Quantifying combined effects of colistin and ciprofloxacin against Escherichia coli in an in silico pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model.

Co-administering a low dose of colistin (CST) with ciprofloxacin (CIP) may improve the antibacterial effect against resistant Escherichia coli, offering an acceptable benefit-risk balance. This study aimed to quantify the interaction between ciprofloxacin and colistin in an in silico pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model from in vitro static time-kill experiments (using strains with minimum inhibitory concentrations, MICCIP 0.023-1 mg/L and MICCST 0.5-0.75 mg/L). It was also sought to demonstrate an approach of simulating concentrations at the site of infection with population pharmacokinetic and whole-body physiologically based pharmacokinetic models to explore the clinical value of the combination when facing more resistant strains (using extrapolated strains with lower susceptibility). The combined effect in the final model was described as the sum of individual drug effects with a change in drug potency: for ciprofloxacin, concentration at half maximum killing rate (EC50) in combination was 160% of the EC50 in monodrug experiments, while for colistin, the change in EC50 was strain-dependent from 54.1% to 119%. The benefit of co-administrating a lower-than-commonly-administrated colistin dose with ciprofloxacin in terms of drug effect in comparison to either monotherapy was predicted in simulated bloodstream infections and pyelonephritis. The study illustrates the value of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling and simulation in streamlining rational development of antibiotic combinations.

A novel mechanism-based pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) model describing ceftazidime/avibactam efficacy against ß-lactamase-producing Gram-negative bacteria.

BACKGROUND: Diazabicyclooctanes (DBOs) are an increasingly important group of non ß-lactam ß-lactamase inhibitors, employed clinically in combinations such as ceftazidime/avibactam. The dose finding of such combinations is complicated using the traditional pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) index approach, especially if the ß-lactamase inhibitor has an antibiotic effect of its own. OBJECTIVES: To develop a novel mechanism-based pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) model for ceftazidime/avibactam against Gram-negative pathogens, with the potential for combination dosage simulation. METHODS: Four ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae, covering Ambler classes A, B and D, were exposed to ceftazidime and avibactam, alone and in combination, in static time-kill experiments. A PKPD model was developed and evaluated using internal and external evaluation, and combined with a population PK model and applied in dosage simulations. RESULTS: The developed PKPD model included the effects of ceftazidime alone, avibactam alone and an 'enhancer' effect of avibactam on ceftazidime in addition to the ß-lactamase inhibitory effect of avibactam. The model could describe an extensive external Pseudomonas aeruginosa data set with minor modifications to the enhancer effect, and the utility of the model for clinical dosage simulation was demonstrated by investigating the influence of the addition of avibactam. CONCLUSIONS: A novel mechanism-based PKPD model for the DBO/ß-lactam combination ceftazidime/avibactam was developed that enables future comparison of the effect of avibactam with other DBO/ß-lactam inhibitors in simulations, and may be an aid in translating PKPD results from in vitro to animals and humans.

Population pharmacokinetics of piperacillin in febrile children receiving cancer chemotherapy: the impact of body weight and target on an optimal dosing regimen.

BACKGROUND: The ß-lactam antibiotic piperacillin (in combination with tazobactam) is commonly chosen for empirical treatment of suspected bacterial infections. However, pharmacokinetic variability among patient populations and across ages leads to uncertainty when selecting a dosing regimen to achieve an appropriate pharmacodynamic target. OBJECTIVES: To guide dosing by establishing a population pharmacokinetic model for unbound piperacillin in febrile children receiving cancer chemotherapy, and to assess pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment (100% fT > 1×MIC and 50% fT > 4×MIC) and resultant exposure, across body weights. METHODS: Forty-three children admitted for 89 febrile episodes contributed 482 samples to the pharmacokinetic analysis. The typical doses required for target attainment were compared for various dosing regimens, in particular prolonged infusions, across MICs and body weights. RESULTS: A two-compartment model with inter-fever-episode variability in CL, and body weight included through allometry, described the data. A high CL of 15.4 L/h (70 kg) combined with high glomerular filtration rate (GFR) values indicated rapid elimination and hyperfiltration. The target of 50% fT > 4×MIC was achieved for an MIC of 4.0 mg/L in a typical patient with extended infusions of 2-3 (q6h) or 3-4 (q8h) h, at or below the standard adult dose (75 and 100 mg/kg/dose for q6h and q8h, respectively). Higher doses or continuous infusion were needed to achieve 100% fT > 1×MIC due to the rapid piperacillin elimination. CONCLUSIONS: The licensed dose for children with febrile neutropenia (80 mg/kg q6h as a 30 min infusion) performs poorly for attainment of fT>MIC pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets. Given the population pharmacokinetic profile, feasible dosing regimens with reasonable exposure are continuous infusion (100% fT > 1×MIC) or prolonged infusions (50% fT > 4×MIC).

