Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Transpl Int ; 23(11): 1094-104, 2010 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20477994

ABSTRACT

Angiograms of cardiac transplant (HTx) recipients were to be evaluated in a ring experiment and a joint consensus on criteria of angiographic evaluation of coronary arteries of HTx patients was to be reached. Twenty-four coronary angiograms from 11 hospitals were circulated. One hundred eighty-eight blinded evaluations were returned. A joint evaluation by six experienced cardiologists was used as reference standard and a consensus evaluation form was developed. Significant lesions (stenosis 75%, 50% in the left main coronary artery) were diagnosed in 10/23 abnormal coronary angiograms (41.7%). Interventional revascularization was recommended in 8/10 (80%). In 21 coronary angiograms distal pruning was found and in 11/21 (52.4%) cases with distal pruning occlusion of at least one peripheral vessel was detected. The best kappa value (0.7) was found for the presence of at least one clinically significant stenosis. Agreement on the site and grade of local stenosis was much less. Some agreement on remodeling was found in assessing diffuse narrowing in the LCA (kappa=0.371, P<0.001). The kappa value for peripheral obliteration was 0.331 (P=0.001). Angiographic evaluation of cardiac allograft vasculopathy, particularly of diffuse and peripheral disease and remodeling, needs standardization. This should be performed in a downward compatible improvement process.


Subject(s)
Coronary Angiography/methods , Heart Transplantation/methods , Transplantation, Homologous/methods , Cardiology/methods , Constriction, Pathologic/therapy , Coronary Angiography/standards , Coronary Vessels/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Vessels/pathology , Germany , Guidelines as Topic , Heart Transplantation/diagnostic imaging , Heart Transplantation/standards , Humans , Myocardial Revascularization/methods , Observer Variation , Sensitivity and Specificity , Treatment Outcome , Ultrasonography
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL