Employing vasopressin as an adjunct vasopressor in uncontrolled traumatic hemorrhagic shock. Three cases and a brief analysis of the literature.

Resuscitation of patients in hemorrhagic shock remains one of the most challenging aspects of trauma care. We showed in experimental studies that vasopressin, but not fluid resuscitation, enabled short-term and long-term survival in a porcine model of uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock after penetrating liver trauma. In this case report, we present two cases with temporarily successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) using vasopressin and catecholamines in uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock with subsequent cardiac arrest that was refractory to catecholamines and fluid replacement. In a third patient, an infusion of vasopressin was started before cardiac arrest occurred; in this case, we were able to stabilize blood pressure thus allowing further therapy. The patient underwent multiple surgical procedures, developed multi-organ failure, but was finally discharged from the critical care unit without neurological damage.

[Treatment of hemorrhagic shock. New therapy options]. / Die Behandlung des hämorrhagischen Schocks. Neue Therapieoptionen.

The future of shock treatment depends on the importance of scientific results, and the willingness of physicians to optimize, and to reconsider established treatment protocols. There are four major potentially promising approaches to advanced trauma life support. First, control of hemorrhage by administration of local hemostatic agents, and a better, target-controlled management of the coagulation system. Second, improving intravascular volume by recruiting blood from the venous vasculature by preventing mistakes during mechanical ventilation, and by employing alternative spontaneous (i.e. use of the inspiratory threshold valve) or artificial ventilation strategies. In addition, artificial oxygen carriers may improve intravascular volume and oxygen delivery. Third, pharmacologic support of physiologic, endogenous mechanisms involved in the compensation phase of shock, and blockade of pathomechanisms that are known to cause irreversible vasoplegia (arginine vasopressin and K(ATP) channel blockers for hemodynamic stabilization). Fourth, employing potentially protective strategies such as mild or moderate hypothermia. Finally, the ultimate vision of trauma resuscitation is the concept of "suspended animation" as a form of delayed resuscitation after protection of vital organ systems.

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation after near drowning and hypothermia: restoration of spontaneous circulation after vasopressin.

Recent animal data have challenged the common clinical practice to avoid vasopressor drugs during hypothermic cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) when core temperature is below 30 degrees C. In this report, we describe the case of a 19-year-old-female patient with prolonged, hypothermic, out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest after near drowning (core temperature, 27 degrees C) in whom cardiocirculatory arrest persisted despite 2 mg of intravenous epinephrine; but, immediate return of spontaneous circulation occurred after a single dose (40 IU) of intravenous vasopressin. The patient was subsequently admitted to a hospital with stable haemodynamics, and was successfully rewarmed with convective rewarming, but died of multiorgan failure 15 h later. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report about the use of vasopressin during hypothermic CPR in humans. This case report adds to the growing evidence that vasopressors may be useful to restore spontaneous circulation in hypothermic cardiac arrest patients prior to rewarming, thus avoiding prolonged mechanical CPR efforts, or usage of extracorporeal circulation. It may also support previous experience that the combination of both epinephrine and vasopressin may be necessary to achieve the vasopressor response needed for restoration of spontaneous circulation, especially after asphyxial cardiac arrest or during prolonged CPR efforts.

[The use of arginine vasopressin during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. An analysis of experimental and clinical experience and a view of the future]. / Der Einsatz von Arginin Vasopressin bei der kardiopulmonalen Reanimation. Eine Analyse der experimentellen und klinischen Erfahrungen sowie ein Ausblick in die Zukunft.

