Intrinsic mechanisms of right ventricular autoregulation.

To elucidate the adaptation of the right ventricle to acute and intermittently sustained afterload elevation, targeted preload reductions and afterload increases were implemented in a porcine model involving 12 pigs. Preload reduction was achieved via balloon occlusion of the inferior vena cava before, immediately and 5 min after acute afterload elevation induced by pulmonary artery occlusion or thromboxane A2 analog (U46619) infusion. Ventricular response was monitored by registration of pressure-volume (PV) loops using a conductance catheter. The end-systolic pressure-volume relationship (ESPVR) during pure preload reduction was adequately described by linear regression (mean and SEM slope of ESPVR (Ees) 0.414 ± 0.064 mmHg/ml), reflecting the classical Frank-Starling mechanism (FSM). The ESPVR during acute afterload elevation exhibited a biphasic trajectory with significantly distinct slopes (mean and SEM Ees bilin1: 1.256 ± 0.066 mmHg ml; Ees bilin2: 0.733 ± 0.063 mmHg ml, p < 0.001). The higher slope during the first phase in the absence of ventricular dilation could be explained by a reduced amount of shortening deactivation (SDA). The changes in PV-loops during the second phase were similar to those observed with a preload intervention. The persistent increase in afterload resulted in an increase in the slopes of ESPVR and preload recruitable stroke work (PRSW) with a slight decrease in filling state, indicating a relevant Anrep effect. This effect became more pronounced after 5 min or TXA infusion. This study demonstrates, for the first time, the relevance of intrinsic mechanisms of cardiac autoregulation in the right ventricle during the adaptation to load. The SDA, FSM, and Anrep effect could be differentiated and occurred successively, potentially with some overlap. Notably, the Anrep effect serves to prevent ventricular dilation.

Perioperative rifaximin is not associated with enhanced functional and volumetric recovery after major liver resection.

The objective of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to assess the impact of rifaximin on the course of liver function, liver regeneration and volumetric recovery in patients undergoing major hepatectomy. The ARROW trial was an investigator initiated, single-center, open-label, phase 3 RCT with two parallel treatment groups, conducted at our hepatobiliary center from 03/2016 to 07/2020. Patients undergoing major hepatectomy were eligible and randomly assigned 1:1 to receive oral rifaximin (550 mg twice daily for 7-10 or 14-21 days in case of portal vein embolization preoperatively and 7 days postoperatively) versus no intervention. Primary endpoint was the relative increase in postoperative liver function measured by LiMAx from postoperative day (POD) 4 to 7. Secondary endpoint were the course of liver function and liver volume during the study period as well as postoperative morbidity and mortality. Between 2016 and 2020, 45 patients were randomized and 35 patients (16 individuals in the rifaximin and 19 individuals in the control group) were eligible for per-protocol analysis. The study was prematurely terminated following interim analysis, due to the unlikelihood of reaching a significant primary endpoint. The median relative increase in liver function from POD 4 to POD 7 was 27% in the rifaximin group and 41% in the control group (p = 0.399). Further, no significant difference was found in terms of any other endpoints of functional liver- and volume regeneration or perioperative surgical complications following the application of rifaximin versus no intervention. Perioperative application of rifaximin has no effect on functional or volumetric regeneration after major hepatectomy (NCT02555293; EudraCT 2013-004644-28).