Pharmacists and transitions of care from emergency department to home.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact of a pharmacist-led telephone outreach program among patients discharged from the emergency department (ED) to home. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a randomized controlled study from February to November 2019 at a tertiary care academic medical center. METHODS: At ED discharge, participants were randomly assigned to usual care (controls) or usual care plus the pharmacist's review (intervention group). Eligible individuals included those being discharged from the ED to home with 8 or more medications. A pharmacist telephoned patients in the intervention group within 48 to 96 hours after ED discharge. The medications in the patient's record from the ED were compared with what the patient was taking at home. Discrepancies were communicated to the primary provider via fax or telephone. The primary outcome was overall health care utilization including unplanned hospital readmissions or ED visits within 30 days of discharge. The effect of the intervention on the number of acute events was analyzed using a Poisson regression model adjusting for relevant baseline characteristics. RESULTS: Of 90 eligible participants, 45 patients each were in the intervention and control groups. A total of 26 patients (58%) in the intervention group were reached, and 56 interventions were provided by the pharmacists. There was no significant difference between groups for overall health care utilization (adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 1.01; 95% CI, 0.50-2.06; P = .96), hospitalizations (aRR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.02-2.18; P = .19), and ED visits (aRR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.56-2.79; P = .59). CONCLUSIONS: A pharmacist-led telephone outreach program conducted after ED discharge was not associated with a change in health care utilization.

Medication Use Among Patients Reporting Xerostomia of an Academic Dental Clinic.

Background: Global prevalence of xerostomia has been reported at 22% (range 0.01%-45%), negatively impacting oral health, nutrition intake, and quality of life. The causal relationship between xerostomia and medications remains uncertain but greater understanding could guide interventions. Objective: To describe the demographic characteristics and medication regimens in patients with xerostomia of an academic dental clinic. Method: This is a retrospective academic dental clinic record review from July 1, 2018 to October 27, 2020. Patient records were obtained from the University at Buffalo, School of Dental Medicine. Xerostomia status was determined via query of electronic health records and validated by manual review. Pharmacologic class and xerostomic potential of medications were identified by the Veterans Affairs Drug Classification System and drug compendia, respectively. Predictors of medication use were assessed using a multiple logistic regression model. Results: Of 37 403 examined records, 366 (0.98%) were identified as xerostomic. After excluding confounding factors (Sjogren's and radiation), 275 of 317 patients received at least one xerostomic medication, majority were female (240, 66%) versus male (126, 34%). Mean ± (SD) age was 64.9 ± 15.11 years. A total of 208 (57%) patients were aged ≥65. The median number of total and xerostomic medications were 8 (interquartile range [IQR], 4-12) and 4 (IQR, 2-7), respectively. The 3 most prevalent xerostomic pharmacologic classes were antidepressants (131, 35%), gastric medications (101, 28%), and vitamin D (87, 24%). Conclusion: Despite observed prevalence of xerostomia lower than global prevalence, xerostomic medication burden for patients experiencing xerostomia was high. Pharmacist-led interprofessional collaborations should be investigated to reduce xerostomic burden.

A cross-sectional survey of attitudes and barriers toward pharmacist services at predoctoral academic dental institutions.

BACKGROUND: The pharmacy profession continues to evolve through novel practice settings and collaborations. Recent reports have highlighted services provided by pharmacists in academic dental settings. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to measure attitudes and barriers to pharmacist services at academic dental institutions via a survey of dental school administrators. METHODS: A survey was circulated in summer 2019 to all accredited dental schools in the United States through the American Dental Education Association clinic dean listserv. The survey consisted of Likert scale questions pertaining to barriers and attitudes regarding pharmacist services in dental education programs and clinics. The survey was open from July 2019 to December 2019. Responses were analyzed with descriptive statistics and Spearman rank correlation. RESULTS: Complete attitude and barrier responses were received from 30 of 66 accredited institutions. Responding schools showed a generally positive attitude toward pharmacist services. Respondents identified funding as the barrier with greatest impact on program development and expansion. CONCLUSION: Attitudes among dental education program administrators regarding pharmacists are generally positive. Barriers remain to fully incorporating pharmacists into dental institutions in the United States. Increased funding and reimbursement for pharmacy services would support universal pharmacist integration to this practice setting.

