Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and tolerability of single-dose fingolimod (FTY720) in adolescents with stable renal transplants.

Oral fingolimod signals the sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor and this in turn mediates immunomodulatory activity. No data of fingolimod in any pediatric population existed before this study. We put our study results in perspective against data from adult renal transplant patients. We investigated pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of single-dose fingolimod (0.07 mg/kg) and its effects on lymphocytes and heart rate in seven adolescents (14.1 ± 1.6 yr) with stable renal transplants. Blood samples for pharmacokinetics and lymphocytes were collected at screening, baseline, and up to 28 days post-dosing. Cardiac monitoring included 12-lead ECG, 24-h Holter monitoring, and echocardiography. A fingolimod dose of 0.07 mg/kg resulted in mean AUC of 731 ± 240 ng·h/mL and C(max) of 3.6 ± 0.6 ng/mL. Drug exposure was nearly identical to adults receiving the same dose. Absolute lymphocyte count decreased 85% from baseline; average nadir occurred by six h post-dose. Heart rate decreased from 74 bpm (predose mean) to 53 bpm (nadir) three h post-dose. Mean heart rates recovered by Day 14 (75 bpm). Weight-adjusted doses of fingolimod in adolescents resulted in drug exposure similar to adults. Adolescents and adults shared comparable negative chronotropic effects and decreased lymphocyte count. Recovery trajectories of these parameters back to baseline were similar between age groups.

Sotrastaurin and everolimus pharmacokinetics after single-dose coadministration.

INTRODUCTION: Sotrastaurin is an immunosuppressant that blocks T-lymphocyte activation via protein kinase C inhibition. The authors determined whether a pharmacokinetic interaction occurs between sotrastaurin and everolimus, both of which are substrates and inhibitors of CYP3A4. METHODS: This was a randomized, three-period, crossover study in 18 healthy subjects. They received single oral doses of (1) 100 mg sotrastaurin, (2) 2 mg everolimus, and (3) the drug combination. Clinical and pharmacokinetic data were collected to Day 5 after each treatment. RESULTS: Coadministration of everolimus decreased sotrastaurin C(max) from 638 +/- 295 to 539 +/- 211 ng/ml yielding a combination/ monotherapy ratio (90% confidence interval) of 0.87 (0.76 - 1.00). Sotrastaurin total AUC was not altered by everolimus with values of 3660 +/- 1853 versus 3630 +/- 2006 ng*h/ml and a ratio of 1.00 (0.88 - 1.13). Sotrastaurin increased everolimus C(max) from 15 +/- 6 to 16 +/- 6 ng/ml yielding a ratio of 1.15 (0.99 - 1.33) and increased everolimus total AUC from 114 +/- 50 to 137 +/- 56 ng*h/ml yielding a ratio of 1.20 (1.05 - 1.37). The possibility that a higher dose of sotrastaurin than used in this study might further increase everolimus blood levels cannot be excluded. CONCLUSIONS: Coadministration of a single 100 mg dose sotrastaurin with a single 2 mg dose everolimus did not alter sotrastaurin pharmacokinetics to a clinically relevant extent. Everolimus AUC was increased 20% by sotrastaurin.

Ethnic sensitivity study of fingolimod in white and Asian subjects.

OBJECTIVE: The authors compared the pharmacokinetics and pharmacological effects of the immunomodulator fingolimod in healthy white and Asian subjects for potential ethnic differences. METHODS: White and Asian (Japanese) healthy subjects were demographically matched for sex, age and weight. Subjects received single 1.25 mg doses of fingolimod (6 ethnic pairs), 2.5 mg (7 pairs), 5 mg (6 pairs) or 5 mg/day for 7 days (6 pairs). The pharmacokinetics of fingolimod, major metabolites, peripheral blood lymphocyte counts and heart rate were characterized over 1 month after single-dose and 2 months after multiple-dose administration. RESULTS: There were no clinically relevant differences in the fingolimod dose Cmax or dose AUC relationships between Asian subjects (slopes 0.84 and 1.05) versus white subjects (slopes 1.13 and 1.26) after single-dose administration. During multiple-dose administration, there were no clinically relevant interethnic differences in fingolimod accumulation ratios (6.6 +/- 0.4 for whites, 7.0 +/- 0.7 for Asians), area under the concentration-time curve (390 +/- 73 versus 382 +/- 106 ng x h/ml), or elimination half-life (7.4 +/- 0.8 versus 7.9 +/- 2.0 days). The acute decrease in lymphocyte counts after single- and multiple-dose fingolimod were similar in the two ethnic groups. The lymphocyte recovery rate to baseline after a 5 mg single dose and 5 mg/day multiple dose was reduced by 36 and 15% in Asian subjects compared with white subjects. The transient, acute decrease in heart rate after the first dose of fingolimod and the subsequent return to baseline was similar in the two ethnic groups. CONCLUSION: There were no marked differences between healthy white and Asian subjects in fingolimod single-dose and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics, lymphocyte trafficking and heart rate responses.

