Genes with relevance for early to late progression of colon carcinoma based on combined genomic and transcriptomic information from the same patients.

BACKGROUND: Genetic and epigenetic alterations in colorectal cancer are numerous. However, it is difficult to judge whether such changes are primary or secondary to the appearance and progression of tumors. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to identify altered DNA regions with significant covariation to transcription alterations along colon cancer progression. METHODS: Tumor and normal colon tissue were obtained at primary operations from 24 patients selected by chance. DNA, RNA and microRNAs were extracted from the same biopsy material in all individuals and analyzed by oligo-nucleotide array-based comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), mRNA- and microRNA oligo-arrays. Statistical analyses were performed to assess statistical interactions (correlations, co-variations) between DNA copy number changes and significant alterations in gene and microRNA expression using appropriate parametric and non-parametric statistics. RESULTS: Main DNA alterations were located on chromosome 7, 8, 13 and 20. Tumor DNA copy number gain increased with tumor progression, significantly related to increased gene expression. Copy number loss was not observed in Dukes A tumors. There was no significant relationship between expressed genes and tumor progression across Dukes A-D tumors; and no relationship between tumor stage and the number of microRNAs with significantly altered expression. Interaction analyses identified overall 41 genes, which discriminated early Dukes A plus B tumors from late Dukes C plus D tumor; 28 of these genes remained with correlations between genomic and transcriptomic alterations in Dukes C plus D tumors and 17 in Dukes D. One microRNA (microR-663) showed interactions with DNA alterations in all Dukes A-D tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Our modeling confirms that colon cancer progression is related to genomic instability and altered gene expression. However, early invasive tumor growth seemed rather related to transcriptomic alterations, where changes in microRNA may be an early phenomenon, and less to DNA copy number changes.

Analysis of patient selection and external validity in the Swedish contribution to the COLOR trial.

OBJECTIVE: The colon cancer laparoscopic or open resection (COLOR) trial is an international, randomised controlled trial comparing outcomes of open and laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer. The main purpose of this study was to determine representability by comparing included and nonincluded patients in the participating Swedish centres. DESIGN: At eight centres, which included 391 of the 422 Swedish patients, a local database search was performed to identify retrospectively all patients (n = 2,384) who underwent surgery for colon cancer during the inclusion period, and data was retrieved from medical records. RESULTS: Four hundred fifty-six patients were randomised, 65 of whom were excluded post randomisation (group 2), leaving 391 patients in the study (group 1). For 1,566 patients, valid exclusion criteria were found (group 3). Thus, 362 patients were eligible but not included (group 4). Relative to group 1, patients in group 4 had a significantly higher American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score, more advanced tumour stage and difference regarding the resections performed. Results showed that 1470 patients (62%) could be calculated as feasible for laparoscopic colon resection (LCR) in a clinical, nontrial situation. CONCLUSIONS: The study population in the Swedish part of the COLOR trial was representative of the eligible population with the exception of comorbidity, where those actually included had less severe comorbidity than the nonincluded but eligible patients. In Sweden, 50-60% of colon cancer patients can be operated on by laparoscopy.

Prostanoid receptor expression in colorectal cancer related to tumor stage, differentiation and progression.

INTRODUCTION: Alterations in eicosanoid metabolism is well established in a variety of malignant tumors, particularly colorectal carcinoma. Recent studies in our laboratory have emphasized a role for EP subtype receptors in progression of colorectal cancer and disease specific mortality. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to extend our knowledge to include additional receptor expression (DP1, DP2, FP, IP, TP) for prostanoids (PGD2, TXA2, PGF2alpha, PGI2) in relationship to tumor stage, differentiation and progression of colorectal cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Total RNA from 62 tumors and adjacent normal colon tissue (n = 48) was extracted. Quantification of receptor expression was performed by realtime PCR and related to the expression of an appropriate housekeeping gene (GAPDH). Tumors were assessed according to Dukes A-D (stage I-IV). RESULTS: DP1, DP2, FP and IP receptor subtypes displayed significantly reduced overall expression in tumor tissue compared to normal colon tissue, while the TP receptor subtype showed significantly higher expression in tumor tissue. Overall expression of the prostanoid receptors in tumor tissue was not related to clinical indexes as tumor stage and tumor cell differentiation evaluated by multivariate analyses. Cultured colorectal cancer cell lines with low (HT-29) and high (HCA-7) intrinsic PGE2 production at confluent state did not express DP1 and IP receptor subtypes, but displayed low expression of DP2, FP and TP receptor subtypes. CONCLUSION: The results in the present study indicate imbalanced expression of prostanoid receptors in colorectal cancer compared to normal colon tissue without clear cut relationship to disease progression. Therefore, future studies should be performed on defined cells within the tumor tissue compartment determining whether any prostanoid receptor(s) is useful as a molecular target in treatment or prevention of colorectal cancer.

EP1-4 subtype, COX and PPAR gamma receptor expression in colorectal cancer in prediction of disease-specific mortality.

The importance of prostaglandins in tumor growth and progression is well recognized, including antineoplastic activities by cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors. Variation in treatment response to COX inhibition has questioned differences in expression of cell surface and nuclear membrane receptors among tumors with different disease progression. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether EP(1-4) subtype, PPAR gamma receptor and COX-1/COX-2 expression in colorectal cancer are related to tumor-specific mortality. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry were used to demonstrate expression and protein appearance in tumor tissue compared with normal colon tissue. EP(1) and EP(2) subtype receptor protein was highly present in tumor cells, EP(3) occurred occasionally and EP(4) was not visible. PPAR gamma, EP(2) and EP(4) mRNA were significantly higher in normal colon tissue compared with tumor tissue, without any distinct relationship to Dukes A-D tumor stage. Multivariate analyses indicated that increased tumor tissue EP(2) and COX-2 expression predicted poor survival (p<0.001). COX-1 expression was significantly higher than COX-2 expression in normal colon tissue. Average COX-2 mRNA was not increased in tumor tissue compared with normal colon. However, most tumor cells stained positive for COX-2 protein, which was low or undetectable in normal mucosa cells. COX-1 protein was preferentially visible in stroma. EP(1-4) subtype receptor mRNAs were generally positively correlated to both COX-1 and COX-2 in tumor tissue, but not in normal colon. Our results imply that both prostaglandin production (COX-2) and signaling via EP(1-4) subtype receptors, particularly EP(2), predict disease-specific mortality in colorectal cancer.

Tumor genome wide DNA alterations assessed by array CGH in patients with poor and excellent survival following operation for colorectal cancer.

Genome wide DNA alterations were evaluated by array CGH in addition to RNA expression profiling in colorectal cancer from patients with excellent and poor survival following primary operations. DNA was used for CGH in BAC and cDNA arrays. Global RNA expression was determined by 44K arrays. DNA and RNA from tumor and normal colon were used from cancer patients grouped according to death, survival or Dukes A, B, C and D tumor stage. Confirmed DNA alterations in all Dukes A - D were judged relevant for carcinogenesis, while changes in Dukes C and D only were regarded relevant for tumor progression. Copy number gain was more common than loss in tumor tissue (p < 0.01). Major tumor DNA alterations occurred in chromosome 8, 13, 18 and 20, where short survival included gain in 8q and loss in 8p. Copy number gains related to tumor progression were most common on chromosome 7, 8, 19, 20, while corresponding major losses appeared in chromosome 8. Losses at chromosome 18 occurred in all Dukes stages. Normal colon tissue from cancer patients displayed gains in chromosome 19 and 20. Mathematical Vector analysis implied a number of BAC-clones in tumor DNA with genes of potential importance for death or survival. The genomic variation in colorectal cancer cells is tremendous and emphasizes that BAC array CGH is presently more powerful than available statistical models to discriminate DNA sequence information related to outcome. Present results suggest that a majority of DNA alterations observed in colorectal cancer are secondary to tumor progression. Therefore, it would require an immense work to distinguish primary from secondary DNA alterations behind colorectal cancer.

Definition of candidate low risk APC alleles in a Swedish population.