An environmental scan of pharmacists supporting pre-doctoral dental education institutions.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: Reports have described pharmacists providing services within academic dental settings. The full scope of these activities and where they exist is unreported. This environmental scan was performed to identify and summarize the levels in which pharmacists provide support to predoctoral dental education programs. METHODS: A survey was circulated in summer 2019 to all CODA accredited dental schools through the American Dental Education Association (ADEA) clinical dean listserv. The IRB approved survey consisted of 23 questions pertaining to the pharmacist's role in predoctoral dental education programs. Institutions were asked whether pharmacists were used and what kinds of services pharmacists provided. Pharmacist roles were classified into standard pharmacy services, clinical pharmacy services, medication inventory, education, and administration/research. Univariate analysis was performed on responses and reported using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: A response rate of 59.1% from 66 institutions was achieved. Of those responding, 28.21% reported utilizing a pharmacist at their institution. Of the institutions responding positively to utilizing a pharmacist, the most common standard pharmacy services used were patient counseling regarding a disease state (50%), and medication errors/adverse event reporting (60%). Some clinical pharmacy services provided were medication history collection (70%), advising antimicrobial selection (50%), and treatment plan consultation (60%). Pharmacists were also found to be active in education, school administration, and research. CONCLUSION: Pharmacists are utilized at just over a quarter of responding CODA accredited predoctoral dental education institutions in the United States. Where deployed, pharmacists provide a wide array of services.

Practical considerations in prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

PURPOSE: There are increasing reports in the literature of high rates of coagulopathy and venous thromboembolism (VTE) among hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Understanding of these abnormalities is continually evolving, but these conditions may pose a risk to patients with COVID-19 beyond the risk typically seen in critically ill patients. SUMMARY: There are currently no widely accepted evidence-based guidelines regarding specifics related to treatment and prevention of COVID-19-related coagulopathies. Areas of management requiring clinical equipoise include agent selection and dosing, continuation vs interruption of home oral anticoagulant therapy during hospital admission, and postdischarge VTE prophylaxis. Clinicians may wish to consider use of a stratified, 3-tiered approach of low-intensity anticoagulation, intermediate-intensity anticoagulation, and therapeutic-dose anticoagulation. Patients can be categorized by tier depending on their risk factors for VTE, acuity of illness, and laboratory values such as D-dimer level. CONCLUSION: Practical guidance on anticoagulation considerations and dosing suggestions are provided to assist clinicians faced with challenging anticoagulation-related situations in caring for hospitalized patients with COVID-19 until formal evidence-based guidelines become available.

Decreased mortality in patients prescribed vancomycin after implementation of antimicrobial stewardship program.

BACKGROUND: The impact of an antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) on 30-day mortality rates was evaluated in patients prescribed vancomycin in a Veterans Affairs hospital. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients receiving a minimum of 48 hours of vancomycin during October 2006-July 2014. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine predictors of mortality. Interventions of the ASP consist of appropriate antibiotic selection, dosing, microbiology, and treatment duration. RESULTS: Death occurred in 12.4% of 453 patients. Of the 56 deaths, 64.3% occurred during prestewardship versus 35.7% during stewardship (P = .021). Increased mortality was associated with pre-ASP (odds ratio [OR], 2.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-4.27), age (unit OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.05-1.12), nephrotoxicity (OR, 3.24; 95% CI, 1.27-8.01), and hypotension (OR, 3.28; 95% CI, 1.42-7.44). Patients treated in the intensive care unit were associated with increased mortality. Patients in the stewardship group experienced lower rates of mortality, which may be caused by interventions initiated by the stewardship team, including minimizing nephrotoxicity and individualized chart review. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality in patients treated with vancomycin was decreased after antimicrobial stewardship was implemented. As anticipated, older age, hypotension, nephrotoxicity, and intensive care unit admission were associated with an increased incidence of mortality.