Differential pharmacokinetic interaction of tacrolimus and cyclosporine on everolimus.

OBJECTIVE: We characterized the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus and everolimus in a combined immunosuppressive regimen. METHODS: This was an open-label exploratory trial in eight maintenance renal transplant patients with calcineurin inhibitor intolerance initially receiving mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and tacrolimus. At enrollment, MMF was discontinued and replaced with everolimus 1.5 mg twice a day in study period 1 (days 1 to 10). In period 2 (day 11 to month 3), tacrolimus dose was reduced by half. RESULTS: At study entry tacrolimus trough level (C0) was 7.9 +/- 3.9 ng/mL and area under the curve over a dosing interval (AUC) was 132 +/- 56 ng x h/mL. The addition of everolimus in period 1 did not change tacrolimus exposure: C0 8.4 +/- 4.0 ng/mL, AUC 134 +/- 70 ng x h/mL. Everolimus pharmacokinetics in the presence of tacrolimus in period 1 were: C0 3.3 +/- 1.2 ng/mL, Cmax 10.4 +/- 5.1 ng/mL, AUC 58 +/- 20 ng x h/mL. When compared to pharmacokinetic data from a previous study in 47 renal transplant patients receiving everolimus at the same fixed dose (1.5 mg twice a day) with cyclosporine, everolimus exposure was 2.5-fold higher with cyclosporine relative to the data in this study with tacrolimus. After tacrolimus dose reduction in period 2, there was no clinically relevant change in everolimus exposure: C0 3.0 +/- 1.1 ng/mL, Cmax 8.2 +/- 1.3 ng/mL, AUC 49 +/- 10 ng x h/mL. CONCLUSIONS: Tacrolimus appears to have a minimal effect on everolimus blood levels compared with the influence of cyclosporine. The dose of everolimus when combined with tacrolimus needs to be higher than when combined with cyclosporine in order to reach a given everolimus blood level.

Exposure-efficacy relationships of a fingolimod-everolimus regimen in kidney transplant patients at risk for delayed graft function.

OBJECTIVE: We explored relationships between blood levels of fingolimod (FTY720) and everolimus versus treated biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) in an open-label trial in de novo kidney transplant recipients. METHODS: Patients (n = 52) who fulfilled predefined criteria placing them at increased risk of delayed graft function received fingolimod 2.5 mg/d, everolimus 2 mg twice daily with trough blood levels (C0) adjusted to 4 to 8 ng/mL, and corticosteroids. Everolimus and fingolimod C0 were collected over 1 year; efficacy readout was at 3 months. RESULTS: Fingolimod C0 accumulated over the first 3 months with a time-averaged level (C0avg) of 5.7 +/- 3.5 ng/mL. At steady state in months 3 to 12, C0 was 7.0 +/- 4.4 ng/mL. Overall, 30 patients (58%) were free from BPAR to month 3. Patients were divided into four groups based on whether their fingolimod C0avg and everolimus C0avg were above or below the population medians. Freedom from BPAR was 53% and 57% for low fingolimod combined with low and high everolimus, whereas the percentages were improved to 83% and 85% for high fingolimod combined with low and high everolimus. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study with an everolimus-fingolimod regimen demonstrated trends in freedom from rejection that were drug concentration-related and that underscored, in particular, a strong contribution to efficacy from fingolimod.

Pharmacokinetic interaction between verapamil and everolimus in healthy subjects.