Many families experience an apparently inherited increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) similar to the known syndromes familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). Besides these high-risk syndromes, approximately 10% of all CRC cases come from families with 2 affected 1st-degree relatives, and even 1st-degree relatives to a single case of CRC are at increased risk. Risk subjects from these families frequently show polyps at colonoscopy, which suggests the APC gene as a good candidate susceptibility gene for these attenuated polypotic syndromes. We used the sensitive DHPLC technique to search for possible predisposing germline mutations in the entire APC gene in 91 risk subjects from these high- and low-risk syndromes with unknown predisposing genes. Most exons were also screened for mutations in 96 normal controls and 96 colorectal cancer cases. In our study we probably have identified the most common APC variants in a Swedish population. Among 30 germline variants identified, 1 clearly pathogenic nonsense mutation and 11 putative pathogenic variants (10 missense and one 3' UTR) were found in 20 index patients (22%). Twelve silent as well as 5 intronic variants were considered nonpathogenic. Two of the missense variants found here, E1317Q and D1822V, have previously been related to a difference in risk of colorectal cancer. One variant, 8636C>A, located within the 3' UTR region of the APC gene, was suggested to constitute an additional low risk allele with a similar relative risk as the Jewish I1307K mutation (OR = 1.8; 95% CI, 0.96-3.40). The question of whether all the other variants confer an increased colorectal cancer risk warrants future large association studies.

P53 mutations in colorectal cancer assessed in both genomic DNA and cDNA as compared to the presence of p53 LOH.

Mutations in p53 is a most common genetic alteration in human cancer and has been related to outcome, also in colorectal cancer. However, published results are not unanimous on this point without clear-cut explanations. Different analytical methods have been applied which could explain some discrepancies. Another factor of importance may be the source of nucleic acids used for identification of sequence alterations. Therefore we compared mutations in exons 7 and 8 of p53 found in genomic DNA, with mutations in cDNA from the same patients and evaluated to what extent LOH and mutations in p53 occurred simultaneously, which are prerequisites for a complete loss of p53 function according to the classic concept. cDNA and genomic DNA from tumor tissue from 123 patients were used. Thirty-four mutations were found in both tumor cDNA and genomic DNA. Twenty missense mutations were the same in both cDNA and genomic DNA. Two missense mutations, one 1 bp deletion and one nonsense mutation were only found in genomic DNA, while nine missense mutations and one 9 bp deletion were found in cDNA only. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference among mutations in cDNA and genomic DNA (p=1.00). Only 2 patients (5%) had both LOH and mutations in exons 2-11 of p53. One patient had LOH without p53 mutation, while 18 patients (44%) showed p53 mutation without LOH and 20 patients (49%) had wt p53 without LOH. Forty-four patients (52%) were non-informative for LOH of the entire cohort consisting of 85 patients. Our findings suggest that different results reported on the role mutated p53 may have in colorectal cancer are probably not explained by the source of nucleic acids (RNA vs DNA) for sequence determinations. Rather, unknown information about simultaneous but different presence of p53 LOH in previously published reports is more likely. However, an unexpectedly infrequent occurrence (5-10%) of complete and isolated p53 ablation (LOH + mutation) would demand considerably larger patient populations (1500-2000 patients) than ever published for relating p53 function to survival in patients with colorectal cancer. Therefore, the role of p53 dysfunction in progression of colorectal cancer remains uncertain.

Septic complications and prognosis after surgery for rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: The influence of septic complications on long-term prognosis after surgery for rectal cancer is controversial. This study was performed to investigate whether an abdominal or perineal septic complication was associated with rectal cancer recurrence. METHODS: A total of 228 patients who had undergone curative resection for rectal cancer from 1973 to 1992 were reviewed. The patients were divided into groups of those who developed either an intra-abdominal abscess or a perineal infection after surgery (infection group) and those who did not (noninfection group). RESULTS: There was no clear difference in the overall incidence of tumor recurrence between the infection group (19/53, 36 percent) and the noninfection group (46/175, 26 percent; P = 0.25). However, the incidence of local recurrence was higher in the infection group (12/53, 23 percent) than in the noninfection group (16/175, 9 percent; P = 0.02). This increased risk was restricted to patients with a perineal infection (10/30, 33 percent; P = 0.003 vs. the noninfection group), whereas patients with an abdominal infection (3/24, 13 percent) did not differ from the noninfection group. CONCLUSION: Patients with a perineal infection after an abdominoperineal resection have an increased incidence of local recurrence. However, there was no association between abdominal sepsis and prognosis after surgery for rectal cancer.