ABSTRACT
Resistance to cytarabine is a key problem in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). To understand the molecular biology of resistance to cytarabine, a viability-based chemosensitizer screen was utilized. We screened synthetic lethal targets using 437 different small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) directed against factors involved in DNA repair mechanisms and cytarabine as the chemical compound. Three hits were identified: CUL4A, TP73, and RFC2. We show here that the ubiquitin ligase CULLIN 4A (CUL4A) and the tumor-suppressive transcription factor p73 contribute to drug resistance by modulating DNA damage response. P73 confers resistance to cytarabine therapy by transactivation of REV3L, encoding the catalytic subunit of translesion DNA polymerase ζ, and CUL4A probably by influencing proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and the polymerase switch towards error-prone translesion DNA polymerases. Abrogation of the polymerase ζ by siRNA causes identical effects as siRNAs against CUL4A or TP73 and resensitizes cells towards cytarabine therapy in vitro. As CUL4A needs to be activated by neddylation to facilitate the degradation of several proteins including PCNA, we propose a novel explanation for the synergism between cytarabine and the neddylation inhibitor pevonedistat by inhibition of translesion synthesis. In keeping with this, in AML patients treated with cytarabine, we found high expression of CUL4A and TP73 to be associated with poor prognosis.
ABSTRACT
p53 protects us from cancer by transcriptionally regulating tumor suppressive programs designed to either prevent the development or clonal expansion of malignant cells. How p53 selects target genes in the genome in a context- and tissue-specific manner remains largely obscure. There is growing evidence that the ability of p53 to bind DNA in a cooperative manner prominently influences target gene selection with activation of the apoptosis program being completely dependent on DNA binding cooperativity. Here, we used ChIP-seq to comprehensively profile the cistrome of p53 mutants with reduced or increased cooperativity. The analysis highlighted a particular relevance of cooperativity for extending the p53 cistrome to non-canonical binding sequences characterized by deletions, spacer insertions and base mismatches. Furthermore, it revealed a striking functional separation of the cistrome on the basis of cooperativity; with low cooperativity genes being significantly enriched for cell cycle and high cooperativity genes for apoptotic functions. Importantly, expression of high but not low cooperativity genes was correlated with superior survival in breast cancer patients. Interestingly, in contrast to most p53-activated genes, p53-repressed genes did not commonly contain p53 binding elements. Nevertheless, both the degree of gene activation and repression were cooperativity-dependent, suggesting that p53-mediated gene repression is largely indirect and mediated by cooperativity-dependently transactivated gene products such as CDKN1A, E2F7 and non-coding RNAs. Since both activation of apoptosis genes with non-canonical response elements and repression of pro-survival genes are crucial for p53's apoptotic activity, the cistrome analysis comprehensively explains why p53-induced apoptosis, but not cell cycle arrest, strongly depends on the intermolecular cooperation of p53 molecules as a possible safeguard mechanism protecting from accidental cell killing.
