Preconditioning with levosimendan before implantation of left ventricular assist devices.

In this retrospective study, we investigated the impact of preconditioning of the right ventricle with the calcium sensitizer levosimendan immediately before left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation on outcome and survival. Nine consecutive LVAD patients (seven suffering from dilative cardiomyopathy and two from ischemic cardiomyopathy) with echocardiographic and invasive evidence of right heart insufficiency received levosimendan with 0.1 µg/kg body weight/min for 24 h before implantation of the assist device (seven HeartWare and two Jarvik 2000). Administration of levosimendan was safe and had not to be discontinued in any patient. We observed no relevant side effects. Twelve-month survival after implantation of the LVAD was 89% representing a superior outcome compared with the fifth INTERMACS registry data with 75% survival. Two temporary extracorporeal membrane-oxygenation implantations were necessary due to intraoperative right ventricular dysfunction. Only one patient died 5 weeks after LVAD implantation of multiorgan failure, five patients were successfully transplanted, and three patients underwent LVAD implantation for destination therapy. Levosimendan might improve clinical outcome and survival when used as pretreatment in patients with right heart insufficiency prior to LVAD implantation. However, we recommend a larger controlled trial in the future to confirm our preliminary results.

Norepinephrine versus dopamine pretreatment of potential heart donors - impact on long-term outcome.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines advocate administration of inotropic agents to stabilize potential deceased heart-beating donors. A consensus on the specific agent or combination therapy is lacking. We thus initiated a retrospective analysis of patients being transplanted at our center in a matched-pair study design focusing on survival after donor pre-treatment either with norepinephrine or dopamine. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 936 patients (759 male; 177 female; mean age: 47.5 ± 15.4 years) were transplanted at our center between 8/1981 and 12/2010. An overall of 22 patient pairs (all male; mean age 55.4 ± 7.5 years; range 23-67 years) were matched according to our strict criteria. During follow-up (5037 ± 1791 days) 11 deaths occurred. Overall survival in both groups was not different (p=0.1438). RESULTS: In a sub-population analysis of all patient-pairs that completed 5-year follow-up (n=19), Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed significant superior survival of recipients that received hearts pre-treated with norepinephrine vs. dopamine pre-treatment (p=0.0368). CONCLUSIONS: Neither norepinephrine nor dopamine pre-treatment of potential heart donors showed superior overall survival. In a sub-population of long-term survivors norepinephrine pre-treatment was associated with better survival in a rather small cohort of heart transplant recipients. These findings underscore the urgent need of further prospective multicenter randomized trials to recommend a preferable adrenergic therapy.