ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic agreement between imaging-guided and non-imaging-guided quantitative sonography of the calcaneus and dual X-ray absorptiometry of the spine and femur to show osteoporosis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In 113 patients (73 women, 59 +/- 14 years old; 40 men, 48 +/- 16 years old), dual X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine and the proximal femur, imaging-guided quantitative sonography, and non-imaging-guided quantitative sonography of the calcaneus were performed. The percentage of patients having a T-score equal to or less than a threshold of -2.5 SDs (prevalence of osteoporosis) was calculated for each imaging technique. The diagnostic agreement of the three techniques in identifying individuals with osteoporosis was assessed. RESULTS: Eleven percent of the women and 8% of the men were classified as osteoporotic by imaging-guided quantitative sonography, and 38% of the women and 25% of the men were so classified by non-imaging-guided quantitative sonography. At dual X-ray absorptiometry of the spine, 44% of the women and 38% of the men were classified as osteoporotic, and, at different femoral regions, 19-60% of the women and 8-38% of the men were so classified. Kappa analysis for both quantitative sonography techniques was not significant. Kappa analysis for both quantitative sonography techniques and dual X-ray absorptiometry showed diagnostic agreement to be generally poor. CONCLUSION: No advantage in diagnostic accuracy could be found for imaging-guided quantitative sonography. The considerable diagnostic disagreement between both quantitative sonography techniques and dual X-ray absorptiometry could be confusing in daily clinical practice.
