (p= 0.023) and a history of inflammatory bowel disease (p= 0.026). In the MODA and MDA sensitivity analyses, 7.5% and 12.5% of patients were considered D2T, respectively. In both sensitivity analyses, extensive psoriasis was again identified as an independent variable for D2T PsA (p= 0.001 and p= 0.008, respectively). Moreover, female gender (p= 0.034) in the MODA analysis and axial disease (p= 0.040) in the MDA analysis were independent variables for D2T PsA. CONCLUSION: Despite the availability of therapies, D2T PsA is common in real-life cohorts of patients with PsA and extensive psoriasis. High BMI, female gender, axial-disease, and history of IBD were also associated with D2T PsA.

Interleukin-1 Blockers: A Paradigm Shift in the Treatment of Recurrent Pericarditis.

Recurrent pericarditis is a problematic clinical condition that impairs the quality of life of the affected patients due to the need for repeated hospital admissions, emergency department visits, and complications from medications, especially glucocorticoids. Unfortunately, available treatments for recurrent pericarditis are very limited, including only a handful of medications such as aspirin/NSAIDs, glucocorticoids, colchicine, and immunosuppressants (such as interleukin-1 (IL-1) blockers, azathioprine, and intravenous human immunoglobulins). Until recently, the clinical experience with the latter class of medications was very limited. Nevertheless, in the last decade, experience with IL-1 blockers has consistently grown, and valid clinical data have emerged from randomized clinical trials. Accordingly, IL-1 blockers are a typical paradigm shift in the treatment of refractory recurrent pericarditis with a clearly positive cost/benefit ratio for those unfortunate patients with multiple recurrences. A drawback related to the above-mentioned medications is the absence of universally accepted and established treatment protocols regarding the full dose administration period and the need for a tapering protocol for individual medications. Another concern is the need for long-standing treatments, which should be discussed with the patients. The above-mentioned unmet needs are expected to be addressed in the near future, such as further insights into pathophysiology and an individualized approach to affected patients.

Health-related quality of life in patients with ANCA vasculitides compared to rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional comparative study.

OBJECTIVES: There are limited data regarding health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitides (AAVs). We aimed to evaluate the HRQoL in patients with AAVs and compare it to another chronic inflammatory disease like RA and to healthy controls (HC). METHODS: This was a multicentre, cross-sectional study of patients with AAVs and RA recruited from three tertiary rheumatology clinics. HRQoL was assessed with the Short Form 36 Health Survey, which included the physical and mental component summary scores (PCS and MCS). Data from 1007 HC served as historical controls. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients with AAVs and 71 with RA were included. Both AAV and RA patients had significantly lower PCS and MCS scores compared with HC (P < 0.05). HRQoL in AAV patients was worse in patients with microscopic polyangiitis compared with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (physical components) and those with high (VDI ≥ 3) vs low (VDI < 3) damage scores while it did not differ between those with active (BVASv3 ≥ 1) vs. inactive (BVASv3 < 1) disease. In contrast, in RA patients, HRQoL correlated both with disease activity (assessed by the DAS28-ESR) and functional impairment/damage (assessed by the HAQ). Although overall patients with RA had similar HRQoL compared with those with AAVs, those with active RA had worse HRQoL compared with those with active AAV. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with AAVs, HRQoL correlated more with organ damage and less with disease activity whereas in RA patients, it correlated with both. These data emphasize the need for AAV therapies aiming at preventing organ damage and thus improving HRQoL.

Sustained cell-mediated but not humoral responses in rituximab-treated rheumatic patients after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2.

OBJECTIVES: B-cell depleting monoclonal antibodies are associated with increased COVID-19 severity and impaired immune response to vaccination. We aimed to assess the humoral and cell mediated (CMI) immune response after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in rituximab (RTX)-treated rheumatic patients. METHODS: Serum and whole blood samples were collected from RTX-treated rheumatic patients 3-6 months after last vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. Serum was tested by ELISA for quantitative detection of anti-spike SARS-CoV-2 IgG. Cell-mediated variant-specific SARS-CoV-2 immunity (CMI) was assessed by interferon-γ release assay Covi-FERON FIA. Patients were interviewed for breakthrough COVID-19 infection (BTI) 3 months post sampling. RESULTS: Sixty patients were studied after a median (IQR) of 179 (117-221.5) days from last vaccine to sampling. Forty (66.7%) patients had positive Covi-FERON and 23 (38.3%) had detectable anti-spike IgG. Covi-FERON positive patients had lower median RTX cumulative dose [6 (4-10.75) vs 11 (6.75-14.75) grams, (P = 0.019)]. Patients with positive anti-spike IgG had received fewer RTX cycles [2 (2-4) vs 6 (4-8), P = 0.002] and cumulative dose [4 (3-7) vs 10 (6.25-13) grams, P = 0.002] and had shorter time from last vaccination to sampling [140 (76-199) vs 192 (128-230) days, P = 0.047]. Thirty-seven percent were positive only for Covi-FERON and 7% only for anti-spike IgG. Twenty (33.3%) BTI occurred post sampling, exclusively during Omicron variant predominance. The proportion of patients with CMI response against Delta variant was lower in patients who experienced BTI (25% vs 55%, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Four out of ten RTX-treated vaccinated patients show lasting cell-mediated immune response despite undetectable anti-spike antibodies. Cumulative RTX dose affects both humoral and cell-mediated responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Cell-mediated immune responses call for attention as a vaccine efficacy marker against SARS-CoV-2.

Omicron variant dominance and anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination are key determinants for a milder course of COVID-19 in patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to determine whether the introduction of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and the dominance of the omicron variant had a significant impact on the outcome of COVID-19 in patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SAIRDs). METHODS: Using data entered to the Greek Rheumatology Society COVID-19 registry, we investigated the incidence of hospitalization and death due to COVID-19, during the successive periods of the pandemic according to the prevalent strain (wild-type, Alpha, Delta, Omicron) in vaccinated and unvaccinated patients. Variables independently associated with hospitalization and death were explored using multivariate regression analyses, while Kaplan-Meier curves were used to depict survival data. RESULTS: From August 2020 until June 30, 2022, 456 cases (70.2% females) of COVID-19 with a mean age (± SD) of 51.4 ± 14.0 years were reported. In unvaccinated patients, the proportions of hospitalization and death were 24.5% and 4%, compared to 12.5% and 0.8% in the vaccinated group (p < 0.001 for both comparisons). The rates of hospitalization for the wild-type, Alpha, Delta, and Omicron periods were 24.7%, 31.3%, 25.9%, and 8.1% respectively (p < 0.0001), while the case fatality rates were 2.7%, 4%, 7%, and 0%, respectively (p = 0.001). Using multivariable regression analysis, factors independently associated with hospitalization were infection by a non-Omicron variant, being non-vaccinated, exposure to rituximab, older age, and respiratory and cardiovascular disease. Independent predictors for death were contracting COVID-19 during the Alpha or Delta period, pulmonary disease, and older age, while being vaccinated was protective. CONCLUSIONS: In this 2-year analysis, the rates of hospitalization and death among patients with SAIRDs have declined significantly. Vaccination and the dominance of the Omicron variant appear to be the major determinants for this shift. Key points • During the late phase of the pandemic, the proportion of severe COVID-19 cases, defined as requiring hospitalization or resulting in death, in patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases has declined. • Anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and the dominance of the Omicron strain are the key factors that have independently contributed to this shift.

Pulmonary-Renal Syndrome During COVID-19 Pandemic Revealed a Rare Case of Anti-GBM Disease.

Anti-GBM disease is a rare, life-threatening small vessel vasculitis caused by circulating anti-GBM antibodies resulting to rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis and/or pulmonary haemorrhage. The gold standard for the diagnosis is the renal biopsy with the pathognomonic finding of linear deposition of IgG along the glomerular capillaries. Early diagnosis and intervention are key determinants of the response to therapy and long-term prognosis of these patients. However, during COVID-19 pandemic recognizing a pulmonary-renal syndrome caused by autoimmune diseases has become challenging. Herein, we aimed to describe a rare case of anti-GBM disease with pulmonary haemorrhage and rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis in a young man in a tertiary referral hospital in Greece, while COVID-19 pandemic was at its peak. Although the patient presented high level of creatinine and crescents, the early diagnosis and start of treatment resulted to favourable renal prognosis.

