Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 23
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Iperception ; 15(1): 20416695231223444, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38188061

ABSTRACT

Visual motion signals can produce self-motion perception known as vection in observers. Vection can be generated by illusory motions in the form of global expantion in still images as well as by visual motion signals. The perception of vection can be enhanced by flickering images at a rate of 5 Hz. This study examined the illusory motion and vection induced by a printed static image under flickering ambient light at rates up to 100 Hz. The perception of illusory motion and vection were enhanced by flickering ambient lights at 50, 75, and 100 Hz. The enhancement effect was higher for the flicker rates expected to be detectable by humans. The findings of this study suggest that alternating bright and dark signals to the cone receptors and primary visual cortex trigger perceptions of illusory motions.

2.
J Physiol Anthropol ; 41(1): 39, 2022 Nov 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36369080

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Spatial ability has been reported to indicate sex-based differences in humans, mainly assessed by Shepard and Metzler mental rotation task (SM-MRT). Most performances in earlier studies have been evaluated by the mean value of reaction time and/or accuracy. The performance indexes might not be sensitive measures of mental rotation. Sex-based differences in the performance might also be involved in the spatial experience of the subject at the time. This study observed variations in components of the SM-MRT over repetition. METHODS: Male (n = 17) and female (n = 17) subjects completed 20 days of repeating the SM-MRT. The slope and intercept of the function performance (reaction time) to the angular disparity are calculated; the slope of this function indexes the mental rotation (main-process), and the intercept indexes the other sub-processes. RESULTS: A significant main effect of sex was obtained on the slope. The intercept also showed a tendency toward statistical difference. The interactions between the sexes and the day were not significant for the indices. Statistical testing for coefficient of variations (CV) indicated no sex-based difference in the effect of the intercept throughout the experiment day. The CV of the slope, however, showed tendencies toward sex-based difference from days 7 to 12. CONCLUSIONS: The difference between the sexes in performance on the slope was sustained throughout the experimental period. A few female subjects who demonstrated larger slope values than male subjects caused the sex difference. The learning rate of mental rotation may be an inherent spatial ability.


Subject(s)
Sex Characteristics , Humans , Female , Male , Reaction Time
3.
Neurosci Lett ; 722: 134857, 2020 03 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32097701

ABSTRACT

Bright light at night has been known to suppress melatonin secretion. Photoreceptors, known as intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs), project dark/bright information into the superchiasmatic nucleus, which regulates the circadian system. Electroretinograms of ipRGCs show fluctuation that is synchronized with light ON-OFF stimulation. This finding suggests that the flickering condition of light may have an impact on our circadian system. In this study, we evaluate light-induced melatonin suppression under flickering and non-flickering light conditions. Fifteen male subjects between the ages of 20 and 23 years (mean ± SD, 21.9 ± 1.9) were exposed to three light conditions (dim, 100-Hz flickering and non-flickering light) from 1:00 a.m. to 2:30 a.m. Saliva samples were taken just before 1:00 and at 1:15, 1:30, 2:00, and 2:30 a.m. Repeated-measure t-test with Bonferroni correction showed a significant decrease in melatonin levels under both 100-Hz and non-flickering light conditions compared to dim light conditions after 2:00 a.m. Moreover, at 2:30 a.m., the rate of change in melatonin level under 100 Hz of flickering light was significantly lower than that under non-flickering light. Our present findings suggest that 100-Hz flickering light may suppress melatonin secretion more than non-flickering light.


Subject(s)
Circadian Rhythm/physiology , Light , Melatonin/metabolism , Photic Stimulation/methods , Saliva/metabolism , Circadian Rhythm/radiation effects , Female , Humans , Male , Melatonin/analysis , Saliva/chemistry , Saliva/radiation effects , Young Adult
4.
J Physiol Anthropol ; 37(1): 23, 2018 Oct 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30340620

