Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Pediatr ; 146(2): 253-7, 2005 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15689919

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Medical dictionaries and anthropologic sources define brachycephaly as a cranial index (CI = width divided by length x 100%) greater than 81%. We examine the impact of supine sleeping on CI and compare orthotic treatment with repositioning. STUDY DESIGN: We compared the effect of repositioning versus helmet therapy on CI in 193 infants referred for abnormal head shape. RESULTS: Eighty percent of the infants had a pretreatment CI > 81%. Their initial mean CI at mean age 5.3 months was 89%, and after treatment, their mean CI was 87% (+/-2 SE = 0.9%) at mean age 9.0 months. For 92 infants with an initial CI at or above 90%, their initial mean CI of 96.1% was reduced to a mean of 91.9%. CONCLUSIONS: Post-treatment CI was 86% to 88%, CI in neonates delivered by cesarean section was 80%, and CI in supine-sleeping Asian children was 85% to 91%, versus 78% to 83% for prone-sleeping American children. Repositioning was less effective than cranial orthotic therapy in correcting severe brachycephaly. We recommend varying the head position when putting infants to sleep.


Subject(s)
Plagiocephaly, Nonsynostotic/therapy , Skull/abnormalities , Supine Position/physiology , Female , Head Protective Devices , Humans , Infant , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Plagiocephaly, Nonsynostotic/physiopathology , Sleep/physiology , Treatment Outcome
2.
J Pediatr ; 146(2): 258-62, 2005 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15689920

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We compare positioning with orthotic therapy in 298 consecutive infants referred for correction of head asymmetry. STUDY DESIGN: We evaluated 176 infants treated with repositioning, 159 treated with helmets, and 37 treated with initial repositioning followed by helmet therapy when treatment failed. We compared reductions in diagonal difference (RDD) between repositioning and cranial orthotic therapy. Helmets were routinely used for infants older than 6 months with DD >1 cm. RESULTS: For infants treated with repositioning at a mean age of 4.8 months, the mean RDD was 0.55 cm (from an initial mean DD of 1.05 cm). For infants treated with cranial orthotics at a mean age of 6.6 months, the mean RDD was 0.71 cm (from an initial mean DD of 1.13 cm). CONCLUSIONS: Infants treated with orthotics were older and required a longer length of treatment (4.2 vs 3.5 months). Infants treated with orthosis had a mean final DD closer to the DD in unaffected infants (0.3 +/- 0.1 cm), orthotic therapy was more effective than repositioning (61% decrease versus 52% decrease in DD), and early orthosis was significantly more effective than later orthosis (65% decrease versus 51% decrease in DD).


Subject(s)
Plagiocephaly, Nonsynostotic/therapy , Supine Position/physiology , Age Factors , Eye Diseases/etiology , Eye Diseases/therapy , Female , Head Protective Devices , Humans , Infant , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Plagiocephaly, Nonsynostotic/complications , Plagiocephaly, Nonsynostotic/physiopathology , Skull/abnormalities , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL