Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 41
Filter
1.
J Neurosci ; 44(22)2024 May 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38548336

ABSTRACT

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive neuromodulation technique gaining more attention in neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs). Due to the phenotypic heterogeneity of NDDs, tDCS is unlikely to be equally effective in all individuals. The present study aimed to establish neuroanatomical markers in typically developing (TD) individuals that may be used for the prediction of individual responses to tDCS. Fifty-seven male and female children received 2 mA anodal and sham tDCS, targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFCleft), right inferior frontal gyrus, and bilateral temporoparietal junction. Response to tDCS was assessed based on task performance differences between anodal and sham tDCS in different neurocognitive tasks (N-back, flanker, Mooney faces detection, attentional emotional recognition task). Measures of cortical thickness (CT) and surface area (SA) were derived from 3 Tesla structural MRI scans. Associations between neuroanatomy and task performance were assessed using general linear models (GLM). Machine learning (ML) algorithms were employed to predict responses to tDCS. Vertex-wise estimates of SA were more closely linked to differences in task performance than measures of CT. Across ML algorithms, highest accuracies were observed for the prediction of N-back task performance differences following stimulation of the DLPFCleft, where 65% of behavioral variance was explained by variability in SA. Lower accuracies were observed for all other tasks and stimulated regions. This suggests that it may be possible to predict individual responses to tDCS for some behavioral measures and target regions. In the future, these models might be extended to predict treatment outcome in individuals with NDDs.


Subject(s)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , Humans , Male , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/methods , Female , Child , Adolescent , Cognition/physiology , Psychomotor Performance/physiology
2.
Dev Cogn Neurosci ; 64: 101317, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37898018

ABSTRACT

Developmental dyslexia is characterized by the pathologically diminished ability to acquire reading and spelling skills. Accurate processing of acoustic information at the phonemic scale is crucial for successful sound-to-letter-mapping which, in turn, is elemental in reading and spelling. Altered activation patterns in the auditory cortex are thought to provide the neurophysiological basis for the inaccurate phonemic perception. Recently, transcranial electrical stimulation has been shown to be an effective method to ameliorate cortical activation patterns in the auditory cortex. In a sample of children and adolescents with dyslexia, we investigated the effect of multi-session transcranial alternating current stimulation delivered concurrently with a phonological training and in combination with a behavioral literacy skills training. Over a 5-week period the participants received 10 training sessions while gamma-tACS was administered over bilateral auditory cortex. We found that gamma-tACS shifted the peak frequency of auditory gamma oscillations reflecting a more fine-grained processing of time-critical acoustic information. This amelioration was accompanied by increased phonemic processing skills. Moreover, individuals who received gamma-tACS showed significant improvements in their spelling skills four months after the intervention. Our results demonstrate that multi-session gamma-tACS enhances the effects of a behavioral intervention and induces long-term improvement on literacy skills in dyslexia.


Subject(s)
Dyslexia , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , Child , Adolescent , Humans , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/methods , Literacy , Dyslexia/therapy , Reading , Language
3.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 8438, 2023 05 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37231030

ABSTRACT

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique with a wide variety of clinical and research applications. As increasingly acknowledged, its effectiveness is subject dependent, which may lead to time consuming and cost ineffective treatment development phases. We propose the combination of electroencephalography (EEG) and unsupervised learning for the stratification and prediction of individual responses to tDCS. A randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind crossover study design was conducted within a clinical trial for the development of pediatric treatments based on tDCS. The tDCS stimulation (sham and active) was applied either in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex or in the right inferior frontal gyrus. Following the stimulation session, participants performed 3 cognitive tasks to assess the response to the intervention: the Flanker Task, N-Back Task and Continuous Performance Test (CPT). We used data from 56 healthy children and adolescents to implement an unsupervised clustering approach that stratify participants based on their resting-state EEG spectral features before the tDCS intervention. We then applied a correlational analysis to characterize the clusters of EEG profiles in terms of participant's difference in the behavioral outcome (accuracy and response time) of the cognitive tasks when performed after a tDCS-sham or a tDCS-active session. Better behavioral performance following the active tDCS session compared to the sham tDCS session is considered a positive intervention response, whilst the reverse is considered a negative one. Optimal results in terms of validity measures was obtained for 4 clusters. These results show that specific EEG-based digital phenotypes can be associated to particular responses. While one cluster presents neurotypical EEG activity, the remaining clusters present non-typical EEG characteristics, which seem to be associated with a positive response. Findings suggest that unsupervised machine learning can be successfully used to stratify and eventually predict responses of individuals to a tDCS treatment.