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bright light at night is known to suppress melatonin secretion. Novel photoreceptors named intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) are mainly responsible for projecting dark/bright information to the suprachiasmatic nucleus and thus regulating the circadian system. However, it has been shown that the amplitude of the electroretinogram of ipRGCs is considerably lower under flickering light at 100 Hz than at 1-5 Hz, suggesting that flickering light may also affect the circadian system. Therefore, in this study, we evaluated light-induced melatonin suppression under flickering and non-flickering light. METHODS: Twelve male participants between the ages of 20 and 23 years (mean ± S.D. = 21.6 ± 1.5 years) were exposed to three light conditions (dim, 100-Hz flickering, and non-flickering blue light) from 1:00 A.M. to 2:30 A.M., and saliva samples were obtained just before 1:00 A.M. and at 1:15, 1:30, 2:00, and 2:30 A.M. RESULTS: A repeated measures t test with Bonferroni correction showed that at 1:15 A.M., melatonin concentrations were significantly lower following exposure to non-flickering light compared with dim light, whereas there was no significant difference between the dim and 100-Hz flickering light conditions. By contrast, after 1:30 A.M., the mean melatonin concentrations were significantly lower under both 100-Hz flickering and non-flickering light than under dim light. CONCLUSION: Although melatonin suppression rate tended to be lower under 100-Hz flickering light than under non-flickering light at the initial 15 min of the light exposure, the present study suggests that 100-Hz flickering light may have the same impact on melatonin secretion as non-flickering light.


Subject(s)
Light , Melatonin/analysis , Saliva/chemistry , Adult , Circadian Rhythm/radiation effects , Humans , Male , Young Adult
5.
J Physiol Anthropol ; 37(1): 17, 2018 Jun 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29914553

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Salivary melatonin levels have been analyzed in many research fields, including physiological anthropology. Although various devices have been utilized for saliva collection, cotton swabs are among the most common. However, previous studies have reported that cotton swabs may interfere with melatonin assay results, whereas synthetic swabs may not. These studies compared only mean melatonin levels between passive and synthetic-polymer swab collection methods but did not evaluate relative and proportional biases. Our study examines the effects of using swabs made of materials other than cotton, such as polypropylene-polyethylene polymer, on salivary melatonin assay results using a Bland-Altman (BA) plot. The effects of the saliva collection method were analyzed using two concentrations of melatonin, lower (< 6 pg/ml) and higher (> 6 pg/ml), because the threshold of dim light melatonin onset was lower than 6 pg/ml in many studies. RESULTS: Differences detected between passive and polypropylene-polyethylene polymer swab methods of saliva collection were not significant in both lower (< 6 pg/ml) and higher (> 6 pg/ml) melatonin levels detected. All correlations between the collection methods were significant, and 95% confidence intervals for differences in melatonin levels in all samples detected using passive and non-cotton swab saliva collection methods included zero in the BA plots. Averages and differences between non-cotton and passive saliva collection obtained from the BA plots were not significantly correlated at lower and higher melatonin levels. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that swabbing methods, including the use of polypropylene-polyethylene polymer, do not affect salivary melatonin assay results. Therefore, the authors suggest that polypropylene-polyethylene polymer swab methods are appropriate for the assessment of dim light melatonin onset and dose response of the circadian system to light.


Subject(s)
Melatonin/analysis , Saliva/chemistry , Specimen Handling/standards , Adult , Humans , Male , Polyethylene , Polypropylenes , Specimen Handling/methods , Specimen Handling/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
6.
Chronobiol Int ; 33(4): 448-52, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27010525

ABSTRACT

Light is the strongest synchronizer of human circadian rhythms, and exposure to residential light at night reportedly causes a delay of circadian rhythms. The present study was conducted to investigate the association between color temperature of light at home and circadian phase of salivary melatonin in adults and children. Twenty healthy children (mean age: 9.7 year) and 17 of their parents (mean age: 41.9 years) participated in the experiment. Circadian phase assessments were made with dim light melatonin onset (DLMO). There were large individual variations in DLMO both in adults and children. The average DLMO in adults and in children were 21:50 ± 1:12 and 20:55 ± 0:44, respectively. The average illuminance and color temperature of light at eye level were 139.6 ± 82.7 lx and 3862.0 ± 965.6 K, respectively. There were significant correlations between color temperature of light and DLMO in adults (r = 0.735, p < 0.01) and children (r = 0.479, p < 0.05), although no significant correlations were found between illuminance level and DLMO. The results suggest that high color temperature light at home might be a cause of the delay of circadian phase in adults and children.


