Early ambulation following 6 French diagnostic left heart catheterization: a prospective randomized trial.

Outpatient cardiac catheterization is frequently performed, but the optimal recovery time after sheath removal has not been defined. Left heart catheterization was performed via the femoral artery utilizing 6 French catheters on 323 outpatients. One hundred thirty-five patients were randomized to ambulate at a mean of 2.5 hr (group 1) after puncture site compression, whereas 188 patients were randomized to ambulate at a mean of 4.1 hr (group 2). Telephone follow-up occurred within 48 hr. A small hematoma (< 5 cm) occurred in 2 (1.6%) patients in group 1 and in 4 (2.4%) patients in group 2. These results indicate that it is safe to ambulate patients 2.5 hr following 6 French diagnostic heart catheterization.

Thrombolysis plus aortic counterpulsation: improved survival in patients who present to community hospitals with cardiogenic shock.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to explore the potential benefit of combining intraaortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP) with thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction (MI) complicated by cardiogenic shock. BACKGROUND: In community hospitals, this condition is usually managed with thrombolysis alone. METHODS: We reviewed the charts of 335 patients from two community hospitals who presented with acute MI and had cardiogenic shock between 1985 and 1995. RESULTS: Of 46 patients who underwent thrombolysis within 12 h of acute infarction with confirmed cardiogenic shock, 27 underwent IABP and 19 did not. Age, systolic blood pressure with shock, pulmonary artery catheter use, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and the incidence of diabetes mellitus and anterior MI did not differ between groups. Patients treated with IABP were somewhat more likely to have prior MI and had a significantly greater cardiac index (2.0 vs. 1.5 liters/min per m2, p = 0.04). Although no deaths occurred within 2 h of presentation, patients not treated with IABP tended to die earlier (6.8 +/- 5 vs. 23.8 +/- 19 h, p = 0.13). Patients treated with IABP had a significantly higher rate of community hospital survival (93% vs. 37%, p = 0.0002), and more of them were transferred for revascularization (85% vs. 37%). Of 30 patients transferred for revascularization, 27 underwent angioplasty or bypass surgery; hospital survival was 74%. Patients treated with IABP also had a significantly higher overall hospital and 1-year survival rate (67% vs. 32%, p = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: Survival may be enhanced and transfer for revascularization facilitated when community hospitals use both thrombolysis and IABP to treat patients with acute MI complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Unstable angina: clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis and management. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research.

Unstable angina is one of the most common reasons for hospital admission in the United States and causes substantial morbidity and mortality. Diagnosis of unstable angina is complicated by the dynamic range of presentations, which can vary between atypical chest pain and acute myocardial infarction. Overcautious management can result in unnecessary hospital admission, whereas inappropriate conservative strategies can cause cardiac injury and death. To define treatment strategies for these patients, the US Agency for Health Care Policy and Research in March 1994 published guidelines on the diagnosis and management of unstable angina. The emphasis is on diagnosis or exclusion of coronary artery disease, establishment of the patient's risk for adverse outcome, and triage to the most appropriate treatment regimen. The guidelines emphasize the use of aspirin, heparin sodium, nitroglycerin, and beta-blockers as the core therapy. Appropriate strategies are reviewed, starting with intensive medical management and ending with patient care after discharge. Many physicians will probably modify their approach to the diagnosis and treatment of unstable angina on the basis of these new guidelines.