Subject(s)
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , Child , Humans , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/methods , Cross-Over Studies , Electroencephalography/methods , Prefrontal Cortex/physiology , Reaction Time , Double-Blind Method
4.
Front Hum Neurosci ; 16: 878994, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35799772

ABSTRACT

Distractibility is one of the key features of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and has been associated with alterations in the neural orienting and alerting networks. Task-irrelevant stimuli are thus expected to have detrimental effects on the performance of patients with ADHD. However, task-irrelevant presentation of novel sounds seems to have the opposite effect and improve subsequent attentional performance particularly in patients with ADHD. Here, we aimed to understand the neural modulations of the attention networks underlying these improvements. Fifty boys (25 with ADHD) participated in a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study in which unique (novel) or repeatedly presented (familiar) sounds were placed before a visual flanker task in 2/3 of the trials. We found that presenting any sound improved task performance in all participants, but the underlying neural mechanisms differed for the type of sound. Familiar sounds led to a stronger increase in activity in the left posterior insula in patients with ADHD compared to typically developing peers. Novel sounds led to activations of the fronto-temporoparietal ventral attention network, likewise in ADHD and TD. These changes in signaling by novelty in the right inferior frontal gyrus were directly related to improved response speed showing that neural orienting network activity following novel sounds facilitated subsequent attentional performance. This mechanism of behavioral enhancement by short distractions could potentially be useful for cognitive trainings or homework situations.

5.
Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr ; 70(7): 588-603, 2021 Nov.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34734548

ABSTRACT

The joint treatment of mentally ill children and their parents represents a special treatment concept in child and adolescent psychiatry. A study conducted by the Working Group (BAG) "Early Childhood" shows the current situation of care and possible models of child and adolescent psychiatric parent-child treatment in Germany. Using the parent-child ward of the Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Department in Magdeburg as an example, the combined treatment of mentally ill children and their parents is presented. The treatment approach consists of a three-week diagnostic phase, after which families are discharged again to their home environment followed by a five-week therapy block, for which the families have to be readmitted to the ward. With a focus on the parent-child relationship, the treatment concept - in contrast to regular child psychiatric treatments - is dynamically adapted to the quality of the parent-child interaction and not primarily related to the disorder of the children. First studies indicate the effectiveness of the special treatment setting and illustrate the efficiency of a joint treatment of parents and child, which, however, is associated with increased economic costs. Based on these results, the chances and limitations of parent-child wards are discussed and conclusions for parent-child treatment are drawn.


Subject(s)
Child of Impaired Parents , Mental Disorders , Adolescent , Adolescent Psychiatry , Humans , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Mental Disorders/therapy , Parent-Child Relations , Parents
6.
Auton Neurosci ; 236: 102901, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34757309

ABSTRACT

Parkinson's disease (PD) is associated with severe motor symptoms but also with several non-motor symptoms (NMS). A substantial reduction of norepinephrine (NE) levels in various brain regions reflecting an extensive loss of innervation from the LC has been assumed as causal for the development of NMS and specifically of attentional impairments in PD. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) is a new, non-invasive neurostimulation method supposed to modulate the LC-NE system in humans. In the current opinion paper, we introduce taVNS as a systemic approach to directly affect NE neurotransmission in healthy as well as clinical populations and discuss its potential as therapeutic option for the treatment of NMS, specifically attentional deficits, in patients with PD. Here, we first describe the LC-NE system and discuss how LC-NE dysfunction might affects cognition in PD before detailing the mode of action of taVNS and proposing its use to modulate cognitive deficits in these patients.


