How to harvest the left internal mammary artery-a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: It is uncertain whether Thunderbeat has a place in harvesting the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) and whether skeletonization is superior to pedicle-harvested LIMA. Some investigations have shown improved flowrates in the skeletonized graft. The aim of this study was to compare 3 groups of harvesting techniques: Pedicled, surgical skeletonized and skeletonized with Thunderbeat in terms of flow rates in the LIMA and postoperative in-hospital outcomes. METHODS: Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with the LIMA to the anterior descending artery were randomized to pedicled (n = 56), surgical skeletonized (n = 55) and skeletonized with Thunderbeat (n = 54). Main outcomes were blood flow and pulsatility index in the graft. RESULTS: No statistical difference between groups regarding flow in LIMA or pulsatility index. Similarly, no difference in postoperative bleeding or days of hospitalization. The duration of harvesting was faster for the pedicled technique compared with surgical skeletonized and skeletonized with Thunderbeat [mean total min: pedicled 20.2 min standard deviation (SD) ± 5.4; surgical skeletonized 28.6 min SD ± 8.7; skeletonized with Thunderbeat 28.3 min SD ± 9.11, P < 0.001]. No grafts discarded due to faulty harvesting and there was no graft failure within hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: We found no difference between the harvesting methods except for a significantly faster harvesting time with the pedicled technique. However, non-touch skeletonized LIMA harvesting with Thunderbeat seems to be an effective alternative to traditional surgical skeletonized LIMA. The future will reveal whether patency is harvesting dependent. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05562908.

Impact of mandatory preoperative dental screening on post-procedural risk of infective endocarditis in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a nationwide retrospective observational study.

Background: Guidelines recommend preoperative dental screening (PDS) prior to cardiac valve surgery, to reduce the incidence of prosthetic valve infective endocarditis (IE). However, limited data support these recommendations, particular in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We aimed to investigate the effect of mandatory PDS on risk of IE in patients undergoing TAVI. Methods: In this observational study, a total of 1133 patients undergoing TAVI in Western-Denmark from 2020 to 2022 were included. Patients were categorized based on two implemented PDS practices: mandatory PDS (MPDS group), and no referral for PDS (NPDS group). Outcome data were retrieved from Danish registries and confirmed using medical records. The primary outcome was incidence of IE. Secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality and composite outcome of all-cause mortality and IE. Findings: Of 568 patients in the MPDS group 126 (22.2%) underwent subsequent oral dental surgery, compared to 8 (1.4%) among 565 patients in the NPDS group. During a median follow-up of 1.9 years (interquartile range 1.4-2.5 years), 31 (2.7%) developed IE. The yearly incidence IE rate was 1.4% (0.8-2.3) and 1.5% (0.8-2.4) in MPDS and NPDS, respectively, p = 0.86. All-cause mortality rates were similar between groups (estimated 2-year overall mortality of 6.7% (4.8-9.2) vs. 4.7% (3.2-6.9), MPDS and NPDS, respectively, p = 0.15). Consistent findings were found in 712 propensity score-matched patients. Interpretation: Mandatory PDS did not demonstrate reduced risk of IE or all-cause mortality compared to targeted PDS in patients undergoing TAVI. Funding: The funder had no role in the study design, data management, or writing.

Exploring Drug Re-Purposing for Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Large abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) present a significant mortality risk. While numerous medical interventions have been proposed, no drugs have convincingly reduced AAA progression, rupture rates, or repair risk. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the impact of re-purposed drugs or dietary supplements on slowing expansion rates, reducing the risk of rupture, or minimising the risk of repair for individuals with AAA. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in five databases. Both observational studies and randomised controlled trials were included. Unpublished data from two screening trials were incorporated. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and revised Cochrane risk of bias tool. Meta-analyses were performed for each identified drug subclass and were stratified by overall risk of bias. Results were reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. RESULTS: Of 7 484 screened studies, 39 met the inclusion criteria. No studies on dietary supplements were included. A total of 84 cohorts were derived from the included studies, and twelve distinct drug groups underwent meta-analyses. Two drug groups, metformin and statins, were statistically significant in slowing AAA growth. No low risk of bias studies were included for these two drug groups, and the results had very high heterogeneity (I2 > 80%). Both groups had a GRADE certainty of very low. Metformin, excluding high risk of bias studies, presented an estimated mean growth difference of AAA diameter between users and non-users of -0.73 mm/year, whilst statins had an overall estimated mean difference of -0.84 mm/year. CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that metformin and statins may provide some effect in slowing AAA progression. However, no definitive evidence was found for any of the investigated drugs included in this study. Further research is needed to identify effective medical treatments for AAA progression with more robust methodology.