Subject(s)
Circadian Rhythm/physiology , Light , Sleep/physiology , Temperature , Adult , Child , Color , Female , Housing , Humans , Male , Melatonin/metabolism , Middle Aged , Young Adult
7.
Neurosci Lett ; 616: 1-4, 2016 Mar 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26777427

ABSTRACT

Bright nocturnal light has been shown to suppress melatonin secretion. However, bright light exposure during the day might reduce light-induced melatonin suppression at night. The human circadian system is sensitive to short wavelength light. This study evaluated the preventive effect of different wavelengths of daytime light on light-induced melatonin suppression at night. Twelve male subjects were exposed to various light conditions (dim, white, and bluish white light) between the hours of 09:00 and 10:30 (daytime light conditions). They were then exposed to light (300lx) again between 01:00 and 02:30 (night-time light exposure). Subjects provided saliva samples before (00:55) and after night-time light exposure (02:30). A two-tailed paired t-test yielded significant decrements in melatonin concentrations after night-time light exposure under daytime dim and white light conditions. No significant differences were found in melatonin concentrations between pre- and post-night-time light exposure with bluish-white light. Present findings suggest that daytime blue light exposure has an acute preventive impact on light-induced melatonin suppression in individuals with a general life rhythm (sleep/wake schedule). These findings may be useful for implementing artificial light environments for humans in, for example, hospitals and underground shopping malls to reduce health risks.


Subject(s)
Circadian Rhythm , Light , Melatonin/metabolism , Saliva/metabolism , Humans , Male , Young Adult
8.
J Physiol Anthropol ; 34: 27, 2015 Jul 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26141542

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bright nocturnal light has been known to suppress melatonin secretion. However, bright light exposure during the day-time might reduce light-induced melatonin suppression (LIMS) at night. The effective proportion of day-time light to night-time light is unclear; however, only a few studies on accurately controlling both day- and night-time conditions have been conducted. This study aims to evaluate the effect of different day-time light intensities on LIMS. METHODS: Twelve male subjects between the ages of 19 and 23 years (mean ± S.D., 20.8 ± 1.1) gave informed consent to participate in this study. They were exposed to various light conditions (<10, 100, 300, 900 and 2700 lx) between the hours of 09:00 and 12:00 (day-time light conditions). They were then exposed to bright light (300 lx) again between 01:00 and 02:30 (night-time light exposure). They provided saliva samples before (00:55) and after night-time light exposure (02:30). RESULTS: A one-tailed paired t test yielded significant decrements of melatonin concentration after night-time light exposure under day-time dim, 100- and 300-lx light conditions. No significant differences exist in melatonin concentration between pre- and post-night-time light exposure under day-time 900- and 2700-lx light conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Present findings suggest the amount of light exposure needed to prevent LIMS caused by ordinary nocturnal light in individuals who have a general life rhythm (sleep/wake schedule). These findings may be useful in implementing artificial light environments for humans in, for example, hospitals and underground shopping malls.


Subject(s)
Circadian Rhythm/radiation effects , Light , Lighting/methods , Melatonin/metabolism , Adult , Humans , Male , Melatonin/analysis , Saliva/chemistry , Young Adult
9.
J Occup Health ; 54(4): 331-5, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22673645

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the possible effects of reduced illumination in the workplace on insomnia among office workers. METHODS: Seventy-two office workers answered the Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS) in July 2009 (under ordinary illumination, 01 conditions) and July 2010 (under reduced illumination, Rl conditions). The workers were divided into three groups, indoor workers (IWs), semi-outdoor workers (SWs) and outdoor workers (OWs), according to the frequency of working outside of the office because a worker with a high frequency of working outside of the office might rarely be exposed to the lighting condition within an office. The first five items of the AIS (AIS-5) were used to assess sleep difficulties, and the last three items (AIS-3) assessed next-day consequences of sleep or daytime symptoms, which often result from insomnia and/or sleep disorders. RESULTS: Illuminance levels at a height of 1,100 mm from the floor under the Rl conditions (550-490 lux) were significantly lower than under the Ol conditions (750-700 lux). The AIS-5 score of the IWs was significantly increased under the Rl conditions compared with the Ol conditions. There was no difference in AIS-3 scores between conditions for any group. CONCLUSION: Indoor workers hardly went outside of the office and were exposed only to office light during the daytime. Thus, the underexposure to light could have had an impact on insomnia in those individuals. A novel lighting environment is required to optimize work-related levels of light exposure.


