Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Bioresour Technol ; 196: 685-93, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26316402

ABSTRACT

Traditional physical/chemical end-of-the-pipe technologies for odor abatement are relatively expensive and present high environmental impacts. On the other hand, biotechnologies have recently emerged as cost-effective and environmentally friendly alternatives but are still limited by their investment costs and land requirements. A more desirable approach to odor control is the prevention of odorant formation before being released to the atmosphere, but limited information is available beyond good design and operational practices of the wastewater treatment process. The present paper reviews two widely applicable and economic alternatives for odor control, Activated Sludge Recycling (ASR) and Oxidized Ammonium Recycling (OAR), by discussing their fundamentals, key operating parameters and experience from the available pilot and field studies. Both technologies present high application potential using readily available plant by-products with a minimum plant upgrading, and low investment and operating costs, contributing to the sustainability and economic efficiency of odor control at wastewater treatment facilities.


Subject(s)
Ammonium Compounds/chemistry , Odorants/prevention & control , Sewage , Wastewater/chemistry , Water Purification/methods , Oxidation-Reduction , Recycling
2.
J Environ Manage ; 149: 77-84, 2015 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25463573

ABSTRACT

This paper aims at analysing the environmental benefits and impacts associated with the treatment of malodorous emissions from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). The life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology was applied to two biological treatments, namely biofilter (BF) and biotrickling filter (BTF), two physical/chemical alternatives, namely activated carbon tower (AC) and chemical scrubber (CS), and a hybrid combination of BTF + AC. The assessment provided consistent guidelines for technology selection, not only based on removal efficiencies, but also on the environmental impact associated with the treatment of emissions. The results showed that biological alternatives entailed the lowest impacts. On the contrary, the use of chemicals led to the highest impacts for CS. Energy use was the main contributor to the impact related to BF and BTF, whereas the production of glass fibre used as infrastructure material played an important role in BTF impact. Production of NaClO entailed the highest burdens among the chemicals used in CS, representing ∼ 90% of the impact associated to chemicals. The frequent replacement of packing material in AC was responsible for the highest environmental impacts, granular activated carbon (GAC) production and its final disposal representing more than 50% of the impact in most categories. Finally, the assessment of BTF + AC showed that the hybrid technology is less recommendable than BF and BTF, but friendlier to the environment than physical/chemical treatments.


Subject(s)
Charcoal/chemistry , Environment , Filtration/methods , Odorants/prevention & control , Waste Disposal, Fluid/methods , Water Purification/methods , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Filtration/instrumentation , Guidelines as Topic , Odorants/analysis
3.
Water Sci Technol ; 69(7): 1426-33, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24718332

ABSTRACT

Technologies for odour control have been widely reviewed and their optimal range of application and performance has been clearly established. Selection criteria, mainly driven by process economics, are usually based on the air flow volume, the inlet concentrations and the required removal efficiency. However, these criteria are shifting with social and environmental issues becoming as important as process economics. A methodology is illustrated to quantify sustainability and robustness of odour control technology in the context of odour control at wastewater treatment or water recycling plants. The most commonly used odour abatement techniques (biofiltration, biotrickling filtration, activated carbon adsorption, chemical scrubbing, activated sludge diffusion and biotrickling filtration coupled with activated carbon adsorption) are evaluated in terms of: (1) sustainability, with quantification of process economics, environmental performance and social impact using the sustainability metrics of the Institution of Chemical Engineers; (2) sensitivity towards design and operating parameters like utility prices (energy and labour), inlet odour concentration (H2S) and design safety (gas contact time); (3) robustness, quantifications of operating reliability, with recommendations to improve reliability during their lifespan of operations. The results show that the odour treatment technologies with the highest investments presented the lowest operating costs, which means that the net present value (NPV) should be used as a selection criterion rather than investment costs. Economies of scale are more important in biotechniques (biofiltration and biotrickling filtration) as, at increased airflows, their reduction in overall costs over 20 years (NPV20) is more extreme when compared to the physical/chemical technologies (chemical scrubbing and activated carbon filtration). Due to their low NPV and their low environmental impact, activated sludge diffusion and biotrickling filtration are in general the most cost-effective, and probably the technologies to be considered first for odour treatment in a wastewater treatment or water recycling plant. When, in an economical and risk evaluation, the reliability is counted to be as relevant as the overall costs, a hybrid technology (biotrickling filtration with activated carbon polishing) would be comparable to biotrickling filtration and activated sludge diffusion as the most preferred technologies, when all technologies are designed to have a 99% reduction of H2S and a 95% reduction of the odour concentration.