Ixekizumab therapy following secukinumab inadequate response in psoriatic arthritis: a case series focusing on axial disease.

There are limited data regarding cycling between interleukin-17 (IL-17) inhibitors in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). We aimed to report the efficacy of an IL-17 inhibitor (ixekizumab-IXE) after inadequate response (IR) of another one (secukinumab-SEC) in patients with PsA. Case series of PsA patients who received IXE after SEC-IR in four rheumatology centers between 1/9/2021 and 1/9/2022 were included. Peripheral arthritis was assessed with disease activity in psoriatic arthritis score (DAPSA) and skin involvement with body surface area (BSA). Axial disease was defined as having both imaging and clinical features and its activity was measured with the ankylosing spondylitis disease activity score (ASDAS). Twenty-four patients (54.2% female, mean [SD] age: 51.6 [14.1]) who were SEC-IR and received IXE either immediately (n = 11) or after ≥ 1 interposed biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) (n = 13) were included. Patients were followed on IXE for a mean [SD] period of 9.6 [4.9] months. Among patients with peripheral arthritis (n = 24), the mean [SD] DAPSA decreased from 22.8 [8.6] to 13.6 [7.8] during follow-up (p = 0.0001) with 62.5% of patients showing improvement in the DAPSA disease activity categories. For patients with axial involvement (n = 16), a clinically meaningful improvement (Δ ≥ 1.1 in ASDAS) was noted in 50% (8/16), while dactylitis and enthesitis resolution was observed in 60% (3/5) and 83% (5/6) of patients, respectively. Regarding psoriasis, the mean [SD] BSA of involved skin decreased from 8.7 [8.7] to 2.4 [3.3] (p = 0.001). In this case series, treatment with IXE after inadequate response to another IL-17 inhibitor (SEC) was efficacious in a real-world setting in patients with PsA, including axial disease.

Disease Profile and Achievement of Therapeutic Goals in a Modern, Nationwide Cohort of 923 Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis.

Background: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a heterogenous chronic inflammatory disease affecting skin, joints, entheses, and spine with various extra-musculoskeletal manifestations and comorbidities. The reported patient, disease and treatment characteristics in the modern therapeutic era are limited. Methods: In this cross-sectional, multi-centre, nationwide study, we recorded the demographic, clinical, and therapeutic characteristics as well as the comorbidities of patients with PsA seen for 1 year (1/1/2022-31/12/2022). Results: 923 patients (55% females) with a median (IQR) age of 57 (48-65) years and a mean disease duration of 9.5 years were enrolled. Family history of psoriasis and PsA was noted in 28.3% and 6.3%, respectively. Most patients had limited psoriasis (BSA<3: 83%) while enthesitis, dactylitis, nail and axial involvement reported in 48.3%, 33.2%, 43% and 25.9% of patients, respectively. Regarding comorbidities, approximately half of patients had dyslipidaemia (42%) or hypertension (45.4%), 36.8% were obese and 17% had diabetes while 22.7% had a depressive disorder. Overall, 60.1% received biologics and among them more patients treated with anti-IL-17 or -12/23 agents were on monotherapy (64.2%) compared to those on TNFi monotherapy (49.4%, p=0.0001). The median PsA activity as assessed by the DAPSA score was 6 (IQR: 2.3 - 13.1) with 46% of patients reaching minimal disease activity status (MDA). Conclusion: In this large, real life, modern cohort of patients with PsA with frequent comorbidities who were treated mainly with biologics, almost half achieved minimal disease activity. These results show the value of existing therapeutic approaches while at the same time highlight the existing unmet needs.

Patient characteristics, treatment patterns and disease outcomes in patients with psoriatic arthritis followed in a combined Dermatology-Rheumatology clinic: a retrospective real-world study.

