Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Behav Med ; 5(4): 281-94, 1998.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16250696

ABSTRACT

In this study, cardiovascular (CV) response to a standard laboratory challenge was compared to 24-hr noninvasive monitoring of heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) in 30 healthy middle-aged train drivers. Laboratory stress test consisted of the orthostatic test, the cold pressor test, the Valsalva maneuver, the Stroop test, and the numerical square. In addition, the participants completed an extensive questionnaire on their health state and family health history, lifestyle, job stress, social and family support, personality characteristics, and health risk behaviors. In waking activities (leisure time, traveling lo work, preparations for driving, and an uneventful driving) NR and systolic blood pressure (SBP), hut not diastolic blood pressure (DBP), were normal (e.g., mean HR = 78.3, SBP = 128.6, and DBP = 92.3 during driving). In occasional stressful work situations, most participants reacted with a considerable rise in SBP and DBP (maximum values 201 for SBP and 126 for DBP). Interindividual differences in maximum BP reactions to emergency stress were predicted reliably by several psychological characteristics and by the CV reactions to the laboratory psychological challenge. The frequency, intensity, and persistence of psychological and physiological reactions to urgent situations appear to be more relevant measures of the health impact of psychological job stress than are the shift average values of physiological stress markers.

2.
Psychopharmacology (Berl) ; 119(1): 39-45, 1995 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7675948

ABSTRACT

While outpatients or other users of therapeutic drugs have to be informed about the risk of impaired functioning during driving or work, the prescribing physician needs to be familiar with the side effects of alternative drugs in order to select the most suitable treatment. With this aim, several types of benzodiazepine anxiolytics in low anxiolytic doses (diazepam 5 mg or 10 mg, nitrazepam 5 mg, oxazepam 10 mg, medazepam 10 mg, and alprazolam 0.2 or 0.5 mg-per 2m2 body surface) were tested under laboratory conditions for their effects on vigilance performance. In a double-blind design, 145 healthy volunteers performed a 60 min vigilance test (composed of discriminatory reactions to acoustic stimuli and a secondary visual tracking task) and four short psychomotor tests (lasting 1-7 min each) before and after a single dose of drug or placebo. Subjects described their perception of the drug effect with the help of a mood check list, and fatigue, sleepiness, and effort scales. Only diazepam 5 mg and 10 mg, alprazolam 0.5 mg, and nitrazepam 5 mg caused significant deterioration in vigilance performance along with perceived sleepiness and the need for a greater effort to overcome it. The onset of diazepam effect was quicker, whereas alprazolam effect lasted longer. No effect was noted in the short psychomotor tests except for the Bourdon Cancellation Test, where the first phase of diazepam effect was registered.


Subject(s)
Arousal/drug effects , Benzodiazepines/pharmacology , Acoustic Stimulation , Adult , Alprazolam/pharmacology , Diazepam/pharmacology , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Nitrazepam/pharmacology , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL