NEFPAT Plus: A Valid and Reliable Tool for Assessing the Nutrition Environment in Food Pantries.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a consumer nutrition environment assessment tool to assess policy, systems, and environmental initiatives that are implemented in food pantries, which incorporates recent national guidance, and evaluate its validity and reliability. SETTING: Illinois, US. DESIGN: This study had 4 phases: (1) tool revision, (2) pilot testing, (3) content validity assessment, and (4) interrater and test-retest reliability assessment. The original Nutrition Environment Food Pantry Assessment Tool (NEFPAT) was revised to incorporate evidence from updated guidelines and evidence. The NEFPAT+ was pilot-tested by 9 professionals at 5 food pantries. After revisions, 18 experts rated the content validity. Interrater and test-retest reliability was based on 2-4 professionals completing independent evaluations at 21 food pantries twice, 1 month apart. ANALYSIS: Content validity indices and intraclass correlation (ICC) coefficients for reliability estimates were compared with established thresholds. RESULTS: The NEFPAT+ was rated content valid by 94% of experts. The ICC for NEFPAT+ scores indicated excellent interrater reliability (ICC, 0.96; 99% confidence interval, 0.75-0.97) and good test-retest reliability (ICC: 0.80; 99% confidence interval, 0.60-0.92). CONCLUSIONS: Evidence supports the content validity, interrater reliability, and test-retest reliability of the NEFPAT+. Future studies can assess how NEFPAT+ scores relate to intervention outcomes and dietary behaviors.

Distribution of fresh foods in food pantries: challenges and opportunities in Illinois during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: The charitable food system distributes free food to clients across the U.S., but many nutrition and health-focused efforts encounter barriers to success, which were exacerbated during the COVID-19 pandemic. The objective of the current study was to understand barriers and facilitators to distributing nutritious, fresh foods in food pantries across Illinois during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Forty-nine pantry representatives participated in focus groups in October 2021. A codebook was created based on relevant literature, stakeholder interests, and an initial review of the recordings. Transcripts of each group were coded and analyzed using a basic interpretive approach. RESULTS: Pantries distribution of fresh foods was impacted by community partners, food bank policies and practices, and the quality of the donated fresh foods. Physical constraints of pantries limit fresh food storage capacity. The COVID-19 pandemic magnified stressors in the charitable food system which highlighted how community partners might improve fresh food distribution. CONCLUSION: Focus groups with food pantry representatives across Illinois provided key insights that can inform future efforts to facilitate fresh food distribution in the charitable food system. Future studies should evaluate the effects of the suggested initiatives and changes at the food pantry, food bank, and policy levels.

Development and evaluation of the Food Bank Health and Nutrition Assessment.

OBJECTIVE: Efforts to improve the nutritional quality and health promotion in the charitable food system have been undertaken. Though methods exist to track these efforts in terms of food banks' inventory, there are not research-tested tools to assess, monitor and influence policy, systems and environmental (PSE) changes. The study objective was to develop and evaluate a novel assessment tool that could be used to evaluate a food bank's efforts to improve the promotion of health and nutritious foods. DESIGN: The study had five phases: (1) initial development; (2) iterative review and revisions; (3) pilot testing; (4) content validity assessment and (5) inter-rater and test-retest assessment. The Food Bank Health and Nutrition Assessment (FB-HANA) was drafted after reviewing existing policies, nutrition-focused charitable food systems guidance and similar tools for food pantries. SETTING: Midwestern United States. PARTICIPANTS: Eleven food banks. RESULTS: Stakeholders and pilot testers provided initial feedback to refine the FB-HANA's flow, ease of completion and collection of contextual information. External experts rated the FB-HANA and each of the eight objectives as content valid. A set of two assessments completed by twenty-six community-based professionals, employed by Extension and fourteen food bank staff across eleven food banks, supported moderate to excellent inter-rater and test-retest reliability for the FB-HANA overall and each of its objectives. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence suggests that the FB-HANA can be used by either food bank or community-based professionals, such as Extension staff, to provide a perspective on ways food banks promote health and nutrition through PSE approaches.

