Real-world experience supporting the role of oncologic resection and adjuvant chemotherapy in biliary tract cancers.

Background: Complete resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy is the gold standard for patients with localized cholangiocarcinoma (CC) or gallbladder cancer (GBC). However, this is not always feasible, and recurrence rates remain high. Objectives: To understand the real-world proportions and reason for treatment failure in resected biliary tract cancers. Design and methods: We performed a retrospective population-based review of patients with GBC or CC [intrahepatic (IHCC) or extrahepatic (EHCC)] resected between 2005 and 2019 using the BC Cancer provincial database. A chart review was conducted to characterize demographics, treatments received and outcomes. Results: In total, 594 patients were identified of whom 416 (70%) had disease recurrence. Most GBCs (96%) were diagnosed incidentally, and repeat oncologic resection was performed in 45%. Adjuvant chemotherapy was received in 51% of patients diagnosed after 2017 (mostly capecitabine). Patient co-morbidities, disease progression and patient preference were the commonest reasons for not proceeding with adjuvant chemotherapy. One-third of patients did not complete all planned cycles. Median overall survival was significantly higher in those with complete (R0) versus incomplete (R1) resection [31.6 versus 18 months, hazard ratio (HR): 0.43, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.35-0.53] and in those with versus without re-resection for GBC [29.4 versus 19 months, HR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.41-0.73]. There was a trend towards improved survival with versus without adjuvant therapy (HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.61-1.02). Only 25% in the more contemporary cohort (2017-2019) had an R0 resection and completed adjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusion: Complete resection, including reresection for incidentally diagnosed GBCs, and adjuvant chemotherapy were associated with improved outcomes in this retrospective cohort, yet many patients were not able to complete these treatments. Neoadjuvant strategies may improve treatment delivery and ultimately, outcomes.

Clinical impact of unsuccessful subcutaneous administration of octreotide LAR instead of intramuscular administration in patients with metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Octreotide LAR is a long-acting somatostatin analogue (SSA) used in the management of metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP NETs). It requires intramuscular (IM) injection. Missed IM injections cause subcutaneous nodules (SCNs) on radiologic images. We reviewed the rates of SCNs in a real-world cohort of GEP NETs receiving octreotide LAR and explored treatment outcomes. Patients commencing octreotide LAR between August 5, 2010 and March 8, 2018 at a single cancer center in Canada were identified from pharmacy records. Patients were included if they had a computed tomography (CT) scan performed at the time of progression and a preceding CT with pelvis included to enable assessment for the presence of nodules. Fisher's exact test was used to examine predictors of SCNs, and Kaplan-Meier curves summarized differences in progression free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) that were compared with log-rank tests. Of 243 patients receiving octreotide LAR, 45 had all required CT images available for central review. SCNs were found in 20/45 (44%) of patients on the last scan showing stable disease before progression and were numerically but not statistically more likely in females (OR: 2.36, 95% CI: 0.66-8.29, p = .23). There was an increased risk of SCNs in patients with a skin-to-muscle distance >38 mm (the length of an octreotide LAR needle) on CT (OR: 5.09, 95% CI: 1.39-16.6, p = .018) and a trend toward increased risk in obese patients (OR: 5.71, 95% CI: 1.26-23.4, p = .061). PFS (HR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.56-1.78, p = .98) and OS (HR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.41-1.8, p = .70) was similar between those with/without SCNs. In conclusion, almost half of patients receiving octreotide LAR had SCNs; however, missed administration of SSA did not appear to result in worse survival in this small study. Factors such as sex, younger age skin-to-muscle distance, and obesity may affect SCN development and should be considered when choosing an SSA.

Primary site and treatment impact in unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Colorectal cancer is a heterogenous disease, with various clinical and molecular subtypes related to the primary site (left versus right colon) of the original tumor. Primary colon tumor side is both a prognostic and predictive marker in metastatic colorectal cancer. AREAS COVERED: There is an increasing body of evidence for how primary site may impact treatment decisions in metastatic colorectal cancer. We reviewed the evidence for its prognostic and predictive value. EXPERT OPINION: Primary site is a prognostic marker in metastatic colorectal cancer, with right colon tumors being associated with more aggressive disease behavior and poorer outcomes. Primary site also appears to predict for outcomes to various treatments, in particular anti-EGFR antibodies. As our understanding and testing of the molecular and biological differences within colorectal cancer increases beyond primary site, this should be integrated into the current treatment algorithm to ensure an individualized patient-centered approach to care.

