Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho ; 34(11): 1819-25, 2007 Nov.
Article in Japanese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18030016

ABSTRACT

In many medical institutes the treatment for advanced (not resectable or radical grade C) or recurrent gastric cancer seems to be based on a regional perspective or prognostic restriction, and rarely on large-scale clinical studies; instead the selection is based on effective cases reported in the literature or on own.s own. In the current situation, chemotherapy using new anti-cancer drugs since S-1 has actually appeared to improve the prognosis or to maintain better QOL. We examined 46 cases (28 advanced (not resectable or radical grade C) cases and 18 recurrent cases after curative operation) during the period from January 2001 to December 2005. In 27 chemotherapy cases (1-year survival 52.5%, 2-year survival 31.5%, 3-year survival 19.5%, and MST=344 day), the survival time was significantly extended compared to 19 cases without chemotherapy (1-year survival 10.5% and MST=102 day) (p<0.0001). In the 27 chemotherapy cases, between 5 performance status (PS) 0 cases and 8 PS 1 cases, there was no significant difference in survival. But in 12 PS 2 cases, survival was significantly shorter smaller than that of PS 0 or PS 1 cases (p<0.05, p<0.001). Also, the period in the hospital during survival time of 6 cases, 2-year survival or more, was significantly shorter than that of 10 less than 1-year survival cases treated with chemotherapy. These findings led us to conclude that chemotherapy using new anti-cancer drug since S-1 showed excellent QOL in addition to longer survival benefits at the present time, when a standard treatment for to advanced or recurrent gastric cancer has not yet been established. It seemed that prognostic improvement by maintaining further excellent QOL could be expected if standard treatments based on the results of large-scale clinical studies were established.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Oxonic Acid/administration & dosage , Stomach Neoplasms/drug therapy , Tegafur/administration & dosage , Aged , Camptothecin/administration & dosage , Camptothecin/analogs & derivatives , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Combinations , Female , Humans , Irinotecan , Male , Methotrexate/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Paclitaxel/administration & dosage , Quality of Life , Stomach Neoplasms/mortality , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Survival Rate
2.
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho ; 29(10): 1765-71, 2002 Oct.
Article in Japanese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12402427

ABSTRACT

The purpose of the present multi-center collaborative study was to elucidate the efficacy of intraportal chemotherapy with the combination of 5-FU and MMC for the prevention of liver recurrence after resection for colorectal cancer. A total of 125 patients with Stage II, III, and IV colorectal cancer were enrolled in this study between June 1993 and December 1995. Of them, 45 patients were randomized to a portal group: 10 mg/body of mitomycin one shot portal infusion, before and after 500 mg/m2 of 5-FU per 24 h for 7 days portal infusion followed by administration of oral 5-FU. Fifty-three patients were randomized to a control group: oral administration of 5-FU. Twelve patients suffered from temporary mild liver damage. One patient (2%) in the portal group and 6 patients (11%) in the control group developed liver metastases; there was not a significant difference between these two groups regarding development of liver metastases. There was also no significant difference by tumor stage between the portal and control groups regarding development of liver metastases. The 5-year survival rate and 5-year disease-free survival were 84.3% and 81.9%, respectively, in the portal group, and 70.7% and 72.4%, respectively, in the control group; the difference was not significant. Although there was not a significant difference between the portal and control groups regarding the prognosis in stage II, there was a significant difference between the portal and control groups regarding the 5-year disease free survival in stage III (81.1% vs 54.2%). These results suggest that intraportal chemotherapy is effective for stage III colorectal cancer.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Liver Neoplasms/prevention & control , Adult , Aged , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Colorectal Neoplasms/mortality , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Liver Neoplasms/mortality , Liver Neoplasms/secondary , Male , Middle Aged , Mitomycins/administration & dosage , Portal Vein , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Survival Rate
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...