AIMS: We sought to define the influence of verapamil, an inhibitor of CYP3A and P-glycoprotein, on the pharmacokinetics of everolimus, a substrate of this enzyme and transporter. METHODS: This was a two-period, single-sequence, crossover study in 16 healthy subjects. In period 1 subjects received a single 2 mg oral dose of everolimus. In period 2 they received verapamil 80 mg three times daily for a total of 6 days and a single 2 mg dose of everolimus co-administered on the second day of verapamil therapy. RESULTS: During verapamil co-administration, everolimus C(max) increased 2.3-fold (90% CI, 1.9, 2.7) from 21 +/- 8 to 47 +/- 18 ng ml(-1) and AUC increased 3.5-fold (90% CI, 3.1, 3.9) from 115 +/- 45 to 392 +/- 142 ng ml(-1) h. Everolimus half-life was only prolonged to a minor extent (32 +/- 6 vs. 37 +/- 6 h). Verapamil predose concentrations doubled from 32 +/- 16 to 74 +/- 42 ng ml(-1) after single dose administration of everolimus. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple dosing with verapamil increased blood concentrations of everolimus after a single dose by an average 3.5-fold. During verapamil treatment, dose reduction for everolimus should be made guided by blood monitoring and for verapamil by blood pressure monitoring.

Blood concentrations of everolimus are markedly increased by ketoconazole.

The authors sought to quantify the influence of the CYP3A and P-glycoprotein inhibitor ketoconazole on the pharmacokinetics of everolimus in healthy subjects. This was a 2-period, single-sequence, crossover study in 12 healthy subjects. In period 1, subjects received the reference treatment of a single 2-mg dose of everolimus. In period 2, they received the test treatment of ketoconazole 200 mg twice daily for a total of 8 days and a single dose of everolimus coadministered on the fourth day of ketoconazole therapy. The test/reference ratio and 90% confidence interval were derived for everolimus maximum concentration and area under the curve. During ketoconazole coadministration, everolimus maximum concentration increased 3.9-fold (90% confidence interval, 3.4-4.6) from 15 +/- 4 ng/mL to 59 +/- 13 ng/mL. Everolimus area under the curve increased 15.0-fold (90% confidence interval, 13.6-16.6) from 90 +/- 23 ng*h/mL to 1324 +/- 232 ng*h/mL. Everolimus half-life was prolonged by 1.9-fold from 30 +/- 4 hours to 56 +/- 5 hours. Everolimus did not appear to alter ketoconazole predose concentrations. Given the magnitude of this drug interaction, use of ketoconazole should be avoided if possible in everolimus-treated patients.

Effect of multiple-dose erythromycin on everolimus pharmacokinetics.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to quantify the influence of the CYP3A inhibitor erythromycin on the pharmacokinetics of everolimus, a CYP3A substrate. METHODS: This was a two-period, single-sequence, crossover study in 16 healthy subjects. In period 1, subjects received the reference treatment of a single 2-mg dose of everolimus. In period 2, they received the test treatment of erythromycin 500 mg three times daily for a total of 9 days and a single 2-mg dose of everolimus coadministered on the fifth day of erythromycin therapy. The test/reference ratio and 90% confidence interval (CI) were derived for everolimus C (max) and AUC. RESULTS: During erythromycin coadministration, everolimus C (max) increased 2.0-fold (90% CI, 1.8-2.3) from 20+/-5 ng/ml to 40+/-10 ng/ml. Everolimus AUC increased 4.4-fold (90% CI, 3.5-5.4) from 116+/-37 ng h/ml to 524+/-225 ng h/ml. Everolimus half-life was prolonged by 39% from 32+/-6 h to 44+/-6 h. Erythromycin predose concentrations were not changed after single-dose administration of everolimus. CONCLUSION: Multiple-dose erythromycin increased single-dose everolimus blood levels by an average 4.4-fold (range, 2.0-12.6). During erythromycin treatment, a compensatory everolimus dose reduction should be made guided by everolimus therapeutic drug monitoring.

FTY720 pharmacokinetics in mild to moderate hepatic impairment.

