To which extent do breast cancer survivors feel well informed about disease and treatment 5 years after diagnosis?

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we investigated to which extent patients feel well informed about their disease and treatment, which areas they wish more or less information and which variables are associated with a need for information about the disease, medical tests and treatment. METHODS: In a German multi-centre prospective study, we enrolled 759 female breast cancer patients at the time of cancer diagnosis (baseline). Data on information were captured at 5 years after diagnosis with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Information Module (EORTC QLQ-INFO24). Good information predictors were analysed using linear regression models. RESULTS: There were 456 patients who participated at the 5-year follow-up. They reported to feel well informed about medical tests (mean score 78.5) and the disease itself (69.3) but relatively poorly about other services (44.3) and about different places of care (31.3). The survivors expressed a need for more information concerning: side effects and long-term consequences of therapy, more information in general, information about aftercare, prognosis, complementary medicine, disease and therapy. Patients with higher incomes were better informed about medical tests (ß 0.26, p 0.04) and worse informed with increasing levels of fear of treatment (ß - 0.11, p 0.02). Information about treatment was reported to be worse by survivors > 70 years old (ß -0.34, p 0.03) and by immigrants (ß -0.11, p 0.02). Survivors who had received additional written information felt better informed about disease, medical tests, treatment and other services (ß 0.19/0.19/0.20/0.25; each p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Health care providers have to reconsider how and what kind of information they provide. Providing written information, in addition to oral information, may improve meeting those information needs.

Predictors of the course of quality of life during therapy in women with primary breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Multimodal therapies affect the quality of life (QoL) of patients with primary breast cancer (PBC). The objectives of this prospective study were to explore the changes in QoL from diagnosis to conclusion of adjuvant therapy and to identify predictive factors of QoL. METHODS: Before surgery (t1), before onset of adjuvant treatment (t2) and after completion of adjuvant chemo- or radiotherapy (t3), patients with PBC (n = 759) completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire, Charlson Comorbidity Index, Patient Health Questionnaire and Perceived Involvement in Care Scales. Predictors of the course of global QoL were estimated using multinomial logistic regression. Effect estimates are odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Global QoL improved between t1 and t3, while physical functioning, emotional functioning and fatigue deteriorated. QoL before surgery was more often poor in patients <60 years (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.5-3.1) and in those with comorbid mental illnesses (OR 8.6, CI 5.4-13.7). Forty-seven percentage reported good global QoL both at t1 and at t3. QoL improved in 28%, worsened in 10% and remained poor in 15%. Compared to patients with consistently good global QoL, a course of improving QoL was more often seen in patients who had received a mastectomy and in those with intense fear of treatment before surgery. A course of decreasing QoL was more often found in patients who were treated with chemotherapy. QoL stayed poor in patients with chemotherapy, mastectomy and intense fear. There was no evidence that radiotherapy, progressive disease or perceived involvement impact the course of QoL. CONCLUSIONS: Younger age and comorbid mental illnesses are associated with poor QoL pre-therapeutically. QoL is more likely to stay or become poor in patients who receive chemotherapy.

Do T1a breast cancers profit from adjuvant systemic therapy? A multicenter retrospective cohort study of 325 T1a-patients.

UNLABELLED: Small tumor size (≤5 mm, T1a) carries an excellent prognosis. Controversy exists over the extent of the variety of treatment approaches. We therefore explored the effect of adjuvant systemic therapy (AST) on recurrence free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OAS) for the group of T1a-tumors. METHODS: The multicenter study population included 9625 early breast cancer patients, diagnosed between 1992 and 2008. 5196 patients were T1 (54.0 %) and 325 of these patients (3.4 %) were T1a. RESULTS: Compared to patients with AST RFS and OAS were significantly worse for patients who did not receive AST (RFS: p = 0.001; OAS: p = 0.021). Even N0-T1a-patients (n = 279) significantly profited from AST (RFS: p = 0.001; OAS: p = 0.006). Patients with at least one poor prognostic factor (HR-, HER2+, N1 or G3) without AST also showed a significantly worse outcome (RFS: p = 0.026; OAS: p = 0.024) compared to pT1a-patients with AST. Consensus guidelines state that the prognosis of patients with T1a that are N0 is uncertain even if HER2 is amplified or overexpressed. In our study nodal-negative (N0) T1a-patients (n = 279) without AST showed a significantly worse RFS (p = 0.001), and a significantly worse OAS (p = 0.006) compared to those patients with AST. In multivariate analysis even after adjusting by age, grading, hormonal receptor status, HER2/neu-status and nodal status T1a-patients without AST were associated with a significantly worse RFS resp. OAS compared to patient with AST (RFS: p = 0.002; OAS: p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: There is an association between AST and improved RFS or OAS for breast cancer patients with T1a tumors.

[Documentation Time and Effort and Associated Resources for Patients with Primary Breast Cancer from Diagnosis to End of Follow-Up - Results of a Multicentre Validation]. / Dokumentationsaufwand und verbundene Ressourcen bei Patientinnen mit einem primären Mammakarzinom - von der Primärdiagnose bis zur Abschluss der Nachsorge - Ergebnisse der multizentrischen Erhebung.

INTRODUCTION: Tumour documentation is essential for quality assurance of oncological therapies and as a source of reliable information about the in- and outpatient care. The documentation effort and the associated resource consumption were analysed for the example of breast cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The different steps in the care of patients with primary breast cancer in a standardised disease situation were defined from initial diagnosis to the end of the follow-up. After the pilot phase, a multicentre validation (n=7 centres) was performed with the support of the Federal Ministry of Health. The documentation time points were horizontally collected and analysed with regard to amount, duration and personnel expenses. RESULTS: 57% of the documentation costs are caused by the physicians. Regarding the different centres, documentation costs were calculated between € 352.82 and € 1 084.08 per patient from diagnosis to completion of aftercare. Non-certified centres had a reduced documentation effort and thus lower costs. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate the need for a reduction of the documentation effort - particularly for physicians - the most expensive profession in the health system. A quality improvement is expected from the certification with its special requirements. In this context, there is a justified demand for an adequate remuneration of the documentation effort for certified centres. Furthermore, it is necessary to reduce the number of variables for quality assurance and to define them centrally. A comprehensive multi-disciplinary documentation should be achieved. Investments in a single data set and interface enhancements of existing documentation systems should be realised.

Identifying the impact of inflammatory breast cancer on survival: a retrospective multi-center cohort study.

PURPOSE: Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) represents a rare and aggressive form of cancer with negative prognosis and high rate of recurrence. The purpose of this retrospective multi-center study was to evaluate the effect of IBC on overall and disease-free survival. Furthermore we analyzed the influence of hormone and Her2 receptor expression on inflammatory breast cancer cells on the clinical outcome of patients. METHODS: This retrospective German multi-center study included 11,780 patients with primary breast cancer recruited from 1992 to 2008. In this sub-group analysis we focused on 70 patients with IBC. RESULTS: Despite the relatively small sample size, we could confirm the aggressiveness of inflammatory breast cancer and the different clinical behavior of IBC subtypes. It could be demonstrated that the lack of expression of hormone receptors on tumor cells is associated with a more aggressive clinical course and decreased overall and disease-free survival. Higher incidence of Her2 overexpression, that is typically associated with poor prognostic outcome among women with non-IBC tumors, seems however to have no prognostic significance. CONCLUSIONS: This BRENDA sub-group analysis, on a German cohort of breast cancer patients confirmed the negative outcome of IBC and the different clinical behavior of IBC subtypes. The best management of IBC requires intensive coordination and cooperation between various clinical disciplines involved in the treatment of IBC patients. Moreover there is a need to identify IBC-specific targeted therapies to improve the curing prospects of this subtype of cancer.

Is guideline-adherent adjuvant treatment an equal alternative for patients aged >65 who cannot participate in adjuvant clinical breast cancer trials? A retrospective multi-center cohort study of 4,142 patients.

