Molecular Targets and Therapies for Ampullary Cancer.

Ampullary carcinomas are rare but increasing in incidence. Ampullary cancers have molecular alterations that guide choice of therapy, particularly in nonresectable cases. These alterations can be more common by subtype (intestinal, pancreaticobiliary, or mixed), and next-generation sequencing is recommended for all patients who cannot undergo surgery. In this article, we review the approach to tissue acquisition and consideration for molecular testing. Common molecular targets of interest in ampullary cancer are also discussed in this review, including HER2/ERBB2, HER3, tumor mutational burden, microsatellite instability, KRAS, and germline BRCA and ATM mutations, along with emerging and rarer alterations.

Treatment of Oligometastatic GI Cancers.

Oligometastatic state is believed to potentially represent a transitional stage between early, locoregional state disease and widely metastatic disease. Historically, locoregional approaches, particularly in advanced colorectal cancers, have demonstrated efficacy in select patients with limited burden of metastatic disease. Recent strides in systemic therapies, including biomarker-based treatments and immunotherapy, alongside innovations in surgical techniques and novel locoregional approaches such as stereotactic radiotherapy and ablation, have ushered in a new era of therapeutic possibilities across all oligometastatic GI cancers. Despite these advancements, there remains a significant gap in high-quality prospective evidence guiding patient selection and treatment decisions across various disease types. Ongoing clinical trials are anticipated to provide crucial insights into oligometastatic states, fostering the refinement of disease-specific oligometastatic state definitions and treatment algorithms. This article reviews existing data on the management of oligometastatic GI cancer, summarizes current state of knowledge for each disease state, and provides updates on ongoing studies in this space.

Spatial Alignment of Organoids Tracking Subclonal Chemotherapy Resistance in Pancreatic and Ampullary Cancer.

Pancreatic and ampullary cancers remain highly morbid diseases for which accurate clinical predictions are needed for precise therapeutic predictions. Patient-derived cancer organoids have been widely adopted; however, prior work has focused on well-level therapeutic sensitivity. To characterize individual oligoclonal units of therapeutic response, we introduce a low-volume screening assay, including an automated alignment algorithm. The oligoclonal growth response was compared against validated markers of response, including well-level viability and markers of single-cell viability. Line-specific sensitivities were compared with clinical outcomes. Automated alignment algorithms were generated to match organoids across time using coordinates across a single projection of Z-stacked images. After screening for baseline size (50 µm) and circularity (>0.4), the match efficiency was found to be optimized by accepting the diffusion thresholded with the root mean standard deviation of 75 µm. Validated well-level viability showed a limited correlation with the mean organoid size (R = 0.408), and a normalized growth assayed by normalized changes in area (R = 0.474) and area (R = 0.486). Subclonal populations were defined by both residual growth and the failure to induce apoptosis and necrosis. For a culture with clinical resistance to gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel, while a therapeutic challenge induced a robust effect in inhibiting cell growth (GΔ = 1.53), residual oligoclonal populations were able to limit the effect on the ability to induce apoptosis (GΔ = 0.52) and cell necrosis (GΔ = 1.07). Bioengineered approaches are feasible to capture oligoclonal heterogeneity in organotypic cultures, integrating ongoing efforts for utilizing organoids across cancer types as integral biomarkers and in novel therapeutic development.

Esophagogastric Cancers: Integrating Immunotherapy Therapy Into Current Practice.

Immunotherapy (IO) agents have led to significant improvements in patient outcomes across many tumor types. There have been great efforts to introduce immune checkpoint inhibitors into the treatment paradigm of esophagogastric cancers as well. A number of randomized phase III trials, which will be reviewed here, established the role of these agents in both early-stage and advanced-stage disease. Adjuvant nivolumab is US Food and Drug Administration-approved after neoadjuvant chemoradiation and resection of esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers on the basis of the phase III CheckMate 577 trial. In the advanced setting, patients with programmed death receptor ligand-1-positive tumors should be recommended IO in combination with chemotherapy in the first-line setting on the basis of the results from KEYNOTE 590, CheckMate 649, and CheckMate 648. Across trials, chemotherapy continues to play a critical role in the first-line setting and should be offered to all patients who are eligible for systemic therapy, including those with biomarker select tumors. In the later lines of treatment, IO has modest activity, and prior studies have grown largely irrelevant because of the enrollment of IO-naive patients. Similar to other disease types, patients with microsatellite unstable (microsatellite instability high) tumors represent a unique cohort that is more sensitive to IO. However, there are no randomized studies evaluating how best to apply IO in early or advanced stages specifically for the treatment of patients with microsatellite instability high upper GI tumors. Questions remain how to best select patients who benefit from IO treatments, how to augment IO activity in programmed death receptor ligand-1-negative tumors, and how to incorporate IO in late-line settings or for recurrent disease that has been treated with IO-containing regimens during early stages.