Population Pharmacokinetics of Piperacillin in Sepsis Patients: Should Alternative Dosing Strategies Be Considered?

Sufficient antibiotic dosing in septic patients is essential for reducing mortality. Piperacillin-tazobactam is often used for empirical treatment, but due to the pharmacokinetic (PK) variability seen in septic patients, optimal dosing may be a challenge. We determined the PK profile for piperacillin given at 4 g every 8 h in 22 septic patients admitted to a medical ward. Piperacillin concentrations were compared to the clinical breakpoint MIC for Pseudomonas aeruginosa (16 mg/liter), and the following PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) targets were evaluated: the percentage of the dosing interval that the free drug concentration is maintained above the MIC (fTMIC) of 50% and 100%. A two-compartment population PK model described the data well, with clearance being divided into renal and nonrenal components. The renal component was proportional to the estimated creatinine clearance (eCLCR) and constituted 74% of the total clearance in a typical individual (eCLCR, 83.9 ml/min). Patients with a high eCLCR (>130 ml/min) were at risk of subtherapeutic concentrations for the current regimen, with a 90% probability of target attainment being reached at MICs of 2.0 (50% fTMIC) and 0.125 mg/liter (100% fTMIC). Simulations of alternative dosing regimens and modes of administration showed that dose increment and prolonged infusion increased the chance of achieving predefined PK/PD targets. Alternative dosing strategies may therefore be needed to optimize piperacillin exposure in septic patients. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT02569086.).

Predicting mutant selection in competition experiments with ciprofloxacin-exposed Escherichia coli.

Predicting competition between antibiotic-susceptible wild-type (WT) and less susceptible mutant (MT) bacteria is valuable for understanding how drug concentrations influence the emergence of resistance. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) models predicting the rate and extent of takeover of resistant bacteria during different antibiotic pressures can thus be a valuable tool in improving treatment regimens. The aim of this study was to evaluate a previously developed mechanism-based PK/PD model for its ability to predict in vitro mixed-population experiments with competition between Escherichia coli (E. coli) WT and three well-defined E. coli resistant MTs when exposed to ciprofloxacin. Model predictions for each bacterial strain and ciprofloxacin concentration were made for in vitro static and dynamic time-kill experiments measuring CFU (colony forming units)/mL up to 24 h with concentrations close to or below the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), as well as for serial passage experiments with concentrations well below the MIC measuring ratios between the two strains with flow cytometry. The model was found to reasonably well predict the initial bacterial growth and killing of most static and dynamic time-kill competition experiments without need for parameter re-estimation. With parameter re-estimation of growth rates, an adequate fit was also obtained for the 6-day serial passage competition experiments. No bacterial interaction in growth was observed. This study demonstrates the predictive capacity of a PK/PD model and further supports the application of PK/PD modelling for prediction of bacterial kill in different settings, including resistance selection.

Multicentre open-label randomised controlled trial to compare colistin alone with colistin plus meropenem for the treatment of severe infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative infections (AIDA): a study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: The emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria has driven renewed interest in older antibacterials, including colistin. Previous studies have shown that colistin is less effective and more toxic than modern antibiotics. In vitro synergy studies and clinical observational studies suggest a benefit of combining colistin with a carbapenem. A randomised controlled study is necessary for clarification. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a multicentre, investigator-initiated, open-label, randomised controlled superiority 1:1 study comparing colistin monotherapy with colistin-meropenem combination therapy for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. The study is being conducted in 6 centres in 3 countries (Italy, Greece and Israel). We include patients with hospital-associated and ventilator-associated pneumonia, bloodstream infections and urosepsis. The primary outcome is treatment success at day 14, defined as survival, haemodynamic stability, stable or improved respiratory status for patients with pneumonia, microbiological cure for patients with bacteraemia and stability or improvement of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. Secondary outcomes include 14-day and 28-day mortality as well as other clinical end points and safety outcomes. A sample size of 360 patients was calculated on the basis of an absolute improvement in clinical success of 15% with combination therapy. Outcomes will be assessed by intention to treat. Serum colistin samples are obtained from all patients to obtain population pharmacokinetic models. Microbiological sampling includes weekly surveillance samples with analysis of resistance mechanisms and synergy. An observational trial is evaluating patients who met eligibility requirements but were not randomised in order to assess generalisability of findings. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by ethics committees at each centre and informed consent will be obtained for all patients. The trial is being performed under the auspices of an independent data and safety monitoring committee and is included in a broad dissemination strategy regarding revival of old antibiotics. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01732250 and 2012-004819-31; Pre-results.