Subject(s)
Light/adverse effects , Lighting/adverse effects , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/epidemiology , Workplace , Adult , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Health , Sleep
10.
J Physiol Anthropol ; 30(6): 251-8, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22197958

ABSTRACT

Bright light at night improves the alertness of night workers. Melatonin suppression induced by light at night is, however, reported to be a possible risk factor for breast cancer. Short-wavelength light has a strong impact on melatonin suppression. A red-visor cap can cut the short-wavelength light from the upper visual field selectively with no adverse effects on visibility. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of a red-visor cap on light-induced melatonin suppression, performance, and sleepiness at night. Eleven healthy young male adults (mean age: 21.2±0.9 yr) volunteered to participate in this study. On the first day, the subjects spent time in dim light (<15 lx) from 20:00 to 03:00 to measure baseline data of nocturnal salivary melatonin concentration. On the second day, the subjects were exposed to light for four hours from 23:00 to 03:00 with a nonvisor cap (500 lx), red-visor cap (approx. 160 lx) and blue-visor cap (approx. 160 lx). Subjective sleepiness and performance of a psychomotor vigilance task (PVT) were also measured on the second day. Compared to salivary melatonin concentration under dim light, the decrease in melatonin concentration was significant in a nonvisor cap condition but was not significant in a red-visor cap condition. The percentages of melatonin suppression in the nonvisor cap and red-visor cap conditions at 4 hours after exposure to light were 52.6±22.4% and 7.7±3.3%, respectively. The red-visor cap had no adverse effect on performance of the PVT, brightness and visual comfort, though it tended to increase subjective sleepiness. These results suggest that a red-visor cap is effective in preventing melatonin suppression with no adverse effects on vigilance performance, brightness and visibility.


Subject(s)
Chronobiology Disorders/prevention & control , Clothing , Melatonin/metabolism , Task Performance and Analysis , Work Schedule Tolerance/physiology , Analysis of Variance , Cross-Over Studies , Humans , Light , Male , Melatonin/radiation effects , Saliva/chemistry , Spectrum Analysis , Wakefulness/physiology , Young Adult
11.
J Physiol Anthropol ; 30(3): 97-102, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21636952

ABSTRACT

The present study evaluated the effects of exposure to light intensity in the morning on dim light melatonin onset (DLMO). The tested light intensities were 750 lux, 150 lux, 3000 lux, 6000 lux and 12,000 lux (horizontal illuminance at cornea), using commercial 5000 K fluorescent lamps. Eleven healthy males aged 21-31 participated in 2-day experiments for each light condition. On the first experimental day (day 1), subjects were exposed to dim light (<30 lux) for 3 h in the morning (09:00-12:00). On the same day, saliva samples were taken in dim light (<30 lux) every 30 min from 21:00 to 01:00 to determine the DLMO phase. The subjects were allowed to sleep from 01:00 to 08:00. On the second experimental day (day 2), the subjects were exposed to experimental light conditions for 3 h in the morning. The experimental schedule after light exposure was the same as on day 1. On comparing day 2 with day 1, significant phase advances of DLMO were obtained at 3000 lux, 6000 lux and 12,000 lux. These findings indicate that exposure to a necessary intensity from an ordinary light source, such as a fluorescent lamp, in the morning within one day affects melatonin secretion.