The influence of mild and moderate hepatic impairment on FTY720 pharmacokinetics was assessed. The authors enrolled 32 subjects consisting of 8 with mild and 8 with moderate hepatic impairment based on Child-Pugh criteria and 16 demographically matched control subjects. A single 1-mg oral dose of FTY720 was administered under fasting conditions. Blood, plasma, and urine samples were obtained over a 14-day period for measurement of FTY720 and metabolite concentrations and protein binding. Total blood lymphocyte counts and heart rate were serially monitored to assess pharmacologic responses to FTY720. Peak FTY720 blood concentrations were similar across groups. Oral clearance (CL/F) was reduced 10% in mild hepatic impairment (P = .493) and 31% in moderate hepatic impairment (P = .034). There were no significant differences in blood exposure to the hexanoic or butanoic acid metabolites among groups. The effect of FTY720 on blood lymphocytes was similar across groups, with a mean decrease of 44% from the predose value. Like-wise, the effect of FTY720 on supine heart rate was similar across groups, with a mean 13% decrease from the predose rate occurring 2 to 4 hours postdose and recovering within 1 to 2 days. Although hepatic impairment elicited changes in the disposition of FTY720, the magnitude of these changes suggests that the FTY720 dose does not need to be adjusted in mild or moderate hepatic-impaired patients.

Cyclosporine absorption profiles in pediatric kidney and liver transplant patients.

Cyclosporine absorption profiling uses either the area under the concentration curve in the first 4 h post dose, AUC(0-4), or the concentration 2 h post dose (C2) to optimize immunosuppression in adult kidney and liver transplantation. We characterized C2 versus AUC(0-4) relationships over time after transplant and across transplant indications in 56 pediatric transplant patients. There were 36 kidney transplant patients aged 9.7+/-3.9 years. Nineteen of these patients were studied in the de novo period on day 7 post transplant and 17 in the maintenance phase more than 1 year post transplant. In addition, 20 liver transplant patients aged 8.9+/-4.2 years were studied in the maintenance phase. All patients had five blood samples collected over the 12-h dose interval that were analyzed by validated assay methods at a central laboratory. Pediatric C2 values were 1,463+/-658 ng/ml for de novo kidney, 954+/-322 ng/ml for maintenance kidney, and 619+/-339 ng/ml for maintenance liver transplant patients. C2 was a strong predictor of AUC(0-4) in all three pediatric groups, with coefficients of determination ( r(2)) ranging from 0.861 to 0.936. Although data were limited from the de novo period, the C2 versus AUC(0-4) regression was consistent over time after transplant and between transplant indications, with a regression slope of 2.50 in de novo kidney, 2.54 in maintenance kidney, and 2.76 in maintenance liver transplant recipients. These slopes were also comparable to that in adult maintenance kidney transplant patients (2.60). In conclusion, C2 versus AUC(0-4) relationships demonstrated consistency over time (de novo vs. maintenance phase), between transplant indications (kidney vs. liver), and across age groups (pediatric vs. adult patients). Average C2 values achieved with current pediatric cyclosporine dosing practices cluster around the target C2 ranges recommended for adults.

Single-dose pharmacokinetics and tolerability of everolimus in stable pediatric renal transplant patients.

Everolimus (Certican; RAD), a novel macrolide with potent immunosuppressive and anti-proliferative activities, prevents acute rejection in adult recipients of renal transplantation. This phase I trial conducted in stable pediatric renal transplant patients examined the single-dose pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of everolimus in combination with cyclosporin A (CsA; Neoral) and corticosteroids, with or without azathioprine. Nineteen pediatric patients were enrolled and received a single 1.2 mg/m2 dose of everolimus. Everolimus was safe and well tolerated, with a low incidence of adverse events reported and none judged to be related to the study medication. Everolimus administration did not increase infection rates or produce clinically significant changes in vital signs or changes in electrocardiograms. Apparent clearance and volume of distribution of everolimus increased with age, weight, and body surface area in a generally linear manner across the pediatric demographic ranges. Compared with adults from a previous study, apparent clearance (L/h) and distribution volume (L) were lower in pediatric patients, whereas the elimination half-life was similar. Single-dose everolimus co-administration did not affect the steady-state pharmacokinetics of CsA. Based on this information, pediatric patients will need a dose scaled down for body size, but can probably maintain the same twice-daily dosing schedule used in adults.

Influence of hepatic impairment on everolimus pharmacokinetics: implications for dose adjustment.