INTRODUCTION: It is well accepted that innovation in oncology is transported through randomized clinical trials (CT), furthermore there is some evidence that patients profit from participation in CT. However, especially elderly patients aged >65 usually do not have access to clinical trials; we therefore used an unselected patient cohort to investigate the following questions: (1) Is there a difference in survival parameters between study participants <65 and elderly 65-80 non-participants? (2) Is guideline-adherent adjuvant treatment an equal alternative for elderly patients aged 65-80? MATERIALS AND METHODS: This German retrospective multi-center cohort study included 4,142 patients (study participants <65 and elderly breast cancer patients 65-80) with primary breast cancer recruited from 1992 to 2008 in 17 participating breast cancer centers. RESULTS: Applying the exclusion criteria, we included 960 (23.2%) study participants (PA) <65 and 3,182 (76.8%) elderly >65. Elderly non-participants (NPA) >65 demonstrate a significantly inferior RFS [RFS: HR = 1.67; p < 0.001] and OS [OS: HR = 1.98; p < 0.001] compared to PA <65. Within the elderly group, 1,868 (58.7%) patients received guideline-adherent adjuvant treatment. When comparing guideline conform elderly >65 versus PA <65, we found no significant difference in RFS [RFS: HR = 1.17; p = 0.218] and OS [OS: HR = 1.34; p = 0.054]. In contrast, non-guideline-adherent elderly demonstrated significantly inferior survival parameters [RFS: HR = 2.06; p < 0.001] [OS: HR = 2.50; p < 0.001] compared to <65 PA. CONCLUSION: Guideline-adherent adjuvant treatment seems to be an equivalent option for elderly breast cancer patients. There is a strong association between guideline adherence and improved outcome parameters in elderly breast cancer patients.

Assessing the impact of CMF-like/Anthracycline-based/Anthracycline-Taxane-based/dose-dense chemotherapy in dependency of positive axillary lymph nodes/hormone receptor-status/grading/T-stage on survival - A retrospective multi-centre cohort study of 3677 patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy.

AIM: Adjuvant chemotherapy has changed dramatically in the last decades. Anthracycline-/Taxane-based and dose-dense chemotherapy regimens improved survival in node positive breast cancer. This study tries to answer the following questions: METHODS: This is a German multi-centre (17 participating hospitals all certified as breast cancer centres) retrospective cohort study. We included patients that received CMF-like (CMF) (n=1308), Anthracycline-based (A) (1046), Anthracycline-Taxane-based (AT) (1110) and dose-dense chemotherapy (DD) (213) into this analysis. RESULTS: In case of N0 and 1-3 pos LN we did not observe statistically significant differences in overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between CMF/A/AT and (for 1-3 pos LN) DD. In the group of 4-10 pos LN we observe an improvement by the use of AT-based chemotherapy, which cannot further be improved by DD chemotherapy. However in the highest risk group, defined as ⩾11 pos LN, we observed a statistically significant improvement in survival by the use of DD chemotherapy. Also a statistically slightly non-significant trend towards improvement of survival parameters by the use of DD compared to AT chemotherapy could be observed. Only for G3 subtypes we could observe a survival benefit for DD. These results remain consistent after exclusion of non-guideline adherent patients (surgery, radiotherapy and endocrine therapy) in order to reduce the bias of guideline violations in other adjuvant treatment modalities. CONCLUSION: DD chemotherapy is associated with improved survival parameters in patients with ⩾11 positive LN.

DGGG Guidelines Programme: Status Quo - Quo Vadis!

The Guidelines programme of the German Society of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (DGGG) is an executive part of the DGGG Guidelines Commission. It includes in-house planning and organisation of all guidelines as well as representation outside of the DGGG. This article does not concern the development of the guidelines as much as it concerns the planning, organisation, registration, editing and publication of the guidelines in context of the DGGG Guidelines programme. It targets interested parties, especially authors and coordinators of guidelines.

Final analysis of the prospective WSG-AGO EC-Doc versus FEC phase III trial in intermediate-risk (pN1) early breast cancer: efficacy and predictive value of Ki67 expression.

