ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Unilateral cranial nerve (CN) VI, or abducens nerve, palsy is rare in children and has not been reported in association with Chiari malformation type 1 (CM1) in the absence of other classic CM1 symptoms. OBSERVATIONS: A 3-year-old male presented with acute incomitant esotropia consistent with a unilateral, left CN VI palsy and no additional neurological symptoms. Imaging demonstrated CM1 without hydrocephalus or papilledema, as well as an anterior inferior cerebellar artery (AICA) vessel loop in the immediate vicinity of the left abducens nerve. Given the high risk of a skull base approach for direct microvascular decompression of the abducens nerve and the absence of other classic Chiari symptoms, the patient was initially observed. However, as his palsy progressed, he underwent posterior fossa decompression with duraplasty (PFDD), with the aim of restoring global cerebrospinal fluid dynamics and decreasing possible AICA compression of the left abducens nerve. Postoperatively, his symptoms completely resolved. LESSONS: In this first reported case of CM1 presenting as a unilateral abducens palsy in a young child, possibly caused by neurovascular compression, the patient's symptoms resolved after indirect surgical decompression via PFDD.
ABSTRACT
Background: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) involves the utilization of an implantable neurostimulation device, stereotypically used in the treatment of patients with chronic neuropathic pain. While these devices have been shown to have significant clinical benefits, there have also been documented potential complications, including the risk of infection, fractured electrodes, electrode migration, and lack of symptom improvement. In addition, there has been minimal documentation on gastrointestinal (GI) side effects after SCS implantation. Case Description: A 42-year-old patient with chronic axial and radicular neuropathic pain in her back and left leg status post multiple lumbar surgeries underwent implantation of an open paddle lead in the T8-T9 region. After the procedure, the patient endorsed a 50% decrease in pain at the 6-week follow-up with no further concerns. However, at the 18 months follow-up, the patient endorsed severe constipation when the SCS was turned on, leading to subsequent evaluation by gastroenterology, motility studies, and a thorough bowel regimen. Symptoms persisted, and the patient ultimately opted for the removal of the SCS implant at 21 months after the initial surgery. Conclusion: While the exact mechanism behind the GI side effects endorsed in this patient is unknown, current literature postulates a variety of theories, including a SCS-induced parasympathetic blockade of the GI tract. Further, investigation is needed to determine the exact effects of SCS on the GI tract.
ABSTRACT
Background: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) consists of the implantation of neuromodulatory devices in the spinal cord to treat refractory neuropathic pain. Although SCS technology has been proven of immense clinical benefit, complications remain including refractory pain, infection risk, and electrode migration or displacement. Till date, there are minimal reports of allergic side effects following SCS implantation. Case Description: In the first case, a 36-year-old male with chronic axial and radicular neuropathic pain in underwent implantation of an open paddle lead and generator. Within 1-3 h of activating the SCS, he developed diffuse raised erythematous hives. Over time, the SCS had immense clinical benefit for his pain reduction; however, he continued to experience recurrent hives and various other allergic reactions including facial flushing and photosensitivity. Four years later, he ultimately opted to retain the device for its clinical pain benefits. In the second case, a 35-year-old female with acute, intractable bilateral occipital neuralgia and a past medical history of Type 1 Chiari Malformation status-post-posterior fossa decompression underwent implantation of an occipital nerve stimulator (ONS). At 1-month follow-up, she began to experience pruritus across the back of her head and along the subcutaneous course of the lead. At 8 months, she continued to experience persistent symptoms, ultimately opting for device removal. Conclusion: Although allergic reactions to implanted neurostimulation systems are rare, and mechanisms not completely understood, existing studies posit multiple theories surrounding the pathophysiology of allergic reactions to these devices, such as delayed hypersensitivity reactions or contact dermatitis. Further research is needed to elucidate the cutaneous and immunologic side effects of SCS and ONS devices.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Evolving technologies have influenced the practice of myelomeningocele repair (MMCr), including mandatory folic acid fortification, advances in prenatal diagnosis, and the 2011 Management of Myelomeningocele Study (MOMS) trial demonstrating benefits of fetal over postnatal MMCr in select individuals. Postnatal MMCr continues to be performed, especially for those with limitations in prenatal diagnosis, health care access, anatomy, or personal preference. A comprehensive, updated national perspective on the trajectory of postnatal MMCr volumes and patient disparities is absent. We characterize national trends in postnatal MMCr rates before and after the MOMS trial publication (2000-2010 vs 2011-2019) and examine whether historical disparities persist. METHODS: This retrospective, cross-sectional analysis queried Nationwide Inpatient Sample data for postnatal MMCr admissions. Annual and race/ethnicity-specific rates were calculated using national birth registry data. Time series analysis assessed for trends relative to the year 2011. Patient, admission, and outcome characteristics were compared between pre-MOMS and post-MOMS cohorts. RESULTS: Between 2000 and 2019, 12 426 postnatal MMCr operations were estimated nationwide. After 2011, there was a gradual, incremental decline in the annual rate of postnatal MMCr. Post-MOMS admissions were increasingly associated with Medicaid insurance and the lowest income quartiles, as well as increased risk indices, length of stay, and hospital charges. By 2019, race/ethnicity-adjusted rates seemed to converge. The mortality rate remained low in both eras, and there was a lower rate of same-admission shunting post-MOMS. CONCLUSION: National rates of postnatal MMCr gradually declined in the post-MOMS era. Medicaid and low-income patients comprise an increasing majority of MMCr patients post-MOMS, whereas historical race/ethnicity-specific disparities are improving. Now more than ever, we must address disparities in the care of MMC patients before and after birth.
