Population PK modelling and simulation based on fluoxetine and norfluoxetine concentrations in milk: a milk concentration-based prediction model.

AIMS: Population pharmacokinetic (pop PK) modelling can be used for PK assessment of drugs in breast milk. However, complex mechanistic modelling of a parent and an active metabolite using both blood and milk samples is challenging. We aimed to develop a simple predictive pop PK model for milk concentration-time profiles of a parent and a metabolite, using data on fluoxetine (FX) and its active metabolite, norfluoxetine (NFX), in milk. METHODS: Using a previously published data set of drug concentrations in milk from 25 women treated with FX, a pop PK model predictive of milk concentration-time profiles of FX and NFX was developed. Simulation was performed with the model to generate FX and NFX concentration-time profiles in milk of 1000 mothers. This milk concentration-based pop PK model was compared with the previously validated plasma/milk concentration-based pop PK model of FX. RESULTS: Milk FX and NFX concentration-time profiles were described reasonably well by a one compartment model with a FX-to-NFX conversion coefficient. Median values of the simulated relative infant dose on a weight basis (sRID: weight-adjusted daily doses of FX and NFX through breastmilk to the infant, expressed as a fraction of therapeutic FX daily dose per body weight) were 0.028 for FX and 0.029 for NFX. The FX sRID estimates were consistent with those of the plasma/milk-based pop PK model. CONCLUSIONS: A predictive pop PK model based on only milk concentrations can be developed for simultaneous estimation of milk concentration-time profiles of a parent (FX) and an active metabolite (NFX).

Use of a sparse sampling study design to assess transfer of tramadol and its O-desmethyl metabolite into transitional breast milk.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT: There are presently no published data on tramadol transfer into breast milk or on its effects in the breastfed infant. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: We have provided quantitative data on the absolute and relative infant doses of rac-tramadol and it rac-O-desmethyl metabolite for the breastfed infant. We have also demonstrated a novel sparse sampling data collection method for investigating infant exposure via milk. AIMS: To investigate the transfer of rac-tramadol and its rac-O-desmethyl metabolite into transitional milk, and assess unwanted effects in the breastfed infant. METHODS: Tramadol HCl (100 mg six hourly) was administered to 75 breastfeeding mothers for postoperative analgesia on days 2-4 after Caesarian section. Milk and plasma samples were collected after administration of four or more doses. Rac-tramadol and rac-O-desmethyltramadol were measured by high performance liquid chromatography. Milk : plasma ratio (M : P) and infant doses were calculated by standard methods. The behavioural characteristics of the exposed breastfed infants and a matched control group of infants not exposed to tramadol were also studied. RESULTS At steady-state, mean (95% CI) M : P was 2.2 (2.0, 2.4) for rac-tramadol and 2.8 (2.5, 3.1) for rac-O-desmethyltramadol. The estimated absolute and relative infant doses were 112 (102, 122) microg kg(-1) day(-1) and 30 (28, 32) microg kg(-1) day(-1), and 2.24% (2.04, 2.44)% and 0.64% (0.59, 0.69)% for rac-tramadol and rac-O-desmethyltramadol, respectively. The exposed infants and control breastfed infants had similar characteristics, including Apgar scores at birth and Neurologic and Adaptive Capacity Scores. CONCLUSIONS: The combined relative infant dose of 2.88% at steady-state was low. The similarity of NACS in exposed infants and controls suggests that there were no significant behavioural adverse effects. We conclude that short-term maternal use of tramadol during establishment of lactation is compatible with breastfeeding.

Transfer of dexamphetamine into breast milk during treatment for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

AIMS: To investigate dexamphetamine transfer into milk, infant doses and effects in the breast-fed infant. METHODS: Four women taking dexamphetamine, and their infants were studied. RESULTS: The median maternal dexamphetamine dose was 18 mg day(-1) (range 15-45 mg day(-1)). Median (interquartile range) descriptors were 3.3 (2.2-4.8) for milk/plasma ratio, 21 microg kg(-1) day(-1) (11-39) for absolute infant dose and 5.7% (4-10.6%) for relative infant dose. No adverse effects were seen. In three infants tested, dexamphetamine in plasma was undetected in one (limit of detection 1 microg l(-1)) and present at 18 microg l(-1) and 2 microg l(-1) in the other two. CONCLUSION: Dexamphetamine readily transfers into milk. The relative infant dose was <10% and within a range that is generally accepted as being 'safe' in the short term.