Subject(s)
Parkinson Disease , Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation , Vagus Nerve Stimulation , Humans , Norepinephrine , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Vagus Nerve
7.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 21512, 2021 11 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34728684

ABSTRACT

Methodological studies investigating transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (lDLPFC) in paediatric populations are limited. Therefore, we investigated in a paediatric population whether stimulation success of multichannel tDCS over the lDLPFC depends on concurrent task performance and individual head anatomy. In a randomised, sham-controlled, double-blind crossover study 22 healthy participants (10-17 years) received 2 mA multichannel anodal tDCS (atDCS) over the lDLPFC with and without a 2-back working memory (WM) task. After stimulation, the 2-back task and a Flanker task were performed. Resting state and task-related EEG were recorded. In 16 participants we calculated the individual electric field (E-field) distribution. Performance and neurophysiological activity in the 2-back task were not affected by atDCS. atDCS reduced reaction times in the Flanker task, independent of whether atDCS had been combined with the 2-back task. Flanker task related beta oscillation increased following stimulation without 2-back task performance. atDCS effects were not correlated with the E-field. We found no effect of multichannel atDCS over the lDLPFC on WM in children/adolescents but a transfer effect on interference control. While this effect on behaviour was independent of concurrent task performance, neurophysiological activity might be more sensitive to cognitive activation during stimulation. However, our results are limited by the small sample size, the lack of an active control group and variations in WM performance.


Subject(s)
Cognition/physiology , Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex/physiology , Memory, Short-Term/physiology , Task Performance and Analysis , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/methods , Adolescent , Child , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Neuropsychological Tests
8.
Prog Brain Res ; 264: 117-150, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34167653

ABSTRACT

Impaired executive functions in ADHD are associated with hypoactivity of the right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG). This region was targeted via repetitive applications of anodal, high-definition transcranial direct current simulation (HD-tDCS) on five consecutive days in 33 ADHD patients (10-17years) and in a healthy control group (n=13, only sham). Patients received either sham (n=13) or verum tDCS with 0.5mA (n=9) or 0.25mA (n=11) depending on individual cutaneous sensitivity. During stimulation, participants performed a combined working memory and response inhibition paradigm (n-back/nogo). At baseline, post, and a 4-month follow up, electroencephalography was recorded during this task. Moreover, interference control (flanker task) and spatial working memory (spanboard task) were assessed to explore possible transfer effects. Omission errors and reaction time variability in all tasks served as measures of attention. In the 0.25mA group increased nogo commission errors indicated a detrimental tDCS effect on response inhibition. After the 5-day stimulation, attentional improvements in the 0.5mA group were indicated by reduced omission errors and reaction time variability. Variability improvements were still evident at follow up. In all groups, nogo P3 amplitudes were reduced post-stimulation, but in the 0.5mA group this reduction was smaller than in the 0.25mA group. Results of the current study suggest distinct effects of tDCS with different current intensities demonstrating the importance of a deeper understanding on the impact of stimulation parameters and repeated tDCS applications to develop effective tDCS-based therapy approaches in ADHD.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , Adolescent , Attention , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/therapy , Child , Humans , Memory, Short-Term , Prefrontal Cortex
9.
Prog Brain Res ; 264: 171-190, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34167655

ABSTRACT

Individuals with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) suffer from a range of cognitive and behavioral problems that severely impair their educational and occupational attainment. ADHD symptoms have been linked to structural and functional changes within and between different brain regions, particularly the prefrontal cortex. At the system level, reduced availability of the neurotransmitters dopamine (DA) and norepinephrine (NE) but also γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) have been repeatedly demonstrated. Recently, non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques have been explored as treatment alternatives to alter dysfunctional activation patterns in specified brain areas or networks. In the current paper, we introduce transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) as a systemic approach to directly affect NE and GABA neurotransmission. TVNS is a non-drug intervention with low risk and proven efficacy in improving cognitive particularly executive functions. It is easy to apply and therefore well-suited to provide home-based or mobile treatment options allowing a significant increase in treatment intensity and providing easier access to medical care for individuals who are unable to regularly visit a clinician. We describe in detail the underlying mechanisms of tVNS and current fields of application and discuss its potential as an adjuvant treatment for ADHD.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity , Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation , Vagus Nerve Stimulation , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/therapy , Brain , Executive Function , Humans , Vagus Nerve
10.
Prog Brain Res ; 264: 363-386, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34167663