The risks and benefits of epinephrine given during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) are controversially discussed. Animal experiments revealed beta-receptor-mediated adverse effects of epinephrine such as increased myocardial oxygen consumption, ventricular arrhythmia, ventilation-perfusion defects, and cardiac failure in the postresuscitation phase. In clinical studies, high-dose vs. standard-dose epinephrine was unable to improve resuscitation success. During CPR in patients, endogenous arginine vasopressin (AVP) levels were increased and surviving vs. non-surviving patients had significantly higher AVP levels. This may indicate that the human body discharges AVP during life-threatening situations as an additional vasopressor to catecholamines in order to maintain cardiocirculatory homeostasis. In different experimental CPR models, AVP compared with epinephrine given during CPR significantly improved vital organ blood flow, coronary perfusion pressure, resuscitability, and long-term survival. During prolonged CPR with repeated drug administration, AVP but not epinephrine maintained coronary perfusion pressure on a level that ensured return of spontaneous circulation. Also, AVP can be administered successfully in the intravenous dose into the endobronchial tree, and also intraosseously. When given during CPR, AVP induces a transient splanchnic hypoperfusion, and an increase in systemic vascular resistance, both of which normalized spontaneously; furthermore, an oligo-anuric state was not observed. In two clinical studies, AVP vs. epinephrine improved 24-h survival during out-of-hospital CPR, and comparable CPR outcome during in-hospital CPR. The new CPR guidelines of both the American Heart Association and the European Resuscitation Council assign a given CPR intervention into classes of recommendation [class 1 (definitely recommended), class 2 A (intervention of choice), class 2B (alternative intervention), class X (neutral), or class 3 (not recommended)]. For CPR of adults with shock-refractory ventricular fibrillation, 40 units AVP or 1 mg epinephrine is recommended (class 2B); patients with asystole or pulseless electrical activity should be resuscitated with epinephrine. AVP is not recommended for adult cardiac arrest patients with asystole or pulseless electrical activity; or pediatric cardiac arrest patients due to a lack of clinical data. Until definitive data about AVP vs. epinephrine effects during CPR are available, the present state of knowledge should be interpreted that two vasopressors are available for use instead of one.

Analysing ventricular fibrillation ECG-signals and predicting defibrillation success during cardiopulmonary resuscitation employing N(alpha)-histograms.

Mean fibrillation frequency may predict defibrillation success during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). N(alpha)-histogram analysis should be investigated as an alternative. After 4 min of cardiac arrest, and 3 versus 8 min of CPR, 25 pigs received either vasopressin or epinephrine (0.4, 0.4, and 0.8 U/kg vasopressin versus 45, 45, and 200 microg/kg epinephrine) every 5 min with defibrillation at 22 min. Before defibrillation, the N(alpha)-parameter histogramstart/histogramwidth and the mean fibrillation frequency in resuscitated versus non-resuscitated pigs were 2.9+/-0.4 versus 1.7+/-0.5 (P=0.0000005); and 9.5+/-1.7 versus 6.9+/-0.7 (P=0.0003). During the last minute prior to defibrillation, histogramstart/histogramwidth of > or =2.3 versus mean fibrillation frequency > or =8 Hz predicted successful defibrillation with subsequent return of a spontaneous circulation for more than 60 min with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 94 versus 82%, 96 versus 89%, 98 versus 93% and 90 versus 74%, respectively. We conclude, that N(alpha)-analysis was superior to mean fibrillation frequency analysis during CPR in predicting defibrillation success, and distinction between vasopressin versus epinephrine effects.

Fibrillation power, an alternative method of ECG spectral analysis for prediction of countershock success in a porcine model of ventricular fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Noninvasive prediction of defibrillation success after cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) may help in determining the optimal time for a countershock, and thus increase the chance for survival. METHODS: In a porcine model (n=25) of prolonged cardiac arrest, advanced cardiac life support was provided by administration of two or three doses of either vasopressin or epinephrine after 3 or 8 min of basic life support. After 4 min of ventricular fibrillation and 18 min of life support, defibrillation was attempted. The denoised power spectral density of 10 s intervals of the ventricular fibrillation electrocardiogram (ECG) was estimated from averaged and smoothed Fourier transforms. We have eliminated the spectral contribution of artifacts from manual chest compressions and provide a definition for the contribution of ventricular fibrillation to the power spectral density. This contribution is quantified and termed "fibrillation power". RESULTS: We tested fibrillation power and two established methods in their discrimination of survivors (n=16) vs. non-survivors (n=9) in the last minute before the countershock. A fibrillation power > or =79 dB predicted successful defibrillation with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 98%, 98%, 99% and 97% while a mean fibrillation frequency > or =7.7 Hz was predictive with 85%, 83%, 90% and 77% and a mean amplitude > or =0.49 mV was predictive with 95%, 90%, 94% and 91%. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that fibrillation power is an alternative source of information on the status of a fibrillating heart and that it may match the established mean frequency and amplitude analysis of ECG in predicting successful countershock during CPR.

