Setting priorities for comparative effectiveness research in inflammatory bowel disease: results of an international provider survey, expert RAND panel, and patient focus groups.

BACKGROUND: Comparative effectiveness research (CER) is an emerging field that compares the relative effectiveness of alternative strategies to prevent, diagnose, or treat patients who are typical of day-to-day practice. We developed a priority list of CER topics for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: Following the Institute of Medicine's approach, we developed and administered a survey to gastroenterologists asking for important CER topics in IBD. Two patient focus groups were convened to solicit additional CER studies. CER topics were presented to the expert panel using the RAND/UCLA methodology. Following initial ratings, the panel met to discuss and re-rate priorities. The top 10 CER topics were identified using a point-allocation system. RESULTS: Responses were collated into 234 CER topics across 21 categories, of which 87 were prioritized for discussion and re-rated. Disagreement regarding priorities was observed in 5 of 87 studies. We utilized a point-allocation system to prioritize the top-10 CER topics. These related to comparing the effectiveness of: biomarkers in IBD; withdrawal of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) or immunomodulators for Crohn's disease in remission; mucosal healing as an endpoint of treatment; infliximab levels versus standard infliximab dosing; anti-TNF monotherapy versus combination therapy in patients failing thiopurines; safety of long-term treatment options; anti-TNF versus thiopurines for prevention of postoperative recurrence; and treatment options for steroid-refractory UC. CONCLUSIONS: We systematically developed a list of high-priority IBD topics for CER based on a survey of gastroenterologists, expert review, and patient input. This list may guide IBD research toward the most important CER studies.

Review article: diagnosis and management of mesenteric ischaemia with an emphasis on pharmacotherapy.

Mesenteric ischaemia results from decreased blood flow to the bowel, causing cellular injury from lack of oxygen and nutrients. Acute mesenteric ischaemia (AMI) is an uncommon disorder with high morbidity and mortality, but outcomes are improved with prompt recognition and aggressive treatment. Five subgroups of AMI have been identified, with superior mesenteric artery embolism (SMAE) the most common. Older age and cardiovascular disease are common risk factors for AMI, excepting acute mesenteric venous thrombosis (AMVT), which affects younger patients with hypercoaguable states. AMI is characterized by sudden onset of abdominal pain; a benign abdominal exam may be observed prior to bowel infarction. Conventional angiography and more recently, computed tomography angiography, are the cornerstones of diagnosis. Correction of predisposing conditions, volume resuscitation and antibiotic treatment are standard treatments for AMI, and surgery is mandated in the setting of peritoneal signs. Intra-arterial vasodilators are used routinely in the treatment of non-occlusive mesenteric ischaemia (NOMI) and also are advocated in the treatment of occlusive AMI to decrease associated vasospasm. Thrombolytics have been used on a limited basis to treat occlusive AMI. A variety of agents have been studied in animal models to treat reperfusion injury, which sometimes can be more harmful than ischaemic injury. Chronic mesenteric ischaemia (CMI) usually is caused by severe obstructive atherosclerotic disease of two or more splanchnic vessels, presents with post-prandial pain and weight loss, and is treated by either surgical revascularization or percutaneous angioplasty and stenting.

Pancreatic carcinoma with brain metastases: case report and literature review.

The case of a patient developing multiple brain metastases from carcinoma of the exocrine pancreas has been described. A 56-year-old man with stage IV pancreatic cancer attained a clinical and radiographic response while receiving the G-FLIP chemotherapy regimen (biweekly gemcitabine, irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and cisplatin). After 4 months of therapy, he developed gait imbalance and weakness in the right hand. An MRI of the brain showed multiple 1-2 mm enhancing nodules in the cerebral hemispheres and pons. A subsequent biopsy confirmed that these were pancreatic carcinoma metastases. The patient experienced a rapid deterioration in his neurological status and died 3 days after brain biopsy. Previously reported cases of brain metastases from pancreatic cancer are reviewed.

Phase I dose-finding study of biweekly irinotecan in combination with fixed doses of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin, gemcitabine and cisplatin (G-FLIP) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer or other solid tumors.