OBJECTIVE: We assessed the influence of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of the immunosuppressant everolimus to provide dose recommendations for clinical use. METHODS: In this open-label, single-dose, case-control study, 8 subjects with liver cirrhosis classed as moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh score, 7-9) and 8 demographically matched healthy control subjects received a single oral 2-mg dose of everolimus. Routine safety assessments were made, and blood samples were taken for determination of everolimus concentrations and protein binding. RESULTS: The apparent clearance of everolimus was significantly reduced by 53% in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment compared with healthy subjects (9.1 +/- 3.1 versus 19.4 +/- 5.8 L/h). This was manifested by a 115% higher area under the blood concentration-time curve (AUC) (245 +/- 91 versus 114 +/- 45 ng. h/ml) and 84% prolonged half-life (79 +/- 42 versus 43 +/- 18 hours) in subjects with hepatic impairment. The rate of absorption of everolimus was not altered by hepatic impairment on the basis of the maximum blood concentration (C(max)) and time to reach C(max) (t(max)). Protein binding was similar in the two groups (73.8% +/- 3.6% versus 73.5% +/- 2.4%). A significant positive correlation of the everolimus AUC with bilirubin level (r = 0.86) and a significant negative correlation with albumin concentration (r = 0.72) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The dose of everolimus should initially be reduced by half in patients with mild and moderate hepatic impairment on the basis of the Child-Pugh classification. Therapeutic monitoring would be a helpful adjunct to subsequent titration of everolimus exposure in this subpopulation. Everolimus has not been assessed in patients with severe hepatic impairment.

Population pharmacokinetics of everolimus in de novo renal transplant patients: impact of ethnicity and comedications.

BACKGROUND: Everolimus is a macrolide immunosuppressant intended for acute rejection prophylaxis after kidney transplantation. METHODS: A total of 5260 blood samples were collected in the context of two randomized, double-blind, multicenter efficacy trials in 673 patients over a 6-month period after kidney transplantation. The data were evaluated in a nonlinear mixed-effects model. The influence of demographic characteristics (age, weight, sex, and ethnicity) and of comedications on everolimus exposure was explored. RESULTS: For a reference 44-year-old, 71-kg Caucasian kidney allograft recipient receiving everolimus as part of a cyclosporine (INN, ciclosporin)-prednisone immunosuppressive regimen, the absorption rate constant was 6.07 h(-1) (standard error [SE], 0.70 h(-1)), the apparent clearance was 8.8 L/h (SE, 0.2 L/h), and the apparent central distribution volume was 110 L (SE, 5 L). There were no clinically relevant influences of age, weight, or sex on clearance. No significant difference in clearance was detected for Asian patients, whereas black patients had an average clearance that was 20% higher than that of nonblack patients. Patients concomitantly receiving erythromycin or azithromycin had an average 19% lower clearance. One patient receiving itraconazole had a 74% reduction in clearance. After we accounted for covariates, the remaining interindividual variability in clearance was 27% and the variability for distribution volume was 36%. The combined intraindividual and assay/measurement residual error in everolimus blood concentrations was 31%. CONCLUSIONS: Dose adjustment of everolimus on the basis of weight does not appear necessary. Black patients may need a higher dose to achieve exposure that is similar to that of nonblack patients. Concomitant administration of potent inhibitors of the cytochrome P450 isozyme CYP3A may reduce everolimus clearance and increase its blood concentrations.

