ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Cancer vaccines represent a novel treatment modality with a complementary mode of action addressing a crucial bottleneck for checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) efficacy. CPIs are expected to release brakes in T-cell responses elicited by vaccination, leading to more robust immune responses. Increased antitumor T-cell responses may confer increased antitumor activity in patients with less immunogenic tumors, a subgroup expected to achieve reduced benefit from CPIs alone. In this trial, a telomerase-based vaccine was combined with pembrolizumab to assess the safety and clinical activity in patients with melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty treatment-naïve patients with advanced melanoma were enrolled. Patients received intradermal injections of UV1 with adjuvant GM-CSF at two dose levels, and pembrolizumab according to the label. Blood samples were assessed for vaccine-induced T-cell responses, and tumor tissues were collected for translational analyses. The primary endpoint was safety, with secondary objectives including progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS: The combination was considered safe and well-tolerated. Grade 3 adverse events were observed in 20% of patients, with no grade 4 or 5 adverse events reported. Vaccination-related adverse events were mostly mild injection site reactions. The median PFS was 18.9 months, and the 1- and 2-year OS rates were 86.7% and 73.3%, respectively. The ORR was 56.7%, with 33.3% achieving complete responses. Vaccine-induced immune responses were observed in evaluable patients, and inflammatory changes were detected in posttreatment biopsies. CONCLUSIONS: Encouraging safety and preliminary efficacy were observed. Randomized phase II trials are currently ongoing.
Subject(s)
Melanoma , Telomerase , Humans , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Melanoma/pathology , VaccinationABSTRACT
Vitiligo, an autoimmune skin disorder, was evaluated in 49 metastatic melanoma patients treated with an immunotherapy regimen of maintenance biotherapy (mBT) following induction concurrent biochemotherapy (cBCT). Patients receiving mBT demonstrated a stable or better response to cBCT. The mBT regimen consisted of outpatient subcutaneous injections of low-dose IL-2 (1 MIU/m(2)) 5/7 days weekly, GM-CSF (125 mcg/m(2)) 14 days monthly, and high-dose pulses of in-patient continuous infusion decrescendo IL-2 (54 MIU/m(2)) over 48 hours monthly for the first 6 months and every 2 months thereafter. The majority of patients had poor prognostic features. Forty-nine patients were without evidence of vitiligo at the start of mBT. Of these, 21 patients (43%) developed vitiligo during mBT and had a median overall survival from the start of mBT of 18.2 months (95% CI, 12.3-N/A) compared to 8.5 months (95%CI <6.7-12.7) for 28 non-vitiligo patients (P=0.027). Six of 21 vitiligo patients (29%) expressed IgG antibody titers to tyrosinase-related protein-2 compared to four of 28 non-vitiligo patients (14%) (P=NS). The development of vitiligo in metastatic melanoma patients on cBCT/mBT immunotherapy correlates with a better therapeutic outcome.
Subject(s)
Biological Therapy/adverse effects , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/secondary , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/therapy , Melanoma/secondary , Melanoma/therapy , Vitiligo/etiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Antibodies/blood , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/immunology , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/mortality , Female , Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor/administration & dosage , Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor/therapeutic use , Humans , Infusion Pumps , Injections, Subcutaneous , Interleukin-2/administration & dosage , Interleukin-2/therapeutic use , Male , Melanoma/immunology , Melanoma/mortality , Membrane Proteins/immunology , Middle Aged , Peptide Fragments/immunology , Survival AnalysisABSTRACT
PURPOSE: A prospective Phase II study of a novel maintenance biotherapy regimen after induction biochemotherapy was conducted in patients with metastatic melanoma in efforts to maintain responses and improve survival. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Thirty-three patients with poor prognosis metastatic melanoma who achieved a partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) to induction concurrent biochemotherapy were treated with chronic low-dose interleukin (IL)-2 and granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor, and intermittent pulses of intermediate/high-dose decrescendo IL-2 over a 12-month period. The outcome of these patients was compared with a control group of patients at our institution who were treated recently with induction biochemotherapy and achieved a PR or SD. RESULTS: Five patients (15%) achieved a complete response, and 4 patients (12%) maintained SD for at least 6 months on maintenance biotherapy. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 8.1 months and 18.5 months, respectively, compared with historical controls, which were PFS 5.9 months (P = 0.0015) and OS 9.3 months (P = 0.0004). Administration of maintenance biotherapy was a significant predictor of PFS (P = 0.0008) and OS (P = 0.0001) in multivariate and matched-pair analyses (P = 0.002). The maintenance biotherapy regimen was well tolerated with no dose-limiting acute or cumulative toxicities. CONCLUSION: In this single institution study, maintenance biotherapy with IL-2 and granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor in patients achieving PR or SD to induction biochemotherapy improved PFS and OS compared with historical controls. A larger multicenter Phase II trial has been initiated in an effort to confirm these results.