Effects of epinephrine in a pig model of hypothermic cardiac arrest and closed-chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation combined with active rewarming.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the current study was to assess the effects of epinephrine in a pig model of hypothermic cardiac arrest followed by closed-chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation combined with active rewarming, simulating the clinical management of an arrested hypothermic patient in a hospital without cardiopulmonary bypass facilities. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized animal study. SETTING: University research laboratory. SUBJECTS: Twelve 12- to 16-week-old domestic pigs. INTERVENTIONS: Pigs were surface cooled to a body core temperature of 28 degrees C. After 4 min of untreated cardiac arrest, manual closed-chest CPR and thoracic lavage with 40 degrees C warmed fluid were started. After 3 min of external chest compression animals were randomly assigned to receive epinephrine (45, 45 and 200 microg/kg) or saline placebo in 5-min intervals. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Coronary perfusion pressure was about 15 mmHg in placebo group pigs. Coronary perfusion pressure was significantly higher after epinephrine, but restoration of spontaneous circulation was not more frequent (one of six epinephrine versus three of six saline placebo pigs, P=0.34). After 45 microg/kg epinephrine the arterial PO(2) was significantly lower when compared to the saline placebo. The third 200 microg/kg epinephrine dose resulted in a significantly enhanced mixed venous hypercarbic acidosis. CONCLUSIONS: After a short 4-min period of hypothermic cardiac arrest, epinephrine may not be necessary to maintain coronary perfusion pressure around the threshold usually correlating with successful defibrillation, even during prolonged closed-chest CPR combined with active rewarming. The enhanced mixed venous hypercarbic acidosis in epinephrine-treated animals may support the argument against repeated or high dose epinephrine administration during hypothermic CPR.

The beneficial effect of basic life support on ventricular fibrillation mean frequency and coronary perfusion pressure.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Chest compressions before initial defibrillation attempts have been shown to increase successful defibrillation. This animal study was designed to assess whether ventricular fibrillation mean frequency after 90 s of basic life support cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) may be used as an indicator of coronary perfusion and mean arterial pressure during CPR. METHODS AND RESULTS: After 4 min of ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest in a porcine model, CPR was performed manually for 3 min. Mean ventricular fibrillation frequency and amplitude, together with coronary perfusion and mean arterial pressure were measured before initiation of chest compressions, and after 90 s and 3 min of basic life support CPR. Increases in fibrillation mean frequency correlated with increases in coronary perfusion and mean arterial pressure after both 90 s (R=0.77, P<0.0001, n=30; R=0.75, P<0.0001, n=30, respectively) and 3 min (R=0.61, P<0.001, n=30; R=0.78, P<0.0001, n=30, respectively) of basic life support CPR. Increases in fibrillation mean amplitude correlated with increases in mean arterial pressure after both 90 s (R=0.46, P<0.01; n=30) and 3 min (R=0.42, P<0.05, n=30) of CPR. Correlation between fibrillation mean amplitude and coronary perfusion pressure was not significant both at 90 s and 3 min of CPR. CONCLUSIONS: In this porcine laboratory model, 90 s and 3 min of CPR improved ventricular fibrillation mean frequency, which correlated positively with coronary perfusion pressure, and mean arterial pressure.