The aim of this study was to assess the patient characteristics, treatment patterns and disease outcomes in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) referred to a combined Dermatology-Rheumatology (Derm-Rheum) Clinic. This was a retrospective study of patients seen in a combined Derm-Rheum Clinic (February 2018 to June 2020) in a Tertiary University Hospital. Consecutive patients with suspicious musculoskeletal symptoms or a known diagnosis of PsA referred to the Derm-Rheum Clinic were examined and followed simultaneously by experienced dermatologists and rheumatologists. Among 151 patients with psoriasis (PSO) with suspicious musculoskeletal complaints, 129 (85%) with a final diagnosis of PsA were included (56% females, mean age: 55 years, median disease duration: 14.2 years). In 62% of these patients (n = 94), PsA was diagnosed for the 1st time. At initial evaluation, 95% had peripheral arthritis, 45% nail involvement, 23% axial involvement, 12% enthesitis and 6% dactylitis with a median DAPSA and PASI scores of 20.5 and 1.6, respectively. 31% of the patients were not receiving any systemic treatment, 45% were on biologics, 29% on non-biologics and 10% on targeted synthetic agents (apremilast). At last visit (median interval time: 15 months), only 8% did not receive any systemic therapy (p < 0.001 compared to 1st visit), 62% were on biologics (p = 0.009 compared to 1st visit), 46% on non-biologics (p = 0.01 compared to 1st visit) and 10% remained on apremilast. The median DAPSA and PASI scores decreased significantly to 5.3 and 0, respectively. In conclusion, about 2/3 of patients with PSO and musculoskeletal complaints referred to a combined Derm-Rheum Clinic were diagnosed for the 1st time with PsA. During follow-up, the percentage of PsA patients on systemic therapies significantly increased with major improvement of disease activity indices. These data emphasize the value of combined Derm-Rheum Clinics for earlier referral, diagnosis, and more effective treatment of PsA patients.

Better outcomes of COVID-19 in vaccinated compared to unvaccinated patients with systemic rheumatic diseases.

OBJECTIVE: Τo report outcomes of breakthrough COVID-19 in comparison with COVID-19 in unvaccinated patients with systemic rheumatic diseases (SRDs). METHODS: Patients with SRD with COVID-19 (vaccinated and unvaccinated) were included by their rheumatologists in a registry operated by the Greek Rheumatology Society in a voluntarily basis. Type, date and doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were recorded, and demographics, type of SRD, concurrent treatment, comorbidities and COVID-19 outcomes (hospitalisation, need for oxygen supplementation and death) were compared between vaccinated and unvaccinated patients. RESULTS: Between 1 March 2020 and 31 August 2021, 195 patients with SRD with COVID-19 were included; 147 unvaccinated and 48 vaccinated with at least one dose of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (Pfizer n=38 or AstraZeneca n=10). Among vaccinated patients, 29 developed breakthrough COVID-19 >14 days after the second vaccine dose (fully vaccinated), while 19 between the first and <14 days after the second vaccine dose (partially vaccinated). Despite no differences in demographics, SRD type, treatment or comorbidities between unvaccinated and vaccinated patients, hospitalisation and mortality rates were higher in unvaccinated (29.3% and 4.1%, respectively) compared with partially vaccinated (21% and 0%) or fully vaccinated (10.3% and 0%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Vaccinated patients with SRD with breakthrough COVID-19 have better outcomes compared with unvaccinated counterparts with similar disease/treatment characteristics.

Kinetics of quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen in patients with rheumatic disease and chronic hepatitis B receiving biologic agents.