Quetiapine and breast feeding.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the relative infant dose of quetiapine during breast feeding, describe the milk:plasma (M:P) ratio, and determine the well-being of the exposed infant. CASE SUMMARY: A 26-year-old mother and her 3-month-old son were studied over a 24 hour quetiapine dose interval at steady-state. Quetiapine concentrations were quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography. Infant exposure was calculated as the concentration in milk multiplied by an estimated milk production of 0.15 L/kg/day and normalized to the weight-adjusted maternal dose. The average concentration in milk was 41 microg/L, the M:P ratio (measured using average concentrations in the elimination phase) was 0.29, and the relative infant dose was 0.09% of the maternal weight-adjusted dose (7273 microg/kg/day). The infant plasma concentration of 1.4 microg/L was some 6% of the corresponding maternal plasma concentration. No adverse effects were noted in the infant. DISCUSSION: Our findings of an infant exposure to quetiapine of less than 0.1% of the maternal dose and a lack of adverse effects confirm and extend the findings of 2 previous studies. CONCLUSIONS: Although limited, the data shown here support the prescription of quetiapine to a breast-feeding mother following a careful individual risk/benefit analysis. We suggest regular monitoring of infant progress and occasional measurement of quetiapine in the infant's plasma.

Gabapentin and breastfeeding: a case report.

The aim of this study was to describe the milk-plasma ratio and relative infant dose of gabapentin in a breastfeeding mother and to determine the well-being of her exposed infant. The mother-infant pair was studied over a 24-hour dose interval at steady state. Gabapentin concentrations were quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography. Infant exposure was calculated as concentration in milk multiplied by an estimated milk production of 0.15 L/kg/d and normalized to the weight-adjusted maternal dose. The milk-plasma ratio was 0.86; the relative infant dose was 2.34%. The absolute infant dose was approximately 3% of the children's dose for gabapentin, and the infant plasma level of 0.4 mg/L was approximately 6% of the maternal plasma drug concentration. No adverse effects attributable to gabapentin were noted in the infant. In combination with a previously published report, these limited data support the prescription of gabapentin to a breastfeeding mother after a careful individual risk-benefit analysis.

Transfer of escitalopram and its metabolite demethylescitalopram into breastmilk.

AIMS: To investigate the transfer of escitalopram and its demethyl metabolite into milk, the absolute and relative infant doses via milk and to assess any unwanted effects in the breastfed infant. METHODS: Multiple samples of blood and milk were obtained over a dose interval at steady state from eight women who were taking escitalopram for postnatal depression. Drug concentrations in plasma and milk were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography and milk/plasma ratio (M/P(AUC)), absolute infant dose and relative infant dose were estimated by standard methods. Their breastfed infants were also examined clinically and in five infants a blood sample was taken for drug analysis. RESULTS: The median dose taken by the women was 10 mg day(-1). The mean (95% confidence interval) M/P(AUC) was 2.2 (2.0, 2.4) for escitalopram and 2.2 (1.9, 2.5) for demethylescitalopram. Absolute infant doses were 7.6 microg kg(-1) day(-1) (5.2, 10.0) for escitalopram and 3.0 microg kg(-1) day(-1) (2.4, 3.6) for demethylescitalopram. The total relative infant dose for escitalopram plus its demethyl metabolite was 5.3% (4.2, 6.4) as escitalopram equivalents. All of the infants had met normal developmental milestones and no adverse effects were seen. Compared with average maternal plasma concentrations (24 microg l(-1)), the concentrations of the parent drug and its metabolite in plasma from five infants were most commonly below the limit of detection (