Developing a vasopressor combination in a pig model of adult asphyxial cardiac arrest.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of vasopressin versus epinephrine, and both drugs combined, in a porcine model of simulated adult asphyxial cardiac arrest. METHODS AND RESULTS: At approximately 7 minutes after the endotracheal tube had been clamped, cardiac arrest was present in 24 pigs and remained untreated for another 8 minutes. After 4 minutes of basic life support cardiopulmonary resuscitation, pigs were randomly assigned to receive, every 5 minutes, either epinephrine (45, 200, or 200 microgram/kg; n=6); vasopressin (0.4, 0.8, or 0.8 U/kg; n=6); or epinephrine combined with vasopressin (high-dose epinephrine/vasopressin combination, microgram/kg and U/kg: 45/0.4, 200/0.8, or 200/0.8; n=6; optimal-dose epinephrine/vasopressin combination, 45/0.4, 45/0.8, or 45/0.8; n=6). Mean+/-SEM coronary perfusion pressure was significantly (P<0.05) higher 90 seconds after high- or optimal-dose epinephrine/vasopressin combinations versus vasopressin alone and versus epinephrine alone (37+/-10 versus 25+/-7 versus 19+/-8 versus 6+/-3 mm Hg; 42+/-6 versus 40+/-5 versus 21+/-5 versus 14+/-6 mm Hg; and 39+/-6 versus 37+/-4 versus 9+/-3 versus 12+/-4 mm Hg, respectively). Six of 6 high-dose, 6 of 6 optimal-dose vasopressin/epinephrine combination, 0 of 6 vasopressin, and 1 of 6 epinephrine pigs had return of spontaneous circulation (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Epinephrine combined with vasopressin, but not epinephrine or vasopressin alone, maintained elevated coronary perfusion pressure during cardiopulmonary resuscitation and resulted in significantly higher survival rates in this adult porcine asphyxial model.

The efficacy of epinephrine or vasopressin for resuscitation during epidural anesthesia.

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) during epidural anesthesia is considered difficult because of diminished coronary perfusion pressure. The efficacy of epinephrine and vasopressin in this setting is unknown. Therefore, we designed this study to assess the effects of epinephrine versus vasopressin on coronary perfusion pressure in a porcine model with and without epidural anesthesia and subsequent cardiac arrest. Thirty minutes before induction of cardiac arrest, 16 pigs received epidural anesthesia with bupivacaine while another 12 pigs received only saline administration epidurally. After 1 min of untreated ventricular fibrillation, followed by 3 min of basic life-support CPR, Epidural Animals and Control Animals randomly received every 5 min either epinephrine (45, 45, and 200 microg/kg) or vasopressin (0.4, 0.4, and 0.8 U/kg). During basic life-support CPR, mean +/- SEM coronary perfusion pressure was significantly lower after epidural bupivacaine than after epidural saline (13 +/- 1 vs 24 +/- 2 mm Hg, P < 0.05). Ninety seconds after the first drug administration, epinephrine increased coronary perfusion pressure significantly less than vasopressin in control animals without epidural block (42 +/- 2 vs 57 +/- 5 mm Hg, P < 0.05), but comparably to vasopressin after epidural block (45 +/- 4 vs 48 +/- 6 mm Hg). Defibrillation was attempted after 18 min of CPR. After return of spontaneous circulation, bradycardia required treatment in animals receiving vasopressin, especially with epidural anesthesia. Systemic acidosis was increased in animals receiving epinephrine than vasopressin, regardless of presence or absence of epidural anesthesia. We conclude that vasopressin may be a more desirable vasopressor for resuscitation during epidural block because the response to a single dose is longer lasting, and acidosis after multiple doses is less severe compared with epinephrine.

Arginine vasopressin during cardiopulmonary resuscitation and vasodilatory shock: current experience and future perspectives.

