A Review of Patellar Tendinopathy in Athletes Involved in Jumping Sports.

This review article discusses the anatomy and histopathology of the patellar tendon, as well as the risk factors and common interventions for patellar tendinopathy (PT) with a view to guide clinicians in treating athletes with patellar tendon pain. PT, or jumper's knee, refers to a chronic injury to the patellar tendon that affects athletes who engage in jumping and explosive movements. The condition is characterized by degeneration and disorganization of the collagen fibers in the tendon, an increase in mucoid ground substance, and fibroblast proliferation. Risk factors for patellar tendinopathy include participation in jumping sports, a greater counter-movement jump height, and training on hard surfaces. Nonoperative treatments for patellar tendinopathy include relative rest, stretching and strengthening exercises, and correction of biomechanical abnormalities. Surgery and other procedures, such as extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) and injection therapies, may be considered for patients who do not respond to conservative measures.

Cemented total knee arthroplasty provides greater knee range of motion at 2 years than cementless technique.

INTRODUCTION: Optimal fixation method between cemented, cementless, and hybrid techniques for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is still debated. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing cemented versus cementless TKA. METHODS: We reviewed 168 patients who underwent a primary TKA at a single academic institution between January 2015 and June 2017. Patients were categorized into cemented (n = 80) or cementless (n = 88) groups. Only patients with greater than or equal to 2-year follow-up were included in the study. Multivariate regressions were performed to analyze the relationship between the surgical fixation technique and the clinical outcomes. RESULTS: There were no differences in demographics or baseline operative characteristics between the two groups. The cemented group had fewer manipulations under anesthesia (MUA) (4 vs. 15, p = 0.01), longer intraoperative tourniquet times (101.30 vs. 93.55 min, p = 0.02), and increased knee range of motion (ROM) at final follow-up (111.48 vs. 103.75°, p = 0.02) compared to the cementless group. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Both cemented and cementless component fixation are viable options for (TKA). This study found that patients who underwent a cemented TKA required fewer MUA's and had greater final ROM compared to patients undergoing cementless TKA. Additional research is required regarding cementless and cemented fixation. We believe that the choice of which fixation technique to use ultimately comes down to patient characteristics and surgeon preference.