Atorvastatin and the influence on postoperative atrial fibrillation after surgical aortic valve replacement (STARC) in adults at Odense University Hospital, Denmark: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common postoperative complication after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and occurs in up to 50% of the patients. Development of postoperative AF (POAF) is associated with a 2-3 fold increased risk of adverse events, including stroke, myocardial infarction and death.Several studies have implied that prophylactic Atorvastatin therapy could prevent POAF in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft. These studies suggest that Atorvastatin has rapid and significant pleiotropic actions that reduce the risk of POAF. However, prophylactic treatment with statins has yet to be understood in SAVR. The aim of this study is to investigate whether prophylactic administration of torvastatin reduces POAF in patients undergoing SAVR. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this investigator-initiated, prospective, parallel-group, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled single-centre trial, 266 patients undergoing elective solitary SAVR with bioprosthetic valve, with no prior history of AF, and statin-naïve will be randomised (1:1) to treatment with Atorvastatin (80 mg once daily) or matching placebo for 1-2 weeks prior to and 30 days after surgery. The primary endpoint is POAF defined as an episode of irregular RR-intervals without a traceable p-wave of at least 30 s duration. After discharge and until day 30 after surgery, POAF will be documented by either rhythm strip or 12-lead ECG. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Protocol approval has been obtained from the Regional Scientific Ethical Committee for Southern Denmark (S-20210159), The Danish Medicines Agency (2021103821) and the Data Protection Agency (21/65621).The trial is conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, the ICH-GCP (International Conference on Harmonisation Good Clinical Practice) guidelines and the legal regulations of Denmark. Study findings will be shared via peer-reviewed journal publication and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05076019.

Stone heart syndrome after prolonged cardioplegia induced cardiac arrest in open-heart surgery - a pilot study on pigs.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate Stone Heart Syndrome (SHS) as consequence of prolonged ischemic arrest in an experimental study on pigs in regards to onset of SHS and pathological changes. Outcomes defined as aortic cross clamp (ACC) time until onset of SHS and cellular changes characterized by SHS. METHODS: Eight pigs were included to undergo normothermic cardioplegia induced cardiac arrest ranging from 80 to 240 minutes of ACC. Duration of ACC was defined as time from initiation of aortic cross clamping until cessation. Normothermic, cardioplegic solution administered directly into the arterial system, though in a reduced dose compared to clinical practice. Myocardial contracture evaluated by palpation of the myocardium. Biopsies were collected from the left ventricle just after the induction of cardiac arrest and after reperfusion. Biopsies were evaluated for pathological changes indicative of SHS by electron microscopy. RESULTS: Six pigs completed the full trial, while two were lost to bleeding. Pigs undergoing 80 to 120 minutes of ACC regained heart rhythm either spontaneously or after defibrillation. Pigs undergoing more than 180 minutes of ACC had contracted hearts with no electrocardiographic response indicating the development of SHS. Electron microscopy findings after ACC of 80 to 120 minutes showed no or low degrees of cellular changes, whereas pig hearts with more than 180 minutes of ACC showed severe mitochondrial changes, endothelial damage, and shortening of sarcomeres consistent with SHS. CONCLUSION: Development of SHS in pigs was ACC time dependent and solely avoided when ACC was limited to a maximum of 120 minutes.

Long-term survival after Carpentier-Edwards Perimount aortic valve replacement in Western Denmark: a multi-centre observational study.

BACKGROUND: This study describes the long-term survival, risk of reoperation and clinical outcomes of patients undergoing solitary surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) with a Carpentier-Edwards Perimount (CE-P) bioprosthetic in Western Denmark. The renewed interest in SAVR is based on the questioning regarding the long-term survival since new aortic replacement technique such as transcatheter aortic-valve replacement (TAVR) probably have shorter durability, why assessment of long-term survival could be a key issue for patients. METHODS: From November 1999 to November 2013 a cohort of a total of 1604 patients with a median age of 73 years (IQR: 69-78) undergoing solitary SAVR with CE-P in Western Denmark was obtained November 2018 from the Western Danish Heart Registry (WDHR). The primary endpoint was long-term survival from all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints were survival free from major adverse cardiovascular and cerebral events (MACCE), risk of reoperation, cause of late death, patient-prothesis mismatch, risk of AMI, stroke, pacemaker or ICD implantation and postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF). Time-to-event analysis was performed with Kaplan-Meier curve, cumulative incidence function was performed with Nelson-Aalen cumulative hazard estimates. Cox regression was applied to detect risk factors for death and reoperation. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality was 2.7% and 30-day mortality at 3.4%. The 5-, 10- and 15-year survival from all-cause mortality was 77, 52 and 24%, respectively. Survival without MACCE was 80% after 10 years. Significant risk factors of mortality were small valves, smoking and EuroSCORE II ≥4%. The risk of reoperation was < 5% after 7.5 years and significant risk factors were valve prosthesis-patient mismatch and EuroSCORE II ≥4%. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing aortic valve replacement with a Carpentier-Edwards Perimount valve shows a very satisfying long-term survival. Future research should aim to investigate biological valves long-term durability for comparison of different SAVR to different TAVR in long perspective.