Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
J Am Acad Nurse Pract ; 6(8): 363-8, 1994 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7946643

ABSTRACT

Today's adolescent confronts a host of medical, social, and economic problems that have a significant impact on their lives as well as on society. The teenage population of the North Side area of the city of Pittsburgh is no exception. To address the needs of these teens a school-based clinic was established in one of the city's middle schools. It became known as the Allegheny Middle School/Allegheny General Hospital Wellness Center (AMS/AGH Wellness Center). Located on the school grounds, this clinic remained in operation during school hours. Student interest was obvious as they began using the services provided by the clinic immediately after its establishment. After only 1 school year of operation, nearly 60% of the student body was enrolled. The number of patient visits totaled 1086. Evidence from the literature attesting to the advanced skills, cost effectiveness, and holistic approach to patient care of nurse practitioners led to the selection of a family nurse practitioner as the primary health care provider for the middle school students. Other clinic staff include a part-time physician, ambulatory technician, secretary, and part-time psychiatric social worker. The establishment and operation of the Wellness Center is discussed in this article.


Subject(s)
Adolescent Health Services/organization & administration , Nurse Practitioners , School Health Services/organization & administration , Adolescent , Adolescent Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Female , Health Services Accessibility , Health Services Needs and Demand , Humans , Male , School Health Services/statistics & numerical data
2.
Am J Dis Child ; 146(5): 556-9, 1992 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1621656

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE--To compare the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of a two-component acellular pertussis vaccine with a whole-cell diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and pertussis vaccine (W-DTP) when administered as a booster to children 4 through 6 years of age. DESIGN--This was a randomized, double-blind study. SETTING--Children in this study were from three general pediatric practices (two were private, one was university-affiliated). PARTICIPANTS--Three hundred and sixteen 4- through 6-year-old children who had received four previous W-DTP immunizations at the recommended times were studied. SELECTION PROCEDURES AND INTERVENTIONS--Children were randomly assigned in a 1:3 ratio to receive either W-DTP or one of three lots of acellular diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and pertussis vaccine (A-DTP). The A-DTPs contained 3.75 micrograms each of lymphocytosis promoting factor and filamentous hemagglutinin protein nitrogen per 0.5 mL and the same concentrations of diphtheria and tetanus toxoids as W-DTP. Serum samples were obtained on the day of immunization and 4 to 6 weeks later. Adverse reactions were recorded by parents at 6, 24, 48, and 72 hours. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS--An indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method determined IgG antibody response to lymphocytosis promoting factor, filamentous hemagglutinin, and tetanus toxoid; a CHO cell assay measured neutralizing antibodies to pertussis toxin; and serum neutralization on VERO cells assayed diphtheria antitoxin. One month after booster doses were administered, the geometric mean antibody levels for A-DTP vs W-DTP were IgG filamentous hemagglutinin, 362 vs 104 ELISA U/mL; IgG lymphocytosis promoting factor, 408 vs 81 ELISA U/mL; CHO cell, 210 vs 107; diphtheria, 21.7 vs 12.1 U/mL; and tetanus, 2.86 vs 2.04 Eq/mL. Following immunization with A-DTP, local and systemic adverse experiences were 30% to 50% and 20% to 30% fewer, respectively, as compared with W-DTP. CONCLUSIONS--The BIKEN A-DTP vaccine used in this study demonstrates enhanced immunogenicity to lymphocytosis promoting factor, filamentous hemagglutinin, and other measured antigens and less reactogenicity compared with licensed W-DTP [corrected].


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Bacterial/blood , Bordetella pertussis/immunology , Clostridium tetani/immunology , Corynebacterium diphtheriae/immunology , Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine/immunology , Child , Child, Preschool , Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , United States
3.
J Pediatr ; 120(1): 84-7, 1992 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1731030

ABSTRACT

This prospective, double-blind, randomized trial compared the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of acellular diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine and Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccine-diphtheria toxoid conjugate, given at separate injection sites or at a single site, in 79 children 18 months of age who had received three prior immunizing doses of whole-cell diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine. No significant differences were observed.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Bacterial/biosynthesis , Bacterial Vaccines/administration & dosage , Diphtheria Toxoid/administration & dosage , Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine/administration & dosage , Haemophilus influenzae/immunology , Bacterial Vaccines/adverse effects , Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Drug Combinations , Fever/etiology , Humans , Infant , Injections, Intramuscular , Irritable Mood , Placebos , Prospective Studies , Safety
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...