ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In chronic pancreatitis, fully covered self-expanding metal stents (FCSEMS) are used to treat refractory pancreatic duct strictures. However, the FCSEMS design, effectiveness, safety, optimal stent indwelling time and patient selection remain unclear. This study aimed at evaluating technical success, clinical success and adverse events with FCSEMS in patients with symptomatic pancreatic duct stricture. METHODS: The prospective study was conducted between May 2017 and May 2021 at a tertiary care center for chronic pancreatitis with refractory pancreatic duct stricture using controlled radial expansion (CRE) endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with FCSEMS (Niti-S, Bumpy stent, Taewoong Medical, Gimpo-Si, South Korea). RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 11 patients underwent ERCP with FCSEMS for refractory pancreatic duct stricture. The mean age (± standard deviation, [SD]) was 32.36 ± 10.98 years and nine patients (81%) were male. Technical and clinical success rates were 100% and 90.9%, respectively. All patients had a history of prior pancreatic endotherapy. The median (inter quartile range, [IQR]) stent indwell time was seven (6-10) months. The median visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score pre and post-FCSEMS was 8 (5-8) and 1 (0-2), respectively (p-value 0.003). Median (IQR) follow-up after stent removal was 48 (40-60) months. One patient (9%) developed de novo main pancreatic duct (MPD) stricture, which was asymptomatic. None of the patients had cholangitis, pancreatitis, perforation, proximal migration or stent fracture. CONCLUSION: The FCSEMS treatment appears to be safe, feasible and possibly an effective option for patients who have not responded to endoscopic plastic stenting.
ABSTRACT
Background: Identification of risk factors for hepatitis C virus (HCV) transmission will help in targeted screening of people who are at risk for HCV. Method: Indian studies, published between January 1989 and June 2020, were systematically reviewed to identify the relevant studies. We searched electronic databases including PubMed/Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Google scholar to identify the original data published in English language. The full-text studies, published in any form, which reported data on risk factors for HCV transmission among low-risk population were selected. The studies which exclusively included high-risk groups were excluded. Results: Data were extracted from 31,176 participants included in 25 studies (median [range] 40 [7-20,113). The participants were HCV infected patients who visited the hospital (n = 10), community population (n = 6), pregnant women (n = 5), blood donors (n = 2), people with diabetes mellitus (n = 1), army recruits (n = 1), or slum dwellers (n = 1). These studies provided data on blood transfusion, use of unsafe injections, minor or major surgery, unsafe dental procedures, tattooing, body piercing, obstetrical procedures, unsafe shaving, intravenous drug use, and unsafe sexual practices as risk factors for HCV transmission. Conclusion: Unsafe injections, body piercing, unsafe dental procedure, unsafe shaving, and tattooing were identified as major risk factors for reported by HCV population participants.More data are needed to identify the risk factors for HCV in Indian population. Risk-factor-targeted screening may increase the yield and reduce the cost of HCV screening in India.