Subject(s)
Circadian Rhythm/radiation effects , Light , Melatonin/metabolism , Adult , Circadian Rhythm/physiology , Cornea/metabolism , Cornea/radiation effects , Humans , Male , Pupil/radiation effects , Retina/metabolism , Retina/radiation effects , Saliva/chemistry , Saliva/metabolism , Young Adult
12.
J Circadian Rhythms ; 9(1): 1, 2011 Jan 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21219623

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although various acceptable and easy-to-use devices have been used for saliva collection, cotton swabs are among the most common ones. Previous studies reported that cotton swabs yield a lower level of melatonin detection. However, this statistical method is not adequate for detecting an agreement between cotton saliva collection and passive saliva collection, and a test for bias is needed. Furthermore, the effects of cotton swabs have not been examined at lower melatonin level, a level at which melatonin is used for assessment of circadian rhythms, namely dim light melatonin onset (DLMO). In the present study, we estimated the effect of cotton swabs on the results of salivary melatonin assay using the Bland-Altman plot at lower level. METHODS: Nine healthy males were recruited and each provided four saliva samples on a single day to yield a total of 36 samples. Saliva samples were directly collected in plastic tubes using plastic straws, and subsequently pipetted onto cotton swabs (cotton saliva collection) and into clear sterile tubes (passive saliva collection). The melatonin levels were analyzed in duplicate using commercially available ELISA kits. RESULTS: The mean melatonin concentration in cotton saliva collection samples was significantly lower than that in passive saliva collection samples at higher melatonin level (>6 pg/mL). The Bland-Altman plot indicated that cotton swabs causes relative and proportional biases in the assay results. For lower melatonin level (<6 pg/mL), although the BA plots didn't show proportional and relative biases, there was no significant correlation between passive and cotton saliva collection samples. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate an interference effect of cotton swabs on the assay result of salivary melatonin at lower melatonin level. Cotton-based collection devices might, thus, not be suitable for assessment of DLMO.

13.
Chronobiol Int ; 27(4): 782-806, 2010 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20560711

ABSTRACT

This study investigated the physiological function of suppressed melatonin through thermoregulation in a cold environment. Interactions between thermoregulation directly affected by exposure to a cold environment and indirectly affected by endogenous melatonin suppression by bright-light exposure were examined. Ten male subjects were exposed to two different illumination intensities (30 and 5000 lux) for 4.5 h, and two different ambient temperatures (15 and 27 degrees C) for 2 h before sleep under dark and thermoneutral conditions. Salivary melatonin level was suppressed by bright light (p < 0.001), although the ambient temperature condition had no significant effect on melatonin. During sleep, significant effects of pre-sleep exposure to a cold ambient temperature (p < 0.001) and bright light (p < 0.01) on rectal temperature (T(re)) were observed. Pre-sleep, bright-light exposure led to an attenuated fall in T(re) during sleep. Moreover, T(re) dropped more precipitously after cold exposure than thermoneutral conditions (cold: -0.54 +/- 0.07 degrees C/h; thermoneutral: -0.16 +/- 0.03 degrees C/h; p < 0.001). Pre-sleep, bright-light exposure delayed the nadir time of T(re) under thermoneutral conditions (p < 0.05), while cold exposure masked the circadian rhythm with a precipitous decrease in T(re). A significant correlation between the T(re) nadir and melatonin level (r = -0.774, p < 0.05) indicated that inter-individual differences with higher melatonin levels lead to a reduction in T(re) after cold exposure. These results suggest that suppressed endogenous melatonin inhibits the downregulation of the body temperature set-point during sleep.


Subject(s)
Body Temperature Regulation/physiology , Circadian Rhythm/physiology , Cold Temperature , Light , Melatonin/metabolism , Sleep/physiology , Adult , Body Temperature/physiology , Humans , Lighting , Male , Young Adult
14.
Eur J Appl Physiol ; 107(6): 743-6, 2009 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19727799

ABSTRACT

Cotton swabs are among the most commonly used devices for collecting saliva, but various studies have reported that their use impacts the results of salivary cortisol assays. These studies, however, estimated this impact by comparing the average of the concentration and/or scatter plots. In the present study, we estimated the impact of cotton swabs on the results of salivary cortisol enzyme immunoassay (EIA) by Bland-Altman plot. Eight healthy males (aged 20-23 years) provided four saliva samples on different days to yield a total of 32 samples. Saliva samples were collected directly in plastic tubes using plastic straws and then pipetted onto cotton swabs (cotton saliva collection) and into clear sterile tubes (passive saliva collection). There was a lower correlation between cotton and passive saliva collection. Individually, four subjects showed a negative correlation between passive and cotton saliva collection. A Bland-Altman plot indicated that cotton swabs causes a proportional bias on the EIA assay result. Our findings indicate a considerable effect of using cotton swabs for saliva collection, and subject-specific variability in the impact. A Bland-Altman plot further suggests possible reasons for this effect.