The effect of biologic treatment on quantitative Hepatitis B surface Antigen (qHBsAg) levels and HBsAg clearance in rheumatic patients with chronic HBV infection has not been well studied. We prospectively followed rheumatic patients with HBeAg-negative chronic HBV infection (n = 28) treated with biologics and oral antivirals, categorized into patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB, group A n = 13) and chronic HBV infection (group B n = 15) and matched them to appropriate non-rheumatic controls. qHBsAg kinetics were serially measured and compared between groups. No HBV reactivation (HBVr) was recorded during the 108.25 patient-year follow-up. Among patients with CHB, the annual rapid qHBsAg decline (i.e. decline >0.5 log10  IU/mL/year) as well as HBsAg clearance did not differ between rheumatic patients [n = 4 (32.7%), n = 1 (7.7%)] and controls [n = 6 (28.4%), p = .726 and n = 2 (7.7%), p = .818, respectively]. In contrast, there was a slower annual qHBsAg decline in rheumatic patients with chronic HBV compared to non-rheumatic controls (-0.04 vs -0.13 log10  IU/mL at year 1, p = .019) with no cases of rapid qHBsAg decline or HBsAg clearance in rheumatic patients (0%) compared to a cumulative incidence of 24% and a rate of 20%, respectively in controls. In biologic-treated rheumatic patients with HBeAg-negative HBV receiving antiviral prophylaxis, there was slower qHBsAg decline, lower cumulative rates of rapid qHBsAg decline and HBsAg clearance compared to non-rheumatic controls.

The Rheumatologist's Role in the Battle Against COVID-19: Insights from the Front Line and Challenges for the Future.

As the worldwide burden of COVID-19 increases exponentially, healthcare systems are plagued by unprecedented pressure. In this setting, many rheumatologists across the globe have been recruited to support the front line, facing several unexpected challenges, but also providing valuable skills in combating COVID-19. At the same time, the rheumatic disease patient population may be especially vulnerable to such a rapidly contagious infectious disease and thus needs care and support that has to be provided quickly and efficiently. Clear advice on viral spread mitigation, precise guidelines on immunosuppressive treatment use and alternative methods of providing care, such as telemedicine, are a few of the rheumatologists' new challenges in caring for their patients in the COVID-19 era. Finally, among other specialties, rheumatologists hold a unique place in the fight against the hyper-inflammatory state caused by severe SARS-CoV-2 infection, leading to increased morbidity and mortality. Given their vast experience in the use of biologic and targeted therapies, rheumatologists should lead the way in developing reliable scientific evidence for the optimal treatment of severe COVID-19.

Correlation of patient preferences to treatment outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in Greece.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate possible associations between rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patient-expressed preferences over anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) treatment and clinical and patient-reported outcomes. METHODS: PANORAMA was a non-interventional, prospective, multicentre, cohort study of 12 months duration, in patients with moderate-to-severe RA who initiated or switched to anti-TNF treatment. After initiation of anti-TNF, patients completed a preferences questionnaire on attributes related to anti-TNF treatment. Satisfaction with treatment was assessed with the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM); compliance and persistence to treatment were recorded via a patient diary. Univariate and multivariate analyses were applied to assess correlations between patients' preferences over treatment with clinical and patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 254 patients were enrolled; 66.1% (168/254) had highly active disease (DAS28-ESR > 5.1), while 65.4% (166/254) were biological-naïve. The 12-month drug-survival rate was 72.3%, while the respective rates of good EULAR response and remission (DAS28-ESR < 2.6) were 56.5% and 40.8%, respectively. By univariate analysis, fulfilment of patient preferences over treatment was associated with increased probability of remaining on therapy (p = 0.019), good EULAR response (p < 0.001) and satisfaction with treatment (p < 0.001). By multivariate analysis, fulfilment of patient preferences was the most important predictor for good EULAR response (OR 5.56, p < 0.001; finding confirmed and after propensity scoring matching), while seropositivity (HR 1.18, p = 0.047) and a high ESR (> 35 mm/h, HR 1.16, p = 0.071) predicted drug survival. CONCLUSIONS: In anti-TNF-treated RA patients, fulfilment of treatment preferences was independently associated with a good EULAR response and correlated with drug persistence at 12 months, emphasising the importance of patient preferences in treatment outcomes. Key Points • In anti-TNF treated RA patients, fulfilment of patients' treatment preferences is associated with a good clinical response at 12 months. • A shared decision-making process can maximise treatment's outcome in anti-TNF treated patients.

Conversion and Reversion Rates of Tuberculosis Screening Assays in Patients With Rheumatic Diseases and Negative Baseline Screening Under Long-Term Biologic Treatment.