Epinephrine use during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is controversial because of its receptor-mediated adverse effects such as increased myocardial oxygen consumption, ventricular arrhythmias, ventilation-perfusion defect, postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction, ventricular arrhythmias, and cardiac failure. In the CPR laboratory, vasopressin improved vital organ blood flow, cerebral oxygen delivery, resuscitability, and neurologic recovery more than did epinephrine. In patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation, a larger proportion of patients treated with vasopressin survived 24 hours than did patients treated with epinephrine. Currently, a large trial of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients being treated with vasopressin versus epinephrine is ongoing in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. The new international CPR guidelines recommend 40 U vasopressin intravenously, and 1 mg epinephrine intravenously, as equally effective for the treatment of adult patients in ventricular fibrillation; however, no recommendation for vasopressin has been made to date for adult patients with asystole and pulseless electrical activity, or in children, because of lack of clinical data. When adrenergic vasopressors were unable to maintain arterial blood pressure in patients with vasodilatory shock, continuous infusions of vasopressin (0.04-0.10 U/min) stabilized cardiocirculatory parameters and even ensured weaning from catecholamines.

[The new international guidelines for cardipulmonary resuscitation: an analysis and comments on the most important changes]. / Die neuen internationalen Richtlinien zur kardiopulmonalen Reanimation. Eine Analyse und Kommentierung der wichtigsten Anderungen.

In August 2000, the American Heart Association and the European Resuscitation Council published the conclusions of the International Guidelines 2000 Conference on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care which contains both the new recommendations and an in-depth review. The discussions and drafting began at a conference in March 1999, followed by a second conference in September 1999, both attended by approx. 250 participants and another conference in February 2000 which was attended by approx. 500 participants. Review of the current state of science, discussion and final consensus continued subsequently via email, conference calls, fax, and personal conversation. During the entire process, scientists and resuscitation councils from all over the world participated, with participants from the United States comprising approx. 60%, and scientists from outside of the United States comprising approx. 40%. In order to ensure that the CPR recomendations are not dominated by any given nation or resuscitation council, most topics were reviewed and interpretated by two scientists from the United States and two scientists from outside of the United States. Accordingly, changes in these new CPR recommendations are the result of an evidence-based review by worldwide experts. The most important changes in the recommendations according to the authors are discontinuation of the pulse-check for lay people, 500 ml instead of 800-1200 ml tidal volume during bag-valve-mask ventilation (FiO2 > 0.4) of a patient with an unprotected airway, verifying correct endotracheal intubation with capnography and an esophageal detector, employing mechanical devices such as interposed abdominal compression CPR, vest CPR, active-compression-decompression CPR, and the inspiratory threshold valve (ITV) CPR as alternatives or adjuncts to standard manual chest compressions, defibrillation with < 200 Joule biphasic instead of with 200-360 Joule monophasic impulses, vasopressin (40 units) and epinephrine (1 mg) as comparable drugs to treat patients with ventricular fibrillation, amiodarone (300 mg) for shock-refractory ventricular fibrillation and intravenous lysis for patients who have suffered a stroke.

Inhibition of nitric oxide improves coronary perfusion pressure and return of spontaneous circulation in a porcine cardiopulmonary resuscitation model.