Subject(s)
Hydrocortisone/analysis , Saliva/chemistry , Specimen Handling/methods , Cotton Fiber , Humans , Immunoenzyme Techniques , Male , Young Adult
15.
Int J Neurosci ; 119(1): 59-67, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19116831

ABSTRACT

Male (n=18) and female (n=16) subjects completed a three-dimensional mental rotation task (MRT). The hormonal and MRT data were collected from female subjects at low (menstruation) and high (ovulation) estrogen phases. Each subject's reaction time (RT) and error rate (ER) were plotted to give the slope and intercept of the functions, relating performance to angular disparity. Males showed faster RT and lower ER compared to females at each menstrual phase; the difference arises from the slope. These findings suggest that there is a sex difference in mental rotation at each menstrual phase.


Subject(s)
Cognition/physiology , Imagination/physiology , Menstrual Cycle/psychology , Sex Characteristics , Space Perception/physiology , Adult , Brain/metabolism , Curriculum , Estrogens/metabolism , Female , Humans , Learning/physiology , Male , Menstrual Cycle/physiology , Mental Processes , Orientation/physiology , Psychomotor Performance/physiology , Young Adult
16.
Biosci Biotechnol Biochem ; 72(7): 1944-7, 2008 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18603803

ABSTRACT

This study examined the effects of odors on sustained attention during a vigilance task. Two essential oils (lavender and eucalyptus) and two materials (l-menthol and linalyl acetate) were compared with a control. The increase in reaction time was significantly lower with lavender than with the control. The results suggest that the administration of lavender helped to maintain sustained attention during the long-term task.


Subject(s)
Attention/drug effects , Lavandula/chemistry , Oils, Volatile/pharmacology , Task Performance and Analysis , Eucalyptus/chemistry , Humans , Menthol/pharmacology , Monoterpenes/pharmacology , Odorants
17.
Neurosci Lett ; 440(1): 23-6, 2008 Jul 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18539392

ABSTRACT

There are large inter-individual differences in pupil size and suppression of melatonin by exposure to light. It has been reported that melatonin suppression by exposure to light increases when pupils are pharmacologically dilated. However, the correlation between normal inter-individual difference in pupil size and melatonin suppression by exposure to light is not clear. Twenty-three healthy male subjects (22.6+/-2.7 years old) were exposed to light (1000 lx) for 2 h at night. The starting time of exposure to light was set to the ascending phase of melatonin concentration of each subject. Pupil area and saliva melatonin concentration were measured before exposure to light under dim light (15 lx) and during exposure to light. There were large inter-individual differences in melatonin suppression and pupil area. The mean and standard deviation of percentage of melatonin suppression 2 h after exposure to light was 57.2+/-22.1%. The mean and standard deviation of pupil areas before and 2 h after exposure to light were 30.7+/-7.9 mm2 and 15.9+/-4.8 mm2, respectively. The percentage of melatonin suppression by light was positively correlated with pupil area during light exposure (r=0.525, p<0.02). Interestingly, it was also correlated with pupil area measured before exposure to light, under dim light (15 lx) (r=0.658, p<0.001). These results suggest that inter-individual difference in pupil area positively correlates with melatonin suppression by light and that pupil area under dim light is a predictor of inter-individual differences in melatonin suppression by light.


