ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The role of physical activity in anorexia nervosa (AN) treatment has been investigated. Muscle strength (MS) reflects physical condition and can predict AN patients' response to this novel treatment approach. This study was intended to find bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) parameters that predict AN patients' MS. METHODS: The study included 42 AN patients and 42 healthy ones in the control group. BIA parameters that predict MS were assessed by dividing AN patients into groups by their hand grip strength test score (higher/lower than 22.5 kg). RESULTS: The highest accuracy for distinguishing AN subjects from the control group was achieved by cell membrane capacitance (AUC = 0.916), impedance at 200 kHz and 5 kHz ratio (AUC = 0.924), phase angle (PA) 5 kHz (AUC = 0.906) and PA 50 kHz (AUC = 0.919). The low MS group had significantly lower values of PA 50 kHz (mean: 4.03 ± 0.80° vs. 4.58 ± 0.65°; p = 0.032) and fat-free mass index (mean: 12.22 ± 1.41 kg/m2 vs. 13.14 ± 0.94 kg/m2; p = 0.026). In the univariate model, PA 50 kHz ≥4.037° was associated with the lowest chance of muscle weakness (OR = 0.230; p = 0.005). In the multivariate analysis, PA 50 kHz was the only significant factor of MS (OR = 0.01; p = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: PA 50 kHz is the best BIA parameter to predict MS in AN patients. It could be useful for assessment before physical activity treatment application.
Subject(s)
Anorexia Nervosa , Anorexia Nervosa/diagnosis , Electric Impedance , Female , Hand Strength , Humans , Muscle StrengthABSTRACT
Background and Objectives: Body mass index (BMI) is still the only recommended measurable nutritional status assessment parameter in anorexia nervosa (AN). The aim of this study was to measure other anthropometrical and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) parameters in AN patients and to evaluate their nutritional status assessment value. Materials and Methods: The 46 AN female patients were examined at the beginning of hospitalization and followed-up in three measurements (in 6 ± 2 weeks' intervals). Anthropometrical assessment was based on BMI, circumferences of arm, calf, thigh, hips, waist, their ratio (waist-to-hip ratio (WHR)), and a skinfold test over biceps and triceps muscle, under the scapula, over the hip, and 2 cm from the umbilicus. The BIA parameters included phase angle (PA), membrane capacitance (Cm), and impedance at 200 kHz, and a 5 kHz ratio (Z200/5). Results: In the 1st measurement, BMI correlated with all anthropometric and BIA parameters (p < 0.05). For BIA parameters, the correlation included arm circumference and WHR (p < 0.05). In the follow-up, significant changes were observed in BMI and all BIA parameters. The correlation between BMI and all BIA parameters was present in the 2nd and 3rd measurements (p < 0.05). In the 4th measurement, BMI correlated only with Cm (p = 0.0114). Comparison of BIA parameters according to the state of starvation (BMI < 16.0 kg/m2) revealed that all studied BIA parameters were characterized by statistically significant sensitivity and specificity in the detection of this condition (p < 0.05), except PA in the 4th measurement (p = 0.2099). Conclusions: Selected BIA and anthropometrical parameters could be used for AN patients' assessment. The study confirmed dynamic changes of BIA parameters during the follow-up. They could be useful in the detection of the state of starvation.
Subject(s)
Anorexia Nervosa/classification , Anthropometry/instrumentation , Electric Impedance/therapeutic use , Nutritional Status , Adolescent , Adult , Anorexia Nervosa/diagnosis , Anthropometry/methods , Body Mass Index , Child , Female , HumansABSTRACT
Files of 68 patients with paranoid schizophrenia treated first time in Department of Psychiatry Medical University of Lublin and in Psychoneurological Hospital of Lublin were analyzed. The aim of this study was evaluation of treatment according to the standards. In the most cases treatment was in consent with standards regarding choice of neuroleptic, period of time of treatment and its effectiveness. The only objections, which we founded were: 1) strong neuroleptics in therapy were used too early and, 2) doses of neuroleptics were elevated to fast, 3) neuroleptics in depo form were used very rarely, 4) atypical neuroleptics were used also very rarely.
