Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Ann Hematol ; 102(12): 3587-3591, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37783854

ABSTRACT

Since 2006, combined graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with ATG Grafalon has been our department's base of peri-transplant supportive care. This recent retrospective study included 398 patients who underwent their first allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation after receiving a defined dose of ATG Grafalon. Our observations recorded reduced incidence of severe acute and chronic GVHD without negative impact on overall survival in a nonselected group with standard and uniform GVHD prophylaxis.


Subject(s)
Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome , Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Incidence , Graft vs Host Disease/epidemiology , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Graft vs Host Disease/prevention & control , Transplantation, Homologous/adverse effects , Antilymphocyte Serum/therapeutic use , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Transplantation Conditioning/adverse effects
2.
Hematol Oncol ; 40(2): 280-286, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35120267

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 significantly impairs survival rates among hematological patients when compared to the general population. Our prospective multicentre project analyzed early administration of anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (NmAbs) - bamlanivimab (72%) and casirivimab/imdevimab (28%) - efficacy among hematological patients with early-stage COVID-19. Mortality rate was compared to a control cohort of 575 SARS-CoV-2 positive hematological patients untreated with any specific anti-COVID-19 therapy. 88 hematological patients with lymphomas, acute leukemias, and myeloma as their most frequent underlying diagnoses (72%) were evaluated with a 97 days median follow-up after NmAb administration. One third of patients (32%) were treated with an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody before COVID-19 diagnosis. Median time between first COVID-19 symptom and NmAb administration was 2 days. When administering NmAb, 29%, 57%, 11%, 2%, and 1% of our patients had asymptomatic, mild, moderate, severe, and critical degrees of COVID-19, respectively. 80% of baseline asymptomatic patients remained asymptomatic following NmAb administration. Median duration of COVID-19 symptoms after NmAb administration was 2.5 days. Progression to severe/critical COVID-19 occurred among a total of 17% (15/88) of our cases and numerically higher with bamlanivimab versus casirivimab/imdevimab (21% vs. 8%; p = 0.215), and myelomas (29%), lymphomas (17%) and acute leukemias (18%), respectively. During final follow-up, nine deaths (10%) were recorded - all after bamlanivimab (p = 0.056) with 8% attributed to COVID-19. Regarding "remdesivir/convalescent plasma naïve" patients, COVID-19 mortality rates were significantly lower in our NmAbs treated cohort compared to the control cohort of untreated SARS-CoV-2 positive hematological patients (6% vs. 16%, p = 0.020), respectively. Our study validated the safety and efficacy of NmAbs early use among hematological patients with newly diagnosed early-stage COVID-19 in terms of alleviating infection course and decreasing mortality. Results confirmed a more positive effect of a casirivimab/imdevimab combination versus bamlanivimab monotherapy.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Antibodies, Neutralizing , COVID-19/therapy , COVID-19 Testing , Czech Republic , Humans , Immunization, Passive , Prospective Studies , COVID-19 Serotherapy
3.
Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove) ; 64(2): 71-76, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34331425

ABSTRACT

Caries incidence and prevalence have decreased significantly over the last few decades due to widespread use of fluoride. However, an increase in the prevalence of dental fluorosis has been reported in both fluoridated and non-fluoridated communities. Care must be taken to ensure that a balance between the optimal fluoride preventive effect at the individual and community level and minimal risk of dental fluorosis is maintained. This review describes the main sources of fluoride intake that have been identified: fluoridated drinking water, dietary fluoride supplement, and topical forms comprising toothpastes, rinses, gels and varnishes. The cited data were taken from meta-analytic studies and reports from Cochrane database systematic reviews up to December 2019. Efficiency, but safety, of topically applied fluorides in individual home care is dependent on the degree of compliance of individuals/parents and on the level of competence of providers of preventive counselling. The broad spectrum of these resources allows individualization of fluoride prevention based on risk analysis of caries attack and taking into consideration other preventive measures.


Subject(s)
Dental Caries/prevention & control , Fluorides, Topical/administration & dosage , Fluorides, Topical/adverse effects , Fluorosis, Dental/etiology , Dentifrices , Dietary Supplements , Fluoridation , Fluorosis, Dental/prevention & control , Home Care Services , Humans , Mouthwashes
4.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31311179

ABSTRACT

Dental care under general anaesthesia (GA) is an option when normal treatment cannot be accomplished due to un-cooperation and systemic or cognitive/intellectual disabilities. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to analyse the dental treatment under GA in medically compromised and healthy children. The data were collected from the medical records of children who received their dental treatment under GA. The data regarding patient age, sex, general health, and type of treatment were analysed. This clinical trial included 229 study subjects (138 males, 91 females) with an average age of 8.34 (SD 3.78). Counts and relative counts were used for description of qualitative data. The association between the variables was analysed using contingency tables. The significance of the findings was tested by the chi-square test. Most of the children were older pre-school 63 (27.51%) and young school children 102 (44.54%). Medical disability (systemic or intellectual) was diagnosed in 142 children (62.01%); the remaining 87 (37.99%) were healthy children. Dental treatment of primary teeth was more commonly performed in healthy children (65.52%) compared to medically compromised children (58.45%) (p = 0.287). The total number of medically compromised children and the total number of healthy children were both considered to be 100% for the purpose of the following calculations. In terms of permanent dentition, medically compromised children required more extractions and fillings (38.03%, 57.04%) compared to healthy children (14.94%, 17.24%, respectively). The results of this study revealed that dental treatment under GA was more commonly performed in medically compromised children in permanent teeth only in comparison to healthy children. Based on these findings, both health professionals and state authorities should focus more on preventive care in medically compromised children in order to improve their oral health.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Dental/statistics & numerical data , Anesthesia, General/statistics & numerical data , Dental Care for Children/methods , Facilities and Services Utilization/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Case-Control Studies , Child , Child Health , Child, Preschool , Chronic Disease , Czech Republic , Dental Care for Children/statistics & numerical data , Female , Health Status , Humans , Male , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...