BACKGROUND: Taxane-based adjuvant chemotherapy is standard in node-positive (N+) early breast cancer (BC). The magnitude of benefit in intermediate-risk N+ early BC is still unclear. WSG-AGO epiribicine and cyclophosphamide (EC)-Doc is a large trial evaluating modern taxane-based chemotherapy in patients with 1-3 positive lymph nodes (LNs) only. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 2011 BC patients (18-65 years, pN1) were entered into a randomized phase III trial comparing 4 × E90C600 q3w followed by 4 × docetaxel 100 q3w (n = 1008) with the current standard: 6 × F500E100C500 q3w (n = 828) or C600M40F600 d1, 8× q4w (n = 175). Primary end point was event-free survival (EFS); secondary end points were overall survival (OS), toxicity, translational research, and quality of life. Central tumor bank samples were evaluable in a representative collective (n = 772; 40%). Ki-67 was assessed centrally in hormone receptor-positive disease as a surrogate marker for the distinction of luminal A/B-like tumors. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were well balanced between study arms in both main study and central tumor bank subset. At 59-month median follow-up, superior efficacy of EC-Doc [versus FEC (a combination of 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide)] was seen in EFS and OS: 5-year EFS: 89.8% versus 87.3% (P = 0.038); 5-year OS: 94.5% versus 92.8% (P = 0.034); both tests one-tailed. EC-Doc caused more toxicity. In hormone receptor-positive (HR)+ disease, only high-Ki-67 tumors (≥ 20%) derived significant benefit from taxane-based therapy: hazard ratio = 0.39 (95% CI 0.18-0.82) for EC-Doc versus FEC (test for interaction; P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: EC-Doc significantly improved EFS and OS versus FEC in intermediate-risk BC (1-3 LNs) within all subgroups as defined by local pathology. In HR+ disease, patients with luminal A-like tumors may be potentially over-treated by taxane-based chemotherapy. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02115204.

The impact of adjuvant radiotherapy on the survival of primary breast cancer patients: a retrospective multicenter cohort study of 8935 subjects.

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy (RT) is proven to be an important backbone for adjuvant therapy in randomized, controlled trials, but it is unclear if these effects are provable in a daily routine cohort of breast cancer patients. This study sought to answer the following questions in a daily routine cohort of breast cancer patients: 1. Does guideline-adherent RT improve primary breast cancer patient survival? 2. Is breast-conserving surgery (BCS) followed by RT equal to a mastectomy (MA) with regard to outcome parameters? 3. Does adjuvant RT compensate for an incomplete tumor resection (R1)? PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective, multicenter cohort study, we investigated data from 8935 primary breast cancer patients recruited from 17 participating certified breast cancer centers in Germany between 1992 and 2008. Guideline adherence based on internationally validated guidelines. RESULTS: The patients who received guideline-adherent RT for primary breast cancer were associated with significantly improved survival parameters [recurrence-free survival (RFS): P < 0.001; overall survival (OS): P < 0.001] compared with patients who did not receive guideline-adherent adjuvant RT. Furthermore, the results demonstrated that there were no significant differences in RFS and OS between BCS followed by RT and MA [RFS: P = 0.293; OS: P = 0.104]. Adjuvant RT did not improve the outcome of patients receiving nonguideline-adherent incomplete tumor resection via BCS (R1); these patients showed a significantly impaired RFS [P < 0.001] and OS [P < 0.001] compared with patients who underwent guideline-adherent complete tumor resection via BCS (R0). In addition, non-guideline-adherent RT after MA (overtherapy) did not significantly influence survival [RFS: P = 0.838; OS: P = 0.613]. CONCLUSION: Our study confirms the importance of guideline-adherent adjuvant RT. It shows highly significant associations between RFS or OS and guideline adherent RT. Nevertheless, inadequate (R1-) surgical resection in a daily routine cohort of patients increases the risk of local recurrence and appears not to be compensated by the following RT.

COMPliance and Arthralgia in Clinical Therapy: the COMPACT trial, assessing the incidence of arthralgia, and compliance within the first year of adjuvant anastrozole therapy.

BACKGROUND: This prospective study evaluated the relationship between arthralgia and compliance during the first year of adjuvant anastrozole therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: COMPliance and Arthralgia in Clinical Therapy (COMPACT) was an open-label, multicenter, noninterventional study conducted in Germany. Patients had started adjuvant anastrozole 3-6 months before the study start. The primary end points were arthralgia, compliance, and the relationship between compliance and arthralgia, assessed at specific time points. RESULTS: Overall, 1916 patients received upfront anastrozole. Mean arthralgia scores were increased from baseline at each visit up to 9 months. Compliance with anastrozole therapy gradually decreased over time from baseline to 9 months (P<0.001). At 9 months, investigators estimated that >95% of patients were compliant versus patient reports of <70%. There was a significant association between arthralgia mean scores and noncompliance at 6 months (P<0.0001), 9 months (P<0.0001), and overall (P<0.0001). Over time, new events or impairment of existing arthralgias were reported in 14% (3 months), 11% (6 months), and 9% (9 months) of patients. CONCLUSION: Arthralgia is important in the clinical management of women with early breast cancer and may contribute to noncompliance and clinical outcomes. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER: NCT00857012.