Technologies to Assess Drug Response and Heterogeneity in Patient-Derived Cancer Organoids.

Patient-derived cancer organoids (PDCOs) are organotypic 3D cultures grown from patient tumor samples. PDCOs provide an exciting opportunity to study drug response and heterogeneity within and between patients. This research can guide new drug development and inform clinical treatment planning. We review technologies to assess PDCO drug response and heterogeneity, discuss best practices for clinically relevant drug screens, and assert the importance of quantifying single-cell and organoid heterogeneity to characterize response. Autofluorescence imaging of PDCO growth and metabolic activity is highlighted as a compelling method to monitor single-cell and single-organoid response robustly and reproducibly. We also speculate on the future of PDCOs in clinical practice and drug discovery.Future development will require standardization of assessment methods for both morphology and function in PDCOs, increased throughput for new drug development, prospective validation with patient outcomes, and robust classification algorithms.

Impact of baseline culture conditions of cancer organoids when determining therapeutic response and tumor heterogeneity.

Representative models are needed to screen new therapies for patients with cancer. Cancer organoids are a leap forward as a culture model that faithfully represents the disease. Mouse-derived cancer organoids (MDCOs) are becoming increasingly popular, however there has yet to be a standardized method to assess therapeutic response and identify subpopulation heterogeneity. There are multiple factors unique to organoid culture that could affect how therapeutic response and MDCO heterogeneity are assessed. Here we describe an analysis of nearly 3500 individual MDCOs where individual organoid morphologic tracking was performed. Change in MDCO diameter was assessed in the presence of control media or targeted therapies. Individual organoid tracking was identified to be more sensitive to treatment response than well-level assessment. The impact of different generations of mice of the same genotype, different regions of the colon, and organoid specific characteristics including baseline size, passage number, plating density, and location within the matrix were examined. Only the starting size of the MDCO altered the subsequent growth. These results were corroborated using ~ 1700 patient-derived cancer organoids (PDCOs) isolated from 19 patients. Here we establish organoid culture parameters for individual organoid morphologic tracking to determine therapeutic response and growth/response heterogeneity for translational studies.

Diagnostic challenges in an aggressive case of peripheralizing marginal zone lymphoma.

B-cell lymphomas with atypical presentation or immunophenotype pose diagnostic challenges. Conventional ancillary tests (cytogenetics, FISH) can help, but have technical limitations. New technologies such as mate-pair sequencing (MPSeq) offer a route around these technical limitations.

Human Colon Organoids and Other Laboratory Strategies to Enhance Patient Treatment Selection.

OPINION STATEMENT: Though many advancements in personalized medicine have been made, better methods are still needed to predict treatment benefit for patients with colorectal cancer. Patient-derived cancer organoids (PDCOs) are a major advance towards true personalization of treatment strategies. A growing body of literature is demonstrating the feasibility of PDCOs as an accurate and high-throughput preclinical tool for patient treatment selection. Many studies demonstrate that these cultures are readily generated and represent the tumors they were derived from phenotypically and based on their mutation profile. This includes maintenance of the driver muatations giving the cancer cells a selective growth advantage, and also heterogeneity, including molecular and metabolic heterogeneity. Additionally, PDCOs are now being utilized to develop patient biospecimen repositories, perform high to moderate-throughput drug screening, and to potentially predict treatment response for individual patients that are undergoing anti-cancer treatments. In order to develop PDCOs as a true clinical tool, further studies are required to determine the reproducibility and accuracy of these models to predict patient response.

