Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Acta Radiol ; 63(3): 368-375, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33657847

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Wrist ligaments are challenging to visualize using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Injuries involving the scapholunate ligament (SLL), the lunotriquetral ligament (LTL), and the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) are common and difficult to diagnose, often requiring diagnostic arthroscopy. PURPOSE: To compare the visualization of wrist ligaments on a three-dimensional (3D) sequence with two-dimensional (2D) sequences on 3-T MRI. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighteen healthy volunteers were examined with a 3D SPACE (sampling perfection with application optimized contrasts using different flip angle evolution) sequence and 2D coronal, axial, and sagittal proton density-weighted (PD) sequences. Four musculoskeletal radiologists graded the anatomical visibility of the SLL, LTL, TFCC, and the image quality, using five grades in a visual grading characteristics (VGC) evaluation. After Bonferroni correction, a P value ≤0.005 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The 3D images were graded significantly better than the 2D images in the visualization of the dorsal and palmar parts of the SLL and the LTL. Regarding the TFCC, the 3D images were graded significantly better for visualization of the foveal attachment. 2D imaging was not found significantly superior to 3D imaging in any aspect. CONCLUSION: The 3D SPACE sequence was scored as superior to the 2D sequences at 3 T in the assessment of the SLL, the LTL, and the foveal attachment of the TFCC. Thus, 3D SPACE can replace 2D PD sequences when these ligaments need to be assessed.


Subject(s)
Ligaments, Articular/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Wrist Joint/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Female , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Triangular Fibrocartilage/diagnostic imaging , Young Adult
2.
Eur Radiol ; 32(2): 1362-1370, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34378077

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Injuries to the wrist are, due to its small size and complex anatomical structures, difficult to assess by MR, and surgical interventions such as diagnostic arthroscopy are often necessary. Therefore, improved visualization using non-invasive methods could be of clinical value. As a first step of improvement, the purpose of this study was to evaluate visualization of anatomical structures at 7T compared with 3T MR. METHODS: Eighteen healthy volunteers (three males and three females from each age decade between 20 and 49 years) were examined with 7T and 3T MR. Four musculoskeletal radiologists graded 2D and 3D images on a five-level grading scale for visibility of ligaments, cartilage, nerves, trabecular bone, and tendons, as well as overall image quality (i.e., edge sharpness, perceived tissue contrast, and presence of artefacts). Statistical analysis was done using a visual grading characteristics (VGC) analysis. RESULTS: Visibility of cartilage, trabecular bone, tendons, nerves, and ligaments was graded significantly higher at 7T with an area under the curve (AUCVGC) of 0.62-0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50-0.97, p = < 0.0001-0.03) using either 2D or 3D imaging. Imaging with 3T was not graded as superior to 7T for any structure. Image quality was also significantly superior at 7T, except for artefacts, where no significant differences were found. CONCLUSIONS: Tendons, trabecular bone, nerves, and ligaments were all significantly better visualized at 7T compared to 3T. KEY POINTS: • MRI of the wrist at 7T with a commercially available wrist coil is feasible at similar acquisition times as for 3T MRI. • The current study showed 7T to be superior to 3T in the visualization of anatomical structures of the wrist, including ligaments, tendons, nerves, and trabecular bone. • Image quality was significantly superior at 7T, except for artefacts, where no significant differences were found.


Subject(s)
Wrist Injuries , Wrist , Adult , Female , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Wrist/diagnostic imaging , Wrist Joint/diagnostic imaging , Young Adult
3.
Acta Orthop ; 85(3): 229-33, 2014 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24786904

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In 2003, an enquiry by the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register (SKAR) 2-7 years after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) revealed patients who were dissatisfied with the outcome of their surgery but who had not been revised. 6 years later, we examined the dissatisfied patients in one Swedish county and a matched group of very satisfied patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 118 TKAs in 114 patients, all of whom had had their surgery between 1996 and 2001, were examined in 2009-2010. 55 patients (with 58 TKAs) had stated in 2003 that they were dissatisfied with their knees and 59 (with 60 TKAs) had stated that they were very satisfied with their knees. The patients were examined clinically and radiographically, and performed functional tests consisting of the 6-minute walk and chair-stand test. All the patients filled out a visual analog scale (VAS, 0-100 mm) regarding knee pain and also the Hospital and Anxiety and Depression scale (HAD). RESULTS: Mean VAS score for knee pain differed by 30 mm in favor of the very satisfied group (p < 0.001). 23 of the 55 patients in the dissatisfied group and 6 of 59 patients in the very satisfied group suffered from anxiety and/or depression (p = 0.001). Mean range of motion was 11 degrees better in the very satisfied group (p < 0.001). The groups were similar with regard to clinical examination, physical performance testing, and radiography. INTERPRETATION: The patients who reported poor response after TKA continued to be unhappy after 8-13 years, as demonstrated by VAS pain and HAD, despite the absence of a discernible objective reason for revision.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/psychology , Osteoarthritis, Knee/psychology , Osteoarthritis, Knee/surgery , Patient Satisfaction , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anxiety/epidemiology , Depression/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Knee Joint/diagnostic imaging , Knee Joint/physiopathology , Knee Joint/surgery , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Pain Measurement , Radiography , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Registries , Research Design , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
4.
Clin Orthop Relat Res ; 448: 164-72, 2006 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16826112

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: There is uncertainty regarding whether and how the subchondral bone plate should be treated during acetabular preparation for cemented cup fixation in a total hip arthroplasty. We hypothesized that removing the bone plate would improve the cement-bone interface without jeopardizing the initial cup stability, and therefore, be advantageous to long-term cup survival. We randomized 50 patients with primary osteoarthritis into two groups, one for removal and one for retention of the subchondral bone plate. The patients were evaluated during 2 years followup using repeated radiostereometric examinations, analyses of radiolucent lines, and clinical followups. Patient scoring was done using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, the Short Form-12, and the Harris hip score. Removal of the subchondral bone plate resulted in a superior cement-bone interface with less development of radiolucent lines. The radiostereometry results showed small migrations in both groups. We found no differences in cup stability between groups, although a difference was observed in rotational behavior with the removal group stabilizing in a slightly vertical position whereas the retention group showed slight but progressive rotation into a more horizontal position. No differences were found during clinical followups. Removing the subchondral bone plate, where possible, improves the cement-bone interface without jeopardizing the stability, implying better long-term cup survival. However, it is a more demanding surgical technique. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, Level I (high quality randomized controlled trial with statistically significant difference or no statistically significant difference but narrow confidence intervals). See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Subject(s)
Acetabulum/surgery , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods , Bone Cements , Hip Joint/surgery , Hip Prosthesis , Osteoarthritis, Hip/surgery , Acetabulum/diagnostic imaging , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hip Joint/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoarthritis, Hip/diagnostic imaging , Prospective Studies , Prosthesis Design , Radiography , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...