This phase I trial was initiated based on encouraging clinical data with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV), gemcitabine and cisplatin (G-FLIP) in the therapy of solid tumors. In this trial, G-FLIP has been modified to facilitate outpatient administration and to optimize sequence-dependent synergistic activity. Treatment consisted of biweekly (once every 14 days) cycles of sequential gemcitabine 500 mg/m, irinotecan per dose escalation schedule, bolus 5-FU 400 mg/m and LV 300 mg on day 1 followed by a 24-h 5-FU infusion 1500 mg/m, followed by cisplatin 35 mg/m on day 2. The irinotecan starting dose was 80 mg/m and escalated by 20 mg/m in cohorts of three patients until the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was defined. Twenty-three patients were enrolled (13 men/10 women) with the following cancers: 11 pancreatic, five gallbladder, three squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, one hepatocellular carcinoma, one melanoma, one gastric, and one breast cancer. Median patient age was 63 years (range 44-78) and median Karnofsky performance status (KPS) was 80. Patients received a median of 8 cycles (range 1-16) over five irinotecan dose levels (80, 100, 120, 140 and 160 mg/m). Dose-limiting toxicity consisting of grade 3 nausea/vomiting despite aggressive anti-emetic therapy occurred in one patient at dose level 1 and three patients at dose level 3. Grade 3-4 hematological toxicities per patient consisted of thrombocytopenia (3%), anemia (6%), thrombosis (23%), neutropenia (16%) and neutropenic fever (10%). Of 18 patients evaluable for response, one complete response (pancreatic) and eight partial responses (three gallbladder, two pancreatic, two head and neck, and one breast) were attained. Seven patients had disease stabilization (five pancreatic, one hepatocellular and one gastric) for a median of 16 weeks (range 10-22). Median time to disease progression among all 23 patients enrolled to the phase I portion of the trial was 20.5 weeks (range 4-37). We conclude that G-FLIP is a novel outpatient chemotherapy regimen with acceptable toxicity at the maximum tolerated irinotecan dose of 120 mg/m. The phase II trial of G-FLIP using an irinotecan dose of 120 mg/m for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer is ongoing.

Response to therapy is independently associated with survival prolongation in chronic myelogenous leukemia in the blastic phase.

BACKGROUND: Achievement of minimal tumor burden, such as complete response, has been accepted as a surrogate marker for improved survival in many solid and hematologic carcinomas. Several new agents have been approved recently for orphan disease indications or unmet medical needs, based on response analyses. This has not been the case for chronic myelogenous leukemia in the blastic phase (CML-BP), despite its poor prognosis, because response has not been proven to be a valuable endpoint for survival prolongation. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of response in CML-BP on survival prolongation. STUDY GROUP AND METHODS In total, 328 patients with CML-BP referred from 1989 to 1999 were studied; 311 patients received therapy for CML-BP, and 275 were evaluable for response. Blastic phase CML was defined by the presence of 30% or more blasts in the blood or bone marrow, or extramedullary disease. Treatment responses were reviewed and categorized as proposed in previous large studies. Four categoric response groups were defined further based on significant differences in outcome: cytogenetic response, hematologic response, bone marrow improvement, and failure. The association of treatment response with survival was evaluated by multivariate and landmark analyses. RESULTS: The association of response with survival was analyzed among the 275 patients who had evaluable responses, and follow-up information was documented. Univariate analysis of pretreatment characteristics found performance status, hemoglobin levels, platelet counts, peripheral blasts, additional chromosomal abnormalities, and blastic phase morphology as showing significant associations with survival (P < 0.1). A multivariate analysis found platelet counts and blastic morphology as independent significant factors associated with survival (P < 0.05). A landmark analysis conducted at 8 weeks from start of therapy showed the beneficial effect of achieving response on survival prolongation (P < 0.001). A repeat multivariate at the 8-week landmark time in the 240 patients alive at that time, which included pretreatment characteristics and treatment response, confirmed the independent significant association of morphology (P = 0.003), platelet counts (P = 0.04), and response (P < 0.001) with survival. CONCLUSIONS: Response to therapy is a significant independent factor associated with survival prolongation and maybe an acceptable therapeutic endpoint for approving new treatments in CML-BP.