Targeted Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Current Standards and Novel Agents in Review.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Treatment options for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer continue to advance as the therapeutic implications of the molecular subtypes of this disease are becoming better understood. DNA sequencing and mismatch repair assessment are now standard of care analyses for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer Thi review describes important aspects of the biology of the clinically relevant molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer based on the current standard of care testing. In addition, the clinical treatment strategies available now and potentially in the future for these colorectal cancer subtypes are discussed. RECENT FINDINGS: Currently for metastatic colorectal cancer, standard of care molecular testing is done for mutations in exons 2, 3, and 4 of KRAS and NRAS, and BRAF V600E. Testing for mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency/microsatellite instability (MSI) status is also done. These aberrations are well known to change the clinical prognosis and guide patients' treatment strategies. Additionally, three new subtypes have emerged: PIK3CAmut, HER2 amplified, and NTRK fusions. With the addition of these emerging subtypes, tumor heterogeneity further validates the need to examine mCRC as a heterogeneous disease. Here we present recent exciting data from translational research and clinical trials exhibiting possible distinct treatment strategies for these different subtypes. SUMMARY: Altogether these data show promising treatment strategies for many of these well-known and emerging subtypes of mCRC. In addition, these also give better clinical prognostic and predictive information. We believe that as molecular testing expands PIK3CA mutation, HER2 amplification, and NTRK fusion molecular testing will be included in standard of care analyses. This incorporation of testing in clinical practice will generate further information regarding prognostic and therapeutic options for these and other CRC subtypes in the future.

MTORC1/2 Inhibition as a Therapeutic Strategy for PIK3CA Mutant Cancers.

PIK3CA mutations are common in clinical molecular profiling, yet an effective means to target these cancers has yet to be developed. MTORC1 inhibitors are often used off-label for patients with PIK3CA mutant cancers with only limited data to support this approach. Here we describe a cohort of patients treated with cancers possessing mutations activating the PI3K signaling cascade with minimal benefit to treatment with the MTORC1 inhibitor everolimus. Previously, we demonstrated that dual PI3K/mTOR inhibition could decrease proliferation, induce differentiation, and result in a treatment response in APC and PIK3CA mutant colorectal cancer. However, reactivation of AKT was identified, indicating that the majority of the benefit may be secondary to MTORC1/2 inhibition. TAK-228, an MTORC1/2 inhibitor, was compared with dual PI3K/mTOR inhibition using BEZ235 in murine colorectal cancer spheroids. A reduction in spheroid size was observed with TAK-228 and BEZ235 (-13% and -14%, respectively) compared with an increase of >200% in control (P < 0.001). These spheroids were resistant to MTORC1 inhibition. In transgenic mice possessing Pik3ca and Apc mutations, BEZ235 and TAK-228 resulted in a median reduction in colon tumor size of 19% and 20%, respectively, with control tumors having a median increase of 18% (P = 0.02 and 0.004, respectively). This response correlated with a decrease in the phosphorylation of 4EBP1 and RPS6. MTORC1/2 inhibition is sufficient to overcome resistance to everolimus and induce a treatment response in PIK3CA mutant colorectal cancers and deserves investigation in clinical trials and in future combination regimens.

Metastatic Bulk Independently Predicts Outcomes for EGFR Precision Targeting in Colorectal Cancer.

Background: Molecular profiles guide the clinical management of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), particularly related to the use of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies. Tumor sidedness has also been implicated in resistance to these therapies, but has largely been studied in the first-line setting. We examined the role of tumor sidedness and disease bulk in predicting clinical outcomes to anti-EGFR therapy in the treatment-refractory setting. Methods: We identified a retrospective cohort of 62 patients with KRAS wild-type mCRC who received anti-EGFR therapy in the late-line setting. Response was assessed per RECIST 1.1, with bulky disease defined as any single lesion >35 mm in longest cross-sectional diameter or nodal short axis. Primary sidedness was defined in relation to the splenic flexure. Results: Patients with right-sided primary tumors at time of late-line EGFR therapy presented with increased tumor bulk and worsened overall survival (OS) relative to left-sided primary tumors. Tumor bulk, defined as either a categorical or continuous variable, predicted worsened progression-free survival (PFS) and OS, which persisted when controlling for differences in the primary tumor location. Within the right-sided cohort, no objective responses were observed for bulky disease or during treatment with anti-EGFR monotherapy. The nonbulky cohort experienced clinical benefit with anti-EGFR monotherapy, showing similar PFS and an improved response rate compared with sequential chemotherapy. Conclusions: In an effort to expand understanding of the role of primary sidedness in clinical response to anti-EGFR therapy, we identified sidedness and tumor bulk as potential predictive biomarkers of clinical response in late-line mCRC. Future prospective studies of EGFR targeting should consider tumor bulk in addition to molecular profiling in the identification of populations most likely to achieve meaningful clinical benefit.