Comparing the outcome between multicentric and multifocal breast cancer: what is the impact on survival, and is there a role for guideline-adherent adjuvant therapy? A retrospective multicenter cohort study of 8,935 patients.

Multifocal (MF) and multicentric (MC) breast cancers have been comprehensively studied, and their outcomes have been compared with unifocal (UF) tumors. We attempted to answer the following questions: (1) Does MF/MC presentation influence the outcome concerning BC mortality?, (2) Is there an impact of guideline-adherent adjuvant treatment in these BC subtypes?, and (3)What is the influence of guideline violations concerning surgery (breast-conserving surgery versus mastectomy) on the survival of MF/MC BC patients? Between 1992 and 2008, we retrospectively analyzed 8,935 breast cancer patients from 17 participating breast cancer centers within the BRENDA study group. Of 8,935 breast cancer patients, 7,073 (79.2 %) had UF tumors, 1,398 (15.6 %) had MF tumors, and 464 (5.2 %) had MC tumors. RFS was significantly worse for MF/MC BC patients compared to patients with UF tumors (MF p = 0.007; MC p = 0.019). OAS was significantly worse for MC patients but not for MF patients compared to patients with UF tumors (MF p = 0.321; MC p = 0.001). Guideline adherence was significantly lower in patients with MF (n = 580; 41.5 %) and MC (n = 204; 44.0 %) compared to patients with UF (n = 3,871; 54.7 %) (p < 0.001) tumors. Guideline violations were associated with a highly significant deterioration in survival throughout all subgroups except for MC, with respect to RFS and OAS. For 100 %-guideline-adherent patients, we could not find any significant differences in RFS and OAS after adjusting by nodal status, grade, and tumor size. Furthermore, we could not find any significant differences in RFS and OAS in patients with MF or MC stratified by breast-conserving therapy (BCT lumpectomy and radiation therapy) and mastectomy. There is a strong association between improved RFS and OAS in patients with MF/MZ BC. There are no significant differences in RFS and OAS for patients with breast-conserving therapy or mastectomy.

Neoadjuvant bevacizumab and anthracycline-taxane-based chemotherapy in 678 triple-negative primary breast cancers; results from the geparquinto study (GBG 44).

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the pathological complete response (pCR) rate after neoadjuvant epirubicin, (E) cyclophosphamide (C) and docetaxel containing chemotherapy with and without the addition of bevacizumab in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with untreated cT1c-4d TNBC represented a stratified subset of the 1948 participants of the HER2-negative part of the GeparQuinto trial. Patients were randomized to receive four cycles EC (90/600 mg/m(2); q3w) followed by four cycles docetaxel (100 mg/m(2); q3w) each with or without bevacizumab (15 mg/kg; q3w) added to chemotherapy. RESULTS: TNBC patients were randomized to chemotherapy without (n = 340) or with bevacizumab (n = 323). pCR (ypT0 ypN0, primary end point) rates were 27.9% without and 39.3% with bevacizumab (P = 0.003). According to other pCR definitions, the addition of bevacizumab increased the pCR rate from 30.9% to 41.8% (ypT0 ypN0/+; P = 0.004), 36.2% to 46.4% (ypT0/is ypN0/+; P = 0.009) and 32.9% to 43.3% (ypT0/is ypN0; P = 0.007). Bevacizumab treatment [OR 1.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.23-2.42; P = 0.002], lower tumor stage (OR 2.38, 95% CI 1.24-4.54; P = 0.009) and grade 3 tumors (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.14-2.48; P = 0.009) were confirmed as independent predictors of higher pCR in multivariate logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy in TNBC significantly increases pCR rates.

[Breast cancer: current recommendations for pathologists on the basis of the S3 guidelines]. / Mammakarzinom: aktuelle Empfehlungen für Pathologen auf Basis der S3-Leitlinie.

Optimal management of breast cancer patients is based on efficient multidisciplinary cooperation. The role of pathologists is to survey those parameters that are crucial for the individually adopted therapy. Thereby, distinct quality criteria have to be considered concerning the handling of the tissue samples, including preparation and examination, as well as the analytical methods used. The interdisciplinary S3 guideline "Diagnosis, therapy and follow-up of breast cancer" includes recommendations concerning these aspects based on current evidence. Its third edition was published in July 2012. In this article an overview of the topics relevant for pathologists that have been modified in the latest edition is provided.