BACKGROUND: To determine the conversion and reversion rates of tuberculosis (TB) screening tests (Tuberculin Skin Test-TST, Interferon Gamma Release Assay-IGRA: T-SPOT.TB) during biologic treatment in patients with rheumatic diseases and negative baseline screening. METHODS: This was a long-term, longitudinal cohort study of 50 patients with rheumatic diseases and negative baseline TB screening (TST: < 5 mm, negative T-SPOT.TB) treated with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) or other non-TNFi biologics. Patients were rescreened at a mean time of 1.4 (first rescreening) and 6.9 (second rescreening) years from baseline, with both assays. The conversion (negative to positive) and reversion (positive to negative) rate was calculated for each TB screening test. RESULTS: Fifty patients (mean age = 60 years) with various rheumatic diseases (rheumatoid arthritis: n = 24, spondyloarthropathies: n = 23, other: n = 3) were enrolled. During the first phase (baseline to first rescreening), all patients were treated with TNFi while during the second phase (first to second rescreening), TNFi (54%) and non-TNFi (46%) were used. Fifteen patients (30%) displayed conversion of at least 1 screening assay during follow-up (10 at the first and 5 at the second rescreening). This conversion rate was higher with TST (n = 11, 22% or 3.47/100 patient-years) compared to T-SPOT.TB (n = 4, 8% or 1.74/100 patient-years). Among the 10 converters at the first rescreening, 5 received isoniazid (INH) preventive therapy and 5 did not; an equal number of patients (3/5, 60%) reverted to negative with or without INH therapy. None of the patients developed active TB during follow-up (6.9 ± 1.0 years). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one-third of patients with rheumatic diseases and negative baseline TB screening developed conversion of at least 1 screening test during long-term biologic treatment. This occurred most often with TST and was usually a transient event. These findings do not support routine serial TB retesting in biologic-treated patients with rheumatic diseases in the absence of TB risk factors.

Reactivation of hepatitis B virus infection in rheumatic diseases: risk and management considerations.

In patients with rheumatic diseases undergoing immunosuppressive treatment, hepatitis B virus reactivation (HBVr) has been long recognized as a major treatment-related adverse event with substantial morbidity and mortality. Because HBVr is easily preventable with appropriate screening and monitoring strategies, and, when indicated, prophylactic antiviral treatment, awareness of this complication is of the utmost importance, especially in the era of biologic treatments. As a condition, it continues to be topical, in view of the emergence of novel classes of immunosuppressive drugs (i.e. Janus kinase inhibitors) acquiring licenses for a variety of rheumatic diseases. The class-specific risk of these agents for HBVr has not yet been determined. Moreover, ambiguity still exists for the management of patients planned to be treated with traditional agents, such as cyclophosphamide and glucocorticoids, particularly in the setting of resolved HBV infection. Clinicians in the field of rheumatic diseases should be tailoring their practice according to the host's profile and treatment-specific risk for HBVr. In this review, the authors attempt to critically review the existing literature and provide practical advice on these issues.

High 3-year golimumab survival in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis: real world data from 328 patients.

OBJECTIVES: Our primary objective was to study the long-term survival on drug (SOD) of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) treated with golimumab (GLM) in real life settings. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational study of all patients treated with GLM in 4 Academic Centres in Greece during a 4-year period (09/2010-06/2014). SOD was analysed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, while Cox regression analysis estimating hazard ratios (HRs) for different baseline variables associated with drug discontinuation was performed for each disease. RESULTS: 328 patients (RA: 166, PsA: 82, AS: 80) were included. The estimated SOD at 2 and 3 years was 68% and 62% overall and was better for AS (79% and 76%) compared to RA (69% and 60%, p=0.067) and PsA (58% and 53%, p=0.001) patients; no difference was noted between RA and PsA patients (p=0.204). There was no difference in SOD between biologic-naïve and experienced nor between non-biologic co-treated or GLM monotherapy treated patients. Seropositivity (rheumatoid factor and/or anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies) was associated with a lower risk for GLM discontinuation by multivariate analysis (HR=0.5, 95% CI=0.0.25-1.1, p=0.05) in RA patients. During 606 patient-years of follow-up, 11 (3.3%) patients discontinued GLM due to adverse events (AE), accounting for 11% of treatment discontinuations. The rates of serious AEs and serious infections were 2.3 and 1.0/100-patient-years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-life study, GLM showed a high 3-year SOD in patients with inflammatory arthritides with a low rate of discontinuation due to AEs.