OBJECTIVE: During spontaneous circulation, nonspecific inhibition of nitric oxide synthase by N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) increases systemic vascular resistance and, therefore, mean arterial pressure. If this effect can be extrapolated to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), administering L-NAME during CPR may be beneficial by maintaining or even improving coronary perfusion pressure, and hence successful defibrillation. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized laboratory investigation using an established porcine model with instrumentation for hemodynamic variables, blood gases, and defibrillation attempt. SETTING: University medical center experimental laboratory. SUBJECTS: Ten domestic pigs. INTERVENTIONS: After 4 mins of ventricular fibrillation, ten animals were randomly assigned to receive L-NAME (25 mg/kg; n = 5) or saline placebo (n = 5) (given in two doses) after 3 and 13 mins of CPR, respectively. Defibrillation was provided 5 mins after the second dose of active drug or placebo. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Mean +/- sem coronary perfusion pressure was significantly (p < .05) higher 90 secs (27 +/- 3 vs. 17 +/- 3 mm Hg), 10 mins (28 +/- 3 vs. 14 +/- 2 mm Hg), and 15 mins (21 +/- 5 vs. 7 +/- 3 mm Hg) after the first L-NAME administration compared with saline placebo. Mean +/- sem coronary perfusion pressure remained significantly higher 90 secs and 5 mins after the second L-NAME vs. saline placebo administration (19 +/- 4 vs. 6 +/- 4 mm Hg, and 17 +/- 3 vs. 4 +/- 4 mm Hg). After 22 mins of cardiac arrest, including 18 mins of CPR, four of five pigs in the L-NAME group were successfully defibrillated, and survived the 60-min postresuscitation phase. In the placebo group, none of five pigs could be defibrillated successfully (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Nonspecific blockade of nitric oxide synthase with L-NAME during CPR was associated with an increase in coronary perfusion pressure and resulted in significantly better initial resuscitation when compared with saline placebo.

The effects of endogenous and exogenous vasopressin during experimental cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Exogenous vasopressin is a promising vasopressor when blood pressure is critically threatened, but the role of endogenous vasopressin during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is unknown. We assessed the role of endogenous versus exogenous vasopressin in a porcine open chest CPR model. Seven minutes before induction of cardiac arrest, seven pigs received 10 microg/kg of a selective vasopressin V(1)-receptor-antagonist (Blocked Vasopressin group); another 12 pigs in two groups received saline administration only. After 4 min of untreated ventricular fibrillation followed by 3 min of basic life support CPR, six animals received 0.8 U/kg vasopressin (Exogenous Vasopressin group), whereas the blocked vasopressin group (n = 7), and the remaining six animals received saline placebo only (Endogenous Vasopressin group). Defibrillation was attempted after 14 min of CPR. During basic life support CPR, left ventricular myocardial blood flow was significantly (P < 0.05) decreased in the Blocked Vasopressin group compared with the Exogenous Vasopressin group and Endogenous Vasopressin group (42 +/- 5 compared with 64 +/- 6 and 66 +/- 6 mL x min(-1) x 100g(-1)). Left ventricular myocardial blood flow was significantly decreased in the Blocked Vasopressin group versus Exogenous Vasopressin group versus Endogenous Vasopressin group 90 s and 5 min after drug administration, respectively (38 +/- 4 and 27 +/- 3 vs 145 +/- 32 and 110 +/- 12 vs 62 +/- 4 and 56 +/- 6 mL x min(-1) x 100g(-1), respectively). None of seven Blocked Vasopressin animals, six of six Exogenous Vasopressin pigs, and six of six Endogenous Vasopressin swine had return of spontaneous circulation after 14 min of cardiac arrest including 10 min of CPR (P < 0.05). In conclusion, pigs with blocked endogenous vasopressin had poor coronary perfusion pressure and left ventricular myocardial blood flow during open chest CPR, and could not be successfully resuscitated. All pigs with effective endogenous vasopressin or pigs with effective endogenous vasopressin and additional exogenous vasopressin had good left ventricular myocardial blood flow during experimental CPR, and survived the 1-h postresuscitation phase. We conclude that endogenous vasopressin is an adjunct vasopressor to epinephrine and may serve as a back-up regulator to maintain cardiocirculatory homeostasis.

In-hospital resuscitation.

A recent world expert conference on resuscitation and emergency cardiac care led to evidence-based international guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Several changes to CPR interventions were recommended, and will have to be implemented into clinical practice. The poor prognosis of patients who suffer in-hospital cardiac arrest may be improved with developments in CPR interventions. In the present review the most important changes recommended by the new CPR guidelines and the latest promising CPR investigations are described, focusing on their impact on in-hospital resuscitation.

[Drug therapy in cardiopulmonary resuscitation]. / Medikamentöse Therapie bei der kardiopulmonalen Reanimation.