Transfer of reboxetine into breastmilk, its plasma concentrations and lack of adverse effects in the breastfed infant.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the transfer of reboxetine into milk, the absolute and relative infant doses via milk and to assess plasma concentrations and adverse unwanted effects in the breastfed infant. METHODS: Multiple samples of blood and milk were obtained over a dose interval at steady-state from four women who were taking reboxetine for postnatal depression. Drug concentrations in plasma and milk were measured by high performance liquid chromatography and milk/plasma ratio (M/P), absolute infant dose and relative infant dose were estimated by standard methods. Their four, breastfed, infants were also examined clinically, and a blood sample was taken for drug analysis. RESULTS: The median (range) dose taken by the women was 6 (4-10) mg/day. There was no significant difference in reboxetine concentration between paired fore-and hind-milk samples. The mean (95% CI) M/P was 0.06 (0.03, 0.09). Absolute infant dose was 1.7 (0.7, 2.4) microg/kg/day for reboxetine while the relative infant dose was 2.0% (1.3, 2.7%). Three of the infants met normal developmental milestones and no adverse effects were seen in any infant. The fourth infant had developmental problems that were not associated with the maternal reboxetine therapy. The concentrations of reboxetine in plasma from the four infants were <4 microg/l, 2.6 microg/l, 2.3 microg/l and 5 microg/l, respectively. CONCLUSION: The study suggests that reboxetine use by lactating women is safe for the breastfed infant. Nevertheless, our study had only four mother/baby pairs, and each decision to breastfeed should always be made on the basis of an individual risk/benefit analysis.

Drug use and breastfeeding.

Section 1 describes the benefits of breastfeeding to both mother and infant as well as the potential risks to the infant from maternal drug use. The extent of adverse drug-related events and the need for quality information on drug transfer is stated. Section 2 describes the physiology of lactation and the effects of drugs that stimulate or decrease milk production. Section 3 deals with transport mechanisms for drug passage into milk and factors that may modify the infant's exposure to drugs. The critical descriptors of 'absolute' and 'relative' infant dose are defined to give an objective measure of infant exposure to drugs in milk. Section 4 reviews new or commonly used drugs under the headings of analgesics and anti-inflammatory agents, neurological, endocrine, psychotropic and antihypertensive drugs. Section 5 concludes with an expert opinion of the drug industry and drug use in lactation, herbal preparations, the process of 'risk-benefit' analysis, minimising infant exposure, understanding drug-related adverse events and fostering good experimental design for drugs in lactation studies.

Transfer of naltrexone and its metabolite 6,beta-naltrexol into human milk.

The excretion of naltrexone and its primary metabolite 6,beta-naltrexol in breast milk from a 30-year-old lactating opiate addict undergoing oral naltrexone pharmacotherapy (5 mg/d) was studied. Concentrations of naltrexone and 6,beta-naltrexol in serial milk and plasma samples taken over a 19.3-hour period of a dose interval at steady state were measured by gas chromatography. The calculated infant dose relative to the maternal weight was 0.03% for naltrexone and 0.83% (as naltrexone equivalents) for 6,beta-naltrexol. Total relative infant dose estimated for the complete 24-hour dose interval was 1.06%. Her 6-week-old breastfed infant was healthy, achieving expected milestones, and showed no adverse effects. Only 6,beta-naltrexol was detected in infant plasma and at a very low concentration of 1.1 micro g/L. Use of naltrexone during breastfeeding should be undertaken only after an individual risk benefit analysis.

A pilot study of newer antidepressant concentrations in cord and maternal serum and possible effects in the neonate.