Incorporating Genomics Into the Care of Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer.

Metastatic breast cancer is a very heterogeneous disease. Recent advances in genomic sequencing have revealed genetic diversity between patients and across distinct subclonal cell populations within the same patient that may evolve across metastatic tumor sites and during treatment. With the increasing availability of commercial and laboratory-developed tests that can detect genomic alterations from patient tumor and blood samples, translating this knowledge into improved clinical care remains a challenge. The goals of this review are to outline the clinical relevance of tumor genomic heterogeneity and clonal evolution, to help clinicians understand how to interpret genomic testing reports, and to provide an overview of recurrent genomic alterations that may be relevant for clinical trials with investigational drug treatments.

The Multidisciplinary Management of Colorectal Cancer: Present and Future Paradigms.

As treatment strategies for patients with colorectal cancer advance, there has now become an ever-increasing need for multidisciplinary teams to care for these patients. Recent investigations into the timing and duration of perioperative therapy, as well as, the rise of molecular profiling have led to more systemic chemotherapeutic options. The most efficacious use, in terms of timing and patient selection, of these therapies in the setting of modern operative and radiotherapy techniques requires the generation of care teams discussing cases at multidisciplinary conferences. This review highlights the role of multidisciplinary team conferences, advances in perioperative chemotherapy, current clinical biomarkers, and emerging therapeutic agents for molecular subtypes of metastatic colon cancer. As our understanding of relevant molecular subtypes increases and as data becomes available on treatment response, the treatment of colorectal cancer will become more precise and effective.

Atherosclerosis and Nanotechnology: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Applications.

Over the past several decades, tremendous advances have been made in the understanding, diagnosis, and treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, with shifting demographics and evolving risk factors we now face new challenges that must be met in order to further advance are management of patients with CAD. In parallel with advances in our mechanistic appreciation of CAD and atherosclerosis, nanotechnology approaches have greatly expanded, offering the potential for significant improvements in our diagnostic and therapeutic management of CAD. To realize this potential we must go beyond to recognize new frontiers including knowledge gaps between understanding atherosclerosis to the translation of targeted molecular tools. This review highlights nanotechnology applications for imaging and therapeutic advancements in CAD.

Gynaecomastia in two men on stable antiretroviral therapy who commenced treatment for tuberculosis.

Gynaecomastia is a common clinical presentation that varies from benign presentations in stages of human development to hormonal pathology, mainly due to hepatic dysfunction, malignancy, and adverse pharmacologic effects. We describe the development of significant bilateral gynaecomastia after starting treatment for pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) in two males with WHO stage III Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection on stable antiretroviral regimens. Emerging reports suggest that distinct hepatic impairment in efavirenz metabolism modulates oestrogenic activity, which may be potentiated by anti-tuberculosis therapy. Clinical application includes early recognition of efavirenz-induced gynaecomastia, especially after commencing tuberculosis treatment. To avoid decreased adherence resulting from the distressing side effect of gynecomastia, transition to an alternative ART regimen over the course of tuberculosis treatment should be considered.

Molecular Profiles Guide Colorectal Cancer Treatment.

An improved understanding of colorectal cancer as a collection of multiple cancer subtypes is paving the way to precision medicine-based treatments.

Design considerations for PAMAM dendrimer therapeutics.

We have previously shown that methotrexate (MTX) conjugated to a cancer-specific poly amido amine (PAMAM) dendrimer has a higher therapeutic index than MTX alone. Unfortunately, these therapeutics have been difficult to advance because of the complicated syntheses and an incomplete understanding of the dendrimer properties. We wished to address these obstacles by using copper-free click chemistry to functionalize the dendrimer scaffolds and to exploring the effects of two dendrimer properties (the targeting ligand and drug linkage) on cytotoxicity. We conjugated either ester or amide-linker modified MTX to dendrimer scaffolds with or without folic acid (FA). Because of multivalency, the FA and MTX functionalized dendrimers had similar capacities to target the folate receptor on cancer cells. Additionally, we found that the ester- and amide-linker modified MTX compounds had similar cytotoxicity but the dendrimer-ester MTX conjugates were much more cytotoxic than the dendrimer-amide MTX conjugates. These results clarify the impact of these properties on therapeutic efficacy and will allow us to design more effective polymer therapeutics.