Dynamic interaction of colistin and meropenem on a WT and a resistant strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa as quantified in a PK/PD model.

OBJECTIVES: Combination therapy can be a strategy to ensure effective bacterial killing when treating Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a Gram-negative bacterium with high potential for developing resistance. The aim of this study was to develop a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model that describes the in vitro bacterial time-kill curves of colistin and meropenem alone and in combination for one WT and one meropenem-resistant strain of P. aeruginosa. METHODS: In vitro time-kill curve experiments were conducted with a P. aeruginosa WT (ATCC 27853) (MICs: meropenem 1 mg/L; colistin 1 mg/L) and a meropenem-resistant type (ARU552) (MICs: meropenem 16 mg/L; colistin 1.5 mg/L). PK/PD models characterizing resistance were fitted to the observed bacterial counts in NONMEM. The final model was applied to predict the bacterial killing of ARU552 for different combination dosages of colistin and meropenem. RESULTS: A model with compartments for growing and resting bacteria, where the bacterial killing by colistin reduced with continued exposure and a small fraction (0.15%) of the start inoculum was resistant to meropenem, characterized the bactericidal effect and resistance development of the two antibiotics. For a typical patient, a loading dose of colistin combined with a high dose of meropenem (2000 mg q8h) was predicted to result in a pronounced kill of the meropenem-resistant strain over 24 h. CONCLUSIONS: The developed PK/PD model successfully described the time course of bacterial counts following exposures to colistin and meropenem, alone and in combination, for both strains, and identified a dynamic drug interaction. The study illustrates the application of a PK/PD model and supports high-dose combination therapy of colistin and meropenem to overcome meropenem resistance.

Simulation-Based Evaluation of PK/PD Indices for Meropenem Across Patient Groups and Experimental Designs.

PURPOSE: Antibiotic dose predictions based on PK/PD indices rely on that the index type and magnitude is insensitive to the pharmacokinetics (PK), the dosing regimen, and bacterial susceptibility. In this work we perform simulations to challenge these assumptions for meropenem and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. METHODS: A published murine dose fractionation study was replicated in silico. The sensitivity of the PK/PD index towards experimental design, drug susceptibility, uncertainty in MIC and different PK profiles was evaluated. RESULTS: The previous murine study data were well replicated with fT > MIC selected as the best predictor. However, for increased dosing frequencies fAUC/MIC was found to be more predictive and the magnitude of the index was sensitive to drug susceptibility. With human PK fT > MIC and fAUC/MIC had similar predictive capacities with preference for fT > MIC when short t1/2 and fAUC/MIC when long t1/2. CONCLUSIONS: A longitudinal PKPD model based on in vitro data successfully predicted a previous in vivo study of meropenem. The type and magnitude of the PK/PD index were sensitive to the experimental design, the MIC and the PK. Therefore, it may be preferable to perform simulations for dose selection based on an integrated PK-PKPD model rather than using a fixed PK/PD index target.

Inter occasion variability in individual optimal design.

Inter occasion variability (IOV) is of importance to consider in the development of a design where individual pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic parameters are of interest. IOV may adversely affect the precision of maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimated individual parameters, yet the influence of inclusion of IOV in optimal design for estimation of individual parameters has not been investigated. In this work two methods of including IOV in the maximum a posteriori Fisher information matrix (FIMMAP) are evaluated: (i) MAP occ-the IOV is included as a fixed effect deviation per occasion and individual, and (ii) POP occ-the IOV is included as an occasion random effect. Sparse sampling schedules were designed for two test models and compared to a scenario where IOV is ignored, either by omitting known IOV (Omit) or by mimicking a situation where unknown IOV has inflated the IIV (Inflate). Accounting for IOV in the FIMMAP markedly affected the designs compared to ignoring IOV and, as evaluated by stochastic simulation and estimation, resulted in superior precision in the individual parameters. In addition MAPocc and POP occ accurately predicted precision and shrinkage. For the investigated designs, the MAP occ method was on average slightly superior to POP occ and was less computationally intensive.