A population pharmacokinetic screen to identify demographic-clinical covariates of basiliximab in liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Basiliximab is a high-affinity interleukin-2 receptor (CD25) chimeric monoclonal antibody used for immunoprophylaxis in organ transplantation. It was assessed in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled efficacy trial in de novo liver allograft recipients who received 40 mg of basiliximab (20 mg on days 0 and 4) in addition to baseline immunosuppression with cyclosporine (INN, ciclosporin) microemulsion and corticosteroids. METHODS: Serial blood samples (8.3 +/- 1.4 per patient) were collected during 12 weeks after transplantation from 184 basiliximab-treated patients, and empirical Bayes estimates of each patient's disposition parameters were derived. Demographic-clinical covariates were explored with regression methods. RESULTS: Basiliximab clearance was 55 +/- 26 mL/h, the distribution volume was 9.7 +/- 4.2 L, and the half-life was 8.7 +/- 6.7 days. Patient weight, age, sex, ethnicity, history of alcoholism, hepatitis C seropositivity, and notable postoperative bleeding had no clinically relevant influences on basiliximab disposition; however, the cumulative volume of drained ascites fluid in the first week was positively correlated with clearance. Receptor-saturating basiliximab concentrations (> or =0.1 microg/mL) were maintained for 38 +/- 16 days, and this was negatively correlated with the cumulative volume of drained ascites fluid in week 1. Patients who experienced an acute rejection episode did not clear basiliximab at a faster rate than their rejection-free peers nor did they maintain CD25-saturating concentrations for a shorter period. CONCLUSIONS: Although the standard dose regimen of 20 mg of basiliximab on days 0 and 4 after transplantation appears to be appropriate for the majority of patients with liver transplants, a supplemental dose at the end of the first week may be considered for those with substantial (>10 L) postoperative ascites fluid drainage.

Differential influence of azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil on the disposition of basiliximab in renal transplant patients.

Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed in two multicenter trials in which basiliximab (anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody) was administered with triple immunosuppression consisting of cyclosporine microemulsion, corticosteroids, and either azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil. Blood samples were collected over 12 wk post-transplant from 31 azathioprine-treated and 66 mycophenolate mofetil-treated patients. Empirical Bayes estimates of each patient's basiliximab disposition parameters were derived and the duration of CD25 saturation was estimated as the time over which serum concentrations exceeded 0.2 microg/mL as confirmed by flow cytometry measurements. Basiliximab clearance was 29+/-14 mL/h when coadministered with azathioprine and 18+/-8 mL/h with mycophenolate mofetil. Both were significantly lower compared with a clearance of 37+/-15 mL/h from a previous study of basiliximab with dual therapy (p<0.001). As a consequence of the lower clearance of basiliximab, the durations of CD25 saturation were prolonged in the presence of azathioprine (50+/-20 d; range, 13--84) and mycophenolate mofetil (59+/-17 d; range, 28--94) compared with dual therapy (36+/-14 d; range, 12--91). A total of 27 acute rejection episodes occurred during the first 6 months in the two studies. Durations of CD25 saturation were not different in these patients compared with those who remained rejection-free in each study. A single patient among 57 who were screened developed anti-idiotype antibodies to basiliximab. The average duration of CD25 saturation was prolonged by 39 and 64% in the presence of azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil, respectively. This graded effect was also observed for basiliximab clearance and may be due in part to a differentially reduced humoral response to basiliximab. Nonetheless, the range of CD25 saturation durations and basiliximab clearances did not extend outside the range when basiliximab was used with dual therapy in the absence of these agents. Hence, no dosing adjustment is deemed necessary when basiliximab is used in triple immunosuppressive therapy including either azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil.

RAD in stable lung and heart/lung transplant recipients: safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and impact of cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: RAD is a novel macrolide with potent immunosuppressive and antiproliferative activities. This study characterizes the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of two different single oral doses of RAD in stable lung and heart/lung transplant recipients with and without cystic fibrosis (CF). METHODS: This was a Phase I, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, two-period, two-sequence, crossover study. Single doses of RAD capsules at doses of 0.035 mg/kg (2.5 mg maximum) or 0.10 mg/kg (7.5 mg maximum) were administered with cyclosporine (Neoral [cyclosporine, USP] modified), steroids, and azathioprine on Day 1. The alternate dose was administered on Day 16. Laboratory assessments, vital signs, and adverse events were recorded throughout the study. RAD pharmacokinetic profiles were assessed over a 7-day period following each dose. Steady-state cyclosporine (CsA) profiles were assessed at baseline and with each RAD dose; RAD and CsA trough concentrations were obtained throughout the study period. RESULTS: Of the 20 patients randomized, 8 had CF and 12 did not. Single doses of RAD were safe and well tolerated. Headache was the most common side effect. RAD produced a mild, dose-dependent, reversible decrease in platelet and leukocyte counts. Cholesterol and triglycerides were minimally affected. At both doses, CF patients had significantly lower peak concentrations of RAD than did non-CF patients (p = 0.03); however, overall exposure (area under the curve/dose) was not different between the groups (p = 0.63). At the higher dose, there was a clinically minor under-proportionality in AUC, averaging -11%. Steady-state pharmacokinetics of CsA were not affected by RAD co-administration.RAD was safe and well tolerated by stable lung and heart/lung transplant recipients with and without CF. The presence of CF did not influence the extent of RAD exposure. Single doses of RAD did not affect the pharmacokinetics of CsA. Ongoing studies are assessing the long-term safety and efficacy of RAD in lung and heart/lung transplantation.