Targeting Mutated KRAS Genes to Treat Solid Tumours.

Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) is one of the most frequently mutated oncogenes in solid tumours. It encodes an important signalling pathway that drives cellular proliferation and growth. It is frequently mutated in aggressive advanced solid tumours, particularly colorectal, lung and pancreatic cancer. Since the first mutated KRAS was discovered in the 1980s, decades of research to develop targeted inhibitors of mutant KRAS have fallen short of the task, until recently. Multiple agents are now in clinical trials, including specific mutant KRAS inhibitors, pan-KRAS inhibitors, therapeutic vaccines and other targeted inhibitors. Mutant-specific KRAS G12C inhibitors are the most advanced, with two inhibitors, adagrasib and sotorasib, achieving approval in 2021 for the second-line treatment of patients with KRAS G12C mutant lung cancer. In this review, we summarise the importance of mutant KRAS in solid tumours, prior attempts at inhibiting mutant KRAS, and the current promising targeted agents being investigated in clinical trials, along with future challenges.

Recent advancements in melanoma management.

The treatment options for patients with melanoma have expanded significantly over the past decade. In particular, the use of targeted therapy and immunotherapy has dramatically transformed the outlook for patients with advanced disease. These treatments are now being utilised as adjuvant therapy for patients with earlier stage melanoma after surgical resection. We review the latest updates for melanoma staging, surgical resection, radiotherapy and systemic therapies.

Curative therapy for rectal cancer.

Introduction: A comprehensive trimodality approach has become the standard of care for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. However, the sequencing and duration of chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy around surgery varies between clinical studies and geographical regions. Growing evidence is also mounting for strategies such as total neoadjuvant therapy and non-operative management for carefully selected patients.Areas covered: We provide a perspective review of the current evidence and controversies in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer including the recent updates from the 2020 ASCO annual conference.Expert opinion: With ongoing advances in the management of locally advanced rectal cancer, a multidisciplinary team approach is necessary as treatments could involve multiple approaches. Chemoradiotherapy whether short or long course followed by at least 3 months of systemic chemotherapy may be the preferred option to balance local and distant disease control. Albeit the choice of doublet or triplet chemotherapy is still controversial. As total neoadjuvant treatment becomes part of the standard of care in rectal cancer, modification of the surveillance schedule is needed to detect early recurrences which may be limited by resources and availability of services.

A retrospective analysis of eosinophilia as a predictive marker of response and toxicity to cancer immunotherapy.

AIM: To investigate eosinophilia as a potential on-treatment biomarker for patients receiving cancer immunotherapy. MATERIALS & METHODS: We evaluated the association between eosinophilia and treatment response and toxicity in a retrospective cohort of patients receiving cancer immunotherapy. RESULTS: The study involved 146 patients. Eosinophilia developed in 22%. Patients who developed eosinophilia were more likely to achieve disease control (p = 0.009), with every 0.1 × 109/l rise in eosinophil count, while receiving treatment was associated with a 28% relative increased chance achieving disease control. Although there was a trend toward improved survival, there was no significant association between eosinophilia and improved overall survival (p = 0.136). Patients with eosinophilia were more likely to develop toxicity (p = 0.042). CONCLUSION: Eosinophilia is a potentially useful biomarker warranting further prospective clinical investigation.

Cardiac angiosarcoma: A diagnostic and therapeutic challenge.

Cardiac angiosarcomas are a rare group of soft tissue sarcomas, characterized by aggressive local growth and early spread. Because this is an uncommon disease, there is currently no standard treatment approach. When localized, surgery appears to lead to the best outcomes, but this can be technically challenging and not always feasible. Upfront chemoradiotherapy provides an alternative that may shrink the tumor to enable definitive surgical resection. We report a case of primary cardiac angiosarcoma with a complete metabolic and pathological response after upfront chemoradiotherapy with paclitaxel, who then underwent surgery, as a potential treatment option for patients with this rare condition. .