Baseline anxiety-sensitivity to estradiol fluctuations predicts anxiety symptom response to transdermal estradiol treatment in perimenopausal women - A randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The menopausal transition (perimenopause) is associated with an increased risk of major depression, characterized by anxiety and anhedonia phenotypes. Greater estradiol (E2) variability predicts the development of perimenopausal depression, especially within the context of stressful life events (SLEs). While transdermal E2 (TE2) reduces perimenopausal depressive symptoms, the mechanisms underlying TE2 efficacy and predictors of TE2 treatment response remain unknown. This study aimed at determining relationships between E2 fluctuations, mood symptoms, and physiologic stress-reactivity (cortisol and interleukin-6) and whether differences in mood-sensitivity to E2 fluctuations predict mood responses to TE2 treatment. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial investigated medically healthy women (46-60 years) in the early or late menopause transition. Baseline E2-sensitivity strength was calculated from eight weekly individual correlations between week-to-week E2 change and index week anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory) and anhedonia (Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale). Women then received eight weeks of TE2 or transdermal placebo. RESULTS: Analyses included 73 women (active TE2 n = 35). Greater baseline E2 fluctuations predicted greater anhedonia (p = .002), particularly in women with more SLEs. Greater E2 fluctuations also predicted higher cortisol (p = .012) and blunted interleukin-6 (p = .02) stress-responses. Controlling for baseline symptoms, TE2 was associated with lower post-treatment anxiety (p < .001) and anhedonia (p < .001) versus placebo. However, the efficacy of TE2 for anxiety (p = .007) and also for somatic complaints (p = .05) was strongest in women with greater baseline E2 sensitivity strength. CONCLUSIONS: TE2 treatment reduced perimenopausal anxiety and anhedonia. The ability of baseline mood-sensitivity to E2 fluctuations to predict greater TE2 efficacy has implications for individualized treatment of perimenopausal anxiety disorders.

Methods for characterizing ovarian and adrenal hormone variability and mood relationships in peripubertal females.

Peripubertal females are at elevated risk for developing affective illness compared to males, yet biological mechanisms underlying this sex disparity are poorly understood. Female risk for depression remains elevated across a woman's reproductive lifespan, implicating reproductive hormones. A sensitivity to normal hormone variability during reproductive transition events (e.g., perimenopause) precipitates affective disturbances in susceptible women; however, the extent of hormone variability during the female pubertal transition and whether vulnerability to peripubertal hormone flux impacts affective state change in peripubertal females has not been studied. 52 healthy peripubertal females (ages 11-14) provided 8 weekly salivary samples and mood ratings. 10 salivary ovarian and adrenal hormones (e.g., estrone, testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA)) were analyzed weekly for 8 weeks using an ultrasensitive assay to characterize the female peripubertal hormone environment and its association with affective state. Hormone variability indices, including standard deviation, mean squared and absolute successive differences of the 8 weekly measurements were analyzed by menarche status. Within-person partial correlations were computed to determine the strength of the relationship between weekly change in hormone level and corresponding mood rating for each participant. As expected, results indicated that hormone variability was greater for post- relative to pre-menarchal females and with advancing pubertal development, yet pregnenolone-sulfate and aldosterone did not differ by menarche status. Mood sensitivity to changes in estrone was exhibited by 57% of participants, whereas 37% were sensitive to testosterone and 6% were sensitive to DHEA changes. The present results offer novel evidence that a substantial proportion of peripubertal females appear to be mood sensitive to hormone changes and may inform future investigations on the biological mechanisms underlying hormone-induced affect dysregulation in peripubertal females.