Community-based nutrition education and hands-on cooking intervention increases farmers' market use and vegetable servings.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the current study was to evaluate the impact of the Market to MyPlate (M2MP) program on participants' reported farmers' market (FM) attitudes and shopping behaviours, frequency of serving vegetables to their families, food resource management behaviours and food security. A secondary objective was to identify facilitators and barriers to shopping at FM and food waste reduction techniques used by low-income families. DESIGN: The current study used a mixed methods evaluation embedded within a cluster randomised trial of the M2MP intervention. SETTING: The 7-week M2MP program was delivered at Extension offices and community centres in central Illinois. PARTICIPANTS: Participants included 120 adults and their families. Class cohorts were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups: (1) nutrition education and cooking classes with produce allocations (PAE, n 39); (2) nutrition education and cooking classes only (EO, n 36) or (3) control group (n 45). RESULTS: Compared with control participants, PAE participants were significantly more likely to report shopping at FM (P = 0·029) and reported serving more vegetables to their families (P = 0·010) (EO participants did not differ from the control group on any outcomes). There were no differences between conditions in survey-based measures of food security or food resource management behaviours. Interview results describe facilitators and barriers to shopping at FM and a variety of food waste reduction techniques (including food placement and food resource management). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that fresh produce provision coupled with nutrition and culinary education can positively impact shopping and dietary behaviours.

Community-based culinary and nutrition education intervention promotes fruit and vegetable consumption.

OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of the Market to MyPlate (M2MP) program on fruit and vegetable consumption and cooking behaviours. Secondary objectives were to examine factors that affected participant retention and program completion, and analyse program feedback provided by participants. DESIGN: This study conducted a mixed methods evaluation embedded within a cluster randomised controlled trial of the M2MP intervention. Adult participants completed a pre- and post-program survey reporting on their fruit and vegetable consumption and cooking behaviours. A subsample participated in structured interviews, providing feedback about M2MP and the impact of the program. SETTING: Seven weekly classes took place in community centres and extension offices in central Illinois. PARTICIPANTS: 120 adults and their families participated. Class cohorts were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups: (1) nutrition education and cooking classes with produce allocations (PAE, n 39); (2) nutrition education and cooking classes only (EO, n 36) or (3) control group (n 45). RESULTS: Compared to control, PAE participants reported larger increases from pre- to post-intervention in fruit (P = 0·001) and vegetable consumption (P = 0·002), with no differences in cooking frequency. Interview analyses identified key themes in behaviour changes due to M2MP, including reported increases in dietary variety, cooking self-efficacy and children's participation in cooking. CONCLUSIONS: PAE participants who received an intervention that directly increased their access to fresh produce (via produce allocations) increased their reported fruit and vegetable consumption. Though participants' cooking frequency did not change, interviewees reported increased variety, cooking confidence and family participation in cooking.

Technical Assistance is Related to Improvements in the Food Pantry Consumer Nutrition Environment.

OBJECTIVE: To assess changes in food pantries' consumer nutrition environment (CNE) after the provision of technical assistance. DESIGN: Pre-post study with 2 phases. SETTING: Staff completed observational assessments using the Nutrition Environment Food Pantry Assessment Tool (NEFPAT) at food pantries in an initial pilot phase. Then, staff conducted NEFPAT observations at pantries in Illinois statewide. PARTICIPANTS: In the pilot phase, 6 staff assessed 28 pantries. In the statewide phase, 35 staff assessed 119 pantries. INTERVENTION: After completing an initial NEFPAT at each pantry, technical assistance was provided by staff to support changes in the pantries' CNE before another NEFPAT observation was completed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Changes in the CNE, as assessed with the NEFPAT, when comparing preassessment and postassessment. ANALYSIS: Score differences were evaluated with paired t tests. RESULTS: In the pilot phase, among 23 pantries with preassessment and postassessment data, 2 objectives on the NEFPAT observation increased significantly. In the statewide phase, among 66 pantries with preassessment and postassessment data, most NEFPAT objectives and the overall NEFPAT score (22.12 ± 8.16 vs 28.20 ± 7.14, P < 0.001) significantly increased. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Technical assistance provided by Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Education implementing staff were related to improvements in the CNE of food pantries in Illinois. Future work should evaluate the association of these CNE changes with changes in behavior among pantry patrons.