Subject(s)
Individuality , Light , Melatonin/metabolism , Pupil/radiation effects , Adolescent , Adult , Humans , Male , Saliva/metabolism , Time Factors
18.
Neurosci Lett ; 439(3): 256-9, 2008 Jul 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18534755

ABSTRACT

In this study, 12 healthy males were exposed to various light conditions (2300K, 3000K, 5000K and dim) for 1.5h at midnight. The conditions of 3000K and 5000K were created by commercial fluorescent lamps. The light at 2300K was achieved by fitting a 3000K fluorescent lamp with a special filter that absorbed short-wavelength light. The vertical illuminance level was kept at 200lx. Saliva samples were taken before and after the light exposure. The light at 5000K suppressed melatonin secretion acutely. The 2300K lamp condition appeared to have no effect on melatonin secretion as well as the dim condition, while melatonin secretion was measurably suppressed by the light at 3000K.


Subject(s)
Circadian Rhythm/radiation effects , Light , Melatonin/metabolism , Radio Waves , Adult , Color , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Female , Humans , Male
19.
J Physiol Anthropol ; 27(1): 19-24, 2008 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18239346

ABSTRACT

Testosterone and estradiol levels were measured by saliva assays in 15 young men, and their relationships with different processes in a mental rotation task were elucidated. The estradiol level was positively correlated with reaction time; this effect was yielded by the slope of functions relating performance to angular disparity. These findings suggest that estrogen may inhibit the performance of a mental rotation task by affecting perception of the rotation process.


Subject(s)
Estradiol/physiology , Saliva/metabolism , Space Perception/physiology , Testosterone/physiology , Adult , Estradiol/metabolism , Humans , Male , Reaction Time/physiology , Testosterone/metabolism
20.
J Physiol Anthropol ; 26(2): 113-21, 2007 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17435353

ABSTRACT

The purpose of the present study was to elucidate the existence of individual differences of pupil response to light stimulation, and to confirm the reproducibility of this phenomenon. Furthermore, the relationship between the individual differences in nocturnal melatonin suppression induced by lighting and the individual differences of pupillary light response (PLR) was examined. The pupil diameter and salivary melatonin content of 20 male students were measured at the same period of time (00:00-02:30 hr) on different days, accordingly. Illumination (530 nm) produced by a monochromatic light-emitting diode (LED) was employed as the light stimulation: pupil diameter was measured with 4 different levels of illuminance of 1, 3, 30 and 600 lux and melatonin levels were measured at 30 and 600 lux (respective controls were taken at 0 lux). Oral temperature, blood pressure and subjective index of sleepiness were taken in experiments where melatonin levels were measured. Changes of the pupil diameter in response to light were expressed as PLR and light-induced melatonin suppression was expressed as a control-adjusted melatonin suppression score (control-adjusted MSS), which was compared to the melatonin level measured at 0 lux. In the PLR, the coefficients of variation obtained at 30 lux or less were large (51.5, 45.0, 28.4 and 6.2% at 1, 3, 30 and 600 lux, respectively). Correlations of illuminance of any combination at 30 lux or less were statistically significant at less than 1% level (1 vs. 3 lux: r=0.68; 1 vs. 30 lux: r=0.64; 3 vs. 30 lux: r=0.73), which showed the reproducibility of individual differences. The control-adjusted MSS at 600 lux (-1.14+/-1.16) was significantly (p<0.05) lower than that registered at 30 lux (-0.22+/-2.12). PLR values measured at 30 and 600 lux were then correlated with control-adjusted MSS; neither indicated a significant linear relationship. However, the control-adjusted MSS showed around 0 under any of the illuminance conditions in subjects with high PLR. In control-adjusted MSS of low values (i.e., melatonin secretions were easily suppressed), subjects indicated typically low PLR. In subjects with low control-adjusted MSS (n=3), characteristic changes in the autonomic nervous system, such as body temperature and blood pressure, were noted in subjects exposed to low illuminance of 30 lux. The fact that the relationship between PLR and control-adjusted MSS portray a similar pattern even under different luminance conditions suggests that MSS may not be affected in those with high PLR at low illuminance, regardless of the illuminance condition.


Subject(s)
Light , Melatonin/metabolism , Pupil/radiation effects , Adult , Arousal , Blood Pressure , Body Temperature , Circadian Rhythm , Humans , Male , Melatonin/antagonists & inhibitors , Pupil/physiology , Saliva/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...