ABSTRACT
Under stress conditions, elevated levels of cellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) may impair crucial cellular structures. To counteract the resulting oxidative damage, living cells are equipped with several defense mechanisms, including photoprotective functions of specific proteins. Here, we discuss the plausible ROS scavenging mechanisms by the enhanced green fluorescent protein, EGFP. To check if this protein could fulfill a photoprotective function, we employed electron spin resonance (ESR) in combination with spin-trapping. Two organic photosensitizers, rose bengal and methylene blue, as well as an inorganic photocatalyst, nano-TiO2, were used to photogenerate ROS. Spin-traps, TMP-OH and DMPO, and a nitroxide radical, TEMPOL, served as molecular targets for ROS. Our results show that EGFP quenches various forms of ROS, including superoxide radicals and singlet oxygen. Compared to the three proteins PNP, papain, and BSA, EGFP revealed high ROS quenching ability, which suggests its photoprotective role in living systems. Damage to the EGFP chromophore was also observed under strong photo-oxidative conditions. This study contributes to the discussion on the protective function of fluorescent proteins homologous to the green fluorescent protein (GFP). It also draws attention to the possible interactions of GFP-like proteins with ROS in systems where such proteins are used as biological markers.
Subject(s)
Green Fluorescent Proteins/chemistry , Photobleaching , Singlet Oxygen/chemistry , Superoxides/chemistry , Electron Spin Resonance SpectroscopyABSTRACT
Enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) is a fluorescent marker used in bio-imaging applications, including as an indicator of folding or aggregation of a fused partner. However, the limited maturation, low folding efficiency, and presence of non-fluorescent states of EGFP can influence the interpretation of experimental data. To measure aggregation associated with de novo folding of EGFP from a high GdnHCl concentration, the analytical ultracentrifugation method was used. Absorption detection at 280 nm allowed to monitor the presence of monomers and aggregated forms. Fluorescence detection enabled the observation of only properly folded molecules with a functional chromophore. The results showed intensive aggregation of EGFP in low concentrations of GdnHCl with a continuous distribution of aggregated forms. The properly folded monomers with mature chromophore were fluorescent, while the conglomerates of EGFP molecules were not. These facts are essential for a proper interpretation of data obtained with EGFP labelling.
Subject(s)
Fluorescence , Green Fluorescent Proteins/chemistry , Protein Aggregates , Ultracentrifugation/methods , Guanidine , Protein Folding , Scientific Experimental ErrorABSTRACT
The mechanism of green fluorescent protein (GFP) chromophore formation is still not clearly defined. Two mechanisms have been proposed: cyclisation-dehydration-oxidation (Mechanism A) and cyclisation-oxidation-dehydration (Mechanism B). To distinguish between these mechanisms, we generated a non-fluorescent mutant of GFP, S65T/G67A-GFP. This mutant folds to a stable, native-like structure but lacks fluorescence due to interruption of the chromophore maturation process. Mass spectrometric analysis of peptides derived from this mutant reveal that chromophore formation follows only mechanism A, but that the final oxidation reaction is suppressed. This result is unexpected within the pool of examined GFP mutants, since for the wild-type GFP, there is strong support for mechanism B.