Subject(s)
Odorants/prevention & control , Waste Management , Conservation of Natural Resources
4.
Biotechnol Adv ; 30(6): 1354-63, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22366514

ABSTRACT

The sensitivity of the economics of the five most commonly applied odour abatement technologies (biofiltration, biotrickling filtration, activated carbon adsorption, chemical scrubbing and a hybrid technology consisting of a biotrickling filter coupled with carbon adsorption) towards design parameters and commodity prices was evaluated. Besides, the influence of the geographical location on the Net Present Value calculated for a 20 years lifespan (NPV20) of each technology and its robustness towards typical process fluctuations and operational upsets were also assessed. This comparative analysis showed that biological techniques present lower operating costs (up to 6 times) and lower sensitivity than their physical/chemical counterparts, with the packing material being the key parameter affecting their operating costs (40-50% of the total operating costs). The use of recycled or partially treated water (e.g. secondary effluent in wastewater treatment plants) offers an opportunity to significantly reduce costs in biological techniques. Physical/chemical technologies present a high sensitivity towards H2S concentration, which is an important drawback due to the fluctuating nature of malodorous emissions. The geographical analysis evidenced high NPV20 variations around the world for all the technologies evaluated, but despite the differences in wage and price levels, biofiltration and biotrickling filtration are always the most cost-efficient alternatives (NPV20). When, in an economical evaluation, the robustness is as relevant as the overall costs (NPV20), the hybrid technology would move up next to BTF as the most preferred technologies.


Subject(s)
Air Pollution/economics , Air Pollution/prevention & control , Commerce/economics , Environmental Restoration and Remediation/economics , Environmental Restoration and Remediation/methods , Odorants/prevention & control , Biotechnology/economics , Costs and Cost Analysis , Geography
5.
Environ Sci Technol ; 45(3): 1100-6, 2011 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21275373

ABSTRACT

Biofiltration, activated sludge diffusion, biotrickling filtration, chemical scrubbing, activated carbon adsorption, regenerative incineration, and a hybrid technology (biotrickling filtration coupled with carbon adsorption) are comparatively evaluated in terms of environmental performance, process economics, and social impact by using the IChemE Sustainability Metrics in the context of odor treatment from wastewater treatment plants (WWTP). This comparative analysis showed that physical/chemical technologies presented higher environmental impacts than their biological counterparts in terms of energy, material and reagents consumption, and hazardous-waste production. Among biological techniques, the main impact was caused by the high water consumption to maintain biological activity (although the use of secondary effluent water can reduce both this environmental impact and operating costs), biofiltration additionally exhibiting high land and material requirements. From a process economics viewpoint, technologies with the highest investments presented the lowest operating costs (biofiltration and biotrickling filtration), which suggested that the Net Present Value should be used as selection criterion. In addition, a significant effect of the economy of scale on the investment costs and odorant concentration on operating cost was observed. The social benefits derived from odor abatement were linked to nuisance reductions in the nearby population and improvements in occupational health within the WWTP, with the hybrid technology exhibiting the highest benefits. On the basis of their low environmental impact, high deodorization performance, and low Net Present Value, biotrickling filtration and AS diffusion emerged as the most promising technologies for odor treatment in WWTP.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants/analysis , Odorants/analysis , Sewage/chemistry , Waste Disposal, Fluid/methods , Water Pollutants, Chemical/analysis , Air Pollutants/chemistry , Air Pollutants/metabolism , Air Pollution/prevention & control , Air Pollution/statistics & numerical data , Biodegradation, Environmental , Sewage/microbiology , Waste Disposal, Fluid/economics , Water Pollutants, Chemical/chemistry , Water Pollutants, Chemical/metabolism
6.
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol ; 58(5): 690-4, 2002 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11956757

ABSTRACT

Recent studies have focused on using vapor-phase bioreactors for the treatment of volatile organic compounds from contaminated air streams. Although high removal capacities have been achieved in many studies, long-term operation is often unstable at high pollutant loadings due to biomass accumulation and drying of the packing medium. In this study, three bench-scale bioreactors were operated to determine the effect of packing material and fungal predation on toluene removal efficiency and pressure drop. Toluene elimination capacities (mass toluene removed per unit packing per unit time) above 100 g m(-3) h(-1) were obtained in the fungal bioreactors packed with light-weight, artificial medium, and submersion of the packing in mineral medium once per week was found to provide sufficient moisture and nutrients to the biofilm. The use of mites as fungal predators improved performance by increasing the overall mineralization of toluene to CO(2), and by dislodging biomass along the bioreactor.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants/metabolism , Bioreactors , Filtration/instrumentation , Mites/physiology , Toluene/metabolism , Aluminum Oxide/chemistry , Animals , Ascomycota/metabolism , Biodegradation, Environmental , Biomass , Host-Parasite Interactions , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Mites/ultrastructure , Polyurethanes/chemistry , Silicon Dioxide/chemistry
7.
Exp Appl Acarol ; 27(4): 265-76, 2002.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12797401

ABSTRACT

The effects of relative humidity, temperature, pH and vapor-phase toluene concentration on Tyrophagus putrescentiae growth on Cladophialophora sp. were tested in controlled environmental chambers. It was observed that the mites were able to reproduce readily at relative humidities between 90% and 97% as well as on porous perlite support material pre-soaked in nutrient media of pH 2.5, 4 and 7. Also, the presence of toluene at gas-phase concentrations of 500 to 2000 mg m(-3) was found to be non-toxic to the mites. The mites, however, were unable to maintain a large population when the temperature was maintained at 14 degrees C, and overpopulation of the living space led to declines in mite population over time. Overall, it was found to be relatively simple to cultivate mites that may be used for fungal biomass control measures in biofilter applications.


Subject(s)
Environment , Filtration/methods , Fungi/physiology , Mites/growth & development , Animals , Humidity , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Mites/drug effects , Mites/physiology , Population Density , Reproduction , Temperature , Toluene/pharmacology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...