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a brain stimulation technique for an alternative or complementary treatment for various neurological disorders, including pediatric ADHD. However, little is known about the experiences of participants undergoing tDCS treatments in clinical trials. Exploration of their views on the matter is an important contribution to the societal debate on ethical issues of tDCS, allowing for a responsible translation into clinical practice and timely identification of potential challenges. METHODS: in-depth interviews study with children with ADHD undertaking tDCS and their parents (n=32). RESULTS: Children reported overall good experiences with the stimulation, although they found participation in the clinical study very tiring and time consuming. Their responses to the actual effects of the stimulation were mixed. Parents were very keen for their children to participate in the study as they saw it as a promising and safe alternative to medication. Even though many of them understood the techniques, they often did not see the link between the (current) lack of side effects and an absence of longitudinal studies. Unlike children, interviewed parents were cautious about using tDCS for non-medical/enhancement purposes. DISCUSSION: There is a need for more transparent information about the state of the art of tDCS, its function and what it actually might be able to offer. It is especially important in order to prevent unrealistic hopes and to make sure that future pediatric patients and their carers are more aware of the potential side-effects and long-term effects of tDCS.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , Adolescent , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/therapy , Brain , Child , Humans , Memory, Short-Term , Parents
11.
Sci Rep ; 10(1): 21453, 2020 12 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33293595

ABSTRACT

Experimental evidence in rodents and humans suggests that long-term memory consolidation can be enhanced by the exploration of a novel environment presented during a vulnerable early phase of consolidation. This memory enhancing effect (behavioral tagging) is caused by dopaminergic and noradrenergic neuromodulation of hippocampal plasticity processes. In translation from animal to human research, we investigated whether behavioral tagging with novelty can be used to tackle memory problems observed in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). 34 patients with ADHD and 34 typically developing participants (age 9-15 years) explored either a previously familiarized or a novel virtual environment 45 min after they had learned a list of 20 words. Participants took a free recall test both immediately after learning the word list and after 24 h. Patients who explored a familiar environment showed significantly impaired memory consolidation compared to typically developing peers. Exploration of a novel environment led to significantly better memory consolidation in children and adolescents with ADHD. However, we did not observe a beneficial effect of novel environment exploration in typically developing participants. Our data rather suggested that increased exploration of a novel environment as well as higher feelings of virtual immersion compromised memory performance in typically developing children and adolescents, which was not the case for patients with ADHD. We propose that behavioral tagging with novel virtual environments is a promising candidate to overcome ADHD related memory problems. Moreover, the discrepancy between children and adolescents with and without ADHD suggests that behavioral tagging might only be able to improve memory consolidation for weakly encoded information.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/therapy , Memory Consolidation , Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy , Adolescent , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/physiopathology , Child , Exploratory Behavior , Female , Humans , Male , Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy/methods
12.
Front Hum Neurosci ; 14: 349, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33100989