Antidepressants are often used antenatally, and placental transfer may lead to adverse effects (toxicity) in the neonate. Pregnant women taking fluoxetine (n=4), sertraline (n=4), paroxetine (n=2) or venlafaxine (n=1) in the last trimester were studied. Maternal and cord sera were collected at delivery and infant serum on day 5 after birth for measurement of antidepressant concentrations. Neonatal Abstinence Scores (NAS) were measured in the infants on days 13 after birth. In maternal serum, median drug concentrations were: fluoxetine (96 microg/l), norfluoxetine (110 microg/l), sertraline (11 microg/l), desmethylsertraline (38 microg/l), paroxetine (mean 12 microg/l), venlafaxine (220 microg/l), and O-desmethylvenlafaxine (392 microg/l). Corresponding median values in cord serum were: fluoxetine (65 microg/l), norfluoxetine (81 microg/l), sertraline (10 microg/l), desmethylsertraline (27 microg/l), paroxetine (mean 6 microg/l), venlafaxine (232 microg/l), and O-desmethylvenlafaxine (406 microg/l). Corresponding median cord:maternal concentration ratios were 0.67 for fluoxetine and 0.72 for norfluoxetine, 0.67 for sertraline and 0.63 for demethylsertraline, 0.52 (mean) for paroxetine, and 1.1 and 1.0 for venlafaxine and O-desmethylvenlafaxine respectively. The neonates of two patients taking fluoxetine had high NAS. Only fluoxetine and norfluoxetine were detected in infant serum. Our data show substantial placental transfer of antidepressants, but only fluoxetine persisted in the infants serum. Neonatal toxicity may be associated with serotonin uptake blockade, and also be influenced by neonatal clearance.

Transfer of risperidone and 9-hydroxyrisperidone into human milk.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the transfer of risperidone and its active metabolite 9-hydroxyrisperidone into breast milk, estimate the amount the infant receives, measure infant plasma concentrations, and clinically assess the safety of breast feeding during maternal risperidone administration. case summaries: The transfer of risperidone and 9-hydroxyrisperidone into milk was studied in 2 breast-feeding women and one woman with risperidone-induced galactorrhea. Plasma samples were available from 2 of the women and from both breast-fed infants. The milk/plasma concentration ratio determined in 2 women was <0.5 for both compounds. The calculated relative infant "doses" were 2.3%, 2.8%, and 4.7% (as risperidone equivalents) of the maternal weight-adjusted doses. Risperidone and 9-hydroxyrisperidone were not detected in the plasma of the 2 breast-fed infants studied, and no adverse effects were noted. DISCUSSION: Risperidone therapy is sometimes necessary in breast-feeding women, raising the issue of safety in the exposed infants. Our study shows that the relative infant dose is lower than the arbitrary 10% level of concern. The data provide clear guidance on infant exposure for the cases presented. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal risperidone therapy is unlikely to be a significant hazard for the breast-fed infant in the short term. Nevertheless, decisions on whether a woman may breast-feed should be made as an individual risk-benefit analysis.

Use of nicotine patches in breast-feeding mothers: transfer of nicotine and cotinine into human milk.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to assess the extent of exposure to nicotine and cotinine in breast-fed infants during maternal smoking and later during maternal use of the nicotine transdermal patch to achieve smoking cessation. METHODS: Fifteen lactating women (mean age, 32 years; mean weight, 72 kg) who were smokers (mean of 17 cigarettes per day) participated in a trial of the nicotine patch to assist in smoking cessation. Serial milk samples were collected from the women over sequential 24-hour periods when they were smoking and when they were stabilized on the 21-mg/d, 14-mg/d, and 7-mg/d nicotine patches. Nicotine and cotinine in milk were quantified by HPLC, and infant dose was calculated. Plasma concentrations of nicotine in the breast-fed infants were assessed, and the infants were also clinically assessed. RESULTS: Nicotine and cotinine concentrations in milk were not significantly different between smoking (mean of 17 cigarettes per day) and the 21-mg/d patch, but concentrations were significantly lower (P <.05) when patients were using the 14-mg/d and 7-mg/d patches than when smoking. There was also a downward trend in absolute infant dose (nicotine equivalents) from smoking or the 21-mg patch through to the 14-mg and 7-mg patches (P <.05 at both 14-mg and 7-mg doses, compared with smoking). Milk intake (shown as median and 25th to 75th percentile) by the breast-fed infants was similar while their mothers were smoking (585 mL/d [507-755 mL/d]) and subsequently when their mothers were using the 21-mg (717 mL/d [504-776 mL/d]), 14-mg (731 mL/d [535-864 mL/d]), and 7-mg (619 mL/d [520-706 mL/d]) patches (chi(2) = 3.19, P =.364). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the absolute infant dose of nicotine and its metabolite cotinine decreases by about 70% from when subjects were smoking or using the 21-mg patch to when they were using the 7-mg patch. In addition, use of the nicotine patch had no significant influence on the milk intake by the breast-fed infant. Undertaking maternal smoking cessation with the nicotine patch is, therefore, a safer option than continued smoking.

