Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 24(1): 669, 2023 Aug 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37620847

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: One of the common mechanical complications following spinal fusion surgery is proximal junctional failure (PJF). The incidence of neurological deficit associated with PJF has been poorly described in the literature. Here, we report a case in which numbness in the lower extremities was recognized as the first symptom, but the discrepancy in the imaging findings made PJF difficult to diagnose. METHODS: A 71-year-old female underwent corrective fusion surgery. Three weeks later, she complained of persistent right leg numbness. Standing X-ray showed the back-out of the pedicle screws (PSs) in the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV), but there was no obvious evidence of cord compression on computed tomography (CT), which caused the delay of diagnosis. Five weeks later, magnetic resonance image (MRI) did not show cord compression on an axial view, but there were signal changes in the spinal cord. RESULTS: The first reason for the delayed diagnosis was the lack of awareness that leg numbness could occur as the first symptom of PJF. The second problem was the lack of evidence for spinal cord compression in various imaging tests. Loosened PSs were dislocated on standing, but were back to their original position on supine position. In our case, these contradictory images led to a delay in diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Loosened PSs caused dynamic cord compression due to repeated deviation and reduction. Supine and standing radiographs may be an important tool in the diagnosis of PJF induced by dynamic cord compression.


Subject(s)
Pedicle Screws , Spinal Cord Compression , Spinal Fusion , Aged , Female , Humans , Hypesthesia , Pedicle Screws/adverse effects , Spinal Cord Compression/diagnostic imaging , Spinal Cord Compression/etiology , Spinal Cord Compression/surgery , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Spinal Fusion/instrumentation
3.
Eur Spine J ; 32(2): 727-733, 2023 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36542165

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Spinal fusion surgery is often performed with pelvic fixation to prevent distal junctional kyphosis. The inclusion of spinopelvic fixation has been reported to induce progression of hip joint arthropathy in a radiographic follow-up study. However, its biomechanical mechanism has not yet been elucidated. This study aimed to compare the changes in hip joint moment before and after spinal fusion surgery. METHODS: This study was an observational study and included nine patients (eight women and one man) who were scheduled to undergo spinopelvic fusion surgery. We calculated the three-dimensional external joint moments of the hip during gait, standing, and climbing stairs before and 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: During gait, the maximum extension moment was 0.51 ± 0.29 and 0.63 ± 0.40 before and after spinopelvic fusion surgery (p = 0.011), and maximum abduction moment was 0.60 ± 0.33 and 0.83 ± 0.34 before and after surgery (p = 0.004), respectively. During standing, maximum extension moment was 0.76 ± 0.32 and 1.04 ± 0.21 before and after spinopelvic fusion surgery (p = 0.0026), and maximum abduction moment was 0.12 ± 0.20 and 0.36 ± 0.22 before and after surgery (p = 0.0005), respectively. During climbing stairs, maximum extension moment was - 0.31 ± 0.30 and - 0.48 ± 0.15 before and after spinopelvic fusion surgery (p = 0.040), and maximum abduction moment was 0.023 ± 0.18 and - 0.02 ± 0.13 before and after surgery (p = 0.038), respectively. CONCLUSION: This study revealed that hip joint flexion-extension and abduction-adduction moments increased after spinopelvic fixation surgery in the postures of standing, walking, and climbing stairs. The mechanism was considered to be adjacent joint disease after spinopelvic fusion surgery including sacroiliac joint fixation.


Subject(s)
Hip Joint , Kyphosis , Male , Humans , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hip Joint/diagnostic imaging , Hip Joint/surgery , Spine/surgery , Pelvis/diagnostic imaging , Pelvis/surgery
4.
J Orthop Case Rep ; 13(12): 125-129, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38162353

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Disc sequestration is well known as a perforation of the fibrous ring and posterior longitudinal ligament, and migration of the fragment to the epidural space. Case Report: A 62-year-old man complained of increased pain and hypoesthesia and muscle weakness of the left lower limb that had started 1 month before. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a tumor-like mass at the L2-3 level on the posterior side of the dura. The fragment was strongly adhered to the dural sac and was resected piece by piece. Disc herniation recognized at L2-3 compressed the left L3 nerve root and was removed. The histopathological diagnosis was consistent with a degenerated intervertebral disc. All symptoms improved after the surgery. Conclusion: There are few reports about the posterior migrated disc herniation at higher lumbar level. It may be associated with fused segments from L4 to the pelvis due to the previous surgery, which impacted the adjacent segment.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...