In the year 2000, new international guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) were published by the American Heart Association, and the European Resuscitation Council. These guidelines are evidence-based, indicating that these recommendations are based primarily on interpretation of data from clinical studies. Levels of recommendation range from class I (proven safe and useful), class IIa (intervention of choice), IIb (alternative intervention), indeterminate (research stage), and class III (unacceptable, no benefit). Administration of drugs during CPR should be performed intravenously or intraosseously (class IIa) or, as a second-line approach, endotracheally (class IIb). Due to lack of evidence, the standard dose of 1 mg epinephrine to treat ventricular fibrillation, pulseless electrical activity, or asystole was categorized as class indeterminate; while a single dose of 40 units vasopressin to treat adults with shock-refractory ventricular fibrillation received a IIb recommendation. Owing to a lack of clinical data, the use of vasopressin was neither recommended to treat adults with pulseless electrical activity or asystole, nor for the use in children. Both endothelin and calcium were not recommended for routine use (class indeterminate). Careful titration of acid-base status with 1 mL/kg 8.4% sodium bicarbonate should only be administered if indicated by blood gas analysis (class indeterminate). If 1 mg epinephrine fails to be effective in adult patients with pulseless electrical activity or asystole, 1 mg atropine can be administered (class indeterminate). Regarding antiarrhythmic drugs, 300 mg amiodarone (class IIb) showed the best results in shock-refractory ventricular fibrillation. The postresuscitation phase has the goal to achieve the best possible neurological performance after return of spontaneous circulation, which requires careful optimization of organ functions.

Excellent coronary perfusion pressure during cardiopulmonary resuscitation is not good enough to ensure long-term survival with good neurologic outcome: a porcine case report.

PURPOSE: To report a case of cerebral ischemia confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging after successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) complicated by acute respiratory injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After 4 min of cardiac arrest, followed by 3 min of basic life support CPR, a female pig weighing 38 kg received every 5 min vasopressin (0.4, 0.4 and 0.8 U/kg). After 22 min of cardiac arrest, including 18 min of CPR, one defibrillation attempt employing 100 J resulted in return of spontaneous circulation. Neurological evaluation was performed 24 and 96 h after successful CPR. Magnetic resonance imaging was carried out 4 days after CPR using a clinical 1.5 T scanner. The magnetic resonance imaging protocol consisted of fast spinecho T2-weighted, as well as spinecho T1-weighted imaging of the brain. RESULTS: CPR with vasopressin resulted in excellent coronary perfusion pressure ranging between 35 and 60 mm Hg throughout CPR. Eight minutes after initiation of chest compressions, bleeding out of the tracheal tube occurred. This was later confirmed as originating from bilateral bloody pulmonary infiltrations, resulting in acute respiratory injury in the post-resuscitation phase. Ninety-six hours after successful CPR, magnetic resonance imaging revealed bilateral diffuse cerebral vasogenic edema. CONCLUSION: Although excellent coronary perfusion pressure renders a return of spontaneous circulation more likely, complications such as acute respiratory injury in the post-resuscitation phase have to be managed carefully in order to ensure good neurological recovery from cardiac arrest.

Vasopressin improves survival after cardiac arrest in hypovolemic shock.