Measurement of nicotine and cotinine in human milk by high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet absorbance detection.

A high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) assay for the determination of nicotine and cotinine in human milk was developed using an extraction by liquid-liquid partition combined with back extraction into acid, and followed by reverse-phase chromatography with UV detection of analytes. The assay was linear up to 500 microg/l for both nicotine and cotinine. Intra- and inter-day relative standard deviations (R.S.D.) were <10% (25-500 microg/l) for both nicotine and cotinine. Limits of quantitation (LOQ) were 10 and 12 microg/l for nicotine and cotinine, respectively, while the limits of detection (LOD) were 8 and 10 microg/l for nicotine and cotinine, respectively. The mean recoveries were 79-93% (range 25-500 microg/l) for nicotine and 78-89% (range 25-500 microg/l) for cotinine. The amount of fat in the milk did not affect the recovery. We found that this method was sensitive and reliable in measuring nicotine and cotinine concentrations in milk from a nursing mother who participated in a trial of the nicotine patch for smoking cessation.

Transfer of olanzapine into breast milk, calculation of infant drug dose, and effect on breast-fed infants.

OBJECTIVE: This study characterized infant drug doses and breast-milk-to-plasma area-under-the-curve ratios for olanzapine and determined plasma concentrations and effects of this drug on breast-feeding infants. METHOD: Seven mother-infant nursing pairs were studied. Olanzapine was measured in plasma and milk with high-performance liquid chromatography over a dose interval (for six patients) or at a single time after dose ingestion (for one patient) at steady state. Infant drug exposure was estimated as the product of an assumed milk production rate and average drug concentration in milk, normalized to body weight, and expressed as a percentage of maternal drug dose, normalized to body weight. RESULTS: The median infant dose of olanzapine ingested through milk was 1.02% of the maternal dose; the median milk-to-plasma area-under-the-curve ratio was 0.38 for the six patients with data collected over the dose interval. Corresponding values in the patient with single-point data were 1.13% and 0.75. Olanzapine was not detected in the plasma of the six infants with an evaluable plasma sample. All of the infants were healthy and experienced no side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Breast-fed infants were exposed to a calculated olanzapine dose of approximately 1%-well below the 10% notional level of concern. In infant plasma, olanzapine was below the detection limit; there were no adverse effects on the infants. These data support the use of olanzapine during breast-feeding. However, the authors recommend that breast-fed infants be monitored closely and the decision to breast-feed be made after individual risk-benefit analysis.

Pseudoephedrine: effects on milk production in women and estimation of infant exposure via breastmilk.

AIMS: To assess the effects of pseudoephedrine on breast blood flow, temperature and milk production, and to estimate the likely infant dose during breastfeeding. METHODS: Eight lactating women (mean age 35 years and weight 69 kg) participated in a single-blind randomized crossover study of 60 mg pseudoephedrine hydrochloride vs placebo. Breast blood flow and surface temperature were measured from 0 to 4 h following the dose, and change in plasma prolactin was measured as the difference between predose and 1 h postdose concentrations. Milk production was measured for 24 h following placebo and pseudoephedrine. Infant dose of pseudoephedrine for a 60-mg dose administered four times daily to the mother was quantified as the product of average steady-state drug concentration in milk and an estimated milk production rate of 0.15 l x kg(-1) x day(-1) and expressed relative to the maternal weight-adjusted dose. RESULTS: There were no physiologically significant changes in breast blood flow or temperature between the placebo and pseudoephedrine periods. The mean change in plasma prolactin was slightly (13.5%), but not significantly lower (t = 1.245, P = 0.253) after pseudoephedrine (1775 mU x l(-1)) compared with placebo (2014 mU x l(-1)). However, the mean milk volume was reduced by 24% from 784 ml x day(-1) in the placebo period to 623 ml x day(-1) in the pseudoephedrine period (difference between means 161 ml x day(-1) (95% CI: 63, 259 ml x day(-1)); t = 3.9, P = 0.006). Assuming maternal intake of 60 mg pseudoephedrine hydrochloride four times daily, the estimated infant dose of pseudoephedrine was 4.3% (95% CI, 3.2, 5.4%) of the weight-adjusted maternal dose. CONCLUSIONS: A single dose of pseudoephedrine significantly reduced milk production. This effect was not attributable to changes in blood flow, but depression of prolactin secretion may be a contributing factor. At the maximum recommended pseudoephedrine doses, the calculated infant dose delivered via milk was < 10% of the maternal dose, and is unlikely to affect the infant adversely. The ability of pseudoephedrine to suppress lactation suggests a novel use for the drug.

