Bioavailability of three novel oral, sustained-release pellets, relative to an immediate-release tablet containing 500 mg flucytosine: A randomized, open-label, crossover study in healthy volunteers.

The opportunistic fungal infection cryptococcal meningoencephalitis is a major cause of death among people living with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa. We report pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety data from a randomized, four-period crossover phase I trial of three sustained-release (SR) oral pellet formulations of 5-flucytosine conducted in South Africa. These formulations were developed to require less frequent administration, to provide a convenient alternative to the current immediate release (IR) formulation, A. Formulations B, C, and D were designed to release 5-flucytosine as a percentage of the nominal dose in vitro. We assessed their safety and PK profiles in a single dose (1 × 3000 mg at 0 h), relative to commercial IR tablets (Ancotil 500 mg tablets; 3 × 500 mg at 0 h and 3 × 500 mg at 6 h) in healthy, fasted participants. Forty-two healthy participants were included. All treatments were well-tolerated. The primary PK parameters, maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax ) and area under the concentration-time profiles, were significantly lower for the SR formulations than for the IR tablets, and the geometric mean ratios fell outside the conventional bioequivalence limits. The median maximum time to Cmax was delayed for the SR pellets. Physiologically-based PK modeling indicated a twice-daily 6400 mg dose of SR formulation D in fasted condition would be optimal for further clinical development. This regimen is predicted to result in a rapid steady-state plasma exposure with effective and safe trough plasma concentration and Cmax values, within the therapeutic boundaries relative to plasma exposure after four times per day administration of IR tablets (PACTR202201760181404).

96-week efficacy and safety of atazanavir, with and without ritonavir, in a HAART regimen in treatment-naive patients.

This study assesses virologic response, safety, tolerability, and changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in antiretroviral (ARV)-naive patients treated with 2 atazanavir (ATV)-based regimens over 96 weeks. Treatment-naive adult patients (n = 200) were randomized to receive either ATV 300 mg with ritonavir (RTV) 100 mg (ATV300/r, n = 95) or ATV 400 mg (ATV400; n = 105). At week 96, 75% of ATV300/r-treated and 70% of ATV400-treated patients achieved viral loads <400 copies/mL (difference estimate [95% confidence interval, CI] = 5.1 [-7.1 to 17.2]). Five and 20 patients, respectively, experienced virologic failure. Adverse event-related discontinuations occurred among 8% receiving ATV300/r and 3% receiving ATV400. Plasma lipid elevations were generally low. Both regimens were well tolerated and associated with sustained improvements in HRQoL. These findings demonstrate long-term efficacy, tolerability, and safety of both ATV300/r and ATV400 in ARV-naive patients through 96 weeks with improvements in HRQoL.

Efficacy and safety of atazanavir, with or without ritonavir, as part of once-daily highly active antiretroviral therapy regimens in antiretroviral-naive patients.

BACKGROUND: Atazanavir (ATV), the first once-daily protease inhibitor approved for the treatment of HIV-1 infection, is recommended for use in antiretroviral (ARV) treatment-naive and -experienced patients. Study AI424-089 was a prospective, randomized, open-label, 96-week study comparing 2 ATV-based treatment regimens in ARV-naive HIV-infected patients. METHODS: Adults with HIV RNA levels > or =2000 copies/mL were randomized (1:1) to once-daily ATV at a dose of 300 mg with ritonavir at a dose of 100 mg (ATV300/RTV) or ATV at a dose of 400 mg (ATV400); both regimens included lamivudine and an investigational extended-release formulation of stavudine. The primary endpoint for this noninferiority study was the proportion of patients (response rate) with an HIV RNA load <400 copies/mL at week 48. RESULTS: Response rates at week 48 were 86% and 85% on the ATV300/RTV and ATV400 regimens, respectively (difference estimate [95% confidence interval] = 1.5 [-8.2 to 11.1]). There were 3 and 10 patients with virologic failure in the ATV300/RTV and ATV400 groups, respectively. One patient (ATV400) developed phenotypic resistance to ATV associated with an I50L substitution. Adverse event-related discontinuations were 8% among ATV300/RTV-treated patients and <1% among ATV400-treated patients. Plasma lipid elevations were low with both regimens. Both regimens were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the ATV300/RTV regimen and confirm the safety and efficacy of ATV400 in an ARV-naive patient population.