Risk Factors for Unexpected Admission Following Lumbar Spine Laminectomy: A National Database Study.

Introduction Laminectomy is one of the most common orthopedic spine surgeries performed in the United States. Compared to other spine operations such as fusions, laminectomies in isolation are of lower morbidity. However, complications may arise that result in readmission to an inpatient healthcare facility. The purpose of this study is to identify the demographics and risk factors associated with unplanned 30-day readmission following a laminectomy. Methods The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was queried for patients who underwent a laminectomy procedure from 2015 to 2019 using CPT code 63030. This query yielded 61,708 cases. Demographic, lifestyle, comorbidity, and peri-operative factors were recorded. Independent samples Student's t-tests, chi-squared, and, where appropriate, Fisher's exact tests were used in univariate analyses to identify demographic, lifestyle, and peri-operative variables related to 30-day readmission following a laminectomy procedure. Multivariate logistic regression modeling was subsequently performed. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated and reported. Results Of the 61,708 patients included in our sample, 2,359 were readmitted within 30 days of surgery, corresponding to a readmission rate of 3.82%. Results of the univariate analysis revealed statistically significant relationships between readmission status and the following patient variables: patient age, sex, BMI, ASA classification, race, bleeding disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes, hypertension, congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic steroid use, total operative time, and tobacco use (p < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression modeling confirmed that the following patient variables were associated with statistically significantly increased odds of readmission: age greater than 65 (p < 0.05), female sex (p = 0.013), bleeding disorder (p = 0.011), diabetes (p = 0.006), current smoker (p = 0.010), COPD (p < 0.001), steroid use (p = 0.006), ASA Class II or above (p < 0.05), and total operative time (p < 0.001). Conclusion Unplanned 30-day readmission after laminectomy is infrequent. However, increasing age, female sex, steroid use, current smokers, bleeding disorders, diabetes, COPD, CHF, a higher ASA classification, and longer operative times are independent risk factors for readmission following laminectomy.

Effect of Pedicle Screw Size on Surgical Outcomes Following Surgery for 412 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Review. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine differences in surgical and post-operative outcomes in AIS patients undergoing spinal deformity correction surgery using standard or large pedicle screw size. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND: Use of pedicle screw fixation in spinal deformity correction surgery is considered safe and effective. Still, the small size of the pedicle and the complex 3D anatomy of the thoracic spine makes screw placement challenging, with improper pedicle screw fixation leading to catastrophic complications including injuries to nerve roots, spinal cord, and major vessels. Thus, insertion of larger diameter screw sizes has raised concerns amongst surgeons, especially in the pediatric population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: AIS patients undergoing PSF between 2013 and 2019 were included. Demographic, radiographic, and operative outcomes collected. Patients in the large screw size group (GpI) received 6.5 mm diameter screw sizes at all levels while standard screw size group (GpII) received 5.0 to 5.5 mm diameter screw sizes at all levels. Kruskall-Wallis and Fisher's exact test performed for continuous and categorical variables respectively.Subanalyses included (1) screw accuracy in patients with available CT scans, (2) stratified analysis of large- and standard-screw patients with ≥60% flexibility rate, (3) stratified analysis of large- and standard-screw patients with <60% flexibility rate, and (4) matched analysis of large- and standard-screw patients by surgeon and year of surgery. RESULTS: GpI patients experienced significantly higher overall curve correction ( P <0.001), with 87.6% experiencing at least one grade reduction of apical vertebral rotation from preoperative to postoperative visit( P =0.008).Patients with larger screws displayed higher postoperative kyphosis. No patient experienced medial breaching. CONCLUSION: Large screw sizes have similar safety profiles to standard screws without negatively impacting surgical and perioperative outcomes in AIS patients undergoing PSF. Additionally, coronal, sagittal, and rotational correction is superior for larger-diameter screws in AIS patients.

Peroneus Longus and Peroneus Brevis: A Review on Pathology and Updated Treatments.

¼: Peroneus longus (PL) and peroneus brevis (PB) pathologies involve a variety of etiologies and degrees of dysfunction, which complicates their diagnoses. ¼: Patient presentation includes a spectrum of disease; however, despite advanced imaging, a misunderstanding of the pathology and diagnostic algorithms has contributed to continued misdiagnoses. ¼: This article summarizes the anatomy and the pathophysiology of the PL and the PB; it also provides updated treatment options and their associated outcomes in order to illuminate an often-misunderstood topic.

Scheuermann Kyphosis Patients Have a Similar Revision and Infection Rate to Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients.

STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective review. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to address major postoperative complications associated with Scheuermann kyphosis (SK) when compared with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) in a large population matched by demographic characteristics, levels fused and operative technique. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Prior studies have found that SK patients are 3.86 times more likely to experience major postoperative complications than in AIS. Historically, however, these studies have often had populations that were significantly different between the two groups in terms of disease severity, demographics, and small sample sizes. METHODS: AIS patients were compared to SK patients between 2006 and 2018 contemporaneously. All surgeries were conducted by six surgeons among two institutions. Complications and revisions were calculated. A sub-analysis comparing SK and AIS patients by age, sex, and levels-fused in one-to-one matched pairs was performed as well as a sub-analysis matched by levels fused only in one-to-one matched pairs. RESULTS: One thousand three hundred twenty two patients were reviewed (1222 AIS; 100 SK). There were 52 (4.3%) complications in the AIS group compared with 20 (20%) complications in the SK group (P < 0.001), with infections and revisions consisting of the majority of complication rates in both cohorts.When matched by age, sex, and levels fused, there were eight complications in the AIS group and 11 in the SK group (P = 0.63), with infection and revision rates being similar, (P = 0.29) and (P = 0.26) respectively.When matched by levels fused only, EBL, operative time and complication rates remained similar (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Contrary to previously published literature, our analyses indicate that in a matched population, postoperative complication rates (i.e., infection and revision rates) are not significantly different between SK and AIS patients.Level of Evidence: 4.