Hepatitis B Reactivation in Rheumatic Diseases: Screening and Prevention.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation (HBVr) has been an increasingly recognized and appreciated risk of immunosuppressive therapies in rheumatic patients. Despite its potential for significant morbidity and mortality, HBVr is a fully preventable complication with appropriate pretreatment screening and close monitoring of susceptible patients. Better knowledge of the risk for HBVr with the different antirheumatic agents and the establishment of the new-generation oral antivirals in clinical practice has greatly improved the design of screening and therapeutic algorithms. In this review, all available data regarding HBVr in rheumatic patients are critically presented and a screening and therapeutic algorithm is proposed.

Increased Frequency of Peripheral B and T Cells Expressing Granulocyte Monocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients.

OBJECTIVES: Granulocyte monocyte colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) is currently considered a crucial inflammatory mediator and a novel therapeutic target in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), despite the fact that its precise cellular sources remain uncertain. We studied the expression of GM-CSF in peripheral lymphocytes from RA patients and its change with antirheumatic therapies. METHODS: Intracellular GM-CSF expression was assessed by flow cytometry in stimulated peripheral B (CD19+) and T (CD3+) cells from RA patients (n = 40), disease (n = 31 including osteoarthritis n = 15, psoriatic arthritis n = 10, and systemic rheumatic diseases n = 6) and healthy (n = 16) controls. The phenotype of GM-CSF+ B cells was assessed as well as longitudinal changes in GM-CSF+ lymphocytes during methotrexate (MTX, n = 10) or anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF, n = 10) therapy. RESULTS: Among untreated RA patients with active disease (Disease Activity Score 28-C-reactive protein = 5.6 ± 0.89) an expanded population of peripheral GM-CSF+ B (4.1 ± 2.2%) and T (3.4 ± 1.6%) cells was detected compared with both disease (1.7 ± 0.9%, p < 0.0001 and 1.7 ± 1.3%, p < 0.0001, respectively) and healthy (0.3 ± 0.2%, p < 0.0001 and 0.6 ± 0.6%, p < 0.0001) controls. RA GM-CSF+ B cells displayed more commonly a plasmablast or transitional phenotype (37.12 ± 18.34% vs. 14.26 ± 9.46%, p = 0.001 and 30.49 ± 15.04% vs. 2.45 ± 1.84%, p < 0.0001, respectively) and less a memory phenotype (21.46 ± 20.71% vs. 66.99 ± 16.63%, p < 0.0001) compared to GM-CSF- cells. GM-CSF expression in RA patients did not correlate to disease duration, activity or serological status. Anti-TNF treatment led to a statistically significant decrease in GM-CSF+ B and T cells while MTX had no significant effect. DISCUSSION: This is the first study showing an expanded population of GM-CSF+ B and T lymphocytes in patients with active RA which declined after anti-TNF therapy.

Prevention of HBV reactivation in patients treated with biologic agents.

Owing to the sensitive equilibrium between the hepatitis B virus (HBV) and the host's immune system in infected and exposed individuals, the immunosuppression caused by biologic treatment has been strongly linked to HBV reactivation (HBVr). HBVr in the setting of biologic therapy is a cause of considerable morbidity, hospitalization, interruption of treatment and mortality. However, recent literature has established that this is a largely preventable problem. Thus, it is essential for clinicians using biologic agents to be aware of HBVr potential and screen all susceptible patients. The risk for HBVr may vary depending on the host's HBV infection status and the potency of immunosuppression. The appropriate pre-emptive antiviral prophylaxis or monitoring for individuals at risk is emphasized in the latest evidence-based guidelines, but a number of unanswered questions remain.