Impact of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program on Patient Safety in Veterans Prescribed Vancomycin.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine the safety impact of an antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) on vancomycin-associated nephrotoxicity and to examine risk factors contributing to the development of toxicity. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of data from 453 veterans receiving vancomycin in the VA Western New York Healthcare System between October 2006 and July 2014. Nephrotoxicity was defined as an increase in serum creatinine of ≥ 0.5 mg/dL or by 50% of baseline for 2 consecutive days. FINDINGS: Patients receiving vancomycin after the implementation of the ASP were less likely to develop nephrotoxicity (odds ratio [OR] = 2.06; 95% CI, 1.02-4.28). Nephrotoxicity occurred in 6.84% of patients from the pre-ASP cohort and in 3.75% of patients after the implementation of the ASP. Predictors of nephrotoxicity included hospital service (surgical service, OR = 2.29; 95% CI, 1.13-4.64), elevated maximum trough concentration (unit OR = 1.15; 95% CI, 1.10-1.20), and concurrent piperacillin/tazobactam therapy (OR = 3.21; 95% CI, 1.43-7.96). The number of vancomycin trough concentration measurements per patient did not vary between the pre-ASP and ASP groups. IMPLICATIONS: ASPs represent an important aspect of a patient-safety initiative in order to reduce vancomycin-associated nephrotoxicity. Concurrent piperacillin/tazobactam therapy, surgical service, and elevated maximum trough concentration were risk factors for nephrotoxicity.

Achievement of therapeutic anti-Xa levels in a proven heparin-resistant patient through the use of nontraditional high-dose enoxaparin.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the successful use of high-dose enoxaparin therapy (1.5 mg/kg subcutaneously twice daily) to attain a therapeutic anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) level in a cancer patient with heparin resistance. CASE SUMMARY: A proven heparin-resistant patient with venous thromboembolism (VTE) and lung cancer who required approximately 66 000 units of unfractionated heparin daily was successfully transitioned to an off-label high-dose enoxaparin (OLHDE) 1.5 mg/kg subcutaneously twice daily. The patient was maintained on this same dose, and therapeutic levels were confirmed via use of the anti-Xa monitoring test. The patient was able to be discharged from the medical floor on this same dose with no further complications of VTE noted. No adverse events from this dosing were observed during the duration of therapy. DISCUSSION: Options for overcoming heparin resistance are limited to case reports and small studies. The best course of treatment in the cancer patient is unclear. OLHDE allowed for the transition from intravenous to subcutaneous medication and transition off the medical floor. This case supports the use of OLHDE as a therapeutic option in heparin-resistant patients with cancer. Further study is needed to confirm the efficacy of OLHDE in this patient population. CONCLUSION: High-dose enoxaparin may be an option to treat cancer patients with confirmed heparin resistance and venous thromboembolism.

Effect of azithromycin on anticoagulation-related outcomes in geriatric patients receiving warfarin.

BACKGROUND: Warfarin is known to have multiple pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions. Of the macrolide family, erythromycin and clarithromycin have been shown to interact with warfarin, leading to an elevated international normalized ratio (INR). The incidence of overanticoagulation in patients prescribed azithromycin stabilized on a warfarin regimen is controversial. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to assess warfarin dosage adjustments and their effect on the INR after treatment with azithromycin. The secondary objective was to examine the occurrence of hemorrhage in patients taking warfarin who received azithromycin. METHODS: This retrospective review included 100 patients from the Western New York Veterans Affairs Healthcare System aged ≥65 years who received a prescription for azithromycin and warfarin between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2009. The inclusion criteria consisted of a stable warfarin dose (2 INR values within 0.2 of the therapeutic range and the last INR determined ≤30 days before the introduction of azithromycin) and no medication changes in the 30 days before azithromycin therapy initiation. A repeated INR was determined 3 to 30 days after azithromycin therapy was initiated. Patients were excluded if they discontinued warfarin use, had a history of hemorrhage, or were taking antiplatelets, anti-inflammatory agents, or any other antibiotics. RESULTS: The impact on the INR was analyzed using a paired samples t test comparing INR values and warfarin doses before and after azithromycin exposure. There was a significant change in the INR between the 2 groups (before vs after azithromycin exposure, P < 0.001). This change was clinically significant given that the values before and after exposure to azithromycin lead to a decrease in warfarin from a mean weekly dose of 30 mg to 29.2 mg (P = 0.001). However, changes in the INR did not result in vitamin K administration or adverse bleeding events. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of azithromycin to a stable warfarin regimen resulted in a significant change in the INR and warfarin dosage alteration without an increase in bleeding.