A cross-sectional analysis of 284 complications for lumbar disc replacements from medical device reports maintained by the United States Food and Drug Administration.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Lumbar disc replacement (LDR) is a motion sparing procedure for degenerative disc disease. When compared to lumbar fusion, this procedure may reduce complications, reoperations, operative time, and length of stay. However, the extent of overall complications related to LDR has not been well defined in the literature. PURPOSE: Demonstrate the complication profile of popular LDR implants reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database review. PATIENT SAMPLE: Nationwide database of reported complications related to LDR products from patients throughout the country. OUTCOME MEASURES: Complications related to LDR. METHODS: Data files from January 1, 2004 to April 1, 2021 were queried using the publicly accessible Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database and Alternative Summary Reporting program. Three LDR ("Charité," "Prodisc-L," and "Activ L") products were analyzed for complications. Data collected included the date the reports were received by the FDA, the type of complication, complication event description, and the source of the report. The complication event description was utilized to determine the completion of the investigation. Entries with insufficient information were excluded. Complications were further divided into two categories, device and non-device related. RESULTS: A total of 431 complication entries were found between January 1, 2004, and April 1, 2021. After screening for duplicates and events with insufficient information there were 284 total complications. The total complications were then further divided into implant and non-implant related. The five most common overall complications were lumbar pain (49 entries, 17.25%), migration of implant (42 entries, 14.78%), polyethylene dislodged (37 entries, 13.0%), insertion of device problem (37 entries, 13.0%), device handling problem (12 entries, 4.22%). The most common implant related complication, along with the number of MAUDE entries for each implant was migration of implant for Charité (n=6); Migration of implant for ActivL (n=24); Polyethylene dislodged for ProdiscL (n=32). Of the 284 total complications analyzed, 86 (30.28%) of the entries were deemed "investigation completed." The majority of reports were submitted from the manufacturer and company representative (66.2%, 14.8 % respectively). There were no entries related to LDR within the Alternative Summary Reporting search. CONCLUSIONS: This study outlined the complications of LDR implants from the MAUDE database which have not always been highlighted in previously published studies. The findings of this study provide insight into the potential targets for improvement in future LDR design and surgical techniques to reduce complications and ensure the safe utilization of these implants.

Risk factors for hospital admission in patients undergoing outpatient anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A national database study.

INTRODUCTION: Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions (ACLR) are routinely performed in an outpatient setting with low 90-day readmission rates (2.3%); however, admissions rates in the immediate perioperative period have been previously reported as high as 13.1%. Despite the surprisingly high number of patients requiring immediate perioperative admission, there has been a lack of recent literature specifically examining the associated risk factors for admission. METHODS: Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database, a query for patients who underwent ACLR from 2011 through 2018 was performed using Current Procedural Terminology codes. The following concomitant procedures were included: meniscectomy, meniscal repair, diagnostic arthroscopy, loose body removal, synovectomy, chondroplasty, abrasion chondroplasty, drilling for osteochondritis dissecans. Demographics including age, sex, race, body mass index (BMI) and comorbidities were collected. Perioperative factors collected were anesthesia type and operative times. Patient demographic and perioperative data were compared using Fisher's exact test and Pearson's chi-square test. Multivariate logistic regressions were used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of independent risk factors for postoperative admission. Holm-Bonferroni method yielded adjusted p-value thresholds for significance. RESULTS: Of the 20,819 patients undergoing ACLR with and without concomitant procedures, 3.8% of patients were admitted to the hospital in the immediate postoperative period. Following multivariate regression analysis, increased odds of admission were demonstrated with the use of regional anesthesia alone (OR = 2.77, 95%CI: 2.22-3.44; p < 0.001), increasing concurrent procedures (Table 1), and obesity classes II (OR = 1.62, 95%CI: 1.26-2.10; p < 0.001) and III (OR = 1.81, 95%CI: 1.33-2.47; p < 0.001). Subsequent subgroup analysis of the isolated ACLR procedures (N = 9,423) demonstrated a 3.3% postoperative admission rate. Multivariate regressions demonstrated increased odds of admission with regional anesthesia use only (OR = 2.62, 95%CI: 1.90-3.60; p < 0.001), obesity class II (OR = 2.22, 95%CI: 1.51-3.26; p < 0.001), and increasing minutes of operative time (OR = 1.01, 95%CI: 1.01-1.01; p < 0.001). Table 2 demonstrates increasing rates and odds of admission with increasing operative time in hours. CONCLUSION: Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions are routinely performed in an outpatient setting; nevertheless, a subset of ACLR patients is admitted postoperatively. We found an increased risk of admission with the use of regional anesthesia alone, increasing concurrent procedures and obesity classes II and III. A further understanding of patient risk factors for those undergoing ACLR allows orthopedic surgeons to better develop a preoperative plan and discuss patient expectations, which will lead to more efficient resource allocation and improved patient satisfaction.