Effect of Rapid Response Order Panels on Resident and Nurse Satisfaction.

Background: Hospitals are required to have rapid response (RR) systems in place to respond to acute changes in a patient's condition. In high-stress situations like RR, medical residents face decision-making challenges due to time constraints and perceived pressure. Instituting order panels (OPs) can facilitate clinical decision making and improve residents' and nurses' satisfaction and patient safety. Objective: This quality improvement (QI) project aimed to create and institute standardized OPs for common RR clinical scenarios to improve satisfaction of internal medicine residents and nurses with the RR process. Methods: This was a single tertiary care center QI project that developed OPs for 10 common RR scenarios. Resident and nursing satisfaction with RR was assessed before and after OP implementation via survey and qualitative data collection. Results: Residents and nurses expressed high levels of satisfaction across various aspects of the RR process before and after OP implementation in both quantitative and qualitative analysis. Increased satisfaction was observed among residents regarding time spent placing orders (94%; P = 0.02) and time spent correcting wrong orders (87%; P = 0.03) after OP implementation. The nurses' survey revealed no statistically significant differences in satisfaction before and after the implementation of OPs regarding communication, collaboration, efficiency, and organization of the team. Conclusion: The introduction of standardized OPs for RRs resulted in increased satisfaction among internal medicine residents in terms of order placement and correcting wrong orders. Nurse satisfaction based on survey responses remained neutral. Qualitative data from both groups demonstrated a positive impact on communication, efficiency, and teamwork.

Can Inhaled Nitric Oxide Response Predict Tolerance to Therapies and Survival in Patients With Combined Precapillary and Postcapillary Pulmonary Hypertension?

Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) relaxes the pulmonary circulation and variably increases the left ventricular preload and pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP)-hemodynamic information that may help guide treatment decisions and assess prognosis in patients with combined precapillary and postcapillary pulmonary hypertension (PH). We included consecutive patients with combined precapillary and postcapillary PH (mean pulmonary artery pressure >20 mm Hg, PAWP >15 mm Hg, and pulmonary vascular resistance [PVR] >2 Woods unit [WU]) who underwent right-sided cardiac catheterization with iNO at the Cleveland Clinic Pulmonary Vascular Disease program between 2017 and 2022. We included 104 patients with baseline PAWP and PVR of 22.2 ± 4.2 mm Hg and 6.1 ± 3.2 WU, respectively. Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) with postcapillary component and PH left heart disease with precapillary component were identified in 27 (26%) and 77 patients (74%), respectively. No side effects were noted during the administration of iNO. During iNO, the PVR decreased 1.1 ± 1.4 WU and the PAWP increased 1.3 ± 3.7 mm Hg. A more pronounced increase in PAWP with iNO was associated with a decrease in PVR (R -0.35, p <0.001) and increase in stroke volume (R 0.20, p = 0.046). Tolerance to PAH-specific medications, overall survival, and heart failure hospitalizations were not significantly associated with the change in PAWP or PVR with iNO. In conclusion, in patients with combined precapillary and postcapillary PH, iNO challenge is safe and caused a significant decrease in PVR, with an increase in PAWP. The changes in PAWP and PVR during iNO administration were not associated with tolerance to PAH-specific medications, heart failure-related hospitalization, or survival.

Epidemiology and prevalence of lean nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and associated cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and cardiovascular outcomes in the United States: a population-based study and review of literature.

BACKGROUNDS: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is linked to obesity and metabolic syndrome conditions. However, a subset of NAFLD patients express a normal or low body mass index (lean NAFLD [L-NAFLD]). Our aim is to compare the prevalence of L-NAFLD to the obesity-associated NAFLD in the United States by assessing prevalence, potential risk factors, liver-related complications, and coronary artery disease outcomes. METHODOLOGY: A multicenter database (Explorys Inc.) of >70 million patients across the United States was screened. A cohort of patients with "nonalcoholic fatty liver" between 1999 and 2021 was identified. Two sub-cohorts of NAFLD patients were identified: those with a body mass index (BMI) < 25 kg/m2 (L-NAFLD) and those with a BMI > 30 kg/m2 (obesity-associated NAFLD). We excluded patients with age <18 and those who have viral hepatitis, hemochromatosis, Wilson's disease, biliary cirrhosis, alcoholic liver disease, cystic fibrosis, alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency, and autoimmune hepatitis. Multivariate analysis was performed to adjust for confounders. RESULTS: 68 892 260 individuals were screened. NAFLD prevalence was four per 100 000, and L-NAFLD prevalence was 0.6 per 100 000. Compared with those without, patients with L-NAFLD tended to be older (OR 2.16), females (OR 1.28), and smokers (OR 4.67) and of Asian race (OR 2.12). L-NAFLD patients were more likely to have acute coronary syndromes (OR 30.00) and metabolic syndrome (OR 2.31) despite the normal/low BMI. Esophageal varices and hepatocellular carcinoma risks were high in both cirrhosis patients. CONCLUSION: This is the largest study to assess L-NAFLD prevalence in the United States. L-NAFLD are at a significantly higher risk for acute coronary syndromes, esophageal varices, and hepatocellular carcinoma.