ABSTRACT

Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), applied over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (lDLPFC), can produce significant effects on working memory (WM) performance and associated neurophysiological activity. However, results from previous studies are inconsistent and occasionally contradictory. This inconsistency may be attributed to methodological and individual differences during experiments. This study therefore investigated two hypotheses: (1) A multichannel-optimized montage was expected to be more effective than a classical bipolar montage, because of increased focality. (2) The subjects were expected to benefit differently from the stimulation depending on their initial task performance. In a sham-controlled crossover study, 24 healthy participants received bipolar, multichannel, and sham stimulation for 20 min in randomized order, targeting the lDLPFC while performing a 2-back WM task. After stimulation, electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded at rest and during 2-back and nontarget continuous performance task (CPT) performance. Bipolar and multichannel stimulations were both well tolerated and effectively blinded. We found no effect of stimulation on behavioral performance or neuronal oscillations comparing the classical bipolar or multichannel montage with sham stimulation. We did, however, find an interaction between stimulation and initial task performance. For multichannel stimulation, initially low-performing participants tended to improve their WM performance while initially high-performing participants tended to worsen their performance compared to sham stimulation. Both tDCS montages induced changes in neural oscillatory power, which correlated with baseline performance. The worse the participants' initial WM performance was, the more task-related theta power was induced by multichannel and bipolar stimulation. The same effect was observed for alpha power in the nontarget task following multichannel stimulation. Notably, we were not able to show a superiority of multichannel stimulation compared to bipolar stimulation. Still, comparing both montages with sham stimulation, multichannel stimulation led to stronger effects than bipolar stimulation. The current study highlights the importance of investigating different parameters with potential influence on tDCS effects in combination. Our results demonstrate how individual differences in cognitive performance and electrode montages influence effects of tDCS on neuropsychological performance. These findings support the idea of an individualized and optimized stimulation setting, potentially leading to increased tDCS effects.

13.
Neurobiol Aging ; 96: 49-57, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32937209

ABSTRACT

Learning to act to receive reward and to withhold to avoid punishment has been found to be easier than learning the opposite contingencies in young adults. To what extent this type of behavioral adaptation might develop during childhood and adolescence and differ during aging remains unclear. We therefore tested 247 healthy individuals across the human life span (7-80 years) with an orthogonalized valenced go/no-go learning task. Computational modeling revealed that peak performance in young adults was attributable to greater sensitivity to both reward and punishment. However, in children and adolescents, we observed an increased bias toward action but not reward sensitivity. By contrast, reduced learning in midlife and older adults was accompanied by decreased reward sensitivity and especially punishment sensitivity along with an age-related increase in the Pavlovian bias. These findings reveal distinct motivation-dependent learning capabilities across the human life span, which cannot be probed using conventional go/reward no-go/punishment style paradigms that have important implications in lifelong education.


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Psychological/physiology , Aging/psychology , Anticipation, Psychological/physiology , Conditioning, Operant/physiology , Learning/physiology , Life Change Events , Punishment , Reward , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Motivation , Young Adult
14.
Front Hum Neurosci ; 14: 322, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32848679

ABSTRACT

The development of cognitive interventions in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) often requires the assessment of multiple cognitive functions. However, experimental settings consisting of various tasks are particularly strenuous for patients and can thus result in poor data quality. For the economical assessment of working memory and response inhibition, this study aims to validate a combined n-back/nogo paradigm by comparing it to single task versions and to demonstrate its applicability for ADHD research. Twenty-five healthy individuals and 34 ADHD patients between 9 and 16 years participated in this event-related potential (ERP) study. Healthy controls underwent single task versions of a 2-back working memory task and a go/nogo response inhibition task as well as the introduced combined 2-back/nogo task. This combined task demonstrated a comparable ERP structure for working memory and response inhibition aspects as single task versions. Behaviorally, higher working memory performance during the combined paradigm indicated lower task difficulty, while high correlations between combined and single task versions still indicated valid working memory measures. For response inhibition performance, different task versions resulted in similar outcomes. The application of the combined n-back/nogo paradigm in ADHD patients revealed the expected working memory and response inhibition deficits, increased omission errors, reaction times, and standard deviation of reaction time, as well as diminished n-back P3 and nogo P3 amplitudes. We conclude that the combined n-back/nogo task is an effective paradigm for the economical assessment of working memory and response inhibition deficits in ADHD on a behavioral and neurophysiological level.