Irinotecan combined with gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and cisplatin (G-FLIP) is an effective and noncrossresistant treatment for chemotherapy refractory metastatic pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Single agents have only modest activity as treatment for metastatic pancreatic cancer with response rates of less than 10% and median survivals of less than 6 months. Evaluations of single-agent gemcitabine and rubitecan as second-line treatment for relapsed pancreatic cancer have reported good patient tolerability and median survivals of 3.85 months and 4.7 months, respectively. Regimens incorporating two drugs have demonstrated encouraging activity and clinical impact compared with single-agent therapy. G-FLIP is a regimen designed to incorporate four active single agents into a tolerable and active combination. This analysis is a retrospective evaluation of the efficacy and safety of the G-FLIP regimen as second-line chemotherapy in a series of consecutively treated patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. METHODS: G-FLIP was administered over 48 hours and repeated every 2 weeks. Day 1 treatment consisted of sequentially administered gemcitabine 500 mg/m(2), irinotecan 80 mg/m(2), leucovorin 300 mg, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m(2) bolus followed by infusional 5-FU 600 mg/m(2) over 8 hours. Day 2 treatment consisted of leucovorin 300 mg and 5-FU 400 mg/m(2) bolus, followed by cisplatin 50 to 75 mg/m(2), and then infusional 5-FU 600 mg/m(2) over 8 hours. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients with histologically confirmed metastatic pancreatic cancer were consecutively treated. The median patient age was 64.5 years (range 41-82 years) and all patients had objective disease progression on prior therapy: 32 patients had disease progression with gemcitabine and 31 had disease progression with a gemcitabine/5-fluorouracil/cisplatin combination. Grade 3-4 hematological toxicities included anemia (23%), thrombocytopenia (53%), and neutropenia (38%). There were no grade 3-4 neutropenic fevers, treatment-related mortalities, or withdrawals. Nonhematological grade 3-4 toxicities were rare: nausea/vomiting (3%), neurotoxicity (3%), nephrotoxicity (6%), and diarrhea (3%). Based on RECIST criteria a partial response (PR) was attained in eight patients (24%) and seven patients had stable disease (SD). Seven and six patients who attained a PR or SD, respectively, had disease progression with prior gemcitabine-based therapy. The median time to disease progression for all 34 patients was 3.9 months and 5.9 months for the eight patients who attained a PR. Median overall survival for all 34 patients was 10.3 months. CONCLUSION: Adding a single new drug such as irinotecan to the same first-line chemotherapy combination upon disease progression may be an important alternative to switching to different drug classes for treatment of relapsed/resistant cancer. The promising clinical outcomes and moderate toxicity associated with G-FLIP in this heavily pretreated group warrant development of this novel regimen including tests as first-line therapy in patients with diseases likely to be responsive to the drugs contained in this combination.

Treatment of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a comprehensive review.

The current standard therapy for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma is the single-agent gemcitabine, by the increasingly used fixed rate infusion of 10 mg/m2/min. There is strong reason to anticipate that additional benefits will accrue with gemcitabine-based combination chemotherapy. Gemcitabine and CPT-11 are synergistic with many drugs and non-cross-resistant with each other. Rigorous clinical investigations will be performed in an effort to identify optimal drug sequence and schedules for these novel combinations.

Therapy for regionally unresectable pancreatic cancer.

Chemoradiotherapy for unresectable LAPA is associated with a median survival time of 9 months or more and manageable toxic side effects. Experience with RT-FSP provides evidence that chemoradiotherapy may extend survival time with or without resection. Chemoradiotherapy or entry into clinical trials is the standard for LAPA. The next generation of clinical trials for LAPA will incorporate newer agents, such as gemcitabine and irinotecan into chemoradiotherapy regimens. Novel agents, such as matrix-metaloproteinase inhibitors, transcription factor inhibitors, antiangiogenic factors, cyclooxegenase-2 inhibitors, and agents that target the K-ras point mutations associated with 90% of pancreatic cancers, are in early phases or clinical development and may have activity for micrometastic or minimal residual disease. Lower toxicity makes these drugs attractive agents for maintenance therapies. The multitude of new agents provides hope to patients and a welcome challenge for further investigation.

Phase I bioequivalency study of MitoExtra and mitomycin C in patients with solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: This study compares serum pharmacokinetics, urinary excretion patterns, and relative bioequivalencies of single doses of MitoExtra (ME; SuperGen, San Ramon, CA) and mitomycin C (MMC). METHODS: Thirty-five patients were entered into this open-label, single-institution, crossover study with 2 treatment arms. Each patient received alternating courses of ME and MMC as 15 mg/m(2) single intravenous doses via a short intravenous infusion. Patients were sequentially assigned to receive either ME or MMC as their first treatment course. The courses were given in 6-week intervals and could be repeated up to 4 times in patients with responding disease. Pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed during the first two courses of therapy. RESULTS: The noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis conducted on serum and urine data obtained from patients who received both ME and MMC indicates that the kinetic disposition of these two formulations is similar. This is evident when the mean (+/- standard deviation) values of the various pharmacokinetic parameters are compared. There were no significant differences in any of the kinetic parameters obtained between treatments in all patients examined. The statistical evaluation conducted on the 25 patients that completed both arms of the 2-way pharmacokinetic crossover demonstrates that ME is bioequivalent to MMC. Hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities were similar between the two treatments. There were three clinically significant infusion-related complications associated with MMC administration and none associated with ME. CONCLUSIONS: The similar pharmacokinetics of MMC and ME suggest complete release of MMC from the hydroxypropyl-Beta-cyclodextrin carrier contained in the ME formulation. Further studies are needed to define the pharmacodynamics, toxicity, and efficacy of this drug-carrier complex.

