Hepatic Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury After Liver Transplantation Is Not Associated with Early Impairment of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.

BACKGROUND Early myocardial dysfunction is a known complication following liver transplant. Although hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury (hIRI) has been shown to cause myocardial injury in rat and porcine models, the clinical association between hIRI and early myocardial dysfunction in humans has not yet been established. We sought to define this relationship through cardiac evaluation via transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) on postoperative day (POD) 1 in adult liver transplant recipients. MATERIAL AND METHODS TTE was performed on POD1 in all liver transplant patients transplanted between January 2020 and April 2021. Hepatic IRI was stratified by serum AST levels on POD1 (none: <200; mild: 200-2000; moderate: 2000-5000; severe: >5000). All patients had pre-transplant TTE as part of the transplant evaluation. RESULTS A total of 173 patients underwent liver transplant (LT) between 2020 and 2021 and had a TTE on POD 1 (median time to echo: 1 day). hIRI was present in 142 (82%) patients (69% mild, 8.6% moderate, 4% severe). Paired analysis between pre-LT and post-LT left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of the entire study population demonstrated no significant decrease following LT (mean difference: -1.376%, P=0.08). There were no significant differences in post-LT LVEF when patients were stratified by severity of hIRI. Three patients (1.7%) had significant post-transplant impairment of LVEF (<35%). None of these patients had significant hIRI. CONCLUSIONS hIRI after liver transplantation is not associated with immediate reduction in LVEF. The pathophysiology of post-LT cardiomyopathy may be driven by extra-hepatic triggers.

Fluid Management During Kidney Transplantation: A Consensus Statement of the Committee on Transplant Anesthesia of the American Society of Anesthesiologists.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative fluid management may affect the outcome after kidney transplantation. However, the amount and type of fluid administered, and monitoring techniques vary greatly between institutions and there are limited prospective randomized trials and meta-analyses to guide fluid management in kidney transplant recipients. METHODS: Members of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) committee on transplantation reviewed the current literature on the amount and type of fluids (albumin, starches, 0.9% saline, and balanced crystalloid solutions) administered and the different monitors used to assess fluid status, resulting in this consensus statement with recommendations based on the best available evidence. RESULTS: Review of the current literature suggests that starch solutions are associated with increased risk of renal injury in randomized trials and should be avoided in kidney donors and recipients. There is no evidence supporting the routine use of albumin solutions in kidney transplants. Balanced crystalloid solutions such as Lactated Ringer are associated with less acidosis and may lead to less hyperkalemia than 0.9% saline solutions. Central venous pressure is only weakly supported as a tool to assess fluid status. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations may be useful to anesthesiologists making fluid management decisions during kidney transplantation and facilitate future research on this topic.

Effect of volatile anesthetics on early and delayed outcomes in pancreas transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) is a common cause of allograft dysfunction and patient morbidity in solid organ transplantation. This study compares the effect of different inhaled anesthetics on early IRI and clinical outcomes in pancreas allograft recipients. METHODS: Data were extracted retrospectively for pancreas transplants at a single center over a 15-year period. Early postoperative pancreatic amylase and lipase levels were used as a marker for graft injury. Clinical outcomes measured included length of hospital stay, readmission, and graft survival. RESULTS: There were 625 pancreas transplants included in the analysis with 3 primary inhaled anesthetics: sevoflurane (53%), desflurane (35%), and isoflurane (12%). In the first 30 days post-transplant, peak amylase was lowest for sevoflurane (147) followed by desflurane (159) and isoflurane (229) (p = .03). Peak lipase levels followed the same trend (peak values 118, 131, and 135, respectively; p = .02). Early graft loss, length of hospital stay, and readmission within 3 months were similar among all three anesthetic groups. There was no difference in 10-year graft survival by Cox regression. CONCLUSIONS: Sevoflurane and desflurane are associated with lower peak amylase and lipase levels postoperatively in pancreas transplantation. Short- and long-term clinical outcomes were equivalent for the three agents.

Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block for laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: Continuous catheter infusion provides no additional analgesic benefit over single-injection ropivacaine.

BACKGROUND: Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks are useful for adjunctive pain control following laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy (LLDN). The objective was to determine if TAP catheter provides additional analgesia compared with single-injection TAP block alone for kidney donors. METHODS: In this prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial, LLDN patients received a single TAP injection of 30 mL 0.2% ropivacaine and had a catheter inserted into the TAP space. Postoperatively, either 0.2% ropivacaine (TAP catheter group; TAP-C) or saline (TAP saline group; TAP-S) was infused at 10 mL/h. Pain scores, narcotic usage, nausea, and sedation were evaluated at 1, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 hours. RESULTS: The study population included 70 patients (35 randomly assigned to each group). No differences in pain scores, narcotic usage, nausea, or sedation were observed at any time point (with the exception of lower median pain score for TAP-S at 60 hours; 3.2 vs 3.9 for TAP-C; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: The lower pain score for placebo group at 60-hour postoperative is likely clinically insignificant. The TAP catheter infusion provided no benefit over a single-injection TAP block; thus, the added risk and cost are not supported. Liposomal bupivacaine should be evaluated in future studies.

Comparison of methods of providing analgesia after pancreas transplant: IV opioid analgesia versus transversus abdominis plane block with liposomal bupivacaine or continuous catheter infusion.

BACKGROUND: Current practices emphasize a multimodal approach to perioperative analgesia due to higher efficacy and decreased opioid usage. Analgesia for pancreas transplant (PT) has traditionally been managed with intravenous (IV) opioids, and reports of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks are limited in this population. METHODS: Three interventions were compared in adult PT patients, including IV opioids, TAP catheter, and TAP block with liposomal bupivacaine. Time to return of intestinal function and oral diet, postoperative pain scores, opioid usage, and length of stay were recorded. RESULTS: Study included 197 PT patients: 62 (32%) standard care, 90 (45%) TAP catheters with continuous 0.2% ropivacaine, and 45 (23%) single liposomal bupivacaine TAP block. Pain scores were lowest for the IV opioid group (P < 0.001). The liposomal bupivacaine group had lower pain scores on postoperative days (POD) 1-5 than the TAP catheter group. Opioid use during POD 1-5 was lower for both TAP block groups (P = 0.03). Time to bowel function was faster for the TAP block groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with IV opioid analgesia, TAP block interventions were associated with lower overall use of opioids and a faster time to intestinal function following pancreas transplant.