15.
Clin Neurophysiol ; 131(5): 1146-1154, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32029377

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the effects of HD-tDCS and conventional tDCS of the right IFG are superior to the effects of sham stimulation for the improvement of working memory performance in ADHD. METHODS: 15 ADHD patients between 10 and 16 years underwent three tDCS sessions in which conventional, HD and sham tDCS of the right IFG were applied. In all sessions a 2-back working memory task was solved and EEG was recorded. Baseline data were assessed from 15 age matched healthy controls. RESULTS: In ADHD patients, increased positive values of P300 and N200 mean amplitudes were found after conventional and HD-tDCS. Thus, both components were more in resemblance to ERPs in healthy controls. Behavioral performance was not generally influenced by tDCS but effects of HD-tDCS depended on individual hyperactive/impulsive symptom load. The rate of responders for HD-tDCS was equivalent to the responder rate for conventional tDCS. CONCLUSIONS: ERP data indicate that HD-tDCS is equally suitable as conventional tDCS for the recruitment of the right IFG in the context of working memory processing. SIGNIFICANCE: HD-tDCS of the right IFG is a promising approach for neuromodulation in ADHD but further research is necessary to develop adaptations that produce reliable behavioral benefits.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/physiopathology , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/therapy , Event-Related Potentials, P300/physiology , Evoked Potentials/physiology , Prefrontal Cortex/physiopathology , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/methods , Adolescent , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/diagnosis , Child , Electroencephalography/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Memory, Short-Term/physiology , Psychomotor Performance/physiology
16.
Front Hum Neurosci ; 13: 381, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31736729

ABSTRACT

Post-error slowing (PES) is an established performance monitoring readout. Several previous studies have found that PES is reduced in children and adolescents with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). We analyzed reaction time data, along with electroencephalography (EEG) data, from a response priming experiment in children and adolescents with ADHD (N = 28) and typically developing (TD) controls (N = 15) between 10 and 17 years of age. We report dynamic reaction time changes before and after errors: whereas TD controls readjusted their response speed to their individual average speed after committing an error, this reaction time adjustment appeared to be delayed and decreased in ADHD patients. In the EEG, error trials were accompanied by increased frontal midline theta activity, which was attenuated in ADHD compared to TD. We conclude that PES has a different time course rather than being fully absent in ADHD and discuss relationships with our EEG findings and potential implications for performance monitoring in ADHD.

17.
Front Psychiatry ; 10: 334, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31156480

ABSTRACT

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a disorder most frequently diagnosed in children and adolescents. Although ADHD can be effectively treated with psychostimulants, a significant proportion of patients discontinue treatment because of adverse events or insufficient improvement of symptoms. In addition, cognitive abilities that are frequently impaired in ADHD are not directly targeted by medication. Therefore, additional treatment options, especially to improve cognitive abilities, are needed. Because of its relatively easy application, well-established safety, and low cost, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising additional treatment option. Further research is needed to establish efficacy and to integrate this treatment into the clinical routine. In particular, limited evidence regarding the use of tDCS in children, lack of clear translational guidelines, and general challenges in conducting research with vulnerable populations pose a number of practical and ethical challenges to tDCS intervention studies. In this paper, we identify and discuss ethical issues related to research on tDCS and its potential therapeutic use for ADHD in children and adolescents. Relevant ethical issues in the tDCS research for pediatric ADHD center on safety, risk/benefit ratio, information and consent, labeling problems, and nonmedical use. Following an analysis of these issues, we developed a list of recommendations that can guide clinicians and researchers in conducting ethically sound research on tDCS in pediatric ADHD.

