ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Myotonic dystrophy is a multisystem disorder characterized by widespread organic involvement including central nervous system symptoms. Although myotonic dystrophy disease types 1 (DM1) and 2 (DM2) cover a similar spectrum of symptoms, more pronounced clinical and brain alterations have been described in DM1. Here, we investigated brain volumetric and white matter alterations in both disease types and compared to healthy controls (HC). METHODS: MRI scans were obtained from 29 DM1, 27 DM2, and 56 HC. We assessed macro- and microstructural brain changes by surface-based analysis of cortical thickness of anatomical images and tract-based spatial statistics of fractional anisotropy (FA) obtained by diffusion-weighted imaging, respectively. Global MRI measures were related to clinical and neuropsychological scores to evaluate their clinical relevance. RESULTS: Cortical thickness was reduced in both patient groups compared to HC, showing similar patterns of regional distribution in DM1 and DM2 (occipital, temporal, frontal) but more pronounced cortical thinning for DM1. Similarly, FA values showed a widespread decrease in DM1 and DM2 compared to HC. Interestingly, FA was significantly lower in DM1 compared to DM2 within most parts of the brain. CONCLUSION: Comparisons between DM1 and DM2 indicate a more pronounced cortical thinning of grey matter and a widespread reduction in microstructural integrity of white matter in DM1. Future studies are required to unravel the underlying and separating mechanisms for the disease courses of the two types and their neuropsychological symptoms.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: We aimed to validate the estimation of the brain parenchymal fraction (BPF) in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) using synthetic magnetic resonance imaging (SyMRI) by comparison with software tools of the FMRIB Software Library (FSL). In addition to a cross-sectional method comparison, longitudinal volume changes were assessed to further elucidate the suitability of SyMRI for quantification of disease-specific changes. METHODS: MRI data from 216 patients with MS and 28 control participants were included for volume estimation by SyMRI and FSL-SIENAX. Moreover, longitudinal data from 35 patients with MS were used to compare registration-based percentage brain volume changes estimated using FSL-SIENA to difference-based calculations of volume changes using SyMRI. RESULTS: We observed strong correlations of estimated brain volumes between the two methods. While SyMRI overestimated grey matter and BPF compared to FSL-SIENAX, indicating a systematic bias, there was excellent agreement according to intra-class correlation coefficients for grey matter and good agreement for BPF and white matter. Bland-Altman plots suggested that the inter-method differences in BPF were smaller in patients with brain atrophy compared to those without atrophy. Longitudinal analyses revealed a tendency for higher atrophy rates for SyMRI than for SIENA, but SyMRI had a robust correlation and a good agreement with SIENA. CONCLUSION: In summary, BPF based on data from SyMRI and FSL-SIENAX is not directly transferable because an overestimation and higher variability of SyMRI values were observed. However, the consistency and correlations between the two methods were satisfactory, and SyMRI was suitable to quantify disease-specific atrophy in MS.