Avascular necrosis of the femoral head in chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with interferon-alpha: a synergistic correlation?

BACKGROUND: The objectives of this study were to describe cases of avascular necrosis of the femoral head (ANFH) observed in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients who were treated with interferon-alpha and to review the literature. METHODS: The authors undertook a case review of the M. D. Anderson experience with ANFH occurring in CML patients who were managed with interferon-alpha-based therapy. MEDLINE (from 1966 to November 1999) and CancerLit (from 1983 to November 1999) searches were conducted to identify cases of avascular necrosis (AVN) associated with either CML or interferon-alpha. RESULTS: Three patients with ANFH were identified from the authors' experience. No common features related to the disease or therapy were seen among them, except for the presence of thrombocytosis and loss of response. A literature review revealed seven cases of ANFH associated with CML with or without interferon-alpha-based therapy. ANFH was not reported in association with interferon-alpha use for indications other than the treatment of patients with CML. CONCLUSIONS: ANFH may be the result of an interaction between CML and interferon-alpha therapy. ANFH that occurs in patients with CML who are treated with interferon-alpha should be recognized for treatment implications. Thrombocytosis with consequent microvascular thrombi and avascular necrosis manifesting in susceptible vascular or weight-bearing areas (e.g., the femoral head) may be an associated finding along with loss of response to interferon-alpha therapy.

The role of the anterior cingulate in automatic and controlled processes: a developmental neuroanatomical study.

This study examines the role of the anterior cingulate in the development of attention. Task performance relying predominantly on either automatic or controlled processes was correlated with magnetic resonance imaging based measures of the anterior cingulate in 26 normal children ages 5 to 16 years. Attentional measures were assessed with a visual discrimination paradigm. Parasagittal slices from a 3-D, T1-weighted volume data set were used to obtain area measurements of the anterior cingulate. Response latencies decreased with age for both tasks. There were significant correlations between attentional performance and right, but not left, anterior cingulate measures. Performance was faster and more accurate during trials requiring predominantly controlled processes for those children with larger right anterior cingulate measures. The results are consistent with adult neuroimaging findings of activation in the right anterior cingulate during attention tasks and with lesion studies implicating greater right hemisphere involvement in attentional processes.

Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of human brain development: ages 4-18.

Brain magnetic resonance images (MRI) of 104 healthy children and adolescents, age 4-18, showed significant effects of age and gender on brain morphometry. Males had larger cerebral (9%) and cerebellar (8%) volumes (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.008, respectively), which remained significant even after correction for height and weight. After adjusting for cerebral size, the putamen and globus pallidus remained larger in males, while relative caudate size was larger in females. Neither cerebral nor cerebellar volume changed significantly across this age range. Lateral ventricular volume increased significantly in males (trend for females), with males showing an increase in slope after age 11. In males only, caudate and putamen decrease with age (P = 0.007 and 0.05, respectively). The left lateral ventricles and putamen were significantly greater than the right (P = 0.01 and 0.001, respectively). In contrast, the cerebral hemispheres and caudate showed a highly consistent right-greater-than-left asymmetry (P < 0.0001 for both). All volumes demonstrated a high degree of variability. These findings highlight gender-specific maturational changes of the developing brain and the need for large gender-matched samples in pediatric neuropsychiatric studies.

Reliability of cerebral measures in repeated examinations with magnetic resonance imaging.

This study examined the reliability of quantitative measures of cerebral magnetic resonance images (MRI) in repeated scans. Ten subjects were scanned twice, at 2- to 4-week intervals. Volumetric data from 14 regions of the cerebrum, the caudate nucleus, and the lateral ventricles and area measures of the corpus callosum were acquired. Intrarater and scan-rescan reliabilities, including the relative percent error from each of these two sources, were determined for each structure. Intraclass correlations ranged from 0.88 for the head of the caudate nucleus to 0.99 for the ventricular volume. Quantitative cerebral MRI measures of these structures are stable over time intervals of 2-4 weeks.

Quantitative morphology of the corpus callosum in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

OBJECTIVE: By means of quantitative neuroanatomic imaging the authors assessed the hypothesis that there are structural brain abnormalities relevant to frontal lobe circuitry in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHOD: The midsagittal cross-sectional area of the corpus callosum, divided into seven sections, was measured from magnetic resonance images of 18 boys with ADHD and 18 carefully matched normal boys. RESULTS: Two anterior regions, the rostrum and the rostral body, were found to have significantly smaller areas in the ADHD group. These areas correlated in the expected direction with teacher and parent ratings of hyperactivity/impulsivity. CONCLUSIONS: This finding supports theories of abnormal frontal lobe development and function in ADHD.