Longitudinal assessment of everolimus in de novo renal transplant recipients over the first post-transplant year: pharmacokinetics, exposure-response relationships, and influence on cyclosporine.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to characterize the steady-state pharmacokinetics of everolimus and cyclosporine (INN, ciclosporin) when coadministered in de novo kidney allograft recipients during the first year after transplantation. METHOD: This study was a multicenter randomized double-blind study of 101 patients who were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive everolimus tablets at doses of 0.5 mg, 1 mg, or 2 mg twice daily with cyclosporine and prednisone. Blood sampling for the pharmacokinetics of everolimus and cyclosporine was performed on day 1, on weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4, and on months 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12. Everolimus dose-proportionality and stability over time were assessed in the context of linear regression and ANOVA models. Everolimus exposure-response relationships between area under the blood concentration-time curve (AUC) and changes in platelets, leukocytes, and lipids were explored with the median-effect model. Potential differences in cyclosporine dosing and pharmacokinetics at different levels of everolimus exposure were assessed in the context of ANOVA. RESULTS: Everolimus steady state was reached on or before day 7, with a median 3-fold accumulation of drug exposure compared with that after the first postoperative dose. Both steady-state maximum concentration and AUC were dose proportional over the full dose range when assessed on day 1, as well as for the full duration of the study at steady state. There was evidence for longitudinal stability in AUC of everolimus during the course of the study. The interindividual pharmacokinetic variability for AUC was 85.4% and intraindividual, interoccasion variability was 40.8%. Age (range, 17-69 years), weight (range, 49-106 kg), and sex (65 men and 36 women) were not significant contributors to variability. There was an increasing incidence of transient thrombocytopenia (< or =100 x 10(9)/L) with increasing everolimus AUC (P = .03). Cyclosporine doses, trough concentrations, and AUC exhibited similar temporal patterns during the course of the study regardless of the co-administered everolimus dose level (P = .13, .82, and .76, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Everolimus exhibited dose-proportional, stable exposure during the first post-transplant year. For a 4-fold range of everolimus doses there were no differential effects on cyclosporine dosing or pharmacokinetics.

Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of 40-0-[2-hydroxyethyl]rapamycin in de novo liver transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: 40-0-[2-Hydroxyethyl]rapamycin (RAD), a novel macrolide with potent immunosuppressive and antiproliferative activities, prevents rejection in animal allotransplantation models. This phase I trial assessed the effects of bile diversion, administration route, and time after transplant on RAD pharmacokinetics after single-dose administration in de novo liver allograft recipients. The influence of RAD on cyclosporine (CsA) pharmacokinetics and the safety of RAD were also evaluated. METHODS: Twenty-six de novo liver allograft recipients were assigned to one of four treatment groups based on the presence or absence of a T tube, administration route (nasogastric or nasoduodenal), and timing of RAD administration. Patients received a single 7.5-mg RAD dose on one to three occasions in addition to CsA (Neoral) and corticosteroids. Steady-state cyclosporine profiles with and without RAD coadministration were evaluated. Results. Recipients with bile diversion demonstrated lower peak concentration (Cmax) than those without, but overall drug exposure (AUC) was not altered. Cmax and AUC were not influenced by administration route. A trend towards higher Cmax on postoperative day 3 than on postoperative day 1 was noted, although AUC was not altered. Single-dose RAD coadministration did not affect steady-state CsA pharmacokinetics. RAD was well tolerated and caused few drug-related adverse effects. RAD administration did not increase infection rates or produce clinically significant changes in laboratory parameters. Conclusions. In de novo liver transplant recipients, the overall extent of RAD absorption was not influenced by bile diversion, administration route, or time of administration. CsA pharmacokinetics were not affected by single-dose RAD coadministration. RAD capsules administered in single doses of 7.5 mg were well tolerated and safe.