UNLABELLED: Survival after hypovolemic shock and cardiac arrest is dismal with current therapies. We evaluated the potential benefits of vasopressin versus large-dose epinephrine in hemorrhagic shock and cardiac arrest on vital organ perfusion, and the likelihood of resuscitation. In 18 pigs, 35% of the estimated blood volume was withdrawn over 15 min and ventricular fibrillation was induced 5 min later. After 4 min of cardiac arrest and 4 min of standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation, a bolus dose of either 200 microg/kg epinephrine (n = 7), 0.8 unit/kg vasopressin (n = 7), or saline placebo (n = 4) was administered in a blinded, randomized manner. Defibrillation was attempted 2.5 min after drug administration, and all animals were subsequently observed for 1 h without further intervention. Spontaneous circulation was restored in 7 of 7 vasopressin animals, in 6 of 7 epinephrine pigs, and in 0 of 4 placebo swine. At 5 and 30 min after return of spontaneous circulation, median (minimum and maximum) renal blood flow after epinephrine was 2 (0-31), and 2 (0-48) mL. 100 g(-1). min(-1), respectively; and after vasopressin 96 (12-161), and 44 (16-105) mL. 100 g(-1). min(-1), respectively (P: <.01 between groups). Epinephrine animals developed a profound metabolic acidosis by 15 min after return of spontaneous circulation (mean arterial pH, 7.11 +/- 0.01), and by 60 min all epinephrine-treated animals had died. The vasopressin pigs had (P: = 0.015) less acidosis (pH = 7.26+/-0. 04) at corresponding time points, and all survived > or =55 min (P: < 0. 01). In conclusion, treatment of hypovolemic cardiac arrest with vasopressin, but not with large-dose epinephrine or saline placebo, resulted in sustained vital organ perfusion, less metabolic acidosis, and prolonged survival. Based on these findings, clinical evaluation of vasopressin during hypovolemic cardiac arrest may be warranted. IMPLICATIONS: The chances of surviving cardiac arrest in hemorrhagic shock are considered dismal without adequate fluid replacement. However, treatment of hypovolemic cardiac arrest with vasopressin, but not with large-dose epinephrine or saline placebo, resulted in sustained vital organ perfusion and prolonged survival in an animal model of suspended infusion therapy.

Intraosseous blood gases during hypothermia: correlation with arterial, mixed venous, and sagittal sinus blood.

OBJECTIVE: Especially in pediatric patients with severe hypothermia, intraosseous access may be more readily available than intravascular access during an early phase of treatment and therefore, may be helpful to optimize management. The purpose of this study was to determine whether intraosseous blood gases are comparable with arterial, mixed venous, and sagittal sinus blood gases during different degrees of hypothermia. DESIGN: Prospective, descriptive laboratory investigation using a porcine model. SETTING: University hospital laboratory. SUBJECTS: Twelve anesthetized, 12- to 16-wk-old domestic pigs weighing 30-35 kg. INTERVENTIONS: Volume-controlled ventilated animals were instrumented with arterial, pulmonary artery, sagittal sinus, and 16-gauge intraosseous catheters. Blood samples were obtained from each site every 15 mins during surface cooling with crushed ice until mean +/- SEM core temperature decreased from 38.5+/-0.1 degrees C [101.3+/-0.2 degrees F] to 27+/-0.5 degrees C [80.5+/-0.9 degrees F] over 2 hrs. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Intraindividual correlation of Pco2 and pH values were determined as the difference (delta) between intraosseous and reference blood samples. With hypothermia, absolute values of Pco2 decreased and pH increased in samples from all sites. At 27 degrees C, intraosseous--arterial delta P(CO2) and delta pH (mean +/- 95% confidence intervals) were 2.6+/-10.6 torr [0.35+/-1.4 kPa] and -0.11+/-0.07 units; intraosseous - mixed venous were 0.4+/-12.2 torr [0.05+/-1.6 kPa] and -0.06+/-0.08 units; and intraosseous - sagittal sinus were -7.3+/-16 torr [-0.97+/-2.1 kPa] and 0.001+/-0.14 units, respectively. Intraosseous Pco2 was not comparable to end-tidal values (deltaP(CO2) 17.4+/-14.6 torr [2.3+/-1.9 kPa]), and intraosseous lactate did not correlate with arterial, mixed venous, or sagittal sinus values. CONCLUSIONS: During hypothermia, intraosseous P(CO2) values were predictable for mixed venous Pco2 and arterial P(CO2). Intraosseous pH values also correlated with mixed venous and sagittal sinus blood samples. Accordingly, interpretation of blood gas values obtained from bone marrow aspirates may be helpful to adjust ventilation and optimize fluid and drug therapy during the early treatment of patients with severe hypothermia.