Corynebacterium glucuronolyticum in men with and without urethritis syndrome: An underrecognized pathogen or a bona fide commensal?

BACKGROUND: By analysing the largest collection of Corynebacterium glucuronolyticum (C. glucuronolyticum) isolates from a single centre thus far, we aimed to appraise a potential causal link between an infrequently isolated species and the urethritis syndrome in men. METHODS: A total of 1055 Caucasian male individuals with or without urethritis syndrome were included in this single-centre case-control study. Group-wise comparisons were pursued by analysing sociodemographic, behavioural and microbiological specificities between the two groups. C. glucuronolyticum isolates from urethral specimens were identified using the analytical profile index biotyping system (API Coryne) and additionally confirmed by MALDI-TOF mass-spectrometry, with subsequent determination of their antimicrobial sensitivity profiles. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05 (two-tailed). RESULTS: C. glucuronolyticum was isolated in 5.08% of study participants with urethritis syndrome and 3.60% of those without it (p = 0.303). In the urethritis group, the species was more frequently found as a sole isolate (p = 0.041) and after prior infection with Chlamydia trachomatis (p = 0.025). The most frequent presentation of urethritis included a clear discharge in small or moderate amounts, without any pathognomonic findings. The resistance rates were 62.22% for clindamycin, 42.22% for tetracycline and 26.67% for ciprofloxacin. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides major insights on the relevance of urethral C. glucuronolyticum in non-gonococcal urethritis, with significant implications for further aetiological research and management approaches.

The impact of Corynebacterium glucuronolyticum on semen parameters: a prospective pre-post-treatment study.

Corynebacterium glucuronolyticum (C. glucuronolyticum) is a rare isolate that is only recently being acknowledged as a potential urogenital pathogen. The bibliographical references on this bacterial species are scarce, and its influence on all semen parameters was hitherto unknown - therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate its effects on a range of sperm quality parameters. A prospective approach to compare semen parameters before and after treatment was used in this study. C. glucuronolyticum in semen specimens was identified using analytical profile index biotyping system (API Coryne) and additionally confirmed by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass-spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), with the determination of antimicrobial susceptibility by Kirby-Bauer method. Semen analysis was performed according to the criteria from the World Health Organization (with the use of Tygerberg method of sperm morphology categorization). Very strict inclusion criteria for participants also included detailed medical history and urological evaluation. From a total of 2169 screened semen specimens, the inclusion rate for participants with C. glucuronolyticum that satisfied all the criteria was 1.01%. Antibiogram-guided treatment of the infection with ensuing microbiological clearance has shown that the resolution of the infection correlates with statistically significant improvement in the vitality of spermatozoa, but also with a lower number of neck and mid-piece defects. Parameters such as sperm count, motility and normal morphology were not affected. In addition, susceptibility testing revealed a trend towards ciprofloxacin resistance, which is something that should be considered when selecting an optimal treatment approach. Albeit it is rarely encountered as a monoisolate in significant quantities, C. glucuronolyticum may negatively influence certain sperm parameters; therefore, it has to be taken into account in the microbiological analysis of urogenital samples.

[ASSESSMENT OF THE KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES OF NURSES ON THE SKIN CONDITION AND TREATMENT OF DAMAGE].

Practical experience and numerous studies have shown that, after finishing their studies nursing graduates are not sure in their independent assessment and treatment of wounds. It appears that nursing education lacks narrowly specialized educational content in this area, practical skills and connection between graduates and experts who follow the standards and guidelines in the area of wound healing. The aim of this study was to assess the knowledge through tests and attitudes of nurses/nursing graduates on the condition of the skin and damage treatment. In addition, the study was also aimed at learning about possible guidelines for the future content of the nursing curriculum studies in Croatia. The study was conducted on a sample of 71 students (six (8.5%) male and 65 (91.5%) female of Nursing Studies at University North. The subjects voluntarily and anonymously completed the survey electronically. A semi-structured standardized questionnaire was used, "Knowledge test about the basis of pressure ulcers in geriatric patients", designed by Dr Andrija Stampar Department of Health Gerontology, Reference Center for Health Care of the Elderly of the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Croatia. The test administered to the sample of students of nursing, mostly aged 18-25 (64.8%) showed correct answers to 12 questions asked, in a range of 17.9% to 100% (median 60.6%, SD 24.1, Q1 53.8%, Q3 81%). Answers to question 13 (daily work with patients) revealed that 39.4% of students knew and often used modern approach to the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers; the same percentage of students rarely used modern method of prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers, 26.8% were not familiar with the issue, while 2.8% were not interested in it. As for question 14 (given the existing contents on the treatment of pressure ulcers in the educational program for students of nursing), 47.9% of study subjects believed they needed more practical skills in treating pressure ulcers, 45.1% considered it necessary to introduce more contents on the treatment of pressure ulcers in regular courses, while 8.5% believed it was not necessary to introduce additional contents because there was enough knowledge on wound treatment. The results indicated that there was a relatively satisfactory partial knowledge to assess skin condition, prevention measures and treatment of pressure ulcers in the elderly, but also that more practical skills were needed in the treatment and modern dressing application, which can be considered as guidelines for future educational contents in the nursing studies. Based on the simple and standardized survey in a relatively broad sample of students of Nursing Studies at University North, student knowledge on the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers with modern methods can be well assessed. Scarce practical knowledge in the field of modern pressure ulcer treatment, the lack of professional literature revision in terms of modern guidelines and theories, as well as poor collaboration of scientific educational and health institutions are the key problems of insufficient knowledge of nursing graduates in daily work of treating chronic wounds. Student insecurity related to prevention and therapy in modern treatment of pressure ulcers show a possible direction for future educational contents of nursing studies. Additional similar studies are warranted in order to get a more detailed insight into assessment of practical and theoretical knowledge of graduates about modern care of patients with chronic wounds.