Development of a life events/icon calendar questionnaire to ascertain occupational histories and other characteristics of migrant farmworkers.

BACKGROUND: Specialized methods are necessary to collect data from migrant farmworkers for epidemiologic research. METHODS: We developed a questionnaire that collected lifetime occupational histories and other lifestyle risk factors via a life events/icon calendar, and administered the questionnaire to a convenience sample of 162 migrant farmworkers in nine areas of the U.S. RESULTS: The average duration of the interviews was about 1 h 30 min, with an average of 45 min for the work history section. The occupational histories covered a median of 27.6 years per person for men and 20.8 years per person for women. The median number of years spent in farm jobs was 11.3 for men and 5.8 for women. The median number of farm jobs (crop/task combination) per person was 59 among men and 27 among women. Many farmworkers performed the same crop/task combinations at multiple times throughout their lives, yielding a median of 13 unique farm jobs and 8 unique crops among men and 7 jobs and 5 crops among women. CONCLUSIONS: The project demonstrated that it is feasible to collect detailed work histories and other risk factor data from farmworkers, documented the complexity of work histories encountered among farmworkers, and yielded recommendations for refining a questionnaire that will facilitate future epidemiologic research on farmworkers.

Ability to trace migrant farmworkers ten years after initial identification in a Northern State (Wisconsin).

BACKGROUND: Migrant farmworkers have rarely been included in epidemiologic studies. To assess the feasibility of following farmworkers over extended periods, a critical feature of many study designs, we attempted to trace a sample of Mexican-American farmworkers identified in a clinic in Wisconsin. METHODS: We randomly chose 100 farmworkers from a migrant health center registration list for 1984-85. In 1995, we searched recent clinic records, made telephone calls, and visited migrant camps to find these farmworkers in Wisconsin during the growing season. We also attempted to find 46 farmworkers at their homes in southwest Texas over a two-week period in 1996 using the address listed in the clinic records, local phone books, and conversations with next-door neighbors. RESULTS: Although 25 farmworkers had reregistered at the clinic in recent years, we found only 6 of them in Wisconsin in 1995. In southwest Texas, we either located or ascertained information about the vital status of 25 of the 46 farmworkers (54%). CONCLUSIONS: Tracing efforts must include extensive contacts in farmworkers' home states and must incorporate a variety of information sources. Tracing farmworkers in epidemiologic studies appears to be feasible but requires more intensive methods over longer periods of time than those used in this study.

Cancer education interventions for rural populations.

To respond to major needs expressed by 15 farm family focus group participants, education interventions were designed to overcome barriers to primary prevention for skin cancer. Farmers are at high risk for developing skin cancer because of occupational exposure. In an attempt to increase skin cancer prevention education in a rural population, three demonstration projects were developed and field tested. Projects were designed to overcome barriers defined by the focus groups. One project evaluated a school-based education intervention. A second project evaluated a family-based education intervention. Knowledge gain was the evaluation endpoint of these two projects. Significant knowledge gain was demonstrated for these projects. A third project was designed to deliver skin cancer information directly to farmers using veterinarians. Farmers found this method of delivery acceptable.

Peer discussions of cancer among Hispanic migrant farm workers.

Hispanic migrant agricultural workers' exposure to pesticides and other agrichemicals places them at increased risk for a variety of acute and chronic conditions, including cancer. As a socioeconomically disadvantaged group, migrant workers also face many barriers to effective cancer control. In 1992, a series of focus groups was held with 55 Hispanic migrant agricultural workers (22 women, 33 men) in central Wisconsin to gather information on their knowledge and attitudes regarding cancer etiology and treatment, their practices regarding cancer screening and early detection, and their concerns regarding occupational exposure to pesticides. Beliefs that pesticides are toxic and can cause health problems were common among participants. In addition, however, participants reported that they are reluctant to demand occupational protections to which they are entitled because they are afraid of losing their jobs. Study results also suggest that barriers to effective primary and secondary prevention of cancer in this Hispanic migrant agricultural worker population include knowledge and information barriers, cultural barriers, and socioeconomic barriers. A lack of knowledge and information regarding the causes of cancer, its prevention, and its early detection and treatment was evident among participants, which in turn was reflected in strong fatalistic attitudes toward the disease. Cultural barriers included attitudes of embarrassment and shame associated with physical examinations and women's strong discomfort with male clinicians. Socioeconomic barriers to secondary prevention included the cost of obtaining health services, time constraints associated with the need to work and long working days, and a lack of transportation. Efforts to improve cancer screening as well as other preventive health services in the Hispanic migrant agricultural worker population must acknowledge these barriers and address as many of them as possible to be successful.