Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
Ergonomics ; 44(11): 953-61, 2001 Sep 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11693246

ABSTRACT

Protective clothing (PC) results in a micro-environment between itself and the body. Workers are then exposed to a heat stress greater than the ambient environment alone, which is a reflection of micro-environment, metabolic rate and time. Adjustments to the ambient environment to account for the micro-environment have been formulated as a means to predict heat strain for safety and productivity purposes. Measurement of the actual micro-environment was made for a mean of 63.1 +/- 7.9 min using a remote sensor at the shoulder, hip and thigh levels on 15 subjects during a continuous work protocol (300 kcal/h) in impermeable PC at an ambient temperature of 30.1 degrees C wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT) (32 degrees C dry, 29 degrees C wet, 33 degrees C globe). Micro-environment temperature increased over the duration of the work period. There was no statistically significant difference (p>0.05) between the measurements made at the three different body sites for temperature or humidity. The mean micro-environmental WBGT at the end of work was 34.6 degrees C WBGT. Micro-environment WBGT increased rapidly in the first 20 min of work then slowed, rising only 0.5 degrees C WBGT from 40 to 60 min. These results suggest that at this particular high ambient temperature (30.1 degrees C WBGT) an adjustment factor of 5 degrees C WBGT would give a more accurate indication of thermal stress for up to 1 h of continuous moderate work within PC. For shorter work durations, an even smaller adjustment would be appropriate.


Subject(s)
Physical Exertion/physiology , Protective Clothing , Adult , Body Temperature/physiology , Heart Rate/physiology , Hot Temperature , Humans , Humidity , Male , Reference Values
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...