18.
Brain Stimul ; 12(4): 930-937, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30826318

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: About 10% of the western population suffers from a specific disability in the acquisition of reading and writing skills, known as developmental dyslexia (DD). Even though DD starts in childhood it frequently continuous throughout lifetime. Impaired processing of acoustic features at the phonematic scale based on dysfunctional auditory temporal resolution is considered as one core deficit underlying DD. Recently, the efficacy of transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) to modulate auditory temporal resolution and phoneme processing in healthy individuals has been demonstrated. OBJECTIVE: The present work aims to investigate online effects of tES on phoneme processing in individuals with DD. METHOD: Using an established phoneme-categorization task, we assessed the immediate behavioral and electrophysiological effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) and transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) over bilateral auditory cortex in children and adolescents with DD (study 1) and adults with DD (study 2) on auditory phoneme processing acuity. RESULTS: Our data revealed that tACS improved phoneme categorization in children and adolescents with DD, an effect that was paralleled by an increase in evoked brain response patterns representing low-level sensory processing. In the adult sample we replicated these findings and additionally showed a more pronounced impact of tRNS on phoneme-categorization acuity. CONCLUSION: These results provide compelling evidence for the potential of both tACS and tRNS to increase temporal precision of the auditory system in DD and suggest transcranial electrical stimulation as potential intervention in DD to foster the effect of standard phonology-based training.


Subject(s)
Acoustic Stimulation/methods , Auditory Cortex/physiology , Dyslexia/psychology , Dyslexia/therapy , Phonetics , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/methods , Adolescent , Auditory Perception/physiology , Child , Dyslexia/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Male , Random Allocation
19.
Front Neurosci ; 12: 761, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30405341

ABSTRACT

Transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) has been considered a promising tool for improving working memory (WM) performance. Recent studies have demonstrated modulation of networks underpinning WM processing through application of transcranial alternating current (TACS) as well as direct current (TDCS) stimulation. Differences between study designs have limited direct comparison of the efficacy of these approaches, however. Here we directly compared the effects of theta TACS (6 Hz) and anodal TDCS on WM, applying TACS to the frontal-parietal loop and TDCS to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). WM was evaluated using a visual 2-back WM task. A within-subject, crossover design was applied (N = 30) in three separate sessions. TACS, TDCS, and sham stimulation were administered in a counterbalanced order, and the WM task was performed before, during, and after stimulation. Neither reaction times for hits (RT-hit) nor accuracy differed according to stimulation type with this study design. A marked practice effect was noted, however, with improvement in RT-hit irrespective of stimulation type, which peaked at the end of the second session. Pre-stimulation RT-hits in session three returned to the level observed pre-stimulation in session two, irrespective of stimulation type. The participants who received sham stimulation in session one and had therefore improved their performance due to practice alone, had thus reached a plateau by session two, enabling us to pool RT-hits from sessions two and three for these participants. The pooling allowed implementation of a within-subject crossover study design, with a direct comparison of the effects of TACS and TDCS in a subgroup of participants (N = 10), each of whom received both stimulation types, in a counterbalanced order, with pre-stimulation performance the same for both sessions. TACS resulted in a greater improvement in RT-hits than TDCS (F(2,18) = 4.31 p = 0.03). Our findings suggest that future work optimizing the application of TACS has the potential to facilitate WM performance.

20.
Cortex ; 109: 215-225, 2018 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30388442

ABSTRACT

Hyperactivity and impulsivity are defining symptoms of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), next to inattention. Hyperactive and impulsive behavior in ADHD is often thought to result from a deficit in inhibitory motor control. However, testing for such a deficit is complicated by coexisting deficits in ADHD, specifically an impairment in maintaining task set, e.g., due to inattention. Typical inhibition paradigms, such as Stop-signal, Go/NoGo or Flanker paradigms, are susceptible to a fundamental confound between inhibition and inattention because inhibition is an explicit goal in these tasks. We eliminate this confound by studying the negative compatibility effect (NCE), reflecting a core inhibitory function in the human motor system which, in healthy individuals, inhibits movements automatically, i.e., without deliberation or even conscious awareness. Our behavioral analysis, including Bayesian model comparison, as well as the time-course of the lateralized readiness potential (LRP), consistently show that this function is intact in children with ADHD compared to healthy controls, independent of the presence or absence of prominent hyperactive-impulsive symptoms. We conclude that hyperactivity and impulsivity in ADHD do not result from a low-level deficit in motor inhibition.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/physiopathology , Impulsive Behavior/physiology , Inhibition, Psychological , Motor Skills/physiology , Adolescent , Attention/physiology , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Neuropsychological Tests
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...