The amount of fluvoxamine in milk is unlikely to be a cause of adverse effects in breastfed infants.

The aim of this study was to characterize milk/plasma (M/P) ratio, as well as relative infant dose and well-being, in 2 breastfeeding women taking fluvoxamine. The women (37 and 34 years old) and their infants (26 and 0.75 months old) were studied over a 24-hour dose interval at steady state. Fluvoxamine concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. Infant exposure was measured as concentration in milk multiplied by an estimated milk production of 0.15 L/kg/d and normalized to the weight-adjusted maternal dose. M/P values of 1.34 and 1.21 were calculated for subjects 1 and 2, respectively, and relative infant doses were estimated to be 1.38% and 0.8%, respectively. No adverse effects in the infants were detected by the mother or on clinical examination, and fluvoxamine was not detected in the infants' plasma (limit of detection 2 micrograms/L). These limited data support the prescription of fluvoxamine to breastfeeding mothers after a careful, individual risk/benefit analysis is undertaken.

Distribution of venlafaxine and its O-desmethyl metabolite in human milk and their effects in breastfed infants.

AIMS: To characterize milk/plasma (M/P) ratio and infant dose, for venlafaxine (V) and its O-desmethyl metabolite (ODV), in breastfeeding women taking venlafaxine for the treatment of depression, and to determine the plasma concentration and effects of these drugs in their infants. METHODS: Six women (mean age 34.5 years, mean weight 84.3 kg) taking venlafaxine (median dose 244 mg day(-1), range 225-300 mg day(-1)) and their seven infants (mean age 7.0 months, mean weight 7.3 kg) were studied. V and ODV in plasma and milk were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography over a 12 h dose interval at steady-state. Infant exposure was estimated as the product of estimated milk production rate (0.15 l kg(-1)day(-1)) and average drug concentration in milk, normalized to body weight and expressed as a percentage of the weight-adjusted maternal dose. RESULTS: Mean M/PAUC values of 2.5 (range 2.0-3.2) and 2.7 (range 2.3-3.2) were calculated for V and ODV, respectively. The mean maximum concentrations (95% CI) of V and ODV in milk were 1161 (95% CI, 588, 1734) microg l(-1) and 796 (362, 1230) microg l(-1). Mean infant exposure was 3.2% (1.7, 4.7%) for V and 3.2% (1.9, 4.9%) for ODV (as V equivalents). V was detected in the plasma of one out of seven infants studied (5 microg l(-1)), while ODV was detected in four of the infants, at concentrations ranging from 3 to 38 microg l(-1). All of the infants in the study were healthy, as reported by their mothers and/or by clinical examination on the study day. CONCLUSIONS: The concentrations of V and ODV in breast milk were 2.5 and 2.7 times those in maternal plasma. The mean total drug exposure (as venlafaxine equivalents) of the breastfed infants was 6.4% (5.5-7.3%), which is below the 10% notional level of concern. There were no adverse effects in any of the infants. The data support the use of V in breastfeeding. Nevertheless, since low concentrations of ODV were detected in the plasma of four out of the seven infants studied, we recommend breastfed infants should be monitored closely. Each decision to breast feed should be made as an individual risk:benefit analysis.