The Patient's Anastrozole Compliance to Therapy (PACT) Program: a randomized, in-practice study on the impact of a standardized information program on persistence and compliance to adjuvant endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Compliance and persistence are often overlooked in adjuvant breast cancer treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: PACT was a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open, parallel-group study assessing whether educational materials (EMs) enhanced compliance with aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy in postmenopausal women with early, hormone-receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer. The primary end points were compliance (proportion taking ≥ 80% anastrozole) at 12 months and persistence (proportion reporting anastrozole intake during the study period). RESULTS: Four thousand eight hundred and forty-four patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive standard therapy or standard therapy with EMs. There was no difference between arms in compliance (N = 2740; 88.5%/88.8%, respectively, P = 0.81) or persistence rates (N = 2740; 40.5%/43.0%, respectively, P = 0.18). Modified end point analyses found no differences in compliance between arms based on the classification of: (i) patients with missing documentation or follow-up visit <9 months as non-compliant (N = 4397, P = 0.15); (ii) patients with early (≤ 292 days) 12-month follow-up documentation excluded (N = 4091, P = 0.19); (iii) patients reaching ≥ 80% compliance during individual follow-up as compliant (N = 4397, P = 0.26). Modified persistence analyses found no difference between arms (N = 4397, P = 0.37). CONCLUSIONS: Addition of EMs to standard therapy did not significantly affect compliance and persistence with adjuvant anastrozole. CLINICALTRIALS ID: NCT00555867.

Trends in patient characteristics, treatment and survival in breast cancer in a non-selected retrospective clinical cohort study of 2,600 patients.

PURPOSE: Breast cancer epidemiology and survival recently saw major changes resulting from improved screening and treatment modalities. This paper aims to provide an overview of changes in recent years in patient characteristics and treatment procedures. METHODS: Using data from BRENDA, an unselected cohort with universal coverage of a constant catchment area over a 13-year observation period, this study provides an overview of key trends. RESULTS: Beside steady increases in overall and disease-free survival, main trends in recent years included a gradual increase in new patients' average ages. Grading, but not T stages, improved. Node negative, endocrine responsive patient shares increased; node positive, endocrine responsive shares decreased. HER2neu screening went from uncommon to ubiquitous. Sentinel node biopsy reduced excised numbers of lymph nodes. Second and third generation chemotherapies replaced CMF. Neoadjuvant therapy was gradually introduced. Aromatase inhibitors pushed down Tamoxifen use. 90 % of endocrine responsive patients now receive endocrine therapy. Our results suggest that improved survival only partially results from improved prognostic factors, but rather seems mainly due to improved treatment modalities. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment procedures have changed dramatically over recent years. This was associated with steady increases in favorable outcomes among patients.

Participation in adjuvant clinical breast cancer trials: does study participation improve survival compared to guideline adherent adjuvant treatment? A retrospective multi-centre cohort study of 9,433 patients.

UNLABELLED: Adjuvant clinical trials (CTs) usually compare a standard treatment regime versus an innovative new substance or regimen. Participation in CT however, is available for only few patients and exclusion criteria are usually very strict. Therefore we used an unselected patient cohort to investigate the following questions: MATERIAL AND METHODS: This German retrospective multi-centre cohort study included 9433 patients with primary breast cancer recruited from 1992 to 2008. RESULTS: One thousand two hundred and fifty-five (13.3%) patients participated in adjuvant clinical trials (PA) and 8178 (86.7%) did not (NPA). RFS was higher among participants (PA) than among non-participants (NPA) [p=0.006], but differences in overall survival (OAS) were not significant [p=0.15]. When stratified for guideline adherence, the outcome was not different for guideline conform NPA [RFS: p=0.88] [OAS: p=0.37] compared to PA. Survival parameters however, were significantly poorer in non-guideline conform PA [RFS: p<0.001] [OAS: p<0.001] and non-guideline conform NPA [RFS: p<0.001] [OAS: p<0.001] as compared to guideline adherent PA. DISCUSSION: There is a strong association between guideline adherence in adjuvant treatment in BC and survival. PA in clinical trials tended to higher survival rates, but only if guideline-adherent treatment was applied. Patients who do not have access to clinical trials may profit